Intelligent Design Thoery


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Politics : Intelligent Design Thoery

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 22 · Next
Author Message
bobby
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 22 Mar 02
Posts: 1928
Credit: 14,349,188
RAC: 3,083
United States
Message 1226441 - Posted: 2 May 2012, 23:28:13 UTC - in response to Message 1226393.

If one were to design a planet it is best to start off with Ringworld and then change the laws of nature so that it is stable. As in Time Bandits it would be better to start with with computers on day one along with several other good ideas.

I think that Discworld by Douglas Adams has a lot more going for it ....



I think you mean Terry Pratchett. Personally I prefer D.N. Adams' works.
____________
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Profile William Rothamel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 2349
Credit: 1,161,092
RAC: 145
United States
Message 1226598 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 8:56:41 UTC - in response to Message 1226533.
Last modified: 3 May 2012, 9:02:01 UTC

Not entirely sure what the arguments or the opinions expressed here are actually saying. A fractal can be a thing of immense beauty and complexity; yet, it follows a simple equation. Intelligent design ? Hardly, just Nature in the form of mathematics.

Try this for you Golden ratio fans. Take any two three digit numbers, add them together, Then add this sum to the second number. Next add this new sum to the previous sum and so on. When you get to the tenth sum divide it by the 9th sum and presto you will get 1.61 and possibly be able to round to 1.618. This is the golden ratio to a good approximation. Again structure and beauty hidden in our world and revealed by Mathematics. No design here just numbers--the way things have to be to be real in our world.

The spirals in cone flowers, pineapples, broccoli etc are what has to occur when new cells are produced and pushed out into the existing center of the flower. Same is true for the Hexagonal, close-pack of a bee hive. Not design just the way things are and must be.

All of the ills that befall the human body are not intelligent design but rather the imperfect result of selective evolution.

Profile Chris S
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 29565
Credit: 9,008,176
RAC: 28,245
United Kingdom
Message 1226601 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 9:33:42 UTC
Last modified: 3 May 2012, 9:38:17 UTC

I think you mean Terry Pratchett. Personally I prefer D.N. Adams' works.

Oooops, yes of course I meant Pratchett!

BTW, good post William! It is a point that the Golden Ratio will be the same anywhere in the universe, whether it is used by centipedes in slime or 10 legged spiders. The same goes for the ratio between the radius and the circumference of a circle. They are fixed mathematical constants that just are what they are, and not by design.

OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 13307
Credit: 27,898,360
RAC: 16,299
United States
Message 1226617 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 11:56:58 UTC - in response to Message 1226533.
Last modified: 3 May 2012, 11:59:18 UTC

denoting Intelligence in the Design; God to most of us. 95% of us.

Oh, I should add Im not the first to think along these lines.
...just sayin!


Yes, there is a severe lack of understanding of science in the majority of the population, but I think your estimate is quite skewed to favor your view. It is clear that some people prefer to draw their own conclusions instead of letting the data lead them to the right one.

All the more reason why we need better science curriculum taught in schools, and not that presumptuous crap taught by Intelligent Design. Just sayin.

Profile SciManStev
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jun 99
Posts: 4670
Credit: 77,330,161
RAC: 42,694
United States
Message 1226635 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 13:00:24 UTC

A more correct datapoint is that in Europe, 25% say they are athiests, while in the US, only 15% say they are athiests.

Steve
____________
Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 13307
Credit: 27,898,360
RAC: 16,299
United States
Message 1226649 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 13:47:58 UTC - in response to Message 1226635.

[Off-topic] Things start to look really interesting when you look at the non-believer category, which includes Atheists and Agnostics (which I still argue that many Agnostics are Atheists whom are asking themselves the wrong question). I've seen some statistics that put the number as high as 30% of the population. ...and I wonder how much higher that number would be if Atheism weren't such a political career-killer or didn't carry the social stigma that it does.

Just sayin.

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 11732
Credit: 5,969,877
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1226650 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 13:49:33 UTC - in response to Message 1226635.

A more correct datapoint is that in Europe, 25% say they are athiests, while in the US, only 15% say they are athiests.

Steve

As I said before:
Ignore inconvenient facts, a requirement of belief.

____________

Profile William Rothamel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 2349
Credit: 1,161,092
RAC: 145
United States
Message 1226677 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 14:48:47 UTC - in response to Message 1226650.
Last modified: 3 May 2012, 14:51:30 UTC

What is the figure among scientists in the US and elsewhere. I'll bet it runs to 60%. I have seen higher numbers in the UK for atheism among the general population. from Wikipedia:

"A majority (53%) of Canadians believe in God. What is of particular interest is that 28% of Protestants, 33% of Catholics, and 23% of those who attend weekly religious services do not."

Profile SciManStev
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jun 99
Posts: 4670
Credit: 77,330,161
RAC: 42,694
United States
Message 1226749 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 17:16:05 UTC - in response to Message 1226737.


Is there Intelligence in YOUR design, William Rothamel, Gary Charpentier, Blank man, SciManStev, Chris S? If the answer is yes, there is Intelligence in your design, how did intelligence get between your ears?



Genetics, traced back over hundreds of millions of years.

Steve
____________
Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

Profile SciManStev
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jun 99
Posts: 4670
Credit: 77,330,161
RAC: 42,694
United States
Message 1226755 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 17:29:45 UTC

I can give a far more comprehensive answer later when I get home from work.

Steve
____________
Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 13307
Credit: 27,898,360
RAC: 16,299
United States
Message 1226758 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 17:38:11 UTC - in response to Message 1226737.

Is there Intelligence in YOUR design? If the answer is yes, there is Intelligence in your design, how did intelligence get between your ears?


The term "design" suggests a "designer". I have no designer. My being is made up of millions of years of evolution, and my intelligence is a collection of various observations, both from those before me and of my own, met with skeptical criticism introduced to me by other great skeptics of the past who have sought to challenge long held myths of our entire race. A skepticism, as we have noted, that is growing rapidly as those myths are proven untrue.

OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 13307
Credit: 27,898,360
RAC: 16,299
United States
Message 1226770 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 18:13:51 UTC - in response to Message 1226766.
Last modified: 3 May 2012, 18:14:09 UTC

If you disregard the below quote your answer means nothing at all. I will listen nevertheless.

"George H. Gallup" wrote:
“I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone-the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.”


George is right, but his conclusion is wrong. The human body and all of its functions didn't "just happen". They evolved over millions of years to provide the best fit for survival of the species. Otherwise, if our bodies were somehow statistical monstrosities that indicate some sort of "designed" advanced function, why can't we fend off the simplest of bacterial or viral infections?

Poor Mr. Gallup just simply couldn't understand the nature behind his own mathematical question.

Profile Gary Charpentier
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 11732
Credit: 5,969,877
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1226779 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 18:34:09 UTC - in response to Message 1226737.

Is there Intelligence in YOUR design, William Rothamel, Gary Charpentier, Blank man, SciManStev, Chris S? If the answer is yes, there is Intelligence in your design, how did intelligence get between your ears?

Infinity is a big number. Given an infinity of time evolution will produce me, and more than once.

____________

bobby
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 22 Mar 02
Posts: 1928
Credit: 14,349,188
RAC: 3,083
United States
Message 1226852 - Posted: 3 May 2012, 21:12:58 UTC - in response to Message 1226737.
Last modified: 3 May 2012, 21:13:39 UTC

Since we are talking statistically......

"George H. Gallup" wrote:
“I could prove God statistically. Take the human body alone-the chances that all the functions of an individual would just happen is a statistical monstrosity.”


This follows the same math of Intelligent Life outside of our own Solar System. I have given you tha math of Drake, not that you alrady didn't know it and the odds are indeed less then zero. As are the odds Mr. Gallup has showen.

Is there Intelligence in YOUR design, William Rothamel, Gary Charpentier, Blank man, SciManStev, Chris S? If the answer is yes, there is Intelligence in your design, how did intelligence get between your ears?


Seeing as you raised the Drake equation again, I'll repeat a question I asked in another thread, "Who asserts that the Drake equation is scientifically valid?".

I'm not sure what your fascination is with the Drake equation, though you already know it shows nothing but the prejudices of the person (or persons) providing values for the variables.

You can't answer why a designer would give all vertebrates one type of camera eye (complete with a blind spot), and cephalopods a different type of camera eye (that does not have a blind spot). Your previous attempt to provide an explanation only appears to answer why land based vertebrates have the inferior "design". Your attempt at explaining why your designer would provide a number of different types of vertebrates with the gene to encode the VMAT2 protein (the so-called God gene) started and stopped with humor.

Your faith in ID is simply that, faith, aka belief regardless of evidence.
____________
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 22 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Intelligent Design Thoery

Copyright © 2014 University of California