Amateur SETI

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Amateur SETI
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Walla
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 06
Posts: 329
Credit: 177,013
RAC: 0
United States
Message 446241 - Posted: 30 Oct 2006, 2:19:35 UTC
Last modified: 30 Oct 2006, 2:20:23 UTC

How many of you have ever thought of doing amateur SETI? I've done a little bit of research into this and it seems for less than $2000 anyone can run their own SETI search using their home computer and a dish as small as 3m. All the pieces you need are availiable via the seti league. They provide software to do real time analysis on any home computer. Do you guys think that amateur SETI could ever succeed? With a 5m dish or so you could detect a signal over tens of light years away.
Some links
http://www.setileague.org/hardware/techmanu.htm
http://www.setileague.org/hardware/blkdiag.htm

Thoughts?
ID: 446241 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 446266 - Posted: 30 Oct 2006, 3:11:17 UTC
Last modified: 30 Oct 2006, 3:13:11 UTC

It will be impossible for an amateur to beat the sensitivity of the Arecibo telescope.

It's over 300m in diameter and roughly 10,000 times more sensitive than a 3m dish.

The main problem with the Seti setup at Arecibo is that we are looking nowhere in particular :o)

The Seti receiver is pointed more or less randomly along with the rest of the telescope, looking into areas without nearby stars most of the time I guess.

If you do the opposite with your amateur setup, i.e. track a nearby star to get long exposure times, you might (though not very likely) be able to detect something.


Regards Hans


ID: 446266 · Report as offensive
Profile Jw
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 10 Sep 06
Posts: 306
Credit: 26,612
RAC: 0
Message 446279 - Posted: 30 Oct 2006, 3:52:20 UTC

Wouldn't Background Noise be an Issue with a Small Dish?
ID: 446279 · Report as offensive
Profile Sleestak
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jun 01
Posts: 779
Credit: 857,664
RAC: 0
United States
Message 446288 - Posted: 30 Oct 2006, 4:02:23 UTC

If you thought SETI could be found locally, a small dish would be adequate. Plus, you could scan the fequencies that you want. Then you'd have to unscamble their encryted communications. LOL.

TEAM
LL
ID: 446288 · Report as offensive
Profile Andy Westcott
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Nov 00
Posts: 101
Credit: 1,282,556
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 446503 - Posted: 30 Oct 2006, 19:40:09 UTC - in response to Message 446288.  

One big problem with amateur SETI is getting other people to believe your results if you found something interesting.

But that aside, yes, but try it on other, lower frequencies than are popular at the moment, although atmospheric absorption and ionospheric reflection/difraction may become an issue if you go too low.
ID: 446503 · Report as offensive
hlx

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 06
Posts: 4
Credit: 99
RAC: 0
Message 448488 - Posted: 2 Nov 2006, 19:37:31 UTC

it is surely worth a try, more research means a greater possibility to find something.
ID: 448488 · Report as offensive
ace_paradis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Oct 01
Posts: 3
Credit: 40,994
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 452073 - Posted: 6 Nov 2006, 10:35:20 UTC

It would be interesting indeed,

However, I am more fond of the idea of having 5 dishes, 1 arecibo, 1 antartica, 1 north pole, 1 austrailia, 1 dark side moon.

But now, I am neither scientifically adept nor a scientist, so what do I know?
ID: 452073 · Report as offensive
JamesBrown

Send message
Joined: 2 Nov 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 218
RAC: 0
United States
Message 452204 - Posted: 6 Nov 2006, 15:07:45 UTC

A good example of the building of a small SETI station is my own.
Look at www.SETI.Net for details.

Regards.... Jim
ID: 452204 · Report as offensive
Profile kinhull
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Oct 03
Posts: 1029
Credit: 636,475
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 452293 - Posted: 6 Nov 2006, 17:21:25 UTC - in response to Message 452073.  
Last modified: 6 Nov 2006, 17:33:55 UTC

It would be interesting indeed,

However, I am more fond of the idea of having 5 dishes, 1 arecibo, 1 antartica, 1 north pole, 1 austrailia, 1 dark side moon.

But now, I am neither scientifically adept nor a scientist, so what do I know?


I'd add 2 more, both in space and both 360 degrees rotatable (directionable?); one perhaps orbiting Earth, and the other in Earth's orbit but on the other side of the Sun (the opposite side of Earth's orbit).
Join TeamACC

Sometimes I think we are alone in the universe, and sometimes I think we are not. In either case the idea is quite staggering.
ID: 452293 · Report as offensive

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Amateur SETI


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.