And yes, I don't doubt spin from all sides... "fake news" is not required as one can effect the same bias by choosing which stories to run/bury and how to describe them to achieve the same effect as making stuff up.

And here is a perfect example. View the clip as edited, and then click on the link in the story to see what happened seconds after the edit cut the clip off to support the liberal left story of Trump being snubbed.
Trump arrives in Poland.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

Here's a novel idea. How about a News Program that just runs video and sound of events without editing or commentary...................let the viewers decide what to take from each clip or not.

Just pure actual experience no slant................

News now is entertainment and competition for prurient excitement.

Ignore it.

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

And that also includes the snowflakes in this forum who choose to make up their cutesy little insulting names for him.

Mark google "Trump BMI", he is obese, look at him he is orange.

---

Mark google "Trump BMI", he is obese, look at him he is orange.

BMI is useless.
BMI is bogus.
At least a quarter of the people BMI declares as obese are healthy.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

Why hasn't anyone mentioned the MILLIONS OF DOLLARS of emoluments her majesty the queen hillary laundered through the "clinton foundation?"

Because, Guy, the liberal left and it's indentured servants (the liberal left media) only mention what they can twist and turn to reflect well on their chosen agenda and poorly on their chosen pariah.

And when did William run this money through his foundation, after he was out of office?

---

Guy in your mind that is true or so you say, regardless that is the past. Now we have the present to deal with such as Trump and constitutionally prohibited emoluments. Get over the past and deal with the very present corruption.

---

What you very obviously failed to mention is that the Clinton's actually paid taxes, at a rate of 31%, that's a lot of taxes.

Whereas the fakepresident boasts about how little taxes he pays.

And those expenses, well if you had taken a little time to look further you will find they are payments to other Clinton charities, like the Clinton Health Access Initiative, which received 57% of the expenses.

I suggest doing your homework properly next time. At the moment you are on a failing grade.

---

betreger, if it didn't matter in the past, why should it matter in the present? (oh... that's right... hypocrisy...)

Guy a couple of points.
One, Don't put words into my mouth. I did not make any statement on whether it mattered or not.
Two, neither Clinton was president at the time. You allegation of corruption is not a constitutional question but a civil or criminal one. There is a difference.
Three, Trump is president now and it does matter whether he follows the constitution. His ethics advisor thought so and reacted accordingly.

---

Anybody 'Hearing' dAt 'HUGE' 'Sums' went to 'Certain' 'Bad' 'Actors'-Not Rushin' or 'Rushin' 'Ordered' or 'Influenced'-and these 'HUGE' 'Sums' came from a 'Foundation' with 'Ties' to 'Madame' 'Screech' and 'Slick' 'Willie', and these 'HUGE' 'Sums' were to 'Make' 'Sure' A 'Certain' 'Female' 'Candidate' Became 'Prez'?

Well 'Maybe' 'You' 'Will' be 'Hearing' such.

BEST PREZ EVER having Another BEST EVER OverSeas Trip

45ers say 'WINNING is GOoD, REAL GOoD'.

Influential Yap

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

If you were men enough to vote a fool in as your president then you should be men enough to put up with the ridicule over your decisions and the fool's actions. ;-)

Cheers.

When she was secretary of state, she was taking millions of dollars from foreign donors on the promise their payback would be when she seized control of the white house.

That's actionable libel. Just too damn bad you put Seti in the middle.

If any payments the Clinton foundation made were improper I'm sure the Rump IRS would have raised a ruckus by now.

The other thing that escapes me is how giving money to a charity which they pay back to you lowers your tax. Sure you get to deduct the income tax but when they pay it back to you you pay that same income tax plus social security tax. Seems to be to be a lose lose route. (But I get a lot of right wingers have no clue about the tax code)

---

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=80890&postid=1876346

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

CheersMeister said:

...then you should be men enough to put up with the ridicule,,,

ROTFLMAO

45ers ROTFLOAO at 'Concerned' 'Citizens' of dA Vrold

'MANNING' 'Up' Yap

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

betreger, if it didn't matter in the past, why should it matter in the present? (oh... that's right... hypocrisy...)

Guy a couple of points.
One, Don't put words into my mouth. I did not make any statement on whether it mattered or not.
Two, neither Clinton was president at the time. You allegation of corruption is not a constitutional question but a civil or criminal one. There is a difference.
Three, Trump is president now and it does matter whether he follows the constitution. His ethics advisor thought so and reacted accordingly.

4: One reason HRC lost was a large number of people believing she was corrupt, something donald JOHN! trump may have been correct in calling her out for, but the hypocrisy is on the side of the "winner(s)".

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

Trump looking for someone to be a friend at the G20 photo shoot.



Cheers.

He's so popular everyone wants to talk to him, NOT.

---

It must be great to be so unpopular. LOL

Cheers.