Self Destuctive Bombers

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Self Destuctive Bombers
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 441981 - Posted: 22 Oct 2006, 19:20:19 UTC

I agree with GREED... The world wasn't always capitalistic... People used to help each other (charity) because it was the right thing to do, people used to use their abilities (work) because it was the right thing to do... Then people got slothful but greedy and started devising a plan to make a lot of wealth while doing very little, hence, the advent of capitalism... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 441981 · Report as offensive
Profile Hev
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 05
Posts: 1118
Credit: 598,303
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 442229 - Posted: 22 Oct 2006, 23:21:55 UTC - in response to Message 441946.  

Where did that original wealth come from?

I believe I've already answered that question here.

Then, as usual, you would be wrong.

So, I'll re-ask. Where did wealth come from? What is wealth? How did the first guy who ever had wealth, get it?

Step up to the plate. Make an argument. Defend whatever postion you have.


I think it would be interesting to look at theTheory of Surplus Value.


ID: 442229 · Report as offensive
Profile BillHyland
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 5,764,172
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442292 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 0:37:29 UTC

Responding with taglines and slogans does not make an argument, convincing or otherwise.

Someone hoarded up what everyone wanted (probably food or an offer of protection for pay).


How?

From the labour of the workers.


Without the consent of the workers, again, how?

Come on people, support your argument with facts, or even convincing inferences from research!
ID: 442292 · Report as offensive
cdr100560
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 May 06
Posts: 681
Credit: 65,502
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442300 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 1:00:13 UTC

Wow.

This thread is turning into an "Atlas Shrugged" reading.

ID: 442300 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 442319 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 1:43:44 UTC - in response to Message 441968.  
Last modified: 23 Oct 2006, 1:56:18 UTC

Jim, he didn not ask the motivation behind gathering wealth, he asked (and asked and asked again),
"Where did wealth come from?"
Answer that question before moving on to motivation.

From the labour of the workers.

What were those labourers working for? Why were they working at all, especially for someone else?
Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 442319 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 442323 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 1:55:37 UTC - in response to Message 442229.  

I think it would be interesting to look at theTheory of Surplus Value.

Sure. And why you are at it, you should look at the Theory of Geocentrism.

Or the Flat Earth Theory too.

Both of those are still widely held by physicists and cosmologists--they haven't been destroyed either. Ask Es.

You know. Because the earth is flat.
Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 442323 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 442521 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 16:53:53 UTC - in response to Message 442323.  

Time has clearly shown us that:

This is true ---> Theory of Surplus Value

This is not true ---> Flat Earth Theory

;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 442521 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 442638 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 21:05:48 UTC - in response to Message 442521.  

Time has clearly shown us that:

This is true ---> Theory of Surplus Value

This is not true ---> Flat Earth Theory

Again, make an argument. Why do YOU believe that TSV is legitimate? Address the point, provide some examples. Anything would be better than your erroneous pronouncements.

Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 442638 · Report as offensive
Profile Hev
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 05
Posts: 1118
Credit: 598,303
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 442668 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:03:46 UTC

Dear Rush,

As I am interested in ideas, I thought I would try and understand where you were coming from. I thought that this would help me

yours in solidarity
Hev
ID: 442668 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442688 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:34:47 UTC - in response to Message 439603.  

There are countless other people who can give you a viable path to personal fulfillment

From what I hear, our President was a draft dodger, graduated college with a 'c' average, and hey, look where that got him... Maybe I should have studied 'charismatics'... ;)

And Hitler was a failed painter with a 'dream'.

ID: 442688 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442689 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:39:42 UTC - in response to Message 440335.  

Or is your contention that it isn't enough?

As long as there are people living in poverty, it isn't enough... ;)

A falsehood raised by those that want more!!!! If you raise everyone to what is now above the 'poverty line', the line is just raised! It is a never ending movement! True some people live like rats and I would not like to trade places with them, but that is NOT what you said.

ID: 442689 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442691 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:46:07 UTC - in response to Message 441359.  

II Thessalonians 3:10
For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
And for the record:
This verse is referring to the people who 'refuse' to work (the rich and the slothful), not the people who are not 'allowed' to work (the poor and the blacklisted)... ;)

And for the record Jeffrey, the very people you are so against are the very people trying sooo hard to make this come to pass, the Republicans and George Bush!!! It is the Democrats and their 'bigger governement' phylsophy that is against you. Yet people like you continue to vote them in! So taken in are you that you cannot see the light for the sun.

ID: 442691 · Report as offensive
Profile Dr. C.E.T.I.
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 00
Posts: 16019
Credit: 794,685
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442693 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:47:04 UTC
Last modified: 23 Oct 2006, 22:47:38 UTC


"Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play."




BOINC Wiki . . .

Science Status Page . . .
ID: 442693 · Report as offensive
Profile BillHyland
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 5,764,172
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442699 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:51:00 UTC - in response to Message 442693.  


"Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play."


Exactly, nobody!

BTW, welcome back and I like the new look.
ID: 442699 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442700 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:54:04 UTC - in response to Message 441422.  

No, it was meant honestly and I was not questioning you on it being voluntary, I was questioning you on whether every member of our U.S. military over the past 15-16 years truly, deeply understands what they're getting themselves into when the enlist.

The problem is Sarge, no one under the age of 50 'truly' and 'deeply' understands anything! Did you have a clue when you enlisted? I didn't? Would I do it again, in a heartbeat!!! Do I see things differently now, absolutely! But in the big picture is it worth it, absolutely. Was Vietnam worth it, no. BUT it was a Treaty we signed, and we had to go. Just as France, and the other Countries, would have had to come to the US if the Communists had attacked the US. Whether they would have come or not, is for the hypothesists to decide.
A Treaty is your word, just like your word is your bond. You give your hand to someone, you fully expect at all costs to live by that handshake. The US signed Treaties all over the World during the days leading upto VietNam. We got called on one of them. We had to go, no choice.

ID: 442700 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 442701 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:54:33 UTC - in response to Message 442668.  

Dear Rush,

As I am interested in ideas, I thought I would try and understand where you were coming from. I thought that this would help me

yours in solidarity
Hev

Hmmm..it seem that Objectivists believe that everything can be worked through using logic..there seems to be a huge lack of understanding of the human brain there...especially as they appear to believe that there is a knowable absolute reality. This is against the laws of physics, so it seems odd to base a so called 'logical' philosophy on it. The whole premise of Objectivism seems fatally flawed at it's foundations and almost bordering on cult ideology.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 442701 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442703 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:55:35 UTC - in response to Message 442693.  


"Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play."


I FOUND HIM, I FOUND NOBODY!!!! Do I win???
How were the ribs? Did you save me any? Same time next year?

ID: 442703 · Report as offensive
Profile Dr. C.E.T.I.
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 00
Posts: 16019
Credit: 794,685
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442707 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 22:57:31 UTC
Last modified: 23 Oct 2006, 22:59:05 UTC

. . . in 'Context' and as well - 'Out of Context'

. . . mind-independent in a rather nuanced sense


@ Bill - Thank You Sir . . .

@ Mikey - YOU SIR!!! wouldn't 'Believe' HOW GOOD DEM RIBS B . . .




BOINC Wiki . . .

Science Status Page . . .
ID: 442707 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 442711 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 23:05:32 UTC - in response to Message 441652.  

There are NO boundaries made upon anyone who lives here.

I wouldn't bet on that...

The fact is that 90 percent of the wealth in this country is held by 10 percent of the population... Without their 'approval', you don't advance... Very few have come up with ideas or inventions to defeat that system, and even fewer have 'worked' there way to the top... @ 5 bucks per hour, there just aren't enough hours in the day to make that amount to anything... Poor people don't ever get rich without the help of someone who is already rich... Crunch the numbers, you'll see, it doesn't add up... ;)

And Jeffrey the "numbers" can be crunched to show that 90% of people that come into this World rich leave it poor! Number are just numbers when you use them in large enough bunches. ANY Kid can get out of poverty, IF he wants to and has the drive to make it happen. LOTS of kids say they want to, but given the chance will not shovel cow shit for $2.00 an hour. Nor flip burgers for minimum wage. Some of the prime examples of your numbers game are the Asian immigrants, living 20 to a 2 bedroom home, running the local 7/11, and putting 6 kids thru College! They came to the the US in a leaky boat, with the clothes on their back and farming skills. BUT they had DRIVE, they wanted, HELL THEY NEEDED to achieve!!! And they did!!! Don't get on about that kid in the ghetto that plays basketball until 3 am and then runs when the cops come around the corner because someone might have some drugs in their pockets. Tell me about the immigrant family that the parents can't speak English yet the kids are getting STRAIGHT A'S and are never seen after school, because they are inside studying!!!
Poverty is a state of mind, if you think you are poor and are never going to be rich, you never will!!

ID: 442711 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 442716 - Posted: 23 Oct 2006, 23:11:39 UTC - in response to Message 442700.  
Last modified: 23 Oct 2006, 23:15:34 UTC

no one under the age of 50 'truly' and 'deeply' understands anything!

And here I've been thinking that everyone over 50 has lost their marbles... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 442716 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Self Destuctive Bombers


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.