Hi there

I saw that someone out there has compiled a special seticruncher for windows based on Naparst, Crunch3r s libraries with caching..

That person has a P4 3.2 Ghz with amazing crunch times and i do believe it's this special optimized versions to thank , that computers RAC is around 1050 credits for what it seem a regular HT based system .. Spec below..

"<core_client_version>5.3.1</core_client_version>
<stderr_txt>
Windows optimized S@H application by truXoft
Improvements by Tetsuji Maverick Rai, Hans Dorn, Harold Naparst, Ned Slider, Crunch3r, trux,...
$URL: http://boinc.truxoft.com $
$Rev: hn-126/tx-004 $
$Date: 2005-11-01 00:47 +0100 $
cache calculated 40 times

</stderr_txt>"

If someone knows where to download this version i would be happy to try it out or even if there are AMD specific compilations for windows too that i don't know about...

Kind Regards.

Vyper

---

_________________________________________________________________________
Addicted to SETI crunching!
Founder of GPU Users Group

Sorry to disappoint you, but I guess you're looking at the output of the linux client.
Harold's binary seems to print out a comment line that came in with some changes made by truXoft.

Did you check the host's OS? You might post the host ID if you like.



Regards Hans

---

Sorry to disappoint you, but I guess you're looking at the output of the linux client.
Harold's binary seems to print out a comment line that came in with some changes made by truXoft.

Did you check the host's OS? You might post the host ID if you like.



Regards Hans

I don't know which machine Vyper is looking at but Crunch3r is running the trux Windows port of the linux client.

2800 seconds for a recently completed WU

Not bad at all :)

I understand that the trux version has not been released because it has a few problems yet.

This was previously discussed in this thread

---

kev

X2 4400+,4200+ @2.75GHz, XP1800+ @1.65GHz, P4 @1.6GHz

Sorry to disappoint you, but I guess you're looking at the output of the linux client.
Harold's binary seems to print out a comment line that came in with some changes made by truXoft.

Did you check the host's OS? You might post the host ID if you like.



Regards Hans

I don't know which machine Vyper is looking at but Crunch3r is running the trux Windows port of the linux client.

2800 seconds for a recently completed WU

Not bad at all :)

I understand that the trux version has not been released because it has a few problems yet.

This was previously discussed in this thread

I'm testing my own build Windows version of a caching client right now.
Hopefully it works. It's running against the reference wu right now while i'm typing this.

---

Join BOINC United now!

I'm testing my own build Windows version of a caching client right now.
Hopefully it works. It's running against the reference wu right now while i'm typing this.

Woohoo! I hope it works. Let me know if you need a tester. :)

BTW - is your A64 3200+ stock or overclocked?


kev

---

kev

X2 4400+,4200+ @2.75GHz, XP1800+ @1.65GHz, P4 @1.6GHz

I'm testing my own build Windows version of a caching client right now.
Hopefully it works. It's running against the reference wu right now while i'm typing this.

Woohoo! I hope it works. Let me know if you need a tester. :)

BTW - is your A64 3200+ stock or overclocked?


kev

The A64 mentioned in this post is stock. It runs @ 2GHz (my notebook)

---

Join BOINC United now!

I'm testing my own build Windows version of a caching client right now.
Hopefully it works. It's running against the reference wu right now while i'm typing this.

Woohoo! I hope it works. Let me know if you need a tester. :)

BTW - is your A64 3200+ stock or overclocked?


kev

The A64 mentioned in this post is stock. It runs @ 2GHz (my notebook)

hope all goes the right way.........

i think it is good to have a Client which does a WU in 45 Minutes on an Athlon64 3.200+, like the old peace of software..

Fingers crossed

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli

Sir Ulli

I was eyeballing your completion times the other day. I was wondering where you got this client.

<core_client_version>5.2.7</core_client_version>
<stderr_txt>
Windows optimized S@H application by truXoft
Improvements by Tetsuji Maverick Rai, Hans Dorn, Harold Naparst, Ned Slider, Crunch3r, trux,...
Rev: 4.13.hn000.tx000 (p4_sse2) Fri Nov 04 22:41:21 2005
cache calculated 53 times

</stderr_txt>

It looks fast.


P.S. It's on your 3.2GHz machine.

---

Sir Ulli

I was eyeballing your completion times the other day. I was wondering where you got this client.

<core_client_version>5.2.7</core_client_version>
<stderr_txt>
Windows optimized S@H application by truXoft
Improvements by Tetsuji Maverick Rai, Hans Dorn, Harold Naparst, Ned Slider, Crunch3r, trux,...
Rev: 4.13.hn000.tx000 (p4_sse2) Fri Nov 04 22:41:21 2005
cache calculated 53 times

</stderr_txt>

It looks fast.

so look here

http://www.guntec.de/Crunch3r/boincx86.html

for Info

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli

so look here

http://www.guntec.de/Crunch3r/boincx86.html

I see a boinc client there but where is the seti client that is getting you those times down around 3000?

P.S. Thanks

---

Hello,

If someone is interested in processing times of my client look here.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=156254730

This is only the SSE version running on a A64 3200+(@2.2GHz).

---

Join BOINC United now!

Hi,

We all like fast crunch times I guess.
However as I look at the results list of this computer I also see a lot of work units with the following "Client error Computing".
I thought the object was to return as much valid results as possible ?
Maybe the optimized client needs some more optimizing ?

Regards,

Rob.

---

[...] I also see a lot of work units with the following "Client error Computing".

I guess that's why Cruncher didn't release this client yet ;)

---

I stand corrected.

Rob.

---

[...] I also see a lot of work units with the following "Client error Computing".

I guess that's why Cruncher didn't release this client yet ;)

No. The errors you see there came from trux client.

Mine gave no errors.

You can see that in the logs.

This one belongs to the trux version
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=156254722

And this one to my client.
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=156349293

---

Join BOINC United now!

Mine gave no errors.

Are you going to release this client to the public then?
Just curious.

Mine gave no errors.

Are you going to release this client to the public then?
Just curious.

I would if i could :-(

I've only got the 30-day trial version of ICC/IPP that's to bad.

---

Join BOINC United now!

Mine gave no errors.

Are you going to release this client to the public then?
Just curious.

I would if i could :-(

I've only got the 30-day trial version of ICC/IPP that's to bad.

Windows users are suffering a lot these days...
But heck, they could always run a linux guest along with an optimized client inside a VMWare-Player session. I bet this would be faster than running a windows client.

Mine gave no errors.

Are you going to release this client to the public then?
Just curious.

I would if i could :-(

I've only got the 30-day trial version of ICC/IPP that's to bad.

Windows users are suffering a lot these days...
But heck, they could always run a linux guest along with an optimized client inside a VMWare-Player session. I bet this would be faster than running a windows client.

To be honest i think the windows version will be faster.

---

Join BOINC United now!

To be honest i think the windows version will be faster.

But you're talking about your new client, which you won't release,right?