Message boards :
Number crunching :
Which was your highest credit for 1 WU?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 8 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
jeffusa Send message Joined: 21 Aug 02 Posts: 224 Credit: 1,809,275 RAC: 0 |
How many WU's do one of these tapes hold? Are they using like LTO-3 tapes or something? I am curious cause I deal a lot with backups. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
This one 91877145 looks like it's going to be a genuine 85.40! Two results in so far, both with 'proper' FLOP-reporting clients. [edit] AR = 0.097183 [/edit] [2nd. edit] It's from that 11oc99 tape people have been complaining about, and it took b****y ages to crunch. Maybe there's something worthwhile buried in all that noise! [/edit] |
MFLuder Send message Joined: 1 Jan 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 441,295 RAC: 1 |
Hello ! I just finished a big WU : http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=91882518 CPU time : 72,005 sec Claimed credit : 91.89 |
hiamps Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 4292 Credit: 72,971,319 RAC: 0 |
CPU real speed: 2551 MHz Work Unit Info True angle range: 0.134274 Flopcounter: 22836361651576.215000 Spike count: 0 Pulse count: 3 Triplet count: 0 Gaussian count: 0 </stderr_txt> Validate state Valid Claimed credit 88.5437633481254 Granted credit 88.5446943889812 application version 5.15 Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons... And no good credit hound! |
Alinator Send message Joined: 19 Apr 05 Posts: 4178 Credit: 4,647,982 RAC: 0 |
I just had a VLAR which granted 88.33. That's the highest I've seen in awhile. Alinator |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
That's four high claims so far today, all "genuine" (i.e. not inflated by obselete BOINC clients), and all from the same tape. Who was listening to what at Arecibo on 11 October 1999? |
Alinator Send message Joined: 19 Apr 05 Posts: 4178 Credit: 4,647,982 RAC: 0 |
My guess is they were swinging the receiver around a lot on that day resulting in a higher percentage of VLAR's than normal. Alinator |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
My guess is they were swinging the receiver around a lot on that day resulting in a higher percentage of VLAR's than normal. Doesn't VLAR suggest they were focusing on a small region? If they were swinging it around, I'd expect VHAR. |
Labbie Send message Joined: 19 Jun 06 Posts: 4083 Credit: 5,930,102 RAC: 0 |
I received an 88.34 on this WU: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=91898126 Edit: It's another from 11 Oct 1999. Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now |
Alinator Send message Joined: 19 Apr 05 Posts: 4178 Credit: 4,647,982 RAC: 0 |
My guess is they were swinging the receiver around a lot on that day resulting in a higher percentage of VLAR's than normal. OOOPS! You got me!! :-) I should have said they must have been tracking something. Alinator |
MFLuder Send message Joined: 1 Jan 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 441,295 RAC: 1 |
91.89 ! |
Orgil Send message Joined: 3 Aug 05 Posts: 979 Credit: 103,527 RAC: 0 |
Very sorry I did not notice which wu but about month or two ago I got some 80's in maybe 2-3 wu's. At the time I just wondered whether this was some calculation timing score something. Perhaps many people might got that score whoever had a chance to share that 1999 tape. OR WAS THIS MATTS SOME MESSAGE THAT SOMETHING REALLY SERIOUS about one of 1999 tapes!!! ;-) Mandtugai! |
littlegreenmanfrommars Send message Joined: 28 Jan 06 Posts: 1410 Credit: 934,158 RAC: 0 |
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=383313082 94.72 Mind you, atm... only one quorum member other than me has reported, and that was a "compute error". Still waiting for the quorum to be completed, and validation, as of time of posting. WU number is: 11oc99aa.8109.20321.804812.3.110_1 Guess what??? October 11th again! |
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
Claimed credit 88.1463173212575 Granted credit 88.1463173214513 for this this WU with my Athlon64 X2 4.400+ (Toledo 2200 MHz 2x 1024 kByte) Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Sir Ulli! Good of you to drop by with another one for my collection. Yes, it's another one from that 11 October 1999 tape. I've got WUs from 91872539 (Alinator) to 91883957 (littlegreenmanfrommars), all with an AR of about 0.09, split from tape between 14:48:03 and 15:54:36 on 20-Sep-2006. Sure looks as if Arecibo was studying something quite intensively on 11 October 1999.... |
Labbie Send message Joined: 19 Jun 06 Posts: 4083 Credit: 5,930,102 RAC: 0 |
Here's another from 11 Oct 99. My PII-300 hasn't finished crunching yet, but according to the other two that have completed it, it will be an 88.something. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=91880684 (sorry about getting lazy with the URL). My PII-300 still has about 14 hours to go which will put it at about 90 hours total to crunch this one WU. Labbie Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Here's another from 11 Oct 99. My PII-300 hasn't finished crunching yet, but according to the other two that have completed it, it will be an 88.something. Since you've got a live one in captivity, so to speak, a couple of questions: What was the original time estimate when you got it - anything like the 90 hours it's turning out to be? My first one was vvveeerrryyy slow (by the standards of the machine that crunched it!), and it knocked my DCF for six... (over 0.47 when I thought to look, 14 hours later: it's back to 0.35 and falling now). Do you feel comfortable copying the downloaded WU data file, and looking inside the copy with a text editor to get, in particular, the RA and DEC figures that say where in the sky it was collected from? |
Sutehk Send message Joined: 11 Jun 99 Posts: 42 Credit: 1,443,674 RAC: 0 |
I did like 15 WU's for that Oct 11, 99 tape all were fairly small and one large one around 85.? credits. Whats the deal with this tape anyway? (edit) I just found 9 more in my cache, one of them is estimated around 75 credits. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Whats the deal with this tape anyway? That's what I'm trying to work out! |
Sutehk Send message Joined: 11 Jun 99 Posts: 42 Credit: 1,443,674 RAC: 0 |
Most of the ones that I have are small ones roughly averaging to about 30 - 60 credits, and then those two big ones. Maybe this info might help maybe not. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.