Questions and Answers :
Preferences :
Project ratio
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
CElliott Send message Joined: 19 Jul 99 Posts: 178 Credit: 79,285,961 RAC: 0 |
How do you set Boinc to spend 90% of CPU time on S&H and 10% on Beta work? |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
Visit the "Your Account" area for each of the projects. Under the project preferences (not the general settings) edit the resource share to be 90 for S@H and 10 for Beta. Or 900 and 100 if you prefer. It is the relative values that are important, not the absoloute values. jm7 |
S@NL - BuddyWolly Send message Joined: 31 May 99 Posts: 19 Credit: 8,523,679 RAC: 1 |
How come then when I have seti@home on 99 and predictor at 1 that bionc asks the same amount of work from both s@h and predictor. It seems that it just calculates the amount of work needed based on maximum diskspace available and then request it from any project. The first one to respond with work available then gets to upload the lot. My settings allows for 250 Mb of BOINC related data on my disk. With predictor at 1% it should get 2.5 Mb at the most. Its maximum so far however was well over 50 Mb ??? |
Keck_Komputers Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 1575 Credit: 4,152,111 RAC: 1 |
> How come then when I have seti@home on 99 and predictor at 1 that bionc asks > the same amount of work from both s@h and predictor. It seems that it just > calculates the amount of work needed based on maximum diskspace available and > then request it from any project. The first one to respond with work available > then gets to upload the lot. > My settings allows for 250 Mb of BOINC related data on my disk. With predictor > at 1% it should get 2.5 Mb at the most. Its maximum so far however was well > over 50 Mb ??? > > BOINC only uses the CPU time to determine resource debt. It fills the queue from whichever project is farthest behind. So if set 99 to 1 then approximatly 1 queue fill out of 100 will be predictor. John Keck BOINCing since 2002/12/08 |
Skip Da Shu Send message Joined: 28 Jun 04 Posts: 233 Credit: 431,047 RAC: 0 |
I also have SETI Resource = 99, Predictor = 1 but am getting and doing only Predictor work. Does it first balance out the credits based on the balance? I had run SETI for a some weeks before adding Predictor so I have about 3,440 SETI credits. Is BOINC trying to get Predictor up to about 34.4 credits first? |
Skip Da Shu Send message Joined: 28 Jun 04 Posts: 233 Credit: 431,047 RAC: 0 |
> I also have SETI Resource = 99, Predictor = 1 but am getting and doing only > Predictor work. Does it first balance out the credits based on the balance? > I had run SETI for a some weeks before adding Predictor so I have about 3,440 > SETI credits. Is BOINC trying to get Predictor up to about 34.4 credits > first? Well so much for that theory...From the PROJECTS tab in BOINC: SETI@home Skip Da Shu 3436.08 218.26 99.00% Predictor@home Skip Da Shu 46.92 250.83 1.00% I have 11 Predictor WUs in que (counting the 1 running now) I have 2 SETI WUs in que Based on the Report Deadline 10 of the Predictor WUs will process before getting to a SETI WU again. Has it now leveled the "resource debt" and will stop getting Predictor WUs once these are finished up? Thanx, Skip |
Heffed Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0 |
> Well so much for that theory...From the PROJECTS tab in BOINC: > > SETI@home Skip Da Shu 3436.08 218.26 99.00% > Predictor@home Skip Da Shu 46.92 250.83 1.00% > > I have 11 Predictor WUs in que (counting the 1 running now) > I have 2 SETI WUs in que > > Based on the Report Deadline 10 of the Predictor WUs will process before > getting to a SETI WU again. > > Has it now leveled the "resource debt" and will stop getting Predictor WUs > once these are finished up? Resource debt isn't based on credits, but actual CPU time. If you have 3436 credtis with S@H, you've been running the project a while. You can expect P@H to dominate your system for a week or two. As I understand it, the resource debt calculation has a half life decay factoring in, so it doesn't need to run P@H for the same amount of total time you've previously run S@H, but it will need to "catch up" for a couple weeks. <a> [/url] |
Skip Da Shu Send message Joined: 28 Jun 04 Posts: 233 Credit: 431,047 RAC: 0 |
> > Well so much for that theory...From the PROJECTS tab in BOINC: > > > > SETI@home Skip Da Shu 3436.08 218.26 99.00% > > Predictor@home Skip Da Shu 46.92 250.83 1.00% > > > > I have 11 Predictor WUs in que (counting the 1 running now) > > I have 2 SETI WUs in que > > > > Based on the Report Deadline 10 of the Predictor WUs will process before > > getting to a SETI WU again. > > > > Has it now leveled the "resource debt" and will stop getting Predictor > WUs > > once these are finished up? > > Resource debt isn't based on credits, but actual CPU time. If you have 3436 > credtis with S@H, you've been running the project a while. You can expect P@H > to dominate your system for a week or two. > > As I understand it, the resource debt calculation has a half life decay > factoring in, so it doesn't need to run P@H for the same amount of total time > you've previously run S@H, but it will need to "catch up" for a couple weeks. Will the 99:1 ratio be observed when leveling the CPU time? |
Heffed Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0 |
> Will the 99:1 ratio be observed when leveling the CPU time? I would assume so. I run balanced settings, and the projects switch almost every time work is requested. I haven't tried 99:1, so I can't comment. <a> [/url] |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
> > Will the 99:1 ratio be observed when leveling the CPU time? > > I would assume so. I run balanced settings, and the projects switch almost > every time work is requested. I haven't tried 99:1, so I can't comment. > > <a> [/url] |
Pascal, K G Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 |
Owner's manual Website Owner's Manual Bah!!! I am in it for the money. Message from the Head ;o) of the Horse Head Nebula Branch of Seti@Home, Check is in the mail |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.