Message boards :
Number crunching :
Data Chat
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 31 · 32 · 33 · 34
Author | Message |
---|---|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13917 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
Premature announcement Stephen. There won't be any new BLC35s issued, but of course there are probably 10s of thousands (if not 100s of thousands) of them still to be cleared out. Grant Darwin NT |
Stephen "Heretic" ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 ![]() ![]() |
we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up. . . They are the final validate checks for overflows on slow machines, I have a handful of _2's as well :) but almost none compared to when they were still splitting ... Stephen < shrug > |
W-K 666 ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19607 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 ![]() ![]() |
we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up. What you say is true, but you fail to take into account the deadline, they are VLAR's, so on my latest it is 04/06/2020 (US format). So we will be seeing blc35 for some time yet. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22 ![]() ![]() |
Things are looking good for the system. We have all the WUs we want as the RTS queue is a healthy size of a couple of hours worth. It is going to take some time for the junk WUs to work their way out of the db and for the Results returned and awaiting validation to get to normal size again. Will it take 6 weeks for those blc35s to time out and plague us again?? We have caught up on Aricebo data files and are now splitting old files again. It also looks like they will have to load some Greenbank data on the splitter pile for us sometime this weekend. I hope the seti team has a nice quiet weekend for a change. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22 ![]() ![]() |
Time to look at the data. I tried to search for TIC434234955 and came up with nothing. anyone know about the TIC files?? |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
Time to look at the data. I tried to search for TIC434234955 and came up with nothing. anyone know about the TIC files?? https://tess.mit.edu/science/tess-input-catalogue/ Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Stephen "Heretic" ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 ![]() ![]() |
we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up. . . Well you can count all that you find on your machine/s and let me know how many continue to plague you ... Stephen <shrug> |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22 ![]() ![]() |
Time to look at the data. I tried to search for TIC434234955 and came up with nothing. anyone know about the TIC files?? Thanks Keith! This is data from pointing the dish at stars with exoplanets, if I'm understanding this correctly. Sounds like a good thing to do. 58838 is Dec 21, 2019. So this is also very fresh data. |
Stephen "Heretic" ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 ![]() ![]() |
Time to look at the data. I tried to search for TIC434234955 and came up with nothing. anyone know about the TIC files?? . . This is very interesting. But we have data on so few exoplanets. There is so much work ahead of this project. Stephen . . |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22 ![]() ![]() |
we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up. We have now passed 10 days since the blc35s that were so bad were last sent. I'm assuming there is still a 10 day cache size limit. So hopefully a bunch more of the blc35s have gone through the system. Now we just need to wait for the time out date for these files to finally be done with them. edit: March 20 for one of the blc35s I still have. |
W-K 666 ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19607 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 ![]() ![]() |
we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up. If they report before the deadline, won't the deadline just trigger the sending of the _2 task and then the deadline for those........... edit: March 20 for one of the blc35s I still have. |
Speedy ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1646 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 ![]() ![]() |
we are done splitting the blc35 that have caused so many problems. I'm sure they will continue to cause issues as they are still in caches and might need more wingmen, but it should be less problems from this point. Hopefully this will give the system a chance to catch up. Yes this is the way I would expect it to work. If it is returned before the deadline unless it is returned as "inconclusive" a _2 task will not need be sent out ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22 ![]() ![]() |
results returned is a bit high at 164,154 per hour... are we getting shorties or bad data?? |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13917 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
I'm seeing quite a few groups of resends, many of which are noise bombs. Edit- and looks like there are a few shorties out and about as well. Grant Darwin NT |
W-K 666 ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19607 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 ![]() ![]() |
But blc35 was mainly noise bombs so probably will go to at least _2. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.