BOINC v6.6.31 available

Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC v6.6.31 available
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14653
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 902821 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 7:38:04 UTC

As the title says.

I would recommend this for anyone running more than one CUDA project - it fixes a major bug when switching from one CUDA task to another. But if you don't run CUDA, or your CUDA tasks never get pre-empted, there's nothing new worth upgrading for.
ID: 902821 · Report as offensive
Profile Vipin Palazhi
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 08
Posts: 286
Credit: 167,386,578
RAC: 0
India
Message 902824 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 7:44:02 UTC

I am still using Cruncher's 6.1.0 version, mainly because I started with this version and just like the way things are. Will this have any impact on the crunching in the long run when more and more crunchers shift to the newer versions? Or is there going to be any updates to Cruncher's 6.1.0 version anytime soon?

And I don't use any CUDA cards.
______________

ID: 902824 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14653
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 902829 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 8:22:19 UTC - in response to Message 902824.  

I am still using Cruncher's 6.1.0 version, mainly because I started with this version and just like the way things are. Will this have any impact on the crunching in the long run when more and more crunchers shift to the newer versions? Or is there going to be any updates to Cruncher's 6.1.0 version anytime soon?

And I don't use any CUDA cards.

No need to change, then. You've survived the releases of v6.2.19, v6.4.5, v6.6.20, v6.6.28 ....

FYI (and for any other readers): Crunch3r released about five different clients, all under the v6.1.0 label, with various improvements. You should be running his v5, where 'Return Results Immediately' has been changed to 'Return Results after 60 seconds', to avoid potential validation errors.

And his client isn't actually based on v6 code, so many of the things you might read here about v6 (separate program and data directories, security accounts, separate graphics applications) don't apply to v6.1.0 - but if they don't cause you any trouble, that's fine.

As to updates - you'll have to ask Crunch3r about that, and he doesn't visit here much any more. No idea.
ID: 902829 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 902837 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 8:48:05 UTC

I've downloaded the 6.6.31 .sh file on my Linux box and installed it. But the BOINC manager says "Connected to localhost (6.6.29)".
Tullio
ID: 902837 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14653
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 902847 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 9:39:04 UTC - in response to Message 902837.  

I've downloaded the 6.6.31 .sh file on my Linux box and installed it. But the BOINC manager says "Connected to localhost (6.6.29)".
Tullio

When did you download it, and which version did you download?

There was an early problem with the 64-bit download, but that was fixed by 21:15 UTC last night.
ID: 902847 · Report as offensive
Profile Questor Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 471
Credit: 230,506,401
RAC: 157
United Kingdom
Message 902850 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 10:07:21 UTC

Richard,
Thanks for the info. What a big difference with the preempting. Just for the hell of it I sat there last night suspending tasks and not a single computation error! (Had just had 6 in a row with some newly downloaded CUDA tasks while waiting for the 6.6.31 download)

My downloaded 32 and 64 bit versions OK - all Windows.


John.
GPU Users Group



ID: 902850 · Report as offensive
Profile Vipin Palazhi
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 08
Posts: 286
Credit: 167,386,578
RAC: 0
India
Message 902851 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 10:26:25 UTC

Thanks for the info, Richard. I wasnt aware that there were newer versions of Cruncher's boinc client as they all appeared the same. Didnt pay attention to the version number at the end.

I just downloaded the latest files and installed on my machine, however, the message shown is still the same "-delayed return_results_immediately (1 min)". I didnt find any entry with 60 seconds.

As you mentioned, I havent had any issues using this client, so I shall continue to use the same.
______________

ID: 902851 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14653
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 902856 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 10:53:28 UTC - in response to Message 902851.  

I just downloaded the latest files and installed on my machine, however, the message shown is still the same "-delayed return_results_immediately (1 min)". I didnt find any entry with 60 seconds.

60 seconds is pretty close to 1 minute in my part of the world ;-)
ID: 902856 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 902857 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 10:54:08 UTC - in response to Message 902847.  
Last modified: 2 Jun 2009, 10:55:26 UTC


When did you download it, and which version did you download?

There was an early problem with the 64-bit download, but that was fixed by 21:15 UTC last night.

I downloaded it today June 2. It is the 32 bit version. I notice it downgraded the floating MIPS from 1352 per core to 1072. Einstein graphics is still working, QMC graphics is not and climateprediction.net graphics crashes with segmentation error. It did not work with 5.10.45 but QMC did.
Tullio
ID: 902857 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14653
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 902862 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 11:05:06 UTC - in response to Message 902857.  

I downloaded it today June 2. It is the 32 bit version. I notice it downgraded the floating MIPS from 1352 per core to 1072. Einstein graphics is still working, QMC graphics is not and climateprediction.net graphics crashes with segmentation error. It did not work with 5.10.45 but QMC did.
Tullio

I'm curious about this benchmark thing. Someone was moaning about it in the credit thread last night, so I looked through the code change logs: there hasn't been any change in the benchmarking code for at least 8 months (just a few extra tests to make sure they ran for the proper length of time) [doesn't rule out a compiler, or compiler flag, change though]. What happens if you re-run benchmarks again by hand, at a time when you know that the CPU isn't busy with non-BOINC tasks? The automatic run immediately after an upgrade always seems to be suspect.

As to the Linux version, I'm out of my depth. You'll have to wait until Martin, Jord or one of the other Linux gurus checks in (but I have posted a link on the BOINC Dev message board).
ID: 902862 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 902867 - Posted: 2 Jun 2009, 11:30:08 UTC
Last modified: 2 Jun 2009, 11:30:26 UTC

I have run the benchmarks, with similar results (1088 floating, 2552 integer). I have two AQUA units running before the BOINC upgrade and the values are still higher (1352,2755). But this is no problem. Cheers.
Tullio
ID: 902867 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 903038 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 0:58:43 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jun 2009, 0:59:46 UTC

Skipping 6.6.32, 6.6.33 is out for all platforms (alpha). Change logs available here.
ID: 903038 · Report as offensive
Larry256
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Nov 05
Posts: 25
Credit: 5,715,079
RAC: 8
United States
Message 903041 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 1:09:32 UTC - in response to Message 902867.  

I have run the benchmarks, with similar results (1088 floating, 2552 integer). I have two AQUA units running before the BOINC upgrade and the values are still higher (1352,2755). But this is no problem. Cheers.
Tullio



LOL
ID: 903041 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 903050 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 1:27:37 UTC

On the BOINC message boards 6.6.31 is given as a development version. When I downloaded and installed it the BOINC manager says "Connected to localhost (6.6.29)". So am I really running 6.6.29?
Tullio

ID: 903050 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65759
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 903066 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 2:01:05 UTC

I'm happy with 6.6.20 as It seems to be more productive than 6.6.28 and probably the same can be said of later versions, Besides I only do Seti.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 903066 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 903074 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 2:12:42 UTC - in response to Message 903066.  

I'm happy with 6.6.20 as It seems to be more productive than 6.6.28 and probably the same can be said of later versions, Besides I only do Seti.

I am running 6 BOINC projects and was using 5.10.45. When I saw that it no longer appeared on the BOINC home page I switched to 6.6.31 on my Linux box but it seems I am running 6.6.29 instead. I would not have downloaded a development version.
Tullio
ID: 903074 · Report as offensive
Profile Questor Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 471
Credit: 230,506,401
RAC: 157
United Kingdom
Message 903162 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 8:08:16 UTC - in response to Message 903074.  

I'm happy with 6.6.20 as It seems to be more productive than 6.6.28 and probably the same can be said of later versions, Besides I only do Seti.

I am running 6 BOINC projects and was using 5.10.45. When I saw that it no longer appeared on the BOINC home page I switched to 6.6.31 on my Linux box but it seems I am running 6.6.29 instead. I would not have downloaded a development version.
Tullio


My Linux version I downloaded yesterday also says 6.6.29. I did notice this with a previous Linux version so it may just be they forgot to update the version number on this release.
GPU Users Group



ID: 903162 · Report as offensive
Profile Questor Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 471
Credit: 230,506,401
RAC: 157
United Kingdom
Message 903164 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 8:17:06 UTC

Is anyone running 6.6.31 on Vista 64?

I am not running it in service mode to avoid problems with CUDA not working.

When I shut down BOINC manager and choose to stop tasks also, BOINC manager quits but all tasks are left running. BOINCtray and BOINC also in memory.

If I try and kill the tasks off manually I get computation errors so don't really want to do that. When I reboot it starts automatically so I can remove it from the startup group to work around this.

Not 100% sure if this happened just with 6.6.31 - may have happened with .28 and I didn't notice.

Will try regression to earlier versions night to see if they are OK in case something funny up with this PC.



GPU Users Group



ID: 903164 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 903167 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 8:23:54 UTC - in response to Message 903162.  


My Linux version I downloaded yesterday also says 6.6.29. I did notice this with a previous Linux version so it may just be they forgot to update the version number on this release.

If you go to version history on the BOINC home page version 6.6.31 is not mentioned. The last is 6.6.29. On the BOINC message board for the client 6.6.31 is considered a development version.
Tullio

ID: 903167 · Report as offensive
Profile Questor Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 471
Credit: 230,506,401
RAC: 157
United Kingdom
Message 903173 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 8:38:17 UTC - in response to Message 903167.  


My Linux version I downloaded yesterday also says 6.6.29. I did notice this with a previous Linux version so it may just be they forgot to update the version number on this release.

If you go to version history on the BOINC home page version 6.6.31 is not mentioned. The last is 6.6.29. On the BOINC message board for the client 6.6.31 is considered a development version.
Tullio



I am looking at Boinc all

and

Boinc Download

and they are both showing 6.6.31 as the Recommended version. for all but Mac OS.
GPU Users Group



ID: 903173 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : BOINC v6.6.31 available


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.