Michael Moore's: Sicko

Message boards : Politics : Michael Moore's: Sicko
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 657386 - Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 17:05:19 UTC - in response to Message 657113.  

A show of hands, please, of all those who want to go to Cuba for their medical care. (LOL)

I don't need to.. I live in the UK.

My sister went to Cuba earlier this year..she said it was a lovely place.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 657386 · Report as offensive
Profile Darth Dogbytes™
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 03
Posts: 7512
Credit: 2,021,148
RAC: 0
United States
Message 657432 - Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 18:05:48 UTC - in response to Message 657113.  

A show of hands, please, of all those who want to go to Cuba for their medical care. (LOL)

Couldn't be any worse, but it would be alot cheaper...
Account frozen...
ID: 657432 · Report as offensive
Profile thorin belvrog
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 06
Posts: 6418
Credit: 8,893
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 657453 - Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 19:05:03 UTC - in response to Message 657432.  

A show of hands, please, of all those who want to go to Cuba for their medical care. (LOL)

Couldn't be any worse, but it would be alot cheaper...

Like almost everywhere where they don't want to make a fortune out of the need of others...
Account frozen...
ID: 657453 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 657491 - Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 21:25:04 UTC

Oops.

From the AP:

Canada's Expectant Moms Heading to U.S. to Deliver

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Mothers in British Columbia are having a baby boom, but it's the United States that has to deliver, and that has some proud Canadians blasting their highly touted government healthcare system.

"I'm a born-bred Canadian, as well as my daughter and son, and I'm ashamed," Jill Irvine told FOX News. Irvine's daughter, Carri Ash, is one of at least 40 mothers or their babies who've been airlifted from British Columbia to the U.S. this year because Canadian hospitals didn't have room for the preemies in their neonatal units.

"It's a big number and bigger than the previous capacity of the system to deal with it," said Adrian Dix, a British Columbia legislator, told FOXNews.com. "So when that happens, you can't have a waiting list for a mother having the baby. She just has the baby."

The mothers have been flown to hospitals in Seattle, Everett, Wash., and Spokane, Wash., to receive treatment, as well as hospitals in the neighboring province of Alberta, Dix said. Three mothers were airlifted in the first weekend of October alone, including Carri Ash.

"I just want to go home and see my kids," she said from her Seattle hospital bed. "I think it's stupid I have to be here."

Canada's socialized health care system, hailed as a model by Michael Moore in his documentary, "Sicko," is hurting, government officials admit, citing not enough money for more equipment and staff to handle high risk births.

Sarah Plank, a spokeswoman for the British Columbia Ministry of Health, said a spike in high risk and premature births coupled with the lack of trained nurses prompted the surge in mothers heading across the border for better care.

"The number of transfers in previous years has been quite low," Plank said. "Before this recent spike we went for more than a year with no transfers to the U.S., so this is something that is happening in other provinces as well."

Critics say these border crossings highlight the dangers of a government-run health care system.

"The Canadian healthcare system has used the United States as a safety net for years," said Michael Turner of the Cato Institute. "In fact, overall about one out of every seven Canadian physicians sends someone to the United States every year for treatment."

Neonatal intensive care units in Alberta and Ontario have also been stretched to capacity, she said.

The cost of these airlifts and treatments, paid to U.S. hospitals by the province under Canada's universal health care system, runs upwards of $1,000 a child.

"We clearly want to see more capacity built in the Canadian system because it’s also expensive for taxpayers here to send people out of the country," Dix said.

The surge could be due to women giving birth later in life, and passport restrictions and family separation adds to the stress.

"I think it’s reasonable to think that this is a trend that would continue and we have to prepare for it and increase the number of beds to deal with perhaps the new reality of the number of premature babies and newborns needing a higher level of care in Canada," Dix said.

British Columbia has added more neonatal beds and increased funding for specialized nurse training, Plank said.

"There is an identified need for some additional capacity just due to population growth and that sort of thing and that is actively being implemented," she said.
Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 657491 · Report as offensive
Profile Fuzzy Hollynoodles
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 9659
Credit: 251,998
RAC: 0
Message 657512 - Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 22:30:58 UTC

Michael Moore’s advice costly for taxpayers

By The Copenhagen Post
Published 20.08.07 14:00



Dozens of municipal politicians have used their city's funds to purchase tickets to a presentation by American documentary film director Michael Moore

It is doubtful that Michael Moore would approve of the way 70 Sønderborg city politicians and business people will use taxpayers’ kroner to attend his presentation next week at the Jutland city’s Alsion concert hall.

At DKK 1600 per person, the total for the big wigs’ night out comes to DKK 112,000. Sønderborg’s mayor, Jan Prokopek Jensen, said Moore’s presentation - which includes a viewing of his latest film about the American health care system, ‘Sicko’ - can be ‘inspirational’ for the city’s businesses and government.

The mayor’s take on the situation was supported by the public administration office of Region Southern Denmark, which supervises the region’s municipal governments.

‘We’ve looked at the purchase and cannot rule out that the arrangement may be relevant to Sønderborg municipality,’ office manager Nina Würtzen told public broadcaster DR.

Two years ago, the administrative office’s equivalent prior to the regional reorganisation decided that Sønderborg’s municipal employees and business persons could not use public funds to attend a Pavarotti concert.

The administration indicated that any arrangement where public funds are used must serve the needs of the community and not the individual, and it determined the concert - unlike a commentary about American health care - would be of no benefit to the city.

-----------------------------------

My comment: The delusions continue. :-(


"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me

ID: 657512 · Report as offensive
Profile thorin belvrog
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 06
Posts: 6418
Credit: 8,893
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 657534 - Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 23:04:51 UTC - in response to Message 657512.  

Michael Moore’s advice costly for taxpayers

By The Copenhagen Post
Published 20.08.07 14:00



Dozens of municipal politicians have used their city's funds to purchase tickets to a presentation by American documentary film director Michael Moore

It is doubtful that Michael Moore would approve of the way 70 Sønderborg city politicians and business people will use taxpayers’ kroner to attend his presentation next week at the Jutland city’s Alsion concert hall.

At DKK 1600 per person, the total for the big wigs’ night out comes to DKK 112,000. Sønderborg’s mayor, Jan Prokopek Jensen, said Moore’s presentation - which includes a viewing of his latest film about the American health care system, ‘Sicko’ - can be ‘inspirational’ for the city’s businesses and government.

The mayor’s take on the situation was supported by the public administration office of Region Southern Denmark, which supervises the region’s municipal governments.

‘We’ve looked at the purchase and cannot rule out that the arrangement may be relevant to Sønderborg municipality,’ office manager Nina Würtzen told public broadcaster DR.

Two years ago, the administrative office’s equivalent prior to the regional reorganisation decided that Sønderborg’s municipal employees and business persons could not use public funds to attend a Pavarotti concert.

The administration indicated that any arrangement where public funds are used must serve the needs of the community and not the individual, and it determined the concert - unlike a commentary about American health care - would be of no benefit to the city.

-----------------------------------

My comment: The delusions continue. :-(


Just more hypocrisy. As if they couldn't afford to pay these tickets themselves! ... And then excusing this robbery like "We are not guilty of spending tax money for private entertainment, it's Michael Moore who teaches us the way..."
Account frozen...
ID: 657534 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 657577 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 0:28:58 UTC - in response to Message 657491.  
Last modified: 11 Oct 2007, 0:31:13 UTC

Canada's Expectant Moms Heading to U.S. to Deliver

'Buying' more friends are we? How about helping our own people for a change... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 657577 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 657677 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 7:40:16 UTC - in response to Message 657534.  

Just more hypocrisy. As if they couldn't afford to pay these tickets themselves! ... And then excusing this robbery like "We are not guilty of spending tax money for private entertainment, it's Michael Moore who teaches us the way..."

One could argue that this is hypocrisy as well given that you regularly advocate taking more from individuals, leaving them with less, and giving these types of people more money and power.

Moore, of course, seems perfectly happy with his free market capitalism and the profits he's making off of globalization. Hmmmm. Anyone else see any irony there?

Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 657677 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 657711 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 9:17:48 UTC

I lot of health services are having trouble with Neo Natal care. I think it has more to do with the rise in premature births, multiple births (due to fertility treatments) and better treatments for premature babies that the way the Healthcare is funded.

Of course on the plus side those Canadians that were flown to US hosiptals actually had access to the healthcare however it was done. Whereas I understand that the main problem with US healthcare is that there would be babies that would simply not have access to the good quality healthcare at all if they were from poorer uninsured families. I believe the infant mortality rates bear this out.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 657711 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 657718 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 9:50:49 UTC - in response to Message 657711.  

I lot of health services are having trouble with Neo Natal care. I think it has more to do with the rise in premature births, multiple births (due to fertility treatments) and better treatments for premature babies that the way the Healthcare is funded.

But it all has to be funded. Thank GOD they have the U.S. system to bail them out. Oh, kinda like they have U.S. pharms to buy drugs, machines, and et cetera from. Whew.

Of course on the plus side those Canadians that were flown to US hosiptals actually had access to the healthcare however it was done. Whereas I understand that the main problem with US healthcare is that there would be babies that would simply not have access to the good quality healthcare at all if they were from poorer uninsured families. I believe the infant mortality rates bear this out.

Well let's see, the Wikster says the U.S. rate is 6.3 and the U.K. and America Jr. rates are 4.8 per 1000. 1.5 kids. So about one kid in 1000.

So given that the U.S. has 300 million people, which is 5 times the number that are in the U.K, and nearly 10 times the number that are in Canada, no, the numbers don't bear that out. Mostly because a country that dwarfs others by 5 times, 10 times, or in the case of Denmark (4.4/K) 60 TIMES, those differences aren't significant.

If these systems are soooooo wonderful and the U.S. system is soooooo crappy, you know, because "the main problem with US healthcare is that there would be babies that would simply not have access to the good quality healthcare at all if they were from poorer uninsured families," the numbers for a country that is 5, 10, or 60 times the size should not come anywhere close, but they do. The difference is negligible.

One could go a step farther and say that if the U.S. system is soooooo crappy because "babies...would simply not have access to the good quality healthcare at all if they were from poorer uninsured families," and since difference in the mortality rate in these other, substantially smaller, countries is negligible, then even with the massive burden of "free" health care, their care is no better than the U.S.

Yep, that's some awesome heath care you go there. Oh, and it's "free!" Heh.
Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 657718 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 657721 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 9:59:05 UTC - in response to Message 657718.  

I lot of health services are having trouble with Neo Natal care. I think it has more to do with the rise in premature births, multiple births (due to fertility treatments) and better treatments for premature babies that the way the Healthcare is funded.

But it all has to be funded. Thank GOD they have the U.S. system to bail them out. Oh, kinda like they have U.S. pharms to buy drugs, machines, and et cetera from. Whew.

Of course on the plus side those Canadians that were flown to US hosiptals actually had access to the healthcare however it was done. Whereas I understand that the main problem with US healthcare is that there would be babies that would simply not have access to the good quality healthcare at all if they were from poorer uninsured families. I believe the infant mortality rates bear this out.

Well let's see, the Wikster says the U.S. rate is 6.3 and the U.K. and America Jr. rates are 4.8 per 1000. 1.5 kids. So about one kid in 1000.

So given that the U.S. has 300 million people, which is 5 times the number that are in the U.K, and nearly 10 times the number that are in Canada, no, the numbers don't bear that out. Mostly because a country that dwarfs others by 5 times, 10 times, or in the case of Denmark (4.4/K) 60 TIMES, those differences aren't significant.

If these systems are soooooo wonderful and the U.S. system is soooooo crappy, you know, because "the main problem with US healthcare is that there would be babies that would simply not have access to the good quality healthcare at all if they were from poorer uninsured families," the numbers for a country that is 5, 10, or 60 times the size should not come anywhere close, but they do. The difference is negligible.

One could go a step farther and say that if the U.S. system is soooooo crappy because "babies...would simply not have access to the good quality healthcare at all if they were from poorer uninsured families," and since difference in the mortality rate in these other, substantially smaller, countries is negligible, then even with the massive burden of "free" health care, their care is no better than the U.S.

Yep, that's some awesome heath care you go there. Oh, and it's "free!" Heh.

I was talking about infant death rates among the poor.

Unlike you I measure cost in lives and suffering, not dollars.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 657721 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 657727 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 10:11:45 UTC - in response to Message 657721.  

I was talking about infant death rates among the poor.

Maybe they should give up their cable and mobile phone service?

Unlike you I measure cost in lives and suffering, not dollars.

Rest assured, the amount you pay is responsible for PLENTY of lives and suffering. How you could possibly ever measure such a subjective thing, other than personal feelings, is another discussion entirely.
Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 657727 · Report as offensive
Profile Fuzzy Hollynoodles
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 9659
Credit: 251,998
RAC: 0
Message 657764 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 12:10:05 UTC - in response to Message 657677.  

Just more hypocrisy. As if they couldn't afford to pay these tickets themselves! ... And then excusing this robbery like "We are not guilty of spending tax money for private entertainment, it's Michael Moore who teaches us the way..."

One could argue that this is hypocrisy as well given that you regularly advocate taking more from individuals, leaving them with less, and giving these types of people more money and power.

Moore, of course, seems perfectly happy with his free market capitalism and the profits he's making off of globalization. Hmmmm. Anyone else see any irony there?


Michael Moore was there at that arrangement in Sønderborg. I'm sure he was very happy to see those politicians and business people drinking his words from his lips. I think he's very happy with his status as guru...


"I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me

ID: 657764 · Report as offensive
bobby
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Mar 02
Posts: 2866
Credit: 17,789,109
RAC: 3
United States
Message 657850 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 15:25:35 UTC - in response to Message 657727.  

I was talking about infant death rates among the poor.

Maybe they should give up their cable and mobile phone service?


Cost of monthly cable TV service may be a little as about $40, cost of monthly cell phone service can be as little as about the same, so we may be dealing with oh, $100 a month (including taxes, etc). Cost of monthly health insurance premuim for a single person, anyone? For a family, anyone? I paid over $400/month for a single person 18 months ago (I was self employed at the time).
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

ID: 657850 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 657860 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 16:11:42 UTC - in response to Message 657850.  

I was talking about infant death rates among the poor.

Maybe they should give up their cable and mobile phone service?


Cost of monthly cable TV service may be a little as about $40, cost of monthly cell phone service can be as little as about the same, so we may be dealing with oh, $100 a month (including taxes, etc). Cost of monthly health insurance premuim for a single person, anyone? For a family, anyone? I paid over $400/month for a single person 18 months ago (I was self employed at the time).

Hmmmm, interesting. How could that be? I mean the eeeevil multi-national corporations that think of nothing besides profit actually manage to provide extremely intricate electronic hard items to consumers at the price that they are willing to line up for? I wouldn't have thought it was possible. Especially since they give a LOT of it away for free for a contract plan...

I wonder what they could do with simple bulk items like pills and needles...

In actuality Bobby, I was just being sarcastic again. NHS has a budget of 80 billion or so, and there are 60 million or so of you. So that's 1350 pounds per month, or about 2700 dollars per month. Hardly a few pounds, even if the numbers are off by half, that's 675 pounds per month, or 1350 dollars per month.

The point being, that while you don't pay that directly, oh jeebus do you pay it indirectly in the price of everything else. Literally everything. Can you imagine what kind of insurance you could get in the U.S. for almost 3K per month?
Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 657860 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 657870 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 16:53:36 UTC - in response to Message 657860.  

I was talking about infant death rates among the poor.

Maybe they should give up their cable and mobile phone service?


Cost of monthly cable TV service may be a little as about $40, cost of monthly cell phone service can be as little as about the same, so we may be dealing with oh, $100 a month (including taxes, etc). Cost of monthly health insurance premuim for a single person, anyone? For a family, anyone? I paid over $400/month for a single person 18 months ago (I was self employed at the time).

Hmmmm, interesting. How could that be? I mean the eeeevil multi-national corporations that think of nothing besides profit actually manage to provide extremely intricate electronic hard items to consumers at the price that they are willing to line up for? I wouldn't have thought it was possible. Especially since they give a LOT of it away for free for a contract plan...

I wonder what they could do with simple bulk items like pills and needles...

In actuality Bobby, I was just being sarcastic again. NHS has a budget of 80 billion or so, and there are 60 million or so of you. So that's 1350 pounds per month, or about 2700 dollars per month. Hardly a few pounds, even if the numbers are off by half, that's 675 pounds per month, or 1350 dollars per month.

The point being, that while you don't pay that directly, oh jeebus do you pay it indirectly in the price of everything else. Literally everything. Can you imagine what kind of insurance you could get in the U.S. for almost 3K per month?

Maybe because people can choose not to buy a mobile phone or to use it less...whereas it is usually the poor who need to spend more on healthcare and people can't decide not to go to the doctor. There actually is nothing to really drive the costs down.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 657870 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 657997 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 21:28:41 UTC - in response to Message 657870.  

There actually is nothing to really drive the costs down.

I'm quite sure that a good dose of 'anarchy' would do the trick... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 657997 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 658002 - Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 21:34:00 UTC - in response to Message 657860.  

Especially since they give a LOT of it away for free for a contract plan...

More commonly known as: The 'trickery plan'... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 658002 · Report as offensive
Profile Rush
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3131
Credit: 302,569
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 664566 - Posted: 22 Oct 2007, 20:22:10 UTC
Last modified: 22 Oct 2007, 21:55:28 UTC

More "free" health care...

From The Times.

October 22, 2007
Tax on public gyms 'will hit people most in need of help'

Rosemary Bennett, Social Affairs Correspondent

Efforts to tackle the growing obesity problem risk being seriously undermined by a move to claim VAT on public gym memberships held by nearly three million people.

While private gyms have to charge VAT on membership at 17.5 per cent, gyms run by leisure centres have enjoyed a partial exemption, allowing them to keep costs down.

In addition, most of the not-for-profit trusts that run hundreds of leisure centre gyms on behalf of local authorities have not been charging VAT at all.

But after a seemingly obscure court case in Scotland won by Revenue & Customs, tax officials have circulated a warning to all 2,597 public gyms saying that they must levy VAT on their full membership fees.

Experts say that the move will undermine Gordon Brown’s attempts to bring obesity under control, with higher fees likely to push thousands of members — and those most at risk of obesity — into giving up going to the gym altogether.

Average monthly fees at public gyms are £28.39, or £340 a year, according to the Leisure Database Company, compared with £42.07 at a private gym. Full VAT on top would increase the annual fee to £400.

Experian, a business consultancy, has analysed the backgrounds of the 2.8 million public gym members and forecast that at least 12 per cent, or 350,000 members, would give up their membership if the cost went up.

“If public leisure centre operators are forced to put up gym fees as a result of this initiative, they risk putting prices beyond the reach of the very target groups the Government is trying to get to do more exercise. It will seriously undermine attempts to get the nation more active,” said Patrick Gray, senior consultant at Experian. A regional breakdown of the data also indicated that charging full VAT on public gym membership would mean that in some areas, including Bristol and Southampton, they would be more expensive than private gyms.

Craig McAteer, chairman of the Sports and Recreation Trusts Association (SpoRTA), urged the Revenue to reconsider. The body represents 115 leisure trusts that run 550 leisure centres for local authorities.

“A significant number of our customers are in the lower socioeconomic groups,” he said. “If our public leisure centres are forced to apply VAT, considerably increasing the price, we could see a huge drop-off in visitors which will ultimately damage the Government’s vision of increasing participation and tackling rising obesity problems.”

The Revenue defended its actions, saying that it had not changed the rules but was simply reminding leisure centres of their VAT liabilities.

The case involved the Highlands council, which levied only a small amount of VAT on fees at leisure centres to cover non-sport facilities at the gym, such as the sauna and steam room. The court ruled that since membership was all-inclusive, VAT had to be charged on the full amount. After its victory, the Revenue dashed out a warning to all leisure centres and trusts.

“Quick as a flash after the court case Revenue & Customs made clear that the whole membership payment is subject to VAT and that trusts must also charge VAT if the subscription covers any activity that is not strictly speaking sport, which is of course most gyms these days,” said Steve Hodgetts, VAT partner at Baker Tilly, the accountant.

“It also made clear it would chase up VAT retrospectively if leisure centres had not been paying it. We calculate a bill of about £20 million.”

The Revenue said that it had not changed the guidelines and was only clarifying what should always have been the case.
Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...
ID: 664566 · Report as offensive
Profile Scary Capitalist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 May 01
Posts: 7404
Credit: 97,085
RAC: 0
United States
Message 665563 - Posted: 24 Oct 2007, 6:02:22 UTC

Cuban refugees have a 'Truth about Cuba' site as a clearing house for smuggled video and information out of that prison state that ES99 called 'lovely'....and liars like Michael Moore uphold as some sort of ideal.

I don't have time to look for the site but one of you can. Shouldn't be hard to find.

Anytime you have to SMUGGLE tapes in and out of a country and insist upon calling it absolutely fabulous, dahling we can suspect that your motives are wholly impure.
Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data!
I did NOT authorize this belly writing!

ID: 665563 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Michael Moore's: Sicko


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.