I have to wait two years

Message boards : Number crunching : I have to wait two years
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
HTH
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jul 00
Posts: 691
Credit: 909,237
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 773261 - Posted: 25 Jun 2008, 10:21:40 UTC

I/We have to wait two years, before I/we can buy Sandy Bridge CPUs. That is an awfully long time to wait.

I barely can wait those 32-core processors with Hyper-Threading, SSE4, AES-NI, and AVX. If I buy two of them, then I can run 2 * 32 * 2 = 128 SETI@home WUs at once. :)

Henri.

Manned mission to Mars in 2019 Petition <-- Sign this, please.
ID: 773261 · Report as offensive
Profile John Clark
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 99
Posts: 16515
Credit: 4,418,829
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 773370 - Posted: 25 Jun 2008, 15:45:41 UTC

Such a rig, with dual Sandy Bridge Xeons, and 16Gb or RAM, can be used on several projects, allocating 8 cores per project to give a large combined BOINC RAC
It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues



ID: 773370 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65752
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 773380 - Posted: 25 Jun 2008, 16:08:18 UTC

Nah, All You need is a time machine, Go to when their making them, then get some and give them to Yourself sometime around now, Or wait until their made like everybody else will, If their plans don't change by then that is. ;)
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 773380 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20291
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 773456 - Posted: 25 Jun 2008, 20:06:37 UTC - in response to Message 773261.  

... I barely can wait those 32-core processors...

You can have that now if you wish...

Just put multiple systems together built up 4 cores at a time.

Meanwhile, I'm waiting for when we can make good use of the parallel GPUs to load up a system with multiple boards for fast hot crunchin'!

Happy crunchin',
Martin

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 773456 · Report as offensive
PhonAcq

Send message
Joined: 14 Apr 01
Posts: 1656
Credit: 30,658,217
RAC: 1
United States
Message 773848 - Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 15:54:41 UTC

For fun consider the Atom experiment that Evilsizer is trying to do. He is getting as much as 150 RAC for each 'cpu'; the Atom is an HT version of a dual core. So on each $70 motherboard, which includes the cpu, he is getting as much as 300 RAC. So, being simplistic here, one could build a 32 cpu rig from 16 motherboards and about $1100. Plus a 'bit' more for memory, you could get the 32-core seti-engine TODAY for about $1500 and some fit-up time. And the beast only runs a few Watts per MB.

So don't wait two years; do it today!

(Ok, ok, I know that's a lot of money to dedicate to SETI but its the thought that counts.)
ID: 773848 · Report as offensive
Evilsizer

Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 06
Posts: 34
Credit: 398,838
RAC: 0
United States
Message 773854 - Posted: 26 Jun 2008, 16:21:10 UTC - in response to Message 773848.  

For fun consider the Atom experiment that Evilsizer is trying to do. He is getting as much as 150 RAC for each 'cpu'; the Atom is an HT version of a dual core. So on each $70 motherboard, which includes the cpu, he is getting as much as 300 RAC. So, being simplistic here, one could build a 32 cpu rig from 16 motherboards and about $1100. Plus a 'bit' more for memory, you could get the 32-core seti-engine TODAY for about $1500 and some fit-up time. And the beast only runs a few Watts per MB.

So don't wait two years; do it today!

(Ok, ok, I know that's a lot of money to dedicate to SETI but its the thought that counts.)

well right now RAC for AtomAnt is up to 280. on OCF Care est that it should do 400-500 avg rac. will find out, now if you go to ewiz they list the atom cpu/board for $60, then $39 for 2gigs of ram. im looking to get 2 gigabyte versions since they offer ocing. toms got the 1.6ghz atom to 1.8ghz, so that would place it about close to a banis cpu at 1.6ghz.

I think intel's plans for atom are alot bigger then they want to let on. if you look at the die size of atom. roughly on a LGAP775 package you could fix about 12-14cores on there, all with HT. thats would be something cool to play with.
ID: 773854 · Report as offensive
john deneer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Nov 06
Posts: 331
Credit: 20,996,606
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 774666 - Posted: 28 Jun 2008, 9:11:11 UTC - in response to Message 773848.  

For fun consider the Atom experiment ..... you could get the 32-core seti-engine TODAY for about $1500 and some fit-up time. And the beast only runs a few Watts per MB.


That's a lot of money for a 32-core machine producing a rac of 5000. Even a single q6600 may do better than that and at lower purchase and power costs too.

Regards,
John.
ID: 774666 · Report as offensive
Luke
Volunteer developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Dec 06
Posts: 2546
Credit: 817,560
RAC: 0
New Zealand
Message 774669 - Posted: 28 Jun 2008, 9:23:47 UTC

Oh no! Don't talk about Sandy Bridge!

When I build my Nehalem, I want to think its cutting edge for as long as possible!!!

The future is hexa-core and octo-core!

Luke.
- Luke.
ID: 774669 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : I have to wait two years


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.