Panic Mode On (80) Server Problems?
Panic Mode On (80) Server Problems? |
|
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (80) Server Problems?
Previous · 1 . . . 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 . . . 25 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Cricket still showing that "average bits out" is still declining slowly but steadily, so there must be a blockage in the pipe somewhere. | |
ID: 1326877 ·  | |
|
Problems connecting to scheduler: | |
| ID: 1326962 · | |
Still the cricket graph shows green..... The green is not the problem. Us crunchers reporting work are represented by the blue line. "Bits out" means out to Eric and pals. The green is "bits in" from Berkeley on their way to the world. I know this is counter-intuitive but that's the way it works! ____________   | |
| ID: 1326975 · | |
|
My scheduler contacts are slow, but they go through about 90% of the time. The most recent one was over 60 seconds to acknowledge 3 completed tasks. | |
| ID: 1327024 · | |
|
Update on No New Tasks increases the retry timer....:(.. I have not been able to report WU for last 12 hours. Not getting any new WU either... | |
| ID: 1327048 · | |
Bernie, I don't know what to suggest except that you either read what I wrote and accept that I used my words correctly, or that you just be insulted or offended all over the place. I said that "I fear," meaning that I am afraid of that, not that I have evidence of that. I fear one of my children may die before me, because I would find that a traumatic event. In a similar, but far, far less important way, I would hate to learn that the guys in the lab don't care. I'm hardly a coward. My word choice was not a clever way of saying something without saying it. If I meant, "The guys in the lab at SETI don't care about this project anymore since they are busy with their high-speed spectrometer and other data they've recently acquired from Green Bank," I would have no problem, at all, saying that, on the record, right here. If I held that opinion, it certainly wouldn't be pointed at, or meant to offend, or insult, you. That isn't even what I said. Read it again with a different inflection. Perhaps we are having a U.S. vs. U.K. usage of words problem? "and insult" to whom, Bernie? ____________  | |
| ID: 1327054 · | |
That they've gone to the effort to inform the fund raisers of their requirements would indicate to most people that they do care. Hey Grant, I may know more about that than you do, and it's entirely possible that I was the very first person to contribute to that fundraiser and made the first public plea for others to do likewise --- before it was even announced. BUT, I don't need, or appreciate, you or anyone else putting words in my mouth. The word is "fear" and denotes anxiety. If I need someone to tell me what I meant, I'll be sure to call for help. ____________ | |
| ID: 1327056 · | |
|
Very close to 3 minute TCP timeout for scheduler. The Scheduler transactions seems to take some time again: | |
| ID: 1327058 · | |
BUT, I don't need, or appreciate, you or anyone else putting words in my mouth. I didn't put any words there, i used the exact words you posted. I did say my "fear" is that nobody cares, and by "nobody" I meant anyone who could do anything about server issues. right from the post you made- http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=70431&postid=1326112 I said that "I fear," meaning that I am afraid of that, not that I have evidence of that. The only reason to fear something as you describe it there, is because you consider it possible. No, you didn't come out & say out right that they don't care, you just implied it. If I need someone to tell me what I meant, I'll be sure to call for help. I have no idea what you meant, i can only go by what you post & what you posted implies that those running the project don't care about the issues they are having. ____________ Grant Darwin NT. | |
| ID: 1327084 · | |
|
Richard Haselgrove  Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 7451 Credit: 39,511,071 RAC: 32,480  | |
The only reason to fear something as you describe it there, is because you consider it possible. ... what you posted implies that those running the project don't care about the issues they are having. Non sequitur. Saying something is possible doesn't turn it into a certainty. "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" (Sherlock Holmes). But that doesn't apply here - there are a lot more possibilities left than the highly unlikely one that the project staff don't care, as evidenced by Matt's New Year post. | |
| ID: 1327099 · | |
 [seti.international] Philip J. FryVolunteer tester  Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 6566 Credit: 50,674,027 RAC: 20,016  | |
|
[panic on] Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server
Scheduler request failed: Failure when receiving data from the peer [/panic on] [panic off] Just now.. - OK, at 14:14 UTC again contact. ;-) [/panic off] [EDIT: [panic on] It was just one well contact since then again .. Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server [/panic on]] * Best regards! :-) * Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. * Optimize your PC for higher RAC. * SETI@home needs your help. * ____________ >Das Deutsche Cafe. The German Cafe.< | |
| ID: 1327116 · | |
|
No work or scheduler connects for over 24 hours now per BOINCTasks. Have been out of gpu work for about 18 hours, crunching Einstein on zero resource share to stay busy. | |
| ID: 1327125 · | |
|
Finally got thru - logjam is slightly abating as the incoming traffic | |
| ID: 1327155 · | |
|
James Sotherden Volunteer moderator  Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 6043 Credit: 14,604,827 RAC: 23,696  | |
|
Im just going to let my machines go to other projects. two allready are, One still has work for maybe 8 hours. They are going to shut down for maintenace anyway so im not going to fight an uphill battle trying to get work. | |
| ID: 1327156 · | |
|
if i could download as many work units as i have `scheduler list` and `master file` i would be crunching fine :(( | |
| ID: 1327163 · | |
Non sequitur. Saying something is possible doesn't turn it into a certainty. I agree. Just because someone believes something doesn't make it so. But beleiving something to be possible indicates that you consider it likely and implies that you consider it to be the case. But that doesn't apply here - there are a lot more possibilities left than the highly unlikely one that the project staff don't care, as evidenced by Matt's New Year post. Yet another indication that they do care. ____________ Grant Darwin NT. | |
| ID: 1327169 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 1327173 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 1327182 · | |
|
More Ammo to have shorties handled like VLAR's especially when AP's are being Split.!!! | |
| ID: 1327187 · | |
|
Wouldn't really help much. The problem with VLAR is a computational one, many GPU just freak out and so produce wrong answers, or get stalled in near infinite loops. The problem with shorties is that everyone gets through them so much faster than a normal WU that everyone, be they a slow CPU cruncher or a mega fast GPU cruncher is getting through them about 5 times faster than a normal one the demand for WUs goes up by a factor of five - perhaps the "cure" is actually the reverse - only distribute shorties when the fastest crunchers are stuffed up to the gills with APs..... | |
| ID: 1327191 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (80) Server Problems?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |
