Why are people really leaving?

Message boards : Number crunching : Why are people really leaving?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Clyde C. Phillips, III

Send message
Joined: 2 Aug 00
Posts: 1851
Credit: 5,955,047
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325159 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 18:11:41 UTC

Per the graph of the preceding post I see that the number of active Seti users has dropped only about six percent (from the April 20 smoothed peak), so that is no disaster, yet. But, the trend in not over, yet. It is pretty disgusting to see all those erroneous units and the lack of fresh data. I thought that the seven-receiver contraption "Alfa" was going to give us new data.
ID: 325159 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 325161 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 18:20:41 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jun 2006, 18:21:09 UTC

WRT number of active users:
Users are considered active when they return new work within a certain amount of time. (14 days for example).

With the longer running enhanced WUs it's more likely for users with slow computers or low resource share to fall off this list.

Regards Hans

P.S: The number of credits given out by seti seems to have stabilized at around 17.500K, coming from about 24.500K


ID: 325161 · Report as offensive
Profile RandyC
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Oct 99
Posts: 714
Credit: 1,704,345
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325163 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 18:21:12 UTC - in response to Message 325159.  

Per the graph of the preceding post I see that the number of active Seti users has dropped only about six percent (from the April 20 smoothed peak), so that is no disaster, yet. But, the trend in not over, yet. It is pretty disgusting to see all those erroneous units and the lack of fresh data. I thought that the seven-receiver contraption "Alfa" was going to give us new data.


Patience...new data will arrive (someday).

As for erroneous units, etc., that's what this thread is for...they ARE trying to do something about it.

Adding my sig, so as not to be accused of being a non-contributor...




Final Classic total: 11446 WU
Classic CPU hours: 72,366
ID: 325163 · Report as offensive
Profile MRAO
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 Apr 05
Posts: 24
Credit: 2,332,981
RAC: 1
United Kingdom
Message 325170 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 18:30:46 UTC - in response to Message 325156.  



This works out to: (188200 - 178000) / 188200 = 0.054198 (5.4198%) loss in active users. That's 10200 active users--A lot (especially if the trend continues), but not the end of the world.

Just trying to keep things in perspective.

Isn't the picture actually rather worse than that? Up to April 18th or so the number of users seems to be going up at a fairly steady rate, faster than it is now going down. There doesn't seem any particular reason why the number of new users a day would have slowed down much since then (or at least, I can't think of one). So the downward turn is probably more like double your figure or worse if that is taken into account.
Are there any similar charts for computers - it would be more worrying still if the users leaving are the multi-computer ones. Mike

ID: 325170 · Report as offensive
Profile David@home
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 03
Posts: 755
Credit: 5,040,916
RAC: 28
United Kingdom
Message 325177 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 18:49:03 UTC - in response to Message 325170.  
Last modified: 3 Jun 2006, 19:18:35 UTC



This works out to: (188200 - 178000) / 188200 = 0.054198 (5.4198%) loss in active users. That's 10200 active users--A lot (especially if the trend continues), but not the end of the world.

Just trying to keep things in perspective.

Isn't the picture actually rather worse than that? Up to April 18th or so the number of users seems to be going up at a fairly steady rate, faster than it is now going down. There doesn't seem any particular reason why the number of new users a day would have slowed down much since then (or at least, I can't think of one). So the downward turn is probably more like double your figure or worse if that is taken into account.
Are there any similar charts for computers - it would be more worrying still if the users leaving are the multi-computer ones. Mike


A graph of the number of active hosts is available at

http://www.teamocuk.com/cprojecthost.php?s=b86a4170fd1db18b3091c20bf84ec360&p=SAH

The chart for active users and hosts was increasing then it tipped the other way. Now the rate of decline is faster than that predicted so this suggests the rate of decline is increasing. There will be a lag in these graphs due the time period required to be flagged as inactive.
ID: 325177 · Report as offensive
Daniel Schaalma
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 May 99
Posts: 297
Credit: 16,953,703
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325186 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 19:15:11 UTC

Well, I set "no new work", and when my cache is drained up in about 5 or 6 days, I will be leaving as well. And taking TWENTY THREE fast computers off the project with me.

Regards, Daniel.
ID: 325186 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325192 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 19:27:57 UTC - in response to Message 324982.  
Last modified: 3 Jun 2006, 19:34:18 UTC

edited
ID: 325192 · Report as offensive
Profile Steve @ SETI.USA
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 04
Posts: 189
Credit: 1,016,797
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325197 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 19:36:58 UTC

Remember that old golden rule - treat others as you would have them treat you?

Until those running the show here (and their cheerleaders) remember that lesson, things will get worse before they get better.

http://www.setiusa.net
ID: 325197 · Report as offensive
Profile mikey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Dec 99
Posts: 4215
Credit: 3,474,603
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325200 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 19:37:53 UTC - in response to Message 325186.  

Well, I set "no new work", and when my cache is drained up in about 5 or 6 days, I will be leaving as well. And taking TWENTY THREE fast computers off the project with me. Regards, Daniel.

Maybe some of the rest of us will move up in the stats finally! Have fun with your Corvette. Oh, what program will you use to test those pc's with now that you are no longer crunching for Seti?

ID: 325200 · Report as offensive
Profile Bymark
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 04
Posts: 29
Credit: 700,896
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 325207 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 19:47:12 UTC - in response to Message 325200.  

Well, I set "no new work", and when my cache is drained up in about 5 or 6 days, I will be leaving as well. And taking TWENTY THREE fast computers off the project with me. Regards, Daniel.

Maybe some of the rest of us will move up in the stats finally! Have fun with your Corvette. Oh, what program will you use to test those pc's with now that you are no longer crunching for Seti?



Same here, 17 computers on "no new work", last ones is uploading on Monday.
Sorry, but true. Regards Thomas.

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/boinc_user_graph.php?pr=bo&id=263552
;)

ID: 325207 · Report as offensive
Profile perryjay
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 02
Posts: 3377
Credit: 20,676,751
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325215 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 19:56:23 UTC

Would anyone really miss me and my two little old EMachines? I'm really sorry Crunch3r has felt the need to leave us. His App gave me the ability to do more work and that is what I feel this is all about. Now with the enhanced apps out we need all the help we can get. If Crunch3r or any of the others working on optimized apps come up with something to allow more work to be done then that is great with me. My poor little machines need all the help they can get.

I care very little about the RAC but I get a kick out of watching every new WU heading in to be checked. The RAC and even the total credit are just fun things to watch, in the end the only credit that matters is who finds ET first. Me and my two little old EMachines won't be leaving SETI but I for one will truely miss Crunch3r and all his fine work. I hope he has a change of heart and comes back to the project.


PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC
ID: 325215 · Report as offensive
Scarecrow

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 00
Posts: 4520
Credit: 486,601
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325277 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 20:41:51 UTC

My decision to suspend Seti had nothing to do with getting even or trying to prove a point, strictly a matter of it wasting more resources than accomplishing anything.
I personally pulled the plug on Seti about 3 week ago. After running enhanced in earnest for just short of a week it was very obvious that there were major problems. WU's that would run for 4 to 7 hours only to error out with a -9 or other errors. Not just on my lowly single host but many, many others. Far more failures than successes. It doesn't matter to me if I got 1000 credits or 0.1 credits for it, it was still many hours of crunching for nothing at all, the 'science' included.

Then on May 8th, when someone questioned why the 'not ready for prime time' software was released, the response from the developer was "Ever wonder why the word "dead" is in the word deadline. :(". That was sort of the 'smell the coffee' point for me. All things considered, it made me wonder how well, or if, the science app really works at the level of actually finding that elusive signal Or is it all just another a layer of lipstick on the pig?

So now here we are, nearly a month later and the original problems I had, and other problems I avoided but were affecting others, are still plaguing those still crunching.
It may well all get fixed eventually and all the kinks ironed out, my present view of capabilities and credibility of the project may improve and I'll be there crunching again.
But until that time, for me at least, Seti@Home as it stands at this point, is just a hole to throw time and money down.

ID: 325277 · Report as offensive
Profile Martin P.

Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 294
Credit: 27,230,961
RAC: 2
Austria
Message 325278 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 20:42:34 UTC - in response to Message 325170.  


Are there any similar charts for computers - it would be more worrying still if the users leaving are the multi-computer ones. Mike


Here are the hosts-stats:

<img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/project_graph4.php?pr=sah&table=hosts">

ID: 325278 · Report as offensive
Profile MRAO
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 Apr 05
Posts: 24
Credit: 2,332,981
RAC: 1
United Kingdom
Message 325290 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 20:54:52 UTC - in response to Message 325278.  


Are there any similar charts for computers - it would be more worrying still if the users leaving are the multi-computer ones. Mike


Here are the hosts-stats:

<img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/project_graph4.php?pr=sah&table=hosts">

Martin, thanks for that. The current number if I calculate it correctly is indeed dropping even faster than the number of users in RandyC's users chart (about 20500 hosts from the peak to the present). And if the growth in host numbers prior to April 18th is extrapolated upwards the drop since then is something that would very greatly worry me if I were a project Admin. Thanks again, Mike
ID: 325290 · Report as offensive
Profile Darth Dogbytes™
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 03
Posts: 7512
Credit: 2,021,148
RAC: 0
United States
Message 325310 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 21:45:34 UTC - in response to Message 325156.  
Last modified: 3 Jun 2006, 21:47:27 UTC




Dogbytes, the graph you posted is rather misleading.

On the surface, it seems to show a DRAMATIC dropoff in active users, with the implication that large numbers have packed-up and left because they're disgusted with how Seti is treating them or others (and that could be right for all I know/can prove).

In actuality, the graph merely shows the tip of the real data. The visible data ranges from 177000 to 191000. The highest values occur from about 14 April thru about 25 April (approximately 188200 users), while the lowest (so far...they may get lower as time passes) are June 1 & 2 at slightly under 178400 (call it 178000 to round it off).

This works out to: (188200 - 178000) / 188200 = 0.054198 (5.4198%) loss in active users. That's 10200 active users--A lot (especially if the trend continues), but not the end of the world.

Just trying to keep things in perspective.

The graph line is pointing in only one direction - SOUTH.
Account frozen...
ID: 325310 · Report as offensive
Profile Nightbird
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 03
Posts: 73
Credit: 53,523
RAC: 0
France
Message 325317 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 21:52:27 UTC

@ Halifax-Lad
I'm with you.






Do you want to get banned for 31 years and your account & credits deleted at a Boinc project ? Predictor@home is your best choice.
ID: 325317 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord_Vader
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 May 05
Posts: 217
Credit: 10,386,105
RAC: 12
United States
Message 325335 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 22:14:04 UTC - in response to Message 324667.  
Last modified: 3 Jun 2006, 22:14:55 UTC

I'm going to raise a touchy subject, but it's very relevant.

Are people mad and leaving the project because a valued user has been slighted?

Or are people mad and leaving the project because they no longer can get faster-than-normal credits?



I'm leaving because I am tired of the fighting. SETI is only one of the ten projects I am running. Since enhanced came out, its been like a bunch of three year olds fighting over a new toy. I actually used to enjoy the crunching thread here, but there are other places to hang out (so to speak). I think the witch hunt over the few extra credits Crunch claimed (but didn't get) really just pushed me over the edge. I'm not angry at anyone, but I am just looking for a less hostile place to be.

I've got about a day to finish my last WUs and I'll be gone.

Later


Fear will keep the local systems in line. Fear of this battle station. - Grand Moff Tarkin
ID: 325335 · Report as offensive
Profile Martin P.

Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 294
Credit: 27,230,961
RAC: 2
Austria
Message 325374 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 23:01:58 UTC - in response to Message 325278.  


Are there any similar charts for computers - it would be more worrying still if the users leaving are the multi-computer ones. Mike


Here are the hosts-stats:

<img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/project_graph4.php?pr=sah&table=hosts">


No idea why the link does not work. Here is the image itself:

<img src="http://gulliver.macbay.de/project_graph4.jpg">

ID: 325374 · Report as offensive
Hans Dorn
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2262
Credit: 26,448,570
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 325378 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 23:05:45 UTC - in response to Message 325374.  
Last modified: 3 Jun 2006, 23:06:15 UTC


Are there any similar charts for computers - it would be more worrying still if the users leaving are the multi-computer ones. Mike


Here are the hosts-stats:



No idea why the link does not work. Here is the image itself:




You'll have to use BBCode for links on this board. (There's a link with instructions in the posting window)

Regards Hans
ID: 325378 · Report as offensive
Profile Sir Ulli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 99
Posts: 2246
Credit: 6,136,250
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 325388 - Posted: 3 Jun 2006, 23:20:09 UTC - in response to Message 325374.  
Last modified: 3 Jun 2006, 23:23:12 UTC


Are there any similar charts for computers - it would be more worrying still if the users leaving are the multi-computer ones. Mike


Here are the hosts-stats:

<img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/project_graph4.php?pr=sah&table=hosts">


No idea why the link does not work. Here is the image itself:

<img src="http://gulliver.macbay.de/project_graph4.jpg">


here is your link

Hit Me

btw Hans was faster...

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli

ID: 325388 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Why are people really leaving?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.