Donald Trump's India, what FOX doesn't want you to see.
https://www.reuters.com/news/picture/deadly-riots-over-indias-citizenship-law-idUSRTS33PBQ

Donald Trump's India, what FOX doesn't want you to see.

I watch FOX; OANN; and NEWsMax and they showed da Riots 'bout CitizenShip Law, many many many times.

Fair? Yep Balanced? Yep. They Show dA News. Hiding Nothing.

RUBEWorld Sees ALL. ALL da Time.

Orange yape

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Like a Virtuoso wif a Strad - a MasterWork of Presidentiality. SUPERPrez handled Presser and dA Lovin' and Hatin' press wif Cool; Calmness; Strength - Greatness as Leader. Wat a Friggin' PREZ!!!!!

Winning for Weeeee da Weeeee Peoples of U S of A

BIGLY

RUBEWorld Proud of Our Greatest Prez of All Time

Orange Yape

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

Like a Virtuoso wif a Strad - a MasterWork of Presidentiality. SUPERPrez handled Presser and dA Lovin' and Hatin' press wif Cool; Calmness; Strength - Greatness as Leader. Wat a Friggin' PREZ!!!!!

Winning for Weeeee da Weeeee Peoples of U S of A

BIGLY

RUBEWorld Proud of Our Greatest Prez of All Time

Orange Yape

That's not what I heard. He said nothing of substance, just hot air.

---

Just think, Rump says Covid 19 not to worry. Is that as accurate as his other science based statements?!

Just think, Rump says Covid 19 not to worry. Is that as accurate as his other science based statements?!

Of course it is.

---

You have told us why Sanders is ahead of Biden and Bloomberg.

<ed>https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=84230&postid=2034281

Instead, the president’s budget request this month for the fiscal year that begins in October would cut the C.D.C.’s budget by almost 16 percent, and the Department of Health and Human Services’s by almost 10 percent. The proposal’s $3 billion in cuts to global health programs included a 53 percent cut to the World Health Organization and a 75 percent cut to the Pan American Health Organization.

Is Trump running out of friends willing to be nominated for appointments. He has nominated Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.) to be next director of national intelligence, a position he withdrew from last year, because in Congress lawmakers raised questions about his credentials and whether he padded his resume.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-again-plans-to-nominate-john-ratcliffe-as-intelligence-director/2020/02/28/163661fe-5a7b-11ea-8753-73d96000faae_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ratcliffe-withdraws-from-consideration-for-intelligence-chief-trump-says/2019/08/02/9f3c42cc-b551-11e9-951e-de024209545d_story.html

And if so, why?

They acquitted the guilty, so now he has ascended.

Yet another some Trump the Genius statements in his presidential campaign...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/29/joe-biden-trump-coronavirus-hoax-claim
Donald Trump called the corona virus the Democrats' new "hoax."
On Friday, Donald Trump defended the administration's way of dealing with the outbreak of the virus, and also accused Democrats of using the situation to hurt him politically.
At the press conference, the president was asked questions about the statement and was then forced to clarify his choice of words:
- "hoax" was used when it comes to the Democrats and what they say. It was a "hoax," they said, Trump explained.
At a press conference in the White House on Saturday, he defended the statement.
On Saturday, the first death in the US was confirmed as a result of the coronavirus outbreak. President Trump first stated that a woman in her 50s had died in the state of Washington, but local authorities later clarified that it was a man.

Trump described the victim as a wonderful woman. I can see how one could get the gender wrong but then needlessly and falsely embellishing it. What reason would anyone have for that?

---

Trump described the victim as a wonderful woman. I can see how one could get the gender wrong but then needlessly and falsely embellishing it. What reason would anyone have for that?

Who, besides a very sick and evil person, would disparage a victim of this disease.

I find Trump never miss an opportunity to disparage his competitors and using victims of all kind to meet his goals.

Who, besides a very sick and evil person, would disparage a victim of this disease.

Are you trying to say that if Trump said nothing false that would be disparaging the victim?

---

Repeating: Who, besides a very sick and evil person, would disparage a victim of this disease.

Well, besides a very sick and evil person, who would call a the victim of this disease both "wonderful" and a "woman" when it was an old man.

Repeating: Who, besides a very sick and evil person, would disparage a victim of this disease.

Well, besides a very sick and evil person, who would call a the victim of this disease both "wonderful" and a "woman" when it was an old man.

Because the victim's Democrat Governor, the Head of the CDC, as the Media reported, said it was a man. This was LATER corrected.

And the Genius Trump, the President of the US, didn't know that before he opened his mouth?

Repeating: Who, besides a very sick and evil person, would disparage a victim of this disease.

How do you think think the family of the man who passed feels about him being called a "wonderful woman"?

---

Repeating: Who, besides a very sick and evil person, would disparage a victim of this disease.

Well, besides a very sick and evil person, who would call a the victim of this disease both "wonderful" and a "woman" when it was an old man.

Because the victim's Democrat Governor, the Head of the CDC, as the Media reported, said it was a man. This was LATER corrected.

And the Genius Trump, the President of the US, didn't know that before he opened his mouth?

Who, execpting those in contact with the victim. Would know that the information transmitted by the CDC was incorrect?
The Democrat Governor did not. The Media did not. Nor did any other person know that.

Well I guess most of us expect that a President doesn't say things to the public without checking facts. Normally officials in those cases say that they cannot talk about specific cases. But apparently Trump has set that aside. Isn't that "wonderful"?

That he made nice statements about the innocent victim is wonderful.
What moral and ethical person would disagree?

I do because he called the victim "wonderful". He didn't know the victim so how can he say that. It could be anyone even a criminal. Who knows. But Trump is rambling as always... He does anything to get some bucks or to get some more voters.
The words moral and ethic is to him just semantics and he doesn't care about what it means.

+1

---