I wish I could say the same of you. :) :) :)

You will, after a period of time. Come to agree with most of what I say.

Yes... I do have faith in you.

I will start agreeing with you when you start providing substance for me to agree with.

I wish I could say the same of you. :) :) :)

You will, after a period of time. Come to agree with most of what I say.

Yes... I do have faith in you.

I will start agreeing with you when you start providing substance for me to agree with.

Guess we both believe the same about each other.

The difference is I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven to be such.

I wish I could say the same of you. :) :) :)

You will, after a period of time. Come to agree with most of what I say.

Yes... I do have faith in you.

I will start agreeing with you when you start providing substance for me to agree with.

Guess we both believe the same about each other.

The difference is I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven to be such.

As you apparently don't remember.

I have accepted my mistakes, or issued a Mea Culpa on many occasions.

I don't remember any of yours. Perhaps you can refresh my memory.

You sidestepped the statement and invented your own response. The statement was: I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven as such. I didn't say anything about mistakes. I don't think it's your memory that needs refreshing, but an ability to read and answer what is actually posted.

I wish I could say the same of you. :) :) :)

You will, after a period of time. Come to agree with most of what I say.

Yes... I do have faith in you.

I will start agreeing with you when you start providing substance for me to agree with.

Guess we both believe the same about each other.

The difference is I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven to be such.

As you apparently don't remember.

I have accepted my mistakes, or issued a Mea Culpa on many occasions.

I don't remember any of yours. Perhaps you can refresh my memory.

You sidestepped the statement and invented your own response. The statement was: I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven as such. I didn't say anything about mistakes. I don't think it's your memory that needs refreshing, but an ability to read and answer what is actually posted.

OzzFan...

Love your non responses. Your posts are just an attempt not to engage in a back-and-forth. Because many, if not most your beliefs, cannot stand up to scrutiny.

If you respond. Please make it brief.

My non-responses? I bring up my willingness to show my rationalizations. You misdirect and bring up mistakes. I call you out for it and now you accuse me of giving a non-response because I want to engage in a back-and-forth? Again, you don't even know what my beliefs are and you're trying to tell me they can't stand up to scrutiny. I'd love to have a discussion about our different beliefs, but you can never stay on topic without misdirecting or setting up strawmen.

I wish I could say the same of you. :) :) :)

You will, after a period of time. Come to agree with most of what I say.

Yes... I do have faith in you.

I will start agreeing with you when you start providing substance for me to agree with.

Guess we both believe the same about each other.

The difference is I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven to be such.

As you apparently don't remember.

I have accepted my mistakes, or issued a Mea Culpa on many occasions.

I don't remember any of yours. Perhaps you can refresh my memory.

You sidestepped the statement and invented your own response. The statement was: I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven as such. I didn't say anything about mistakes. I don't think it's your memory that needs refreshing, but an ability to read and answer what is actually posted.

OzzFan...

Love your non responses. Your posts are just an attempt not to engage in a back-and-forth. Because many, if not most your beliefs, cannot stand up to scrutiny.

If you respond. Please make it brief.

My non-responses? I bring up my willingness to show my rationalizations. You misdirect and bring up mistakes. I call you out for it and now you accuse me of giving a non-response because I want to engage in a back-and-forth? Again, you don't even know what my beliefs are and you're trying to tell me they can't stand up to scrutiny. I'd love to have a discussion about our different beliefs, but you can never stay on topic without misdirecting or setting up strawmen.

Really?

Is that the best intellectual response you can muster? Or are you simply trying to have the last word and antagonize everyone else?

I wish I could say the same of you. :) :) :)

You will, after a period of time. Come to agree with most of what I say.

Yes... I do have faith in you.

I will start agreeing with you when you start providing substance for me to agree with.

Guess we both believe the same about each other.

The difference is I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven to be such.

As you apparently don't remember.

I have accepted my mistakes, or issued a Mea Culpa on many occasions.

I don't remember any of yours. Perhaps you can refresh my memory.

You sidestepped the statement and invented your own response. The statement was: I'm willing to show my rationalizations for my beliefs and I'm willing to be wrong if proven as such. I didn't say anything about mistakes. I don't think it's your memory that needs refreshing, but an ability to read and answer what is actually posted.

OzzFan...

Love your non responses. Your posts are just an attempt not to engage in a back-and-forth. Because many, if not most your beliefs, cannot stand up to scrutiny.

If you respond. Please make it brief.

My non-responses? I bring up my willingness to show my rationalizations. You misdirect and bring up mistakes. I call you out for it and now you accuse me of giving a non-response because I want to engage in a back-and-forth? Again, you don't even know what my beliefs are and you're trying to tell me they can't stand up to scrutiny. I'd love to have a discussion about our different beliefs, but you can never stay on topic without misdirecting or setting up strawmen.

Really?

Is that the best intellectual response you can muster? Or are you simply trying to have the last word and antagonize everyone else?

Fascinating.

As I posted in other threads. I am getting bored by his responses.

LOL You can't control yourself can you? You really can't stand to be seen as having let anyone get the upper hand on you, so you continue to degenerate into simpleton posts like this while trying to have the last word. A true intellectual at his finest.

As I posted in other threads. I am getting bored by his responses.

By replying you prove the opposite.

---

Not advancing the discussion at all.

If people really do not like what others post, and do not get satisfactory replies, the moderators advice is always put them on filter.

It is very difficult for the moderator in a "he said" type of argument.

44 GOING TO JAIL

IT WILL BE A TEACHABLE MOMENT

Sweet Will Taste So Super Sweet, when dA STAR is Put BEHIND BARS.

Convict Yappin'

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

44 GOING TO JAIL

IT WILL BE A TEACHABLE MOMENT

Sweet Will Taste So Super Sweet, when dA STAR is Put BEHIND BARS.

Convict Yappin'

Only If Trump's accusations are correct.

If not: Trump is finito!

BTW: Trump's use of a Tweet to make these Serious Criminal Allegations. Should make those 100% for Trump... Pause a bit.

Trump, Pence, Clinton, Obama? Does it matter who?

The US is in one big mess so the question is:

Who's going to do the cleaning?

More likely 45 will be the 1 in a cell (padded or otherwise).

Cheers.

We are not, nor have ever been, one big happy family.

What?
So why Trump keep ranting "Make America Great Again!"

44 GOING TO JAIL

IT WILL BE A TEACHABLE MOMENT

Sweet Will Taste So Super Sweet, when dA STAR is Put BEHIND BARS.

Convict Yappin'

Only If Trump's accusations are correct.

If not: Trump is finito!

BTW: Trump's use of a Tweet to make these Serious Criminal Allegations. Should make those 100% for Trump... Pause a bit.

Trump, Pence, Clinton, Obama? Does it matter who?

The US is in one big mess so the question is:

Who's going to do the cleaning?

Who knows.

The USA has "been one big mess" many times. Difficult for Non Americans to understand our numerous Social and Political Cultures. Which has produced numerous clashes during its existence.

We are not, nor have ever been, one big happy family. Just a very Dysfunctional Country. Which just 'muddles along'...

...and enjoys interfering with other nations :-)

We are not, nor have ever been, one big happy family.

What?
So why Trump keep ranting "Make America Great Again!"

It means, and we understand it means:
"Make Our Dysfunctional, Continually Attacking Each Other, Family Great Again"
One must understand a Culture. To understand what its words really mean.

Of course.
Al Bundy has explained it very well:)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PncQ3M_Ri6M

45 Will be going to jail long before any other president. 44 didn't do anything illegal in any event. Someone's been reading fake news again I suppose.

---

#resist

What ever the details are, it's quite evident that king hussein added a lot to the under-cover police state. This police state must be destroyed before it destroys this country.

Trump is currently winning against the Praetorian Guard news media. But this isn't enough.

A CONVENTION OF STATES is a peaceful way to save this country.

And what is your evidence of this?

Cheers.

More likely 45 will be the 1 in a cell (padded or otherwise).

Cheers.

I doubt it, too many of The Donald's supporters hate 44 so much because he is black that they like any lie which attacks him.

---

I would've thought that sharing information between all intelligence agencies would be a no brainer as that is what happens elsewhere, and certainly happens here, for better security.

Or are you afraid of being caught out about something that you have done?

Cheers.