Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (9) Server problems
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
|
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
New thread to continue server problems. Now why would we need that? There aren't any continuing server problems to panic about, are there? ;-) |
PhonAcq Send message Joined: 14 Apr 01 Posts: 1656 Credit: 30,658,217 RAC: 1 |
No, they just come and go. |
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 |
|
Dr. C.E.T.I. Send message Joined: 29 Feb 00 Posts: 16019 Credit: 794,685 RAC: 0 |
Well I am getting no new work, since I switched on an hour ago Results ready to send 1 0m Current result creation rate 22.90/sec 0m Results out in the field 3,265,650 0m Results received in last hour 45,294 0m Result turnaround time (last hour average) 66.87 hours 0m Results returned and awaiting validation 2,810,170 0m Workunits waiting for validation 1 0m Workunits waiting for assimilation 129,612 0m Workunit files waiting for deletion 21 0m Result files waiting for deletion 63 0m Workunits waiting for db purging 539,953 0m Results waiting for db purging 1,126,633 0m Transitioner backlog (hours) 0 0m ;) go get iT ;) BOINC Wiki . . . Science Status Page . . . |
6dj72cn8 Send message Joined: 3 Sep 99 Posts: 24 Credit: 163,811 RAC: 0 |
New thread to continue server problems. It would save bandwidth if we had a thread for when there aren't server problems! |
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0 |
New thread to continue server problems. It would save bandwidth if people didn't panic. The BOINC client is designed to keep crunching and talk to the project when the project servers are available. |
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
It would save bandwidth if people didn't panic. WORD!! |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Last Sunday I posted in the (8) version of this thread, in part: There's a situation on the Server status page which I've been wondering about. Before and after the difficulties last Thursday (Sept. 11) the status showed the first two channels on 22mr08aa being active, and the first one on 23mr08aa. That hasn't changed, indicating those three splitter processes aren't producing any WUs. The Tuesday outage modified that, there's only one 'active' on each now. But there still hasn't been any progress past the first channel on those. It's been at least a full week now... Joe |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65747 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Seems to be a problem getting in touch with the scheduler as I'm getting HTTP Errors when Boinc tries to contact the server. 9/18/2008 10:03:09 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 9/18/2008 10:03:11 PM||Access to reference site succeeded - project servers may be temporarily down. 9/18/2008 10:03:13 PM|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: failed sending data to the peer 9/18/2008 10:03:13 PM|SETI@home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec 9/18/2008 10:03:13 PM|SETI@home|Reason: scheduler request failed 9/18/2008 10:03:28 PM|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user 9/18/2008 10:03:28 PM|SETI@home|Reporting 2 tasks 9/18/2008 10:04:54 PM|SETI@home|Computation for task 24au08ag.484.13569.5.8.196_0 finished 9/18/2008 10:04:54 PM|SETI@home|Starting 19au08ad.28082.4162.3.8.106_1 9/18/2008 10:04:54 PM|SETI@home|Starting task 19au08ad.28082.4162.3.8.106_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 528 9/18/2008 10:04:56 PM|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 24au08ag.484.13569.5.8.196_0_0 9/18/2008 10:05:17 PM||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 9/18/2008 10:05:17 PM|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 24au08ag.484.13569.5.8.196_0_0: HTTP error 9/18/2008 10:05:17 PM|SETI@home|Backing off 1 min 0 sec on upload of file 24au08ag.484.13569.5.8.196_0_0 9/18/2008 10:05:18 PM||Access to reference site succeeded - project servers may be temporarily down. 9/18/2008 10:06:18 PM|SETI@home|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 24au08ag.484.13569.5.8.196_0_0 The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Seems to be a problem getting in touch with the scheduler as I'm getting HTTP Errors when Boinc tries to contact the server. I just noticed that in the last 20 minutes or so as well......none of my rigs are getting through.......... "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65747 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Seems to be a problem getting in touch with the scheduler as I'm getting HTTP Errors when Boinc tries to contact the server. Yeah I just did a tracert to the server(thinman of course). Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] (C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1>tracert setiathome.berkeley.edu Tracing route to setiathome.SSL.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 42 ms 26 ms 25 ms L100.DSL-35.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [71.105.32.1] 2 28 ms 28 ms 29 ms G9-0-2935.LCR-09.LSANCA.verizon-gni.net [130.81.136.14] 3 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms 130.81.28.72 4 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 0.so-7-2-0.XT2.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.153] 5 31 ms 30 ms 31 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XT1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.116.249] 6 31 ms 30 ms 30 ms 0.so-6-0-0.BR1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.112.41] 7 31 ms 30 ms 30 ms 204.255.169.194 8 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms los-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.32.13] 9 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms los-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.32.38] 10 31 ms 37 ms 30 ms 63.147.28.182 11 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms dc-svl-isp--lax-isp-t2.cenic.net [137.164.40.222] 12 43 ms 43 ms 42 ms inet-ucb--svl-isp.cenic.net [137.164.24.106] 13 40 ms 40 ms 40 ms g3-19.inr-201-eva.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.0.58] 14 40 ms 40 ms 40 ms g6-1.inr-230-spr.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.255.110] 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 50 ms 40 ms 40 ms thinman.ssl.berkeley.edu [128.32.18.150] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.PC1> The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Ahhh....the problem seems to have been short.......my rigs are connecting again.... Another blip in the history of Seti....LOL. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65747 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Ahhh....the problem seems to have been short.......my rigs are connecting again.... Yes the Mystery blip, weird, must have been a router hiccup, maybe. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 |
|
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I normally get the odd HTTP errors on my dowmload I have had it since the main problem a few weeks ago. THe WU normal then downloads either a minute or two later, so not worried/ Well, the bandwidth seems to be about maxxxed..... Why the continuous activity at 90 mbs/second or so??? Are they downloading data on the link again? "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65747 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
I normally get the odd HTTP errors on my download I have had it since the main problem a few weeks ago. The WU normal then downloads either a minute or two later, so not worried/ Could be, That or we've got a spambot here. ;) The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I normally get the odd HTTP errors on my download I have had it since the main problem a few weeks ago. The WU normal then downloads either a minute or two later, so not worried/ I knoo the possibility of DNS attacks was floated in the past,,,,,,but was discounted at the time.........might another new analysis of network traffic be in order at this time? "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 |
I knoo the possibility of DNS attacks was floated in the past,,,,,,but was discounted at the time.........might another new analysis of network traffic be in order at this time?I was curious about the traffic too, as I've been studying some networking subjects lately. When I started traffic was at a much more humble rate around 20Mbps on the cricket graphs. Switching to the long term view recently, however, seems to tell the grim truth: bandwidth utilisation is scaling proportionally with Moore's law... "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I knoo the possibility of DNS attacks was floated in the past,,,,,,but was discounted at the time.........might another new analysis of network traffic be in order at this time?I was curious about the traffic too, as I've been studying some networking subjects lately. When I started traffic was at a much more humble rate around 20Mbps on the cricket graphs. Switching to the long term view recently, however, seems to tell the grim truth: bandwidth utilisation is scaling proportionally with Moore's law... But is it all due to crunching, or server data transfer, or what?????? "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.