Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (85) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14654 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
One of my units failed with this error. Specifically, abort any WUs that have a 411KB datapak size, instead of the normal 367KB (as discussed earlier in this thread). That's worth doing, because the error happens at the end of processing, so a lot of time and power is wasted. |
BetelgeuseFive Send message Joined: 6 Jul 99 Posts: 158 Credit: 17,117,787 RAC: 19 |
I'm having download issues: 13-12-2013 17:25:30 | SETI@home | [error] MD5 check failed for ap_02no13aa_B2_P0_00300_20131212_14449.wu 13-12-2013 17:25:30 | SETI@home | [error] expected 7534b6a53c1d19a55c5f7bc3e428a54c, got 50a4ec6e1c6df9bb1590e3e2c446d805 13-12-2013 17:25:30 | SETI@home | [error] Checksum or signature error for ap_02no13aa_B2_P0_00300_20131212_14449.wu Never seen that before. Related to the upload issues ? EDIT: looks like I'm not the only one having issues with this file: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1377309002 Tom |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51469 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I'm having download issues: I had 3 failed downloads about 2 hours ago, but things seem to have been OK since then. EDIT...And one more just 10 minutes ago. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14654 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Looks like the problem with georgem, still shows up from time to time. I just got this one: Won't be around much longer - there were a couple after you, but no more ;) http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1377309023 |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
One of my units failed with this error. It appears I caught one of these overnight, WU #1375646975. It came and went while I was sleeping, so no chance to do anything about it. It also looks like it'll be sent out to a couple more unsuspecting hosts before it finally dies. |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
One of my units failed with this error. Just found another one lurking on a different machine, WU #1375888293. It only arrived about an hour ago, so I aborted it and it looks like it won't be resent, although it's still "In progress" on one unlucky host. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13750 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
More problems brewing? Aother stuck tape? Result creation rate has dropped off, ready-to-send buffer is OK, but showing signs of being affected. Also the AP Awaiting Validation & assimilator queues are backing up. Also noticed a lot more database queries per seconbd than usual over the last few feeks. Usually it's less than 1,000 with a couple of spkies over 1,000 each day. Last week it was around 1,500 as a minimum for most of the week. Even now it's running around 1,000 with spikes up to 3,000. Grant Darwin NT |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
What is: <error_code>-131</error_code> I get few WU crunched and at the end exit with this error. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13750 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
What is: <error_code>-131</error_code> With the crash of the sever there were a batch of WUs that are around 416kB in size instead of the usual 367kB (or so) in size. That's the error that results when they are processed & you try to report them. Just had a look in my data directory & noticed a bunch that are 22kB in size. Grant Darwin NT |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
What is: <error_code>-131</error_code> Thanks for the info. Anything to worry about beside the loose of processing time? If they are with the wrong size and will end on a error i imagine is easy to clear them at the server side or not? |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14654 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
What is: <error_code>-131</error_code> The small ones are normally (but check) ones which end with a double underscore: _n_0 Those are the results you're crunching ready to send back to the server. Don't delete them, whatever you do! |
Bill G Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 1282 Credit: 187,688,550 RAC: 182 |
Take a look at those small files again Grant, the appear to be additional files attached to a vlar with a vlar_1_0 suffix on them. They have the same name as the vlar. I have no idea what that means however? edit::I see you answered my question Richard. Thanks for that info. SETI@home classic workunits 4,019 SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
Aother stuck tape? Actually, I think 20jn12ac might finally be unstuck, after all these months. I just noticed a task from that file just arrived on one of my machines. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13750 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
edit::I see you answered my question Richard. Thanks for that info. Yep, thanks Richard. Grant Darwin NT |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34896 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Aother stuck tape? It'll be interesting to see if 20jn12ac actually finishes this time without causing the bad effect like it has many times before. Cheers. |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
Pretty impressive shape of the throughput on the cricket graph. 560mbit for..approaching 30 continuous hours now. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
Aother stuck tape? It certainly does look like its stuck again, on the last channel. Perhaps they need to shoot it and put it out of it's misery. However, the tasks I did receive from that file seem to process okay. I just finished 3 on one machine, WU #s 1378744682, 1378744651, and 1378744673, without any problems, so I guess the data's okay, if the splitter can just dig it out. I've also got 2 in the queue on another machine, but they probably won't run until tomorrow. |
Jaudy Send message Joined: 13 Jan 10 Posts: 128 Credit: 1,651,057 RAC: 0 |
Hi ! Four days ago. my modem stopped to function. I called the internet server (Bell Canada) and they sent me a new one. Since I restart the connexion with Seti, it seems that I can not send you the results of the works. Plus, Seti give me a new user number. I spoke with Bell Canada (Server service) and my internet connexion is OK. But having completed 10 works for you and nothing has been transferred for validation. The forums access are functioning properly. Please, I need suggestions... Thank you. |
Tim Send message Joined: 19 May 99 Posts: 211 Credit: 278,575,259 RAC: 0 |
Hi ! Disable the internal firewall of the modem to see what happen. Tim |
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
If you have a new modem this will not influence BOINC. At least a reboot of the PC and the new modem should work with the PC (maybe - after successful detection/installation of driver). If you open the BOINC Manager/tab 'Transfers', there are deferred results ready for upload? Select the results and press 'retry' or something similar (I use an other Manager). If this won't resolve your problem, please write a message again. * Best regards! :-) * Philip J. Fry, team seti.international founder. * Optimize your PC for higher RAC. * SETI@home needs your help. * |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.