Data Chat

Message boards : Number crunching : Data Chat
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 31 · 32 · 33 · 34

AuthorMessage
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13917
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 2030613 - Posted: 3 Feb 2020, 7:13:28 UTC - in response to Message 2030599.  
Last modified: 3 Feb 2020, 7:13:48 UTC

Premature announcement Stephen.
I reported 10 tasks, received five blc35 _2's

There won't be any new BLC35s issued, but of course there are probably 10s of thousands (if not 100s of thousands) of them still to be cleared out.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 2030613 · Report as offensive
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 2030637 - Posted: 3 Feb 2020, 12:30:17 UTC - in response to Message 2030599.  

we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up.


. . And the Setizens bid a fond farewell to the Blc35 WUs of 58692 and 58693 with a hearty cheer ...

"RACK OFF YA NASTY, NOISY SOANDSOs"

Stephen

:)

Premature announcement Stephen.
I reported 10 tasks, received five blc35 _2's


. . They are the final validate checks for overflows on slow machines, I have a handful of _2's as well :) but almost none compared to when they were still splitting ...

Stephen

< shrug >
ID: 2030637 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19607
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 2030698 - Posted: 3 Feb 2020, 21:48:34 UTC - in response to Message 2030637.  

we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up.


. . And the Setizens bid a fond farewell to the Blc35 WUs of 58692 and 58693 with a hearty cheer ...

"RACK OFF YA NASTY, NOISY SOANDSOs"

Stephen

:)

Premature announcement Stephen.
I reported 10 tasks, received five blc35 _2's


. . They are the final validate checks for overflows on slow machines, I have a handful of _2's as well :) but almost none compared to when they were still splitting ...

Stephen

< shrug >

What you say is true, but you fail to take into account the deadline, they are VLAR's, so on my latest it is 04/06/2020 (US format). So we will be seeing blc35 for some time yet.
ID: 2030698 · Report as offensive
Profile Unixchick Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Mar 12
Posts: 815
Credit: 2,361,516
RAC: 22
United States
Message 2031351 - Posted: 8 Feb 2020, 3:47:15 UTC

Things are looking good for the system. We have all the WUs we want as the RTS queue is a healthy size of a couple of hours worth. It is going to take some time for the junk WUs to work their way out of the db and for the Results returned and awaiting validation to get to normal size again. Will it take 6 weeks for those blc35s to time out and plague us again??

We have caught up on Aricebo data files and are now splitting old files again. It also looks like they will have to load some Greenbank data on the splitter pile for us sometime this weekend.

I hope the seti team has a nice quiet weekend for a change.
ID: 2031351 · Report as offensive
Profile Unixchick Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Mar 12
Posts: 815
Credit: 2,361,516
RAC: 22
United States
Message 2031352 - Posted: 8 Feb 2020, 4:04:35 UTC

Time to look at the data. I tried to search for TIC434234955 and came up with nothing. anyone know about the TIC files??
ID: 2031352 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 2031353 - Posted: 8 Feb 2020, 4:12:18 UTC - in response to Message 2031352.  

Time to look at the data. I tried to search for TIC434234955 and came up with nothing. anyone know about the TIC files??

https://tess.mit.edu/science/tess-input-catalogue/
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 2031353 · Report as offensive
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 2031362 - Posted: 8 Feb 2020, 6:11:46 UTC - in response to Message 2030698.  

we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up.


. . And the Setizens bid a fond farewell to the Blc35 WUs of 58692 and 58693 with a hearty cheer ...

"RACK OFF YA NASTY, NOISY SOANDSOs"

Stephen

:)



. . They are the final validate checks for overflows on slow machines, I have a handful of _2's as well :) but almost none compared to when they were still splitting ...

Stephen

< shrug >

What you say is true, but you fail to take into account the deadline, they are VLAR's, so on my latest it is 04/06/2020 (US format). So we will be seeing blc35 for some time yet.


. . Well you can count all that you find on your machine/s and let me know how many continue to plague you ...

Stephen

<shrug>
ID: 2031362 · Report as offensive
Profile Unixchick Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Mar 12
Posts: 815
Credit: 2,361,516
RAC: 22
United States
Message 2031447 - Posted: 8 Feb 2020, 17:15:53 UTC - in response to Message 2031353.  

Time to look at the data. I tried to search for TIC434234955 and came up with nothing. anyone know about the TIC files??

https://tess.mit.edu/science/tess-input-catalogue/


Thanks Keith!

This is data from pointing the dish at stars with exoplanets, if I'm understanding this correctly. Sounds like a good thing to do. 58838 is Dec 21, 2019. So this is also very fresh data.
ID: 2031447 · Report as offensive
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 2031514 - Posted: 8 Feb 2020, 23:45:11 UTC - in response to Message 2031447.  

Time to look at the data. I tried to search for TIC434234955 and came up with nothing. anyone know about the TIC files??

https://tess.mit.edu/science/tess-input-catalogue/


Thanks Keith!

This is data from pointing the dish at stars with exoplanets, if I'm understanding this correctly. Sounds like a good thing to do. 58838 is Dec 21, 2019. So this is also very fresh data.


. . This is very interesting. But we have data on so few exoplanets. There is so much work ahead of this project.

Stephen

. .
ID: 2031514 · Report as offensive
Profile Unixchick Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Mar 12
Posts: 815
Credit: 2,361,516
RAC: 22
United States
Message 2032130 - Posted: 13 Feb 2020, 0:01:28 UTC - in response to Message 2030549.  
Last modified: 13 Feb 2020, 0:04:23 UTC

we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up.


We have now passed 10 days since the blc35s that were so bad were last sent. I'm assuming there is still a 10 day cache size limit. So hopefully a bunch more of the blc35s have gone through the system. Now we just need to wait for the time out date for these files to finally be done with them.

edit: March 20 for one of the blc35s I still have.
ID: 2032130 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19607
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 2032144 - Posted: 13 Feb 2020, 1:23:06 UTC - in response to Message 2032130.  

we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up.


We have now passed 10 days since the blc35s that were so bad were last sent. I'm assuming there is still a 10 day cache size limit. So hopefully a bunch more of the blc35s have gone through the system. Now we just need to wait for the time out date for these files to finally be done with them.


If they report before the deadline, won't the deadline just trigger the sending of the _2 task and then the deadline for those...........

edit: March 20 for one of the blc35s I still have.
ID: 2032144 · Report as offensive
Speedy
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 04
Posts: 1646
Credit: 12,921,799
RAC: 89
New Zealand
Message 2032158 - Posted: 13 Feb 2020, 2:37:23 UTC - in response to Message 2032144.  

we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up.


We have now passed 10 days since the blc35s that were so bad were last sent. I'm assuming there is still a 10 day cache size limit. So hopefully a bunch more of the blc35s have gone through the system. Now we just need to wait for the time out date for these files to finally be done with them.


If they report before the deadline, won't the deadline just trigger the sending of the _2 task and then the deadline for those...........

edit: March 20 for one of the blc35s I still have.

Yes this is the way I would expect it to work. If it is returned before the deadline unless it is returned as "inconclusive" a _2 task will not need be sent out
ID: 2032158 · Report as offensive
Profile Unixchick Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Mar 12
Posts: 815
Credit: 2,361,516
RAC: 22
United States
Message 2032175 - Posted: 13 Feb 2020, 4:44:51 UTC

results returned is a bit high at 164,154 per hour... are we getting shorties or bad data??
ID: 2032175 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13917
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 2032180 - Posted: 13 Feb 2020, 5:51:49 UTC
Last modified: 13 Feb 2020, 5:55:47 UTC

I'm seeing quite a few groups of resends, many of which are noise bombs.

Edit- and looks like there are a few shorties out and about as well.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 2032180 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19607
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 2032194 - Posted: 13 Feb 2020, 8:20:16 UTC - in response to Message 2032158.  

But blc35 was mainly noise bombs so probably will go to at least _2.
ID: 2032194 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 31 · 32 · 33 · 34

Message boards : Number crunching : Data Chat


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.