Avation and Flight

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Avation and Flight
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Troy Stull
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 06
Posts: 264
Credit: 46,144
RAC: 0
United States
Message 390616 - Posted: 7 Aug 2006, 0:53:19 UTC

ID: 390616 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 390674 - Posted: 7 Aug 2006, 1:43:47 UTC


ID: 390674 · Report as offensive
Profile BillHyland
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 5,764,172
RAC: 0
United States
Message 390758 - Posted: 7 Aug 2006, 4:44:03 UTC - in response to Message 390674.  


Anyone who has been in a 777 and looking at the wing during a severe up/down draft event has a whole new outlook on this picture!
ID: 390758 · Report as offensive
cdr100560
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 May 06
Posts: 681
Credit: 65,502
RAC: 0
United States
Message 392141 - Posted: 8 Aug 2006, 16:17:26 UTC - in response to Message 390674.  


ROTF!

Good one Cap'n!

I remember a flight back from Germany (K-town) on a MAC chartered 747 where the plane was loaded to the maximum weight. As the plane taxied down the runway, I looked out my window seat by the wing and saw the wing rise gradually for quite a long time before the plane actually left the ground. In a lesser sense, the wing did almost what your parody shows!

Quite an engineering marvel to see that much flex designed into the wing!
ID: 392141 · Report as offensive
Profile Scary Capitalist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 May 01
Posts: 7404
Credit: 97,085
RAC: 0
United States
Message 392143 - Posted: 8 Aug 2006, 16:21:59 UTC - in response to Message 392141.  


ROTF!

Good one Cap'n!

I remember a flight back from Germany (K-town) on a MAC chartered 747 where the plane was loaded to the maximum weight. As the plane taxied down the runway, I looked out my window seat by the wing and saw the wing rise gradually for quite a long time before the plane actually left the ground. In a lesser sense, the wing did almost what your parody shows!

Quite an engineering marvel to see that much flex designed into the wing!

And all this time I thought the wings acted like that because the planes are powered by giant rubber bands.....
Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data!
I did NOT authorize this belly writing!

ID: 392143 · Report as offensive
Profile Troy Stull
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 06
Posts: 264
Credit: 46,144
RAC: 0
United States
Message 394200 - Posted: 10 Aug 2006, 23:07:27 UTC

ID: 394200 · Report as offensive
cdr100560
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 May 06
Posts: 681
Credit: 65,502
RAC: 0
United States
Message 394294 - Posted: 11 Aug 2006, 4:00:32 UTC

It's amazing that an aircraft that entered service over 40 years ago is still as valued for its role in combat today as it was back then. And if memory serves correct, the planned lifespan and use of the aircraft will put its usefulness well into this century almost giving it some 60-70 years of service!

As a little retro, I always liked this bomber, the B-58. it was short lived (from 1960-1970) but it set many benchmarks and was radical in it's day.


ID: 394294 · Report as offensive
Profile BillHyland
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 5,764,172
RAC: 0
United States
Message 395352 - Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 4:23:43 UTC - in response to Message 394294.  

It's amazing that an aircraft that entered service over 40 years ago is still as valued for its role in combat today as it was back then. And if memory serves correct, the planned lifespan and use of the aircraft will put its usefulness well into this century almost giving it some 60-70 years of service!

As a little retro, I always liked this bomber, the B-58. it was short lived (from 1960-1970) but it set many benchmarks and was radical in it's day.



I don't have pics, but two of my personal favorites have always been the Navy EA-6B Prowler, because for some reason it reminds me of a dragon fly, and the Air Force SR-71 Blackbird, because my cousin used to fly them.
ID: 395352 · Report as offensive
cdr100560
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 May 06
Posts: 681
Credit: 65,502
RAC: 0
United States
Message 395367 - Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 4:29:10 UTC

I don't have pics, but two of my personal favorites have always been the Navy EA-6B Prowler, because for some reason it reminds me of a dragon fly, and the Air Force SR-71 Blackbird, because my cousin used to fly them.


Very cool. What a piece of engineering. And a handful to fly from what I understand. It took a special kind of pilot to fly one. My hats off to your cousin. He was one of a few truly special pilots to have flown missions in one.

And as a token of appreciation, a nice photo of the Blackbird in flight.

ID: 395367 · Report as offensive
cdr100560
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 May 06
Posts: 681
Credit: 65,502
RAC: 0
United States
Message 395382 - Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 4:34:49 UTC

And one of the Prowler. Not the fastest plane in town, but a real workhorse for the Navy!



ID: 395382 · Report as offensive
Profile Troy Stull
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 06
Posts: 264
Credit: 46,144
RAC: 0
United States
Message 395690 - Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 15:15:15 UTC

Among my favorites are of course the B-52, the A-10 (both of which I've already posted)but another great one is the F/EF/FB-111




/Central Florida Astronomical Society
ID: 395690 · Report as offensive
Profile m.mitch
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Jun 01
Posts: 338
Credit: 127,769
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 395710 - Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 16:01:44 UTC - in response to Message 395690.  

Among my favorites are of course the B-52, the A-10 (both of which I've already posted)but another great one is the F/EF/FB-111


I'm not going to disagree with that!



ID: 395710 · Report as offensive
Profile BillHyland
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 04
Posts: 907
Credit: 5,764,172
RAC: 0
United States
Message 396312 - Posted: 13 Aug 2006, 7:04:55 UTC - in response to Message 395367.  

I don't have pics, but two of my personal favorites have always been the Navy EA-6B Prowler, because for some reason it reminds me of a dragon fly, and the Air Force SR-71 Blackbird, because my cousin used to fly them.


Very cool. What a piece of engineering. And a handful to fly from what I understand. It took a special kind of pilot to fly one. My hats off to your cousin. He was one of a few truly special pilots to have flown missions in one.

And as a token of appreciation, a nice photo of the Blackbird in flight.


He had many stories about the plane. My favorite wasn't really a story. He just mentioned one day that the Blackbird leaked jet fuel "like a sieve" on the runway! When I asked him about that (I think my question went something like, "WHAT?"), he told me that it was designed to seal properly after the skin warmed up. Apparently, Blackbird pilots would always have a minimal fuel load to take off, then refuel in the air after flying around a bit. This is one of the reasons I was a submarine sailor!
ID: 396312 · Report as offensive
Profile Troy Stull
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 06
Posts: 264
Credit: 46,144
RAC: 0
United States
Message 396696 - Posted: 13 Aug 2006, 20:15:46 UTC
Last modified: 13 Aug 2006, 20:16:06 UTC



another one of my classic favorites... The F-104. The Hot Rod of the skies.


/Central Florida Astronomical Society
ID: 396696 · Report as offensive
Profile Fat B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 1688
Credit: 4,205,162
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 401334 - Posted: 19 Aug 2006, 12:14:18 UTC

Chaffe Test

A nice little vid, have you seen it Troy?



ID: 401334 · Report as offensive
Profile GalaxyIce
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 May 06
Posts: 8927
Credit: 1,361,057
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 401355 - Posted: 19 Aug 2006, 13:00:32 UTC


The Brits got a few;




flaming balloons
ID: 401355 · Report as offensive
Profile TimeLord04
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Mar 06
Posts: 21140
Credit: 33,933,039
RAC: 23
United States
Message 401376 - Posted: 19 Aug 2006, 13:49:04 UTC - in response to Message 385485.  

...This is scenario seems similar to the clashes between the Japanese Zero and the American P-48 that the AVGs (who became known as the Flying Tigers) flew. The Japanese plane could turn more quickly and go faster than the P-48, but was relatively lightly armoured. The P-48 could dive faster and take far more punishment. Chennault's tactics made the best of the P-48's few advantages.



I am NOOOOOO expert; however, just a mild enthusiast of WW-II, and with the facts above - isn't this exactly why the F4U Chance/Vought Corsair was created??? (Following the P-48, of course.) The F4U Corsairs, (I thought) were built to be "Zero Killers"... The "Gull Wing" made her more manueverable; however, it also made her one of the most, (if not the most), difficult planes to land - at the time... Still, I thought she was the best at "Zero Killing".

8-D
TimeLord04
Have TARDIS, will travel...
Come along K-9!
Join Calm Chaos
ID: 401376 · Report as offensive
Profile GalaxyIce
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 May 06
Posts: 8927
Credit: 1,361,057
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 401379 - Posted: 19 Aug 2006, 13:54:50 UTC
Last modified: 19 Aug 2006, 13:55:04 UTC


Saudi Arabia have just bought 72 of these




flaming balloons
ID: 401379 · Report as offensive
Profile Dominique
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Mar 05
Posts: 1628
Credit: 74,745
RAC: 0
United States
Message 401434 - Posted: 19 Aug 2006, 15:15:52 UTC - in response to Message 401376.  

...This is scenario seems similar to the clashes between the Japanese Zero and the American P-48 that the AVGs (who became known as the Flying Tigers) flew. The Japanese plane could turn more quickly and go faster than the P-48, but was relatively lightly armoured. The P-48 could dive faster and take far more punishment. Chennault's tactics made the best of the P-48's few advantages.



I am NOOOOOO expert; however, just a mild enthusiast of WW-II, and with the facts above - isn't this exactly why the F4U Chance/Vought Corsair was created??? (Following the P-48, of course.) The F4U Corsairs, (I thought) were built to be "Zero Killers"... The "Gull Wing" made her more manueverable; however, it also made her one of the most, (if not the most), difficult planes to land - at the time... Still, I thought she was the best at "Zero Killing".

8-D


The Grumman F6F Hellcat was the premier "Zero Killer". They were superior to the Zero on all counts. They were also known as "Ace Makers". They downed thousands. They ruled the skies over the Pacific from 1943 on.


ID: 401434 · Report as offensive
Profile Scary Capitalist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 May 01
Posts: 7404
Credit: 97,085
RAC: 0
United States
Message 401439 - Posted: 19 Aug 2006, 15:21:15 UTC

My paternal grandfather served as a mechanic on an aircraft carrier. I wonder if he worked on those....I should probably do more research on that.
Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data!
I did NOT authorize this belly writing!

ID: 401439 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Avation and Flight


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.