Message boards :
Number crunching :
NVidia 436.xx and later drivers can cause very long compute times especially on Arecibo VHAR work units
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 . . . 20 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 15 Apr 11 Posts: 149 Credit: 9,783,406 RAC: 9 |
I will only test this on my main System 1 (RTX 2080, GTX 980 Ti, GTX 980). And I tested it. The results are: - Win 10 v1909 Release (fully patched) > DDU and restart makes Windows Update install 432.00, which works fine for Arecibo VHAR - Win 10 Insider Build 19555 > DDU and restart makes Windows Update install 450.12, which is broken for Arecibo VHAR, in the same broken behaviors as discussed. Regards, Jacob |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14655 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
I think their versions of the drivers have been hit or miss regarding whether they have removed the OpenCL parts. Seems like I remember reports that some releases have been fine while others were missing.When I first set up that Windows 10 test partition - at least two years ago - Microsoft sent me * a CUDA (only) driver for the NVidia card * an OpenCL driver for the Intel GPU * and the Intel driver allowed OpenCL to run on the NVidia card, too |
VelocityRC Send message Joined: 27 Sep 19 Posts: 23 Credit: 1,421,582 RAC: 86 |
Is there a way to check the providence of a Windows Nvidia driver as to origin? Already answered. So you folks are telling me I need to check after W-10 updates and rollback my nVidia drivers if needed ??? |
VelocityRC Send message Joined: 27 Sep 19 Posts: 23 Credit: 1,421,582 RAC: 86 |
Well, since I announced the availability of the test build in this thread (and the similar parallel ATI thread), I'd sort of assumed that people would report back here. I'd prefer the test reports to be publicly visible for peer review, rather than hidden in PMs, but I'll try to read it wherever you post. But be aware I can't see inside private team discussion groups. OK, thanks for the clarification. I guess i'm doing the right thing for now, all seems to work. WOW !!! I have to say to all how nice everyone is on this forum. I ask newb questions that might make some of the more experienced shake their heads, (how many times do we have to cover this) but so far everyone has been genuinely helpful. It's a fresh feeling from some of the other forums I frequent. THANK YOU !!! Bill S |
VelocityRC Send message Joined: 27 Sep 19 Posts: 23 Credit: 1,421,582 RAC: 86 |
@VelocityRC: You currently are showing 'NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (2048MB) driver: 432.00'. That's earlier than the number in the thread title. 431.60 is the one installed from nvidia's "older versions" link a few weeks back. Why is my machine showing 432.00 when I look at it on here ? nVidia doesn't show a driver in their list starting with 432 for 1050's and W1064. Did W10 do something ? Need to roll back again ?? Bill S. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14655 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
431.60 is the one installed from nvidia's "older versions" link a few weeks back. Why is my machine showing 432.00 when I look at it on here ? nVidia doesn't show a driver in their list starting with 432 for 1050's and W1064. Did W10 do something ? Need to roll back again ??Your post prompted us to check exactly that. We've now confirmed: 1) Version 432.00 is supplied by Microsoft when they're doing their monthly security updates. 2) v432.00 seems to be functionally equivalent to v431.60 - you can safely go on using it. |
VelocityRC Send message Joined: 27 Sep 19 Posts: 23 Credit: 1,421,582 RAC: 86 |
431.60 is the one installed from nvidia's "older versions" link a few weeks back. Why is my machine showing 432.00 when I look at it on here ? nVidia doesn't show a driver in their list starting with 432 for 1050's and W1064. Did W10 do something ? Need to roll back again ??Your post prompted us to check exactly that. OK thanks. I guess I'll have to keep closer tabs on things that W10 is doing. Much appreciated. Bill S. |
6BQ5 Send message Joined: 7 Dec 18 Posts: 29 Credit: 12,725,636 RAC: 357 |
Check out this link : https://www.pcgamer.com/nvidias-latest-gpu-driver-offers-a-more-flexible-framerate-cap-to-save-power/ Yes, it's from PC Gamer. It's an article about an update to the Nvidia drivers. You skip through all the frame rate capping but don't skip too fast! I quote from the article, with emphasis. " On top of it all, there is the usual round of bug fixes. Here they are: [The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Blood and Wine]: The game may crash when a user reaches a specific cut scene. [Maxwell GPUs][OpenCL]: SETI@Home shows driver TDR occuring on Maxwell GPUs using OpenCL. [Call of Duty Modern Warfare]: Streaming of gameplay using OBS will randomly stop. Battleye][Low-Latency Mode]: Launching Battleye with NVIDIA ...... .... " Does this help us any? -=- Boris |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14655 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
It's well worth checking out, but don't all rush at once - especially with maintenance coming up! We'll be testing 1) the stand-alone download from NVidia 2) the next Microsoft monthly roll-up and gathering/sharing experiences. |
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 15 Apr 11 Posts: 149 Credit: 9,783,406 RAC: 9 |
Go ahead and rush. I'm told the fixes are in the new 442.19 driver version. I'll test them soon. :) Edit: Fixed to read 442.19 |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
The release notes for 442.19 have the same comment about Setiathome TDR fix for Maxwell cards. Not sure why that is specific to Maxwell since those cards are 3 generations old. Unless they are finally getting around to fixing a bug complaint from 2014. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14655 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Jacob's original bug report to NVidia mentioned both crashing on Maxwell cards, and stalling on Pascal/Turing cards. They probably filed it under the first part only, as seemingly the more serious problem. |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
Jacob's original bug report to NVidia mentioned both crashing on Maxwell cards, and stalling on Pascal/Turing cards. They probably filed it under the first part only, as seemingly the more serious problem. OK, that makes sense I guess. I wonder if the fix was directly in response to Jacob's bug report. He should be able to confirm as he should have been informed of the response to his report for a fix. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 15 Apr 11 Posts: 149 Credit: 9,783,406 RAC: 9 |
I reported the problem using the Driver Feedback links in the Driver Feedback threads. And I made sure to provide a clear repro, with a OneDrive location for easy repro files. And then I followed up with an NVIDIA contact to make sure that a bug was created, and routinely asked for updates. So, while I don't have a bug ID or bug reference number, and I did not get any direct response about the bug report .... I do know that the squeaky wheel may have gotten some grease. I'll take some credit. :) Going to test these shortly. |
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 15 Apr 11 Posts: 149 Credit: 9,783,406 RAC: 9 |
LOL @ Seeing "SETI@Home" in the driver release notes. Epic. |
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 15 Apr 11 Posts: 149 Credit: 9,783,406 RAC: 9 |
Initial testing is looking very very promising :) |
Mr. Kevvy Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3776 Credit: 1,114,826,392 RAC: 3,319 |
LOL @ Seeing "SETI@Home" in the driver release notes. Epic. It's becoming commonplace these days... 😃 Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.1.1 Highlights |
BoincSpy Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 146 Credit: 124,775,115 RAC: 353 |
New Nvidia drivers out ( 442.19 ) installing, however release notes do not indicate any cuda fixes.... |
Ian&Steve C. Send message Joined: 28 Sep 99 Posts: 4267 Credit: 1,282,604,591 RAC: 6,640 |
Because there was never any problem with CUDA. The only issue was with the SoG app, which is OpenCL. Seti@Home classic workunits: 29,492 CPU time: 134,419 hours |
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 15 Apr 11 Posts: 149 Credit: 9,783,406 RAC: 9 |
I think 442.19 has definitely fixed it! In my testing of the 442.19 drivers, I had no problems processing VHAR work items, on my main rig (RTX 2080, GTX 980 Ti, GTX 980) using Windows 10. All 3 GPUs acted correctly. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.