BOINC Popularity vs Classic SETI@Home

Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC Popularity vs Classic SETI@Home
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

AuthorMessage
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 176573 - Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 4:21:57 UTC - in response to Message 176569.  

Please make sure she gets the slow, easily interrupted modem line then. ;)
ID: 176573 · Report as offensive
Scott Brown

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 00
Posts: 110
Credit: 59,739
RAC: 0
United States
Message 176627 - Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 12:24:31 UTC - in response to Message 176403.  

How many of the PC's crunching BOINC projects would have to be left "on" 24/7 if they were not being used for distributed computing projects? Virtually none. That is why its appropriate to question the amount of resources expended on these projects. I would guess that the majority of computers being used for BOINC projects average only a couple hours a day of "regular" computer use - some more than others, but there are many machines out there that do nothing but DC. The only PC's that really have to be on 24/7 are servers and gateways...how many of you can say your computers would have to be "on" all the time if not for DC?


I have one 24/7 machine that would be 24/7 regardless of DC projects (a university office machine that frequently does analyses for me overnight). Two others are on dial-up and are never on 24/7, though overnight runs for the slow process of updates are not unusual.

Thank you though for your guess that the majority of machines are only on a couple of hours per day in regular use. I suppose we should write the the thousands of businesses, universities, etc. that have people employed 8 hours per day that they really only need to provide their workers with computers 1/4th of the time...think of the overhead they would save!

I would guess that there are many more servers and gateways running BOINC than you suggest. Also, there are many other instances of 'have to be on 24/7' machines (e.g., university computer labs, etc.).
ID: 176627 · Report as offensive
Profile Karl Roos
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 01
Posts: 36
Credit: 206,258,788
RAC: 0
United States
Message 176634 - Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 12:52:07 UTC

Sure is easy to stir up this hive!
ID: 176634 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 176635 - Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 12:56:32 UTC - in response to Message 176634.  

Sure is easy to stir up this hive!

bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
ID: 176635 · Report as offensive
Profile barbarossa
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 99
Posts: 1294
Credit: 6,629,998
RAC: 3
Switzerland
Message 176651 - Posted: 11 Oct 2005, 13:43:19 UTC - in response to Message 176634.  

Sure is easy to stir up this hive!

Of course it is! That needed no prove...

:-/ Greybeard
All about BOINC: BOINC-Wiki (by Paul D. Buck)

ID: 176651 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC Popularity vs Classic SETI@Home


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.