Message boards :
Number crunching :
Don't know where it should go? Stick it here!
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 72 · 73 · 74 · 75 · 76 · 77 · 78 . . . 148 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,097,633 RAC: 2 ![]() |
Greetings: HOORAY ! ! ! After days of wondering and worrying about what went wrong, everything is now working normally! B.O.I.N.C. is working and S.E.T.I. is working. I am a happy camper. Thank you. John Robert Mallernee Ashley Valley Shadows Vernal, Utah 84078 |
![]() Send message Joined: 29 May 19 Posts: 86 Credit: 6,688,090 RAC: 32 ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14596/toshiba-western-digital-nand-production-partially-halted-by-power-outage Excuse my skepticism, but wasn't this just a ploy to reduce the glut of Flash RAM that has flooded the market in the last six months so they could raise the prices because of artificial shortage? We've seen this story before in years past. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
rob smith ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22867 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 ![]() ![]() |
I'd say about 1 in 10 of such stories are not actually the result of a "real" power outage, but more a "power outage of convenience". Or am I just getting cynical in my old age? Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
I'd say about 1 in 10 of such stories are not actually the result of a "real" power outage, but more a "power outage of convenience". Or am I just getting cynical in my old age? +1 Add me to the cynical camp. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
rcthardcore Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 48 Credit: 1,306,006 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Hating CreditScrew more and more each day. You would have thought by now that the problem with it would already have been fixed. No such luck here. I guess we are forever stuck with it. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
I try to never think of it . . . . . that way I can never be disappointed. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Speedy ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1648 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 ![]() ![]() |
Anybody know what happens to the noisy data (noise bomb) data when it is pulled from the server because the server can't cope? I am wondering doesn't get discarded or does somebody else look at it ![]() |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13970 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
Anybody know what happens to the noisy data (noise bomb) data when it is pulled from the server because the server can't cope? I am wondering doesn't get discarded or does somebody else look at it I'd expect they're just put aside for another day. There are some WUs in there that do crunch, so once they get the servers sorted out so they can handle the load, they could release them here again. Grant Darwin NT |
Speedy ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1648 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 ![]() ![]() |
Anybody know what happens to the noisy data (noise bomb) data when it is pulled from the server because the server can't cope? I am wondering doesn't get discarded or does somebody else look at it Thanks Grant I thought that was possibly the case. If they are complete noise bombs go and end within 3 seconds as there useful information within that time? ![]() |
rob smith ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22867 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 ![]() ![]() |
Noise bombs may contain useful data, but the current analysis tools don't let us get at it if it is there... Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Speedy ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1648 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 ![]() ![]() |
Noise bombs may contain useful data, but the current analysis tools don't let us get at it if it is there... Thank you for the information. This is good to know ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 27 Jul 09 Posts: 83 Credit: 12,388,119 RAC: 140 ![]() ![]() |
I figured I would just post here instead of making a new thread. I have 3 new work units I’ve never seen before for my gpu. Two cuda42 and one cuda50. What are these? ![]() All of this has happened before and will happen again -Battlestar Galactica |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
Since you are running the normal platform decided by the schedulers, they have sent you some of the older applications. The scheduler is still trying to determine the best app for your host. The CUDA42 and CUDA50 applications are MUCH slower than the SoG application. You are just going to have to suffer through the CUDA42 and CUDA50 tasks until the APR's for those apps are established and the SoG app wins out in the end. The only way to circumvent this scenario is to run the anonymous platform where YOU get to decide which apps to run. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 27 Jul 09 Posts: 83 Credit: 12,388,119 RAC: 140 ![]() ![]() |
Since you are running the normal platform decided by the schedulers, they have sent you some of the older applications. The scheduler is still trying to determine the best app for your host. The CUDA42 and CUDA50 applications are MUCH slower than the SoG application. You are just going to have to suffer through the CUDA42 and CUDA50 tasks until the APR's for those apps are established and the SoG app wins out in the end. The only way to circumvent this scenario is to run the anonymous platform where YOU get to decide which apps to run. Thanks Keith! I’ll let it crunch whatever they send me until it gets used to the new host haha. Someone’s gotta do it. LOL! ![]() All of this has happened before and will happen again -Battlestar Galactica |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
You will need 11 validated, non-overflowed CUDA42 and 50 tasks to develop the APR for those applications. So much is determined by the turnaround time for your wingmen. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 ![]() ![]() |
Anybody know what happens to the noisy data (noise bomb) data when it is pulled from the server because the server can't cope? I am wondering doesn't get discarded or does somebody else look at itI would imagine they will run them through at some point here. I server can handle them - just not all at once! If they are split one at a time they will whistle their way right on through ... but takes some babysitting and the hard to find TIME. ![]() |
Speedy ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1648 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 ![]() ![]() |
Anybody know what happens to the noisy data (noise bomb) data when it is pulled from the server because the server can't cope? I am wondering doesn't get discarded or does somebody else look at itI would imagine they will run them through at some point here. I server can handle them - just not all at once! I'm aware that the noise bombs create a lot of pressure for the server but eventually it clears itself and the creation rate is able to come back to a reasonable level would it not be more sensible to just let them all run the same time? ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 38404 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 ![]() ![]() |
We had a similar batch not long back that also got pulled, but they wound up letting a file or 2 process at a time a few days later until that batch was done. I imagine that they'll do the same thing again when they have the time to manually feed them back in.I'm aware that the noise bombs create a lot of pressure for the server but eventually it clears itself and the creation rate is able to come back to a reasonable level would it not be more sensible to just let them all run the same time?Anybody know what happens to the noisy data (noise bomb) data when it is pulled from the server because the server can't cope? I am wondering doesn't get discarded or does somebody else look at itI would imagine they will run them through at some point here. I server can handle them - just not all at once! Cheers. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13970 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
would it not be more sensible to just let them all run the same time? If the servers could handle it, yes. But the last two server system crashes were as a result of the shorty storms that had been occurring at the time. The servers just can't cope with that sort of sustained load. Grant Darwin NT |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.