Climate Change, 'Greenhouse' effects: DENIAL

Message boards : Politics : Climate Change, 'Greenhouse' effects: DENIAL
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 . . . 36 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile James Sotherden
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 10436
Credit: 110,373,059
RAC: 54
United States
Message 1474996 - Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 1:58:33 UTC - in response to Message 1474983.  

Good to see we're into some graphs...

So, to set the scene, I guess everyone is familiar with what is happening in these two examples:


YouTube Vid: Heating Curve of Water -Time lapse with Graph

and

YouTube Vid: Doc Physics - Latent Heat of Fusion and Vaporization


Now... For something the size of the ice fields and permafrost on our one dear planet... How long a temperature plateau might we expect before we notice signs of increased heating?...


All on our only one planet,
Martin

Nice videos Martin. So if from what I understand of them is, That water and ice make excellent heat sinks. And maybe that is why results of mankinds supossedly adding to the green house gasses has gone unnoticed?
[/quote]

Old James
ID: 1474996 · Report as offensive
ihenderson

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 00
Posts: 50
Credit: 1,100,259
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1475051 - Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 5:28:15 UTC

Well as you add heat ice melts and if the ice is over land IE not floating, the sea level will rise.
Of course the temperature fluctuations of any ice through the year is much more complicated than a steady state theoretical argument or a non-equilibrium experiment.

Will the temperature rise be moderated by the melting ice absorbing heat, well that's a reasonable assumption for a closed system. Do you think the planet is a closed system. If its not then any external loses or additions will have to be factored in.
ID: 1475051 · Report as offensive
Profile James Sotherden
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 10436
Credit: 110,373,059
RAC: 54
United States
Message 1475054 - Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 5:31:37 UTC - in response to Message 1475051.  

Well as you add heat ice melts and if the ice is over land IE not floating, the sea level will rise.
Of course the temperature fluctuations of any ice through the year is much more complicated than a steady state theoretical argument or a non-equilibrium experiment.

Will the temperature rise be moderated by the melting ice absorbing heat, well that's a reasonable assumption for a closed system. Do you think the planet is a closed system. If its not then any external loses or additions will have to be factored in.

That might be a question that real scientists need to answer.
[/quote]

Old James
ID: 1475054 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20365
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1475216 - Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 14:59:39 UTC - in response to Message 1475051.  
Last modified: 10 Feb 2014, 15:05:06 UTC

Well as you add heat ice melts and if the ice is over land IE not floating, the sea level will rise.
Of course the temperature fluctuations of any ice through the year is much more complicated than a steady state theoretical argument or a non-equilibrium experiment.

Will the temperature rise be moderated by the melting ice absorbing heat...

Phew! The "non-equilibrium" comment is a bit too-brief-obscure even for me... ;-)


To try to comment:

Ice that is on land that then melts will add a volume of water to the oceans to then cause the sea level to rise;

Floating ice that then melts does not directly change the sea level because the ice was floating in the sea to begin with (the volume of the melt-water fits exactly in the same underwater volume that the ice floated in);

As the average temperature of the ocean increases, the volume of the ocean increases due to the thermal expansion of the water to thus raise the sea level. (Most materials expand as you raise their temperature. Water above 4 deg C likewise expands as you warm it up.)


There is a "positive feedback" mechanism in that the dark ocean water absorbs most of the sunlight to so warm the water. Whereas ice cover will reflect most of the sunlight away from the Earth's surface to then keep that ice cover cold.


Now... If average heat in from the sun equals the average heat lost back to space, then we should expect the ice cover for our planet and the ocean temperature to stay at the same average.

If we have an increase of heat input, or a reduction in the heat lost to space, then the ice and oceans of our planet will 'for a time' 'soak up' the extra heat.


The nasty shock comes when the ice-ocean 'heat reservoir' is finally exhausted...

Note also that we can expect some small fluctuations in temperature as various parts of the 'natural thermal reservoirs' come into play and are then exhausted around various parts of the world. After that, we then get to see more of a steady rise to whatever new temperature balance comes into play.


All on our only one world,
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1475216 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1475428 - Posted: 10 Feb 2014, 23:35:01 UTC

Question is, what melted the ice from the last ice age?

How long did it take to melt that ice?

Seems to me our rock is looking for a balance, regardless of what dominate lifeform is on this rock.
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1475428 · Report as offensive
ihenderson

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 00
Posts: 50
Credit: 1,100,259
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1475547 - Posted: 11 Feb 2014, 6:16:41 UTC

found these graphs



ID: 1475547 · Report as offensive
Profile James Sotherden
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 10436
Credit: 110,373,059
RAC: 54
United States
Message 1475598 - Posted: 11 Feb 2014, 7:53:39 UTC
Last modified: 11 Feb 2014, 7:54:28 UTC

Whats really interesting is after 120 thousand years is sea level peaks. And then slowly goes down as ice builds up. We are in the process of peaking now.
So the Earths precession will soon start to go the other way of cooling.

Mans effects of global warming may slow the process but not stop it. I can see how the southern hemisphere will react to all of us moving south as the glaciers move that way. But then what of the southern glaciers moving north?
[/quote]

Old James
ID: 1475598 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19091
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1475667 - Posted: 11 Feb 2014, 12:06:06 UTC - in response to Message 1475598.  

We are actually a long way away from the natural point of entering an ice age as we are in the position in our orbit that perihelion was at the beginning of January. That means we were at our closest, warmest, point in the middle of winter.

We need to be at aphelion in winter and with the tilt angle that gives us max winter in the North, at present the tilt is 23.4 degrees about the middle of the range.
ID: 1475667 · Report as offensive
Profile The Simonator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 04
Posts: 5700
Credit: 3,855,702
RAC: 50
United Kingdom
Message 1476093 - Posted: 12 Feb 2014, 12:10:55 UTC - in response to Message 1475673.  

In words of one syllable, the Earth has a wobble, but it's getting less as time goes on. Shame we can't say the same about the people of the planet.

The diet's going well thank you. :)

If the north could tilt a bit more towards the sun, it might make solar panels in Britain a bit more effective.

News story broke today about some new solar panels that use less expensive components, so hopefully could become more affordable. If the Earth's going to warm up and we get more sunshine, bring it on.

Solar panels
Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge.
ID: 1476093 · Report as offensive
Profile The Simonator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 04
Posts: 5700
Credit: 3,855,702
RAC: 50
United Kingdom
Message 1476515 - Posted: 13 Feb 2014, 13:47:42 UTC

I could feasibly run my laptop off this in good weather.

But you're right, even with these slightly cheaper panels, they're still too expensive once one takes total cost into account.
Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge.
ID: 1476515 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1476615 - Posted: 13 Feb 2014, 18:16:18 UTC

And the Great Lakes are about to freeze over....
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1476615 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20365
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1476674 - Posted: 13 Feb 2014, 19:39:02 UTC - in response to Message 1476617.  
Last modified: 13 Feb 2014, 19:40:05 UTC

And the Great Lakes are about to freeze over....

Well...

At least we in SETI/BOINC are doing our bit to combat Global Cooling.

And what you are talking about at the moment is called The Weather.

Climate is something different. However, what our industry and farming are doing to the climate is pushing the weather to ever greater extremes...

At the moment, the USA has snow. Meanwhile the UK has unusually severe flooding... And elsewhere?...


All on our only one planet,
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1476674 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1476706 - Posted: 13 Feb 2014, 20:30:20 UTC

Please excuse me...

But day to day weather makes up the graphs you all are so fond of.

And a 250 years storm cycle that England is looking at.

And please don't call winter a polar vortex.

Understand my point?
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1476706 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1476846 - Posted: 14 Feb 2014, 1:39:29 UTC - in response to Message 1476707.  
Last modified: 14 Feb 2014, 1:42:35 UTC

Solar activity is less now and the burning of so much coal by China is causing Global Cooling as I surmised some time ago.

Also: how can the Artic ice be melting while the great lakes and the Hudson river are freezing for the fisrt time in decades.
ID: 1476846 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 1476863 - Posted: 14 Feb 2014, 2:40:55 UTC - in response to Message 1476683.  
Last modified: 14 Feb 2014, 2:46:59 UTC

And what you are talking about at the moment is called The Weather.


A very good point. Climate is long term, weather is short term.

And if the scientists can barely predict the weather correctly more than a few days in advance, HTH are we supposed to believe they can predict things 10, 20 or 50 years ahead ?

Chicken hepatoscopists have as much chance of predicting the climate in 50 years time as the AGW cult !!

T.A.
ID: 1476863 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1476874 - Posted: 14 Feb 2014, 3:19:49 UTC

ID: 1476874 · Report as offensive
Profile Intelligent Design
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 12
Posts: 3626
Credit: 37,520
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1476881 - Posted: 14 Feb 2014, 3:55:08 UTC - in response to Message 1476863.  

And what you are talking about at the moment is called The Weather.


A very good point. Climate is long term, weather is short term.

And if the scientists can barely predict the weather correctly more than a few days in advance, HTH are we supposed to believe they can predict things 10, 20 or 50 years ahead ?

Chicken hepatoscopists have as much chance of predicting the climate in 50 years time as the AGW cult !!

T.A.

hear hear... +1
Must not conflict resolve by suggesting that someone should go sit on an ice pick...
ID: 1476881 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 1476975 - Posted: 14 Feb 2014, 7:56:27 UTC - in response to Message 1476874.  
Last modified: 14 Feb 2014, 7:56:45 UTC


Global warming is being caused by humans, not the sun, and is highly sensitive to carbon, new research shows
New research reinforces human-caused global warming and a climate that's highly sensitive to an increased greenhouse effect

Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics !! No new research, nothing ground breaking, just a "re-evaluation" of the SOS but multiplied by a different "K factor" in order to get the results they wanted !!!

It is a real shame that reality is not echoing the predictions of the AGW doomsayers.

So far there is nothing in the so called extremes of weather that has not occurred before. Australia has had hot spells, the USA has had blizzards and the UK/Europe has had wet winters.

Half a degree is NOT the end of the world, neither is a centimetre or rise in sea level over the past 100 years.

The AGW mob is clutching at straws and know it. But they have to keep publishing this sh*t because their grants depend on it !!

T.A.
ID: 1476975 · Report as offensive
Мишель
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 13
Posts: 3073
Credit: 87,868
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 1477063 - Posted: 14 Feb 2014, 11:40:06 UTC - in response to Message 1476674.  

At the moment, the USA has snow. Meanwhile the UK has unusually severe flooding... And elsewhere?...

For the moment the Netherlands has skipped the winter entirely. Temperatures have not dropped below zero degrees Celcius. It has been continuously sunny with temperatures around 10 degrees.

I bet that the winter will hit us in March/April. And then May will be summer. And then from June to August it will be Autumnish, with periods of summer. Than September will be summer again and half October it will get autumn again.
ID: 1477063 · Report as offensive
Profile The Simonator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 04
Posts: 5700
Credit: 3,855,702
RAC: 50
United Kingdom
Message 1477064 - Posted: 14 Feb 2014, 11:41:08 UTC

Thought the ozone hole was over the South pole, or is this another one i've missed?

Given how i react to sunlight anyway:

I'll stay well away!
Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge.
ID: 1477064 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 . . . 36 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Climate Change, 'Greenhouse' effects: DENIAL


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.