Post Dual Core RAC's

Message boards : Number crunching : Post Dual Core RAC's
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Andy Lee Robinson
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 05
Posts: 630
Credit: 59,973,836
RAC: 0
Hungary
Message 504182 - Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 20:32:09 UTC - in response to Message 504041.  

No offence inferred or implied... just facts!

There is SO much headroom for overclocking these processors, it is a shame not to take advantage of it.

The best thing you can do to maximise return is to run BOINC in the background day and night continuously while you use the machine. It makes absolutely negligible difference to its performance.

I'm probably one of the greatest power users there are, often with at least 50 windows open, 20 applications simultaneously, compiling software, developing web applications, SQL programming, php editing, administrating linux machines through ssh windows, reading web news and researching while raytracing animations in the background too, in addition to the usual office stuff. All the time BOINC soaks up the spare processor cycles that would otherwise be going to waste.

There are loads of resources available for overclocking, and you should be able to get at least another 30% performance out of the machine with appropriate cooling.

Good luck,
Andy.
ID: 504182 · Report as offensive
Profile Sir Ulli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 99
Posts: 2246
Credit: 6,136,250
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 504246 - Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 22:20:25 UTC

My Athlon XP 4.400+, Dual Core running Windows XP SP2


System

Asus A8N-SLI SE, Athlon64 X2 4.400+ (Toledo 2200 MHz 2x 1024 kByte) 4 x 512 Twinmos 512 MB at 2.5 3 3 8, Maxtor 200 Gig Pata, 300 Gig SATA WD, DVD Toshiba SD-M1612, Burner LG GSA-4167B...Graka Nforce 7300 GT, in an CS 601 with 4 extra Silent Fans.. not OC

Recent average credit 791.92

Hit Me

using the SSE2 Versin from Chicken...

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli


ID: 504246 · Report as offensive
Profile Brock
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 06
Posts: 201
Credit: 774,488
RAC: 0
United States
Message 504328 - Posted: 17 Jan 2007, 1:16:13 UTC - in response to Message 504246.  

My Athlon XP 4.400+, Dual Core running Windows XP SP2
System

Recent average credit 791.92

using the SSE2 Versin from Chicken...



Hi Sir Ulli,
I also have an AMD 4400+. Mine's OC'd to 2.5GHz. I've only been a member for 3 weeks so my RAC is still climbing. Its at 760 right now. I'm also using the generic SSE2 version from the Chicken of Angnor.

Brock's Baby



ID: 504328 · Report as offensive
Profile davis@e-maxx.info

Send message
Joined: 2 May 00
Posts: 74
Credit: 3,895,817
RAC: 0
France
Message 504890 - Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 12:14:06 UTC - in response to Message 498947.  

Dont know what i seem to be doing wrong then in the RAC deptartment then. I have a X2 4800 and am only getting a RAC of about 522 and that with using chickens App


I get about 750 - 800 RAC with a X2 4800.



bi Xeon 3.06 2gig ram
bi AMD Opteron 2210 4gig ram
AMD X2 4200 2gig ram
AMD X2 4800 1gig ram
AMD Opteron 165 2gig ram
ID: 504890 · Report as offensive
Profile Karsten Vinding
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 239
Credit: 25,201,931
RAC: 11
Denmark
Message 504906 - Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 12:50:47 UTC

On my AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Socket 939 with 2x512Mb DDR-ram), OC'ed to 2475, using a patched version of Chicken's Intel "only" P4 SSE2, that also runs on AMD's, I'm getting a RAC of currently 1131 points.

This computer is 100% dedicated to S@H, but looses some crunching time due to me playing a lot of Company of heroes at the moment.
ID: 504906 · Report as offensive
Pedro Mariano Yunes Garcia

Send message
Joined: 1 Jul 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 226,176
RAC: 0
Brazil
Message 514610 - Posted: 7 Feb 2007, 16:42:12 UTC - in response to Message 498186.  

you can take a look at mine. 1 dual AMD 4400+, 1 Intel 2600 and 1 PIII 600

crunch on!

skywatch


Hi skywatch! What about your P4 2.4GHz sistem? Is it O.C.ed? Is it running Chicken's soup?
ID: 514610 · Report as offensive
Dark Angel
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 01
Posts: 432
Credit: 2,673,754
RAC: 0
United States
Message 514855 - Posted: 8 Feb 2007, 5:47:41 UTC
Last modified: 8 Feb 2007, 5:49:08 UTC

Today my Mac Pro with two dual core chips at 3Ghz or 4 total cores over two chips clocked RAC of 4750+ per the SETI site, BOINC is a different story as it usually lags by a day or two...

ID: 514855 · Report as offensive
Profile Brock
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 06
Posts: 201
Credit: 774,488
RAC: 0
United States
Message 515959 - Posted: 10 Feb 2007, 22:52:49 UTC - in response to Message 504906.  

On my AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Socket 939 with 2x512Mb DDR-ram), OC'ed to 2475, using a patched version of Chicken's Intel "only" P4 SSE2, that also runs on AMD's, I'm getting a RAC of currently 1131 points.

This computer is 100% dedicated to S@H, but looses some crunching time due to me playing a lot of Company of heroes at the moment.


@Karsten-
How did you patch the Intel-only version of Chicken's SSE2 app? I tried using the Perl script at:

http://www.swallowtail.org/naughty-intel.html but I kept getting an error:

WARNING: 10 lines were to be patched in 'SaH_5.15_KWSN_SSE2-Intel_Ben-Joe_2.0_B.exe': should be a multiple of 3! Skipping this file.

Any ideas?

TIA,
Brock

ID: 515959 · Report as offensive
Profile KWSN - Chicken of Angnor
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 99
Posts: 1199
Credit: 6,615,780
RAC: 0
Austria
Message 515975 - Posted: 10 Feb 2007, 23:16:03 UTC
Last modified: 10 Feb 2007, 23:21:22 UTC

Hi folks,

my PD 805 just passed 1400 RAC using a new pre-release science app (it's overclocked from 2.66 to 3.95 GHz though). Nice cruncher on a budget, cost 375 USD for the whole system. Eats a bit of juice though ;)

On the subject of patching, you may find this file useful.

This message and the next few have further information on how to use it.

Note: your mileage may vary. Make a copy of files before you do anything. PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK! You have been warned.

HTH,
Simon.
Donate to SETI@Home via PayPal!

Optimized SETI@Home apps + Information
ID: 515975 · Report as offensive
Profile Brock
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 06
Posts: 201
Credit: 774,488
RAC: 0
United States
Message 515984 - Posted: 10 Feb 2007, 23:42:33 UTC - in response to Message 515975.  

@Simon-

Thanks for the help Simon. I believe I have successfully patched my app (after a few bumble-stumbles)

Really looking forward to the GA release of the new science app.

Crunch on!
ID: 515984 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65825
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 516001 - Posted: 11 Feb 2007, 0:56:33 UTC - in response to Message 515975.  

Hi folks,

my PD 805 just passed 1400 RAC using a new pre-release science app (it's overclocked from 2.66 to 3.95 GHz though). Nice cruncher on a budget, cost 375 USD for the whole system. Eats a bit of juice though ;)

On the subject of patching, you may find this file useful.

This message and the next few have further information on how to use it.

Note: your mileage may vary. Make a copy of files before you do anything. PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK! You have been warned.

HTH,
Simon.

So do My 4 or soon 5 PCs, but that's Seti life. ;) Crunchin like mad as always. :D
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 516001 · Report as offensive
Profile Philadelphia
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 07
Posts: 1590
Credit: 399,688
RAC: 0
United States
Message 518519 - Posted: 17 Feb 2007, 2:29:57 UTC

I'm a NEWBIE to all this "stuff" but I find it all so interesting, so don't beat me up :)

I'm going to ask a "if" question, here it goes: "IF" you were to build a computer for this fun processing of information "stuff" and you could build it they way you wanted to, would you go for more processer speed or more L2 or........?

"If" you don't mind emailing me in addidtion to your post I would appreciate it, I'm new to this as my points indicate and I'm also thinking about building my own machine which I would like to use for these projects as well. danmartinaz@aol.com

Sorry for any mis-spellings.
ID: 518519 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 518549 - Posted: 17 Feb 2007, 3:07:07 UTC - in response to Message 518519.  
Last modified: 17 Feb 2007, 3:10:18 UTC

I'm a NEWBIE to all this "stuff" but I find it all so interesting, so don't beat me up :)

I'm going to ask a "if" question, here it goes: "IF" you were to build a computer for this fun processing of information "stuff" and you could build it they way you wanted to, would you go for more processer speed or more L2 or........?

"If" you don't mind emailing me in addidtion to your post I would appreciate it, I'm new to this as my points indicate and I'm also thinking about building my own machine which I would like to use for these projects as well. danmartinaz@aol.com

Sorry for any mis-spellings.

I hope you're still around, you can click on edit this post (next to your last post)and change your email addy to something not easily scraped by bots. Something like geeimhappy (AT) hot mail DOT com, or geeimhappy athotmail dotcom, or geeimhappy (at) hotmail dot com. Anything but the whole addy. That said, both are important get the fastest for the cash with the highest L2. If the app can fit in L2 then it doesn't have to go out to the slow ram chips (atleast not most of it). Tell us how much you think you can afford. If you can reuse the existing case, what size case, if you wanna reuse the PSU, what wattage, can you reuse the cd drive? Etc. someone might spec it out for you.
tony
ID: 518549 · Report as offensive
Natronomonas
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 02
Posts: 176
Credit: 3,367,602
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 530534 - Posted: 12 Mar 2007, 23:00:10 UTC - in response to Message 518549.  

Anyone have a RAC for stock e4300? (@1.8ghz).

I just got one, wondering where it's going to go. Using the KWSN linux app, 1.3 (I believe v2 is on the way).

Thanks!
Crunching SETI@Home as a member of the Whirlpool BOINC Teams
ID: 530534 · Report as offensive
Natronomonas
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 02
Posts: 176
Credit: 3,367,602
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 530535 - Posted: 12 Mar 2007, 23:00:25 UTC - in response to Message 518549.  
Last modified: 12 Mar 2007, 23:00:58 UTC

ID: 530535 · Report as offensive
Profile Ghery S. Pettit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Nov 99
Posts: 325
Credit: 28,109,066
RAC: 82
United States
Message 530563 - Posted: 12 Mar 2007, 23:52:03 UTC

Using the Chicken client, here's my 6700 C2D machine. No overclocking.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=3063789

It scoots right along. :-)


ID: 530563 · Report as offensive
Profile John Clark
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 99
Posts: 16515
Credit: 4,418,829
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 530604 - Posted: 13 Mar 2007, 1:05:33 UTC - in response to Message 530563.  

Using the Chicken client, here's my 6700 C2D machine. No overclocking.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=3063789

It scoots right along. :-)




That's really interesting and suggests the extra 2 cores, running at stock, on a C2Q give approximately the same output again
It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues



ID: 530604 · Report as offensive
Dark Angel
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 01
Posts: 432
Credit: 2,673,754
RAC: 0
United States
Message 530612 - Posted: 13 Mar 2007, 1:13:51 UTC - in response to Message 530604.  

Using the Chicken client, here's my 6700 C2D machine. No overclocking.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=3063789

It scoots right along. :-)




That's really interesting and suggests the extra 2 cores, running at stock, on a C2Q give approximately the same output again


That should follow since BOINC and SETI will use all cores given access to at full clip a quad will use each of the four cores to process a single work unit each so naturally you if you have two cores you have two WU's processing at the same time if you have 4 then you have 4 WU's and so on. If you remember that old CG machine with 127 cores or somthing crazy like that...it pulled alot of RAC but it was a dog per work unit. Took it something like 37 hours per work unit so it really wasn't faster then a 3GHZ C2D

ID: 530612 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 530709 - Posted: 13 Mar 2007, 4:37:55 UTC
Last modified: 13 Mar 2007, 4:39:48 UTC

FWIW, there's an SG machine back in the RAC top twenty again. It's probably a good thing it doesn't have contemporary PC core speeds (at least from a SAH crunching POV), otherwise with 127 or more cores it would spend most its time twiddling its thumbs waiting for a new quota day to start. :-)

Thinking about it, at this rate it won't be too much longer before quota exhaustion becomes the limiting RAC factor on PC's either. ;-)

Alinator
ID: 530709 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65825
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 530721 - Posted: 13 Mar 2007, 5:10:59 UTC - in response to Message 530709.  

FWIW, there's an SG machine back in the RAC top twenty again. It's probably a good thing it doesn't have contemporary PC core speeds (at least from a SAH crunching POV), otherwise with 127 or more cores it would spend most its time twiddling its thumbs waiting for a new quota day to start. :-)

Thinking about it, at this rate it won't be too much longer before quota exhaustion becomes the limiting RAC factor on PC's either. ;-)

Alinator

Yeah, I've got a feeling Seti may have to raise the limit some as most of the C2D and C2Q cpus can be overclocked to in excess of 3GHz, I just have to replace a NB heatsink just to get the 5th PC working, That is If the NB chip isn't damaged.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 530721 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Post Dual Core RAC's


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.