Message boards :
Number crunching :
Benchmark variations
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
StokeyBob Send message Joined: 31 Aug 03 Posts: 848 Credit: 2,218,691 RAC: 0 |
I just restarted a machine to run out the work units, now that we look down. Like usually happens the benchmark started right after the machine started and while the anti-virus also wanted to update. I then re-ran them to see if all the other applications also running and starting effected the benchmark. 3/20/2009 10:03:35 PM||Running CPU benchmarks 3/20/2009 10:04:07 PM||Benchmark results: 3/20/2009 10:04:07 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2 3/20/2009 10:04:07 PM|| 1411 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 3/20/2009 10:04:07 PM|| 2087 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 3/20/2009 10:04:08 PM|SETI@home|Restarting task 02ja09ad.23093.62225.6.8.166_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 528 3/20/2009 10:04:08 PM|SETI@home|Restarting task 02ja09ad.23093.64679.6.8.28_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 528 3/20/2009 10:05:26 PM||Running CPU benchmarks 3/20/2009 10:05:27 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks 3/20/2009 10:05:58 PM||Benchmark results: 3/20/2009 10:05:58 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2 3/20/2009 10:05:58 PM|| 1422 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 3/20/2009 10:05:58 PM|| 3052 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 3/20/2009 10:05:59 PM||Resuming computation I'm not sure if this variation can be repeated but I was wondering how this effects credit. Which is better credit wise? |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65768 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Mines like so: 3/20/2009 8:57:24 PM Running CPU benchmarks 3/20/2009 8:57:24 PM Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks 3/20/2009 8:57:55 PM Benchmark results: 3/20/2009 8:57:55 PM Number of CPUs: 4 3/20/2009 8:57:55 PM 3507 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 3/20/2009 8:57:55 PM 10321 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU But I have a Q9300 Quad cpu running at 3.51GHz. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I'm not sure if this variation can be repeated but I was wondering how this effects credit. Which is better credit wise? It only affects the projects that still use benchmarks for credit calculations. SETI@Home uses FPOPs and not benchmarks so it has no affect on credit here. It does, however, have an affect upon work fetch as I understand it. |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65768 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
I'm not sure if this variation can be repeated but I was wondering how this effects credit. Which is better credit wise? Yeah that's so true, But they are fun to see. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
StokeyBob Send message Joined: 31 Aug 03 Posts: 848 Credit: 2,218,691 RAC: 0 |
Thanks OzzFan. Those are some nice looking numbers SuperJoker. P.S. SuperJoker, I looked at your task. Your doing four work units at a time in 900 seconds about while I'm doing two at a time in about 14,000 second, if I reading it right. Man have things changed fast. |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65768 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Thanks OzzFan. Thanks. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.