WINNING MUCH? and ALL dA TIME? YEP

CRACK It REAL GOoD

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/mexico-migration-border-crackdown/2019/05/03/id/914392

RUBEWorld LOVEs FRACKin'; CRACKin' and ALL AROUND STACKin'

OH OH OH is So YO with ONE GREAT AMAZin' ORANGe YAPe

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

With the white washing testimony by A.G. Barr in the Senate yesterday and the no-show today in the House, I wonder how long it will take the dear leader to dissolve all of Congress ( both the House & Senate).

Must have watched a different hearing than I did. Barr made the Senate Buffoons act like their namesake. Barr was calm, clear tied them all in a knot so bad that Honolulu Hirono totally lost it. A nastier piece of work has never been spawned by Madam Pe'le'.

As to the House hearing, it was appropriate he gave them an empty chair for the empty suits of the abdicated Congress to question......which Nadler did. A total kabuki theater in both of the circus arenas.

The Wall Street Journal summed it up quite neatly this morning:

A Real Attorney General
By The Editorial Board
May 1, 2019 7:11 p.m. ET

Washington pile-ons are never pretty, but this week’s political setup of Attorney General William Barr is disreputable even by Beltway standards. Democrats and the media are turning the AG into a villain for doing his duty and making the hard decisions that special counsel Robert Mueller abdicated.
Mr. Barr’s Wednesday testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee was preceded late Tuesday by the leak of a letter Mr. Mueller had sent the AG on March 27. Mr. Mueller griped in the letter that Mr. Barr’s four-page explanation to Congress of the principal conclusions of the Mueller report on March 24 “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the Mueller team’s “work and conclusions.” Only in Washington could this exercise in posterior covering be puffed into a mini-outrage.Democrats leapt on the letter as proof that Mr. Barr was somehow covering for Donald Trump when he has covered up nothing. Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono, the Democratic answer to Rep. Louie Gohmert, accused Mr. Barr of abusing his office and lying to Congress, and demanded that he resign. The only thing she lacked was evidence.

Mr. Barr’s four-page letter couldn’t possibly have covered all the nuances of a 448-page report. It was an attempt to provide Mr. Mueller’s conclusions to Congress and the public as quickly as possible, while he took the time to work through the entire document to make redactions required by law and Justice Department rules.

This is exactly what he promised to do in his confirmation hearing. Even Mr. Mueller’s complaining letter admits that Mr. Barr’s letter wasn’t inaccurate, a fact Mr. Barr says Mr. Mueller also conceded in a subsequent phone call. The Mueller complaint, rather, was that there was “public confusion about critical aspects” of his investigation.

Translation: Republicans were claiming vindication for Donald Trump, and Mr. Mueller was taking hits in the press for not nailing the worst President in history. Having been hailed for months as a combination of Eliot Ness and St. Thomas More, Mr. Mueller and his team of prosecutors seem to have been unnerved by some bad press clips.

Mr. Barr told the Senate Wednesday that he offered Mr. Mueller the chance to review his four-page letter before sending it to Congress, but the special counsel declined. Mr. Mueller worked for Mr. Barr, and that was the proper time to offer suggestions or disagree. Instead, Mr. Mueller ducked that responsibility and then griped in an ex-post-facto letter that was conveniently leaked on the eve of Mr. Barr’s testimony. Quite the stand-up guy.
Mr. Barr has since released the full Mueller report with minor redactions, as he promised, and with the “context” intact. Keep in mind Mr. Barr was under no legal obligation to release anything at all. Mr. Mueller reports only to Mr. Barr, not to the country or Congress.

Mr. Barr has also made nearly all of the redactions in the report available to senior Members of Congress to inspect at Justice. Yet as of this writing, only three Members have bothered—Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and ranking House Republican on Judiciary Doug Collins. Not one Democrat howling about Mr. Barr’s lack of transparency has examined the outrages they claim are hidden.
Democrats are also upset that Mr. Barr concluded that Mr. Trump did not obstruct justice regarding the Russia probe. But in that decision too Mr. Barr was behaving as an Attorney General should. Mr. Mueller compiled a factual record but shrank from a “prosecutorial judgment.” Mr. Barr then stepped up and made the call, however unpopular with Democrats and the press.
***
Contrast that to the abdication of Loretta Lynch, who failed as Barack Obama’s last Attorney General to make a prosecutorial judgment about Hillary Clinton’s misuse of classified information. Ms. Lynch cowered before the bullying of then FBI director James Comey, who absolved Mrs. Clinton of wrongdoing while publicly scolding her. That egregious break with Justice policy eventually led Mr. Comey to re-open the Clinton probe in late October 2016, which helped to elect Mr. Trump.
All of this shows again the risks of appointing special counsels. They lack the political accountability that the Founders built into the separation of powers. Mr. Mueller, in his March 27 letter, revealed again that like Mr. Comey at the FBI he viewed himself as accountable only to himself.
This trashing of Bill Barr shows how frustrated and angry Democrats continue to be that the special counsel came up empty in his Russia collusion probe. He was supposed to be their fast-track to impeachment. Now they’re left trying to gin up an obstruction tale, but the probe wasn’t obstructed and there was no underlying crime. So they’re shouting and pounding the table against Bill Barr for acting like a real Attorney General.
Appeared in the May 2, 2019, print edition.

Go Get 'em General Barr. The snakes are desperately trying slither away from the swamp unscathed.
The Dims opened the door and the AG is striding right through. Buckle up and get the popcorn, the next six years are going to be fun to watch.

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Eye, so you believe Barr is a paragon of virtue and Mueller is corrupt?

---

Question you need to answer to see if it has any bias. Who owns the WSJ? (hint, dig deeper than News Corporation)

Question you need to answer to see if it has any bias. Who owns the WSJ? (hint, dig deeper than News Corporation)

You might be interested in this https://knx1070.radio.com/media/audio-channel/knx-depth-james-comey-special-may-3-2019 (Ignore the commercial at the start)

Question you need to answer to see if it has any bias. Who owns the WSJ? (hint, dig deeper than News Corporation)

You might be interested in this https://knx1070.radio.com/media/audio-channel/knx-depth-james-comey-special-may-3-2019 (Ignore the commercial at the start)

Thanks. Very interesting, Comey had some hard choices, but comes across as interesting, honest and with integrity.

Question you need to answer to see if it has any bias. Who owns the WSJ? (hint, dig deeper than News Corporation)

You might be interested in this https://knx1070.radio.com/media/audio-channel/knx-depth-james-comey-special-may-3-2019 (Ignore the commercial at the start)

Thanks. Very interesting, Comey had some hard choices, but comes across as interesting, honest and with integrity.

.....and the Earth is Flat, and The Tooth Fairy will leave a quarter under your pillow.......

SOCIOPATHS ALWAYS " come across as interesting, honest and with integrity."

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Anti-social morals on display again. :-(

Perhaps the present investigation into criminal activities by the Obama FBI and DOJ will also result in a big nothing.

We will see.

With the 3 decade history of Clinton 'inconsistencies'(being nice), I tend to think there will be a 'there' there.
General Barr is an honest investigator and will not resort to fake 'dossiers' and innuendo. The next shoe is due to drop in June when the OIG report on the FBI comes in......yes, we will see.

Hunter Thompson may come back from the dead and pen a sequel......."Fear and Loathing in DC".

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

The fear and terror being emitted by the Democrat Party and some in the Obama FBI and DOJ is amazing.

Comey recent statement is perhaps another indication regarding his fear regarding what the present investigation into his activities and the FBI during and after the 2016 election will reveal.

As with the Mueller investigation regarding an alleged Trump/Russia Collusion being a big nothing.

Perhaps the present investigation into criminal activities by the Obama FBI and DOJ will also result in a big nothing.

We will see.
Those who cann

May be, maybe not, the lessons of history teach us that all movements will ultimately be taken over by evil doers so it is clear that the evil Castro regime in Cuba must be overthrown so their health care system can be defeated.

---

The fear and terror being emitted by the Democrat Party

May be, maybe not, the lessons of history teach us that all movements will ultimately be taken over by evil doers

Gosh the Putin propaganda bots are already out trying to ensure 4 more years to develop weapons without an American counter measure.

Yep, I learned that from professor dull eye.

---

Perhaps the present investigation into criminal activities by the Obama FBI and DOJ will also result in a big nothing.

We will see.

With the 3 decade history of Clinton 'inconsistencies'(being nice), I tend to think there will be a 'there' there.
General Barr is an honest investigator and will not resort to fake 'dossiers' and innuendo. The next shoe is due to drop in June when the OIG report on the FBI comes in......yes, we will see.

Hunter Thompson may come back from the dead and pen a sequel......."Fear and Loathing in DC".

Dear JE...

Until the IOG Report regarding the investigation of possible criminal activities by Obama's FBI and DOJ during and after the 2016 Presidential election is finalized and released.

Let's not pre-judge its results nor believe politically motivated "leaks". As was done for two years during the Mueller Investigation.

Otherwise, we will sink into the Never Trump Media's and now the Never Barr Media's sewer of madness.

Could you give more details on what IOG report you are waiting to be released.

Or did you miss June 14 2018.

As it has been previously investigated, then it's just another waste of your taxes, glad it's not mine, by the Republicans. Again.

Oh how some just love to keep flogging a dead horse.

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Oh how some just love to keep flogging a dead horse.

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

The Democrat Party and the Mueller Report?

Yes, I agree.

BTW: The Republican Party now emulating the two year and still continuing delusional hysteria of the Democrat Party, their Media and the Never Trumper's in Social Media is fascinating.

And the Democrat Party, their Media and the Never Trumper's Social Media hysteria against someone doing to them what they did to others is wonderful to behold :-D

So you think it is ok for foreign interests to interfere with your elections?

Oh how some just love to keep flogging a dead horse.

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

The Democrat Party and the Mueller Report?

Yes, I agree.

BTW: The Republican Party now emulating the two year and still continuing delusional hysteria of the Democrat Party, their Media and the Never Trumper's in Social Media is fascinating.

And the Democrat Party, their Media and the Never Trumper's Social Media hysteria against someone doing to them what they did to others is wonderful to behold :-D

So you think it is ok for foreign interests to interfere with your elections?

The Trump/Russia Collusion was proven false.

Who says that besides Trump mouthpiece Barr?
Have you read the redacted version. IMHO it does not support your statement.

The Democrat President Obama Administration apparently did not do enough, after being informed prior to the 2016 elections, to stop this problem of foreign interference. Hopefully, but having little hope, the Trump Administration will do so.

Who directs the security organisations to start investigations, Is it only the President and the AG?

One should not have great faith, as per what is happening inside the USA and inside the UK (BREXIT). That the Political Party's will place the interest of their Country above their political interests.

We are only discussing US problems here, we do not need to off on a tangent.

The Trump/Russia Collusion was proven false.

Not proving something does not mean it isn't real. As an example for decades science tried to prove gravity wave existed. The fact they didn't did not mean they weren't real. In fact they were proven to be real. Professor your lack of the ability or willingness to use Boolean logic is appalling, especially for one who purports to ban an academic.

---

Probably the closest verdict should be the Scottish verdict of "Not Proven"

Both in the "solemn" and the "summary" acquittals, not proven is interpreted as indicating that the jury or judge, respectively, is not convinced of the innocence of the accused; in fact, they may be morally convinced that the accused is guilty, but do not find the proofs sufficient for a conviction.