Message boards :
Politics :
Torture: Is it ever OK?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 . . . 11 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Rush Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 3131 Credit: 302,569 RAC: 0 |
...Masri in May was committed to a psychiatric institution after he was arrested in the southern German city of Neu-Ulm on suspicion of arson. His attorney blamed his troubles on the CIA, saying the kidnapping and detention had left Masri a "psychological wreck." Oh yeah, because OF COURSE he was tortured. They ALWAYS say that whether it was true or not--you'd be a fool not to say that. Any smart organization teaches it's people to say that. Not that it necessarily will get you very far because since they always say it, it isn't always taken very seriously. Especially by those that know better. "But judge, judge, I'm INNOCENT!! Seriously, ya gotta believe me!!" That works well too. Cordially, Rush elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com Remove the obvious... |
Saenger Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2452 Credit: 33,281 RAC: 0 |
"But judge, judge, I'm INNOCENT!! Seriously, ya gotta believe me!!" That works well too. He definitely is, until proven otherwise. But the USA ducked responsibility for some dubious "security reasons". If they have nothing to hide, why don't they come out. Isn't that what they always say about the surveillance programs? Only the guilty will be affected, the innocent have to fear no harm? It's one of the best documented cases of illegal kidnapping by some terrorist CIA-thugs. They kidnapped him, they tortured him, they dumped him once they found out he's not what they thought he is (took them some while to find out). But if this kidnapping will become official knowledge, someone probably will have to look for the culprits and sentence them for it, that would be very inconvenient for those who want to go on with kidnapping and torture, perhaps even up to the real responsible upper echelons, not just some scape goats like in Abu Ghraib. |
Rush Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 3131 Credit: 302,569 RAC: 0 |
"But judge, judge, I'm INNOCENT!! Seriously, ya gotta believe me!!" That works well too. Which wasn't the point. The point was that you can't take anyone's word at face value because they ALWAYS say they've been tortured, just as they ALWAYS say the quote above. It's just more words. But the USA ducked responsibility for some dubious "security reasons". If they have nothing to hide, why don't they come out. Isn't that what they always say about the surveillance programs? Only the guilty will be affected, the innocent have to fear no harm? Ummmm, they didn't say they didn't have nothing to hide. In fact, they said SPECIFICALLY that they DID have something to hide. They said that they actually are hiding something, and guess what, the District Judge agreed, the Fourth Circuit unanimously agreed, and so did the U.S. Supreme Court. He got his shot at the legal system, and the law did not take his side. The case had plenty of judicial review. Any number of judges reviewed the case and turned him down. Why? Most likely because his case has little merit, regardless of the rhetoric, but also because countries use these tactics all the time. As far as ANY program, mistakes will be made. They always will. You seem to think that because they system isn't perfect that the gov't will roll over and renounce it. They won't. They don't. They never do. Well, except in the popular press, but those are just words to placate. It's one of the best documented cases of illegal kidnapping by some terrorist CIA-thugs. They kidnapped him, they tortured him, they dumped him once they found out he's not what they thought he is (took them some while to find out). All you actually know is that he was abducted (probably) and returned. You have no idea if he was tortured or not. Or interrogated or not. Or fed. Or starved. How does he even know they were CIA, you figure they showed him their CIA right-to-abduct ID cards? No one has any idea and both sides have plenty of incentive to tell stories in their favor. But if this kidnapping will become official knowledge, someone probably will have to look for the culprits and sentence them for it, that would be very inconvenient for those who want to go on with kidnapping and torture, perhaps even up to the real responsible upper echelons, not just some scape goats like in Abu Ghraib. The case is official knowledge. There was a suit, appeals, and certiorari to the Supreme Court. No other charges were filed and it's likely they won't. Germany filed charges against "CIA agents" but that is relatively ambiguous as well. If they actually were "agents" that would mean that they were foreign nationals, not CIA Foreign Service Officers, and if that's true, you have a real hard time proving that the CIA was involved. EDIT: According to the NYT, "For his part, Mr. Masri was arrested by the German police in May on suspicion of setting a fire that caused $675,000 in damage to a market in a Bavarian town. His lawyer said Mr. Masri had had a dispute with the store, and that his action was the result of not receiving psychological counseling that he had sought. A German judge ordered him held in a psychiatric ward." So, Mr. Innocent figures his best plan on the road to proving his innocence is to act like a common criminal and set fire the a market, causing $675K damage. His response? It's the CIA's fault. Sure it is. And I'll bet he tells that judge that he's innocent too. Hey do you think they arrested everyone in town and interrogated them all? Or do you think they just arrested they guy that they had reasonable suspicion about? Cordially, Rush elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com Remove the obvious... |
thorin belvrog Send message Joined: 29 Sep 06 Posts: 6418 Credit: 8,893 RAC: 0 |
see also the other thread about torture. Account frozen... |
Es99 Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 |
Popcorn, i need popcorn. This one is making me nauseous. :( I think people have been watching too much Jack Bauer and fallen for that post 9/11 propaganda. Slippery slope indeed. It never ceases to amaze me the acts that people can manage to justify. Reality Internet Personality |
Rush Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 3131 Credit: 302,569 RAC: 0 |
I think people have been watching too much Jack Bauer and fallen for that post 9/11 propaganda. True, they think that crap is reality. Slippery slope indeed. It never ceases to amaze me the acts that people can manage to justify. You don't have to agree with the justifications, but that's why everyone does it, whether you like it or not. It's the epitome of gov't force. A lot of you guys seem to love that stuff. Well, as long as you agree with it. Cordially, Rush elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com Remove the obvious... |
Jeffrey Send message Joined: 21 Nov 03 Posts: 4793 Credit: 26,029 RAC: 0 |
I think people have been watching too much Jack Bauer and fallen for that post 9/11 propaganda. EXACTLY!!! ;) It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . . |
KWSN - MajorKong Send message Joined: 5 Jan 00 Posts: 2892 Credit: 1,499,890 RAC: 0 |
"But judge, judge, I'm INNOCENT!! Seriously, ya gotta believe me!!" That works well too. Oh, gimmie a break... This line of reasoning, namely that some CIA affiliated people kidnapped this guy, and then tortured him, breaks down when this guy got 'released'. If the CIA is going to break the law by kidnapping someone from foreign soil, then further break the law by torturing that someone, you can rest assured that the CIA is going to follow through and "release" that someone embedded in a barrel full of concrete, mid-ocean, if they didn't get the info they wanted (and maybe even if they did). Secrecy must be preserved. Many CIA 'activities' in other nations are against the law, anyway. They certainly are against the law in that other nation (violating laws in those nations against spying). The real crime here would have been letting that guy go, if the allegations were true. In my opinion, that guy must have been a foreign national working for the CIA, who, after meeting with his handlers, decided he wasn't being paid enough. So, he made up some story about being kidnapped and tortured by the CIA to cover his own backside. |
bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 3 |
I think people have been watching too much Jack Bauer and fallen for that post 9/11 propaganda. Had a feeling that one would raise it's ugly head sometime. Yes I do agree with the use of government force, when it comes to taxation, because, of my own free will, I accept that such force may be used against myself. I accept the use of government force to imprison convicted criminals, because I accept that if I were to become one of their number I, too, shall be imprisoned. I don't accept that torture may be used against me, hence I don't condone its use against others. By similar reasoning, if one accepts the use of torture against another, then one must accept that it may be used against oneself. I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... |
Rush Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 3131 Credit: 302,569 RAC: 0 |
Had a feeling that one would raise it's ugly head sometime. Yes I do agree with the use of government force, when it comes to taxation, because, of my own free will, I accept that such force may be used against myself. I accept the use of government force to imprison convicted criminals, because I accept that if I were to become one of their number I, too, shall be imprisoned. It doesn't matter what you accept or don't accept, as long as others convince the gov't to use force against you. Speaking of which, do you enjoy paying for the CIA and the WHISC? How about those secret CIA prisons, those are your tax dollars hard at work. Oh, and the Lear jets that they use for rendition aren't cheap either. Whether you accept that gov't can use torture against others or not is of no concern--they'll do it to you (or anyone else) without any consideration of your position at all. Cordially, Rush elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com Remove the obvious... |
thorin belvrog Send message Joined: 29 Sep 06 Posts: 6418 Credit: 8,893 RAC: 0 |
You and the USA as you like it, Rush, can be glad that I ever can become president there. First thing after calling back all military forces from each foreign country would be: close down all secret services and their affiliate agencies, including their official and secret facilities - and then punish all those who are or were guilty of torture and other violations of Human Rights. It would save a lot of the budget to not spend money anymore to such useless agencies like CIA, NSA et cetera ad nauseam. Account frozen... |
Rush Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 3131 Credit: 302,569 RAC: 0 |
You and the USA as you like it, Rush, can be glad that I ever can become president there. First thing after calling back all military forces from each foreign country would be: close down all secret services and their affiliate agencies, including their official and secret facilities - and then punish all those who are or were guilty of torture and other violations of Human Rights. It would save a lot of the budget to not spend money anymore to such useless agencies like CIA, NSA et cetera ad nauseam. Since you can't read Thorin, I'll remind you. I don't like the gov't. Were I in charge, I'd shut down FAR more of the gov't than you would ever think to. All of the things you're crabbing about in your comments above were created because people like you convinced the gov't that that crap was necessary. That it had to meddle in other people's lives because that was better for everyone if they did. It's all just gov't force, it's just gov't force that you don't happen to agree with. But for what it's worth, even as President you wouldn't be able to do hardly any of that crap. You *might* be able to call military units home, but the rest of it is unlikely. You can't control the courts, and many of the institutions you dislike are created and protected by law. Congress won't let you do what you want. Anymore than they would let me. Cordially, Rush elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com Remove the obvious... |
Es99 Send message Joined: 23 Aug 05 Posts: 10874 Credit: 350,402 RAC: 0 |
Congress won't let you do what you want. Anymore than they would let me. No..you aren't rich enough to pay the lobbyists. Reality Internet Personality |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 9659 Credit: 251,998 RAC: 0 |
Popcorn, i need popcorn. There ya go, Champ. Always at your service. :-D "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me |
bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 3 |
It doesn't matter what you accept or don't accept, as long as others convince the gov't to use force against you. Speaking of which, do you enjoy paying for the CIA and the WHISC? How about those secret CIA prisons, those are your tax dollars hard at work. Oh, and the Lear jets that they use for rendition aren't cheap either. Yes, yes, it doesn't matter to you, the gov't or anybody else that matters, but the case you appear to be making is not that torture is moral, just that it's practiced. The thread here is not whether torture occurs, it's whether it's OK, I don't think any of us are naive enough to assume that it doesn't occur. On the question of the use made of my tax dollars, I'm afraid I have no say whatsoever in the matter, though I'm hoping that situation will change soon. I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 9659 Credit: 251,998 RAC: 0 |
... Thorin, I don't think you have any ideas how the people who are trained for those things are being selected. The guys I have known from the Rangers here, who also are being taught things they don't speak about, or only mention at rare occasions, have been some of the most mentally balanced people I have met. If they are not able to show self-restraint, they are simply not chosen for the tasks! But what about you, Thorin, are you aroused? "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me |
Jeffrey Send message Joined: 21 Nov 03 Posts: 4793 Credit: 26,029 RAC: 0 |
If they are not able to show self-restraint, they are simply not chosen for the tasks! Self-restraint from a government employee? Now thats an oxymoron if I've ever heard one... ;) It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . . |
thorin belvrog Send message Joined: 29 Sep 06 Posts: 6418 Credit: 8,893 RAC: 0 |
... No. Definitely not by these virtual things here. And also not by any powers I had in Real Life. Quite the contrary: I am a person who considers responsible posts not as posts to use power but to serve those who I am responsible for. It's a matter of humbleness and respect, not of pride and disrespect. As somebody wise had said: "With powers comes responsibility." And when I see the violence of some cops or other officers, and especially of interrogators - connected to your sentence If they are not able to show self-restraint, they are simply not chosen for the tasks!... then I must say, most of these guys are chosen poorly. Thorin, I don't think you have any ideas how the people who are trained for those things are being selected.You are right. I have no idea how they are selected. But I don't think that any of the things I know about interrogations: the intimidating, decently violent atmosphere in the interrogation room, the threatenings, the disrespect and hate, and finally the violence itself, are things which people who are "mentally balanced" ever can accustom to. Account frozen... |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 9659 Credit: 251,998 RAC: 0 |
... Can you make up your mind? You say these people are chosen poorly and then you say that you don't know how they are selected. In fact you have never been through the entrance examination the Rangers and the Frogs are going through. No offense, but I don't think you would last a day there. :-O Either you would give up yourself or you would be sent home! "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me |
Rush Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 3131 Credit: 302,569 RAC: 0 |
Yes, yes, it doesn't matter to you, the gov't or anybody else that matters, but the case you appear to be making is not that torture is moral, just that it's practiced. I thought I was clear when I said torture is not moral. Interrogation is not torture, for the reasons presented earlier. However, if your idea of a moral system is one that creates the greatest good, then yes, it's more moral to possibly cause extreme discomfort in order to possibly save the lives of others. How that will apply to any specific occasion is up to the participants and their own moral code. On the other hand, if your idea of a moral system is that you won't cause extreme discomfort at any cost, and that means that the lives of others are regularly sacrificed to your feelings on the matter, well, then no, that's not a moral system. On the question of the use made of my tax dollars, I'm afraid I have no say whatsoever in the matter, though I'm hoping that situation will change soon. Good luck!! Cordially, Rush elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com Remove the obvious... |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.