Todays Televisions

Questions and Answers : Wish list : Todays Televisions

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Carl

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 12
Posts: 15
Credit: 18,927
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1212352 - Posted: 31 Mar 2012, 15:04:25 UTC

I noticed most avg televisions have built in wi-fi and other internet functions.Why not make it so you guys can use those as computing resources.Just an idea ,don't go all mightymoe on me for this thought
ID: 1212352 · Report as offensive
Profile Ageless
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 13821
Credit: 3,269,733
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 1212390 - Posted: 31 Mar 2012, 15:53:01 UTC - in response to Message 1212352.  

Wi-fi and internet is nice to have on a TV, but you don't need a strong CPU for that, or one that does (any) (lots of) floating point executions and certainly not some (USB) hard drive with oodles of space.

So the questions become:
- what kind of processor is in those TVs?
- what kind of hard drive space are we talking about?
- can we install some Linux on that drive without breaking the TV?
- is it even possible to run an OS on that processor?
- how much memory does the TV have?
-- can we add memory to it if need be?
- is it possible to port BOINC and Seti to the native OS on the TV and work that way?

End question will be, is it really worth it?
Jord

Ancient Astronaut Theorists suggest that in many ways, you can be considered an alien conspiracy!
ID: 1212390 · Report as offensive
Profile Carl

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 12
Posts: 15
Credit: 18,927
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1212432 - Posted: 31 Mar 2012, 17:24:55 UTC - in response to Message 1212390.  

lmmfao NOooooooooo!! i see and i never even thought of the hardrive space,

Thanks again
ID: 1212432 · Report as offensive
Profile Ex
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 12
Posts: 2895
Credit: 2,080,145
RAC: 421
United States
Message 1213209 - Posted: 2 Apr 2012, 15:13:17 UTC - in response to Message 1212390.  
Last modified: 2 Apr 2012, 15:30:25 UTC

"So the questions become:"
- what kind of processor is in those TVs? : Probably very lightweight ARM type processors

- what kind of hard drive space are we talking about? : Not much, maybe enough for seti@home, but the first question already rules out the ability to run it

- can we install some Linux on that drive without breaking the TV? : Without breaking the TV? Probably not, but I'm sure we could get embedded Linux on it. *evil grin*

- is it even possible to run an OS on that processor? : I guarantee there's a linux distro that would run on it, regardless of its architecture.

- how much memory does the TV have? : I'm sure very little, just enough to run what's natively installed on the TV.

-- can we add memory to it if need be? : Probably can't add memory that could be used as part of the native OS, but there are usually SDcard readers on these devices, and with the right OS I'm sure it could be in theory used for an OS storage device.

- is it possible to port BOINC and Seti to the native OS on the TV and work that way? : Ported to a Linux that could be installed on the TV, yes (Still doesn't matter the hardware is not powerful enough).. Ported to the TV's native OS- Anythings possible. But the work involved means it wouldn't happen and definitely wouldn't be worth it. And the hardware comprising the system is not powerful enough to even bother.

-End question will be, is it really worth it? : Not today, maybe in 10 years with powerful enough native hardware, and a big enough user-base of some standardized operating system. (Maybe we should consider an android port, people could kill their batteries in 2 hours for 1000 FLOPs. j/k) :-)

But it's fun to think through the process of things like this. It could be a fun project to hack a TV into running a nice embedded Linux. Or even just boot it from a memory card/stick :-)
-Dave
ID: 1213209 · Report as offensive
John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24806
Credit: 754,585
RAC: 65
United States
Message 1213408 - Posted: 2 Apr 2012, 23:41:09 UTC

More useful would be the Digital Recorder. -- assuming it could be done without breaking it.


BOINC WIKI
ID: 1213408 · Report as offensive
Profile Ex
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 12
Posts: 2895
Credit: 2,080,145
RAC: 421
United States
Message 1213430 - Posted: 3 Apr 2012, 1:33:24 UTC - in response to Message 1213408.  

More useful would be the Digital Recorder. -- assuming it could be done without breaking it.

It'd be far easier to use a special built pc as a "video intermediary" to act as a DVR.

(But again, a standardized OS could be useful. To someday be able to use an app to just plug in a storage device to the TV and use it as a DVR. Android On TV! there's an idea...)
-Dave
ID: 1213430 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : Wish list : Todays Televisions


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.