If not, do it again and look at the fields showing your wu count in SETI classic. It has been updated last night ;)

---

Aloha, Uli

So, the obvious conclusion might be that SETI Classic will soon be shutting down???

It's kinda nice to have a headstart, for once... maybe...

---

LarryB56

Oh no... I was kinda hoping to make it to 1000 classic WUs...

---

Ulrich Metzler wrote
======================
> If not, do it again and look at the fields showing your wu count in SETI
> classic. It has been updated last night ;)
>
>
======================

thank you Ulrich ___ you have sharp eagle eyes !

regards
byron

> > So, the obvious conclusion might be that SETI Classic will soon be
> shutting
> > down???
> >
> >
>
> Sounds like it, they probably don't want to shout it because
> of the impending stampede from classic.
> It would be like a worlds record DOS attack.
>

Not really, Matt answered with this yesterday.

" This came up in the general meeting yesterday. We will re-sync the classic SETI@home stats at least one more time, if not soon and then once again once classic is shut down for good. We understand how off-putting it is to see old numbers in that field. There's a lot of user-account cleanup we need to do..

Edit: expect a revised "migration from classic to SETI@home/BOINC" page sometime soon.

- Matt
BOINC/SETI@home"

Greetings to Byron, pan me some concentrates m8 :-)

---

Click below for our Team Website

> [ Snip ]
>
> Greetings to Byron, pan me some concentrates m8 :-)
>

========================

Hi deej ,

nice to see ya ! __ hope you are well.__ I'll bring back some gold for ya __ :)





My Very Best wishes to everyone ......... and keep on crunching :)

friendly and respectful
byron ... [/url] _ Earth Flag

<B>S@h_ Berkeley's Staff Friends Club member m2 ©[/b]

Latest from Classic

Hello, People of the Boards,

Here's a warning message that we will soon be ramping down these message
boards and we highly encourage everybody to start using the BOINC message
board system:

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/forum_index.php

Of course, you'll have to register your account with BOINC to post new
messages there. In case you haven't done so, information is here:

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_participate.php

More information about the new SETI@home in general:

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu

- Matt

---

<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v708/frontear/pan.jpg">

<b>Do you know what type of bomb it was? The exploding kind.<b>

It's weird. My link over my Avatar displays the correct number of work units and time, but the old date of 14 may 2004 is still dispalyed.

If I go directly to my account display the date is then correct with March 16, 2005.

Does anybody have any ideas why this could happened?

---

Red Bull Air Racing

Gas price by zip at Seti

Yeah I just love mine.

> It's weird. My link over my Avatar displays the correct number of work units
> and time, but the old date of 14 may 2004 is still dispalyed.
>
> If I go directly to my account display the date is then correct with March 16,
> 2005.
>
> Does anybody have any ideas why this could happened?
>
=================
Hi Ricard ... yes .. same here .. I have no idea either ?

byron

> > It's weird. My link over my Avatar displays the correct number of work
> units
> > and time, but the old date of 14 may 2004 is still dispalyed.
> >
> > If I go directly to my account display the date is then correct with
> March 16,
> > 2005.
> >
> > Does anybody have any ideas why this could happened?
> >
> =================
> Hi Ricard ... yes .. same here .. I have no idea either ?
>
> byron
>
When I look at your's it has the correct date!

---

Red Bull Air Racing

Gas price by zip at Seti

Have I checked my profile lately? Sure. It looks roughly like Alfred Hitchcock, or a shape similar to holding a dead frog upright letting its rear legs dangle.

> > Yeah I just love mine.
> >
>
> Send $20.00 to my PayPal account and I won't tell your wife
> about all your half naked Avatars :D
>

Or send me $10.00 and I will tell CR's wife all about him starring at your half-naked avatars...

---

I'd rather speak my mind because it hurts too much to bite my tongue.

American Spirit BBQ Proudly Serving those that courageously defend freedom.

> > > Yeah I just love mine.
> > >
> >
> > Send $20.00 to my PayPal account and I won't tell your wife
> > about all your half naked Avatars :D
> >
>
> Or send me $10.00 and I will tell CR's wife all about him starring at your
> half-naked avatars...
>
>
>

Wow now we all joined the same time Apr 3rd 1999...

---

I'd rather speak my mind because it hurts too much to bite my tongue.

American Spirit BBQ Proudly Serving those that courageously defend freedom.

> > Or send me $10.00 and I will tell CR's wife all about him starring at
> your
> > half-naked avatars...
> >
> >
>
> Hey!!! Watch your Blackmail etiquette!
> Your not supposed to under bid another Blackmailer!
>
>

OK then you send me $25.00 and I won't tell your wife that you have been starring at Misfits half Naked avatar...

Oh and if you get any ideas about telling my wife don't bother all she will do is laugh and say "So what's new"

---

I'd rather speak my mind because it hurts too much to bite my tongue.

American Spirit BBQ Proudly Serving those that courageously defend freedom.

I was just issued a new drivers license... and I was informed that my 'profile' was included in the bar-code on the reverse.

Since it's a bar-code, taking a strong magnet to it will not erase it.

I'll not feel good about that, ... even after I find a reader to see what it says.....

---

> I was just issued a new drivers license... and I was informed that my
> 'profile' was included in the bar-code on the reverse.
>
> Since it's a bar-code, taking a strong magnet to it will not erase it.
>
> I'll not feel good about that, ... even after I find a reader to see what it
> says.....
>

It says everything it says on the front and includes any restrictions and/or endorsements..

[EDIT] Yes I am sure... [ENDEDIT]

---

I'd rather speak my mind because it hurts too much to bite my tongue.

American Spirit BBQ Proudly Serving those that courageously defend freedom.

restrictions and/or endorsements are on the front..

I was informed that 'additionanl' info, such as driving record, etc was coded into the bar code so that when it's fed into a reader you're whole 'profile' was available to the officers by simply entering the card into the onboard computers. The 'etc' was what was not specified and what's troubling to me.

Like a faulty credit report, I'd like the ability to double check the data once in awhile just to guard against errors of input or I,D, hack attack...

maybe it's just me, but I have a certain aversion to the whole data base categorization that everyone is subjected to these days.

I just read about the 'new' legislation on new passports..... they're to be tagged with a readable chip.

One argument against that development was that with a portable scanner, someone would only have to gain a certain proximity and they would be able to 'read' your chip. In the least case, you are instantly identifiable as an American, ......in the worst case, too much information about you is out of your control.

Kind of off on a jag here but if we're all to be 'tagged', at the least we should be able to self verify the tags from time to time...

---

> I was informed that 'additionanl' info, such as driving record, etc was coded
> into the bar code so that when it's fed into a reader you're whole 'profile'
> was available to the officers by simply entering the card into the onboard
> computers. The 'etc' was what was not specified and what's troubling to me.

You were informed incorrectly. The bar code has all the information on the front. The idea is to allow a police officer to swip the drivers license in a reader on his cars computer and pull up your record. It is not on the card.

>
> Like a faulty credit report, I'd like the ability to double check the data
> once in awhile just to guard against errors of input or I,D, hack attack...
>
Ask a police officer to swip it for you if he can.

> maybe it's just me, but I have a certain aversion to the whole data base
> categorization that everyone is subjected to these days.
>

Just because you are not paranoid doesn't mean nobody is watching you..

> I just read about the 'new' legislation on new passports..... they're to be
> tagged with a readable chip.
>

Heard that too..

> One argument against that development was that with a portable scanner,
> someone would only have to gain a certain proximity and they would be able to
> 'read' your chip. In the least case, you are instantly identifiable as an
> American, ......in the worst case, too much information about you is out of
> your control.

See above line about paranoia!!

>
> Kind of off on a jag here but if we're all to be 'tagged', at the least we
> should be able to self verify the tags from time to time...
>

See above line about paranoia

---

I'd rather speak my mind because it hurts too much to bite my tongue.

American Spirit BBQ Proudly Serving those that courageously defend freedom.

> restrictions and/or endorsements are on the front..
>
> I was informed that 'additionanl' info, such as driving record, etc was coded
> into the bar code so that when it's fed into a reader you're whole 'profile'
> was available to the officers by simply entering the card into the onboard
> computers. The 'etc' was what was not specified and what's troubling to me.
>
> Like a faulty credit report, I'd like the ability to double check the data
> once in awhile just to guard against errors of input or I,D, hack attack...
>
> maybe it's just me, but I have a certain aversion to the whole data base
> categorization that everyone is subjected to these days.
>
> I just read about the 'new' legislation on new passports..... they're to be
> tagged with a readable chip.
>
> One argument against that development was that with a portable scanner,
> someone would only have to gain a certain proximity and they would be able to
> 'read' your chip. In the least case, you are instantly identifiable as an
> American, ......in the worst case, too much information about you is out of
> your control.
>
> Kind of off on a jag here but if we're all to be 'tagged', at the least we
> should be able to self verify the tags from time to time...
>

---

"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me