Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (109) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Stephen "Heretic" ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 ![]() ![]() |
. . <smirk> mb_splitter/ap_splitter: Reads tapes (or tape images on disk) containing raw telescope data and creates SETI@home (multi-beam) or Astropulse workunits for the BOINC/SETI@home clients. At least one needs to be running to produce work, and that's usually enough. . . nuff said :) Stephen :) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
I noticed that gbt_splitter#4 got briefly pulled from duty. Now back. I wonder if it was hanging up the output. Really frustrating that my Linux box is still unable to get any appreciable work while my slow Windows7 boxes have mostly full caches. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3848 Credit: 1,114,826,392 RAC: 3,319 ![]() ![]() |
Really frustrating that my Linux box is still unable to get any appreciable work while my slow Windows7 boxes have mostly full caches. I noticed that as well... I'm sure some would disagree but I see it with my own eyes: even with a zero resource share, if E@H has minimal work (one WU per slot running and zero cached) and SETI@Home is empty, BOINC often stops asking for SETI@Home work (has zero work units and it's just sitting with no countdown timer to next scheduler request) and I have to hit Update manually to remind it. Well I did that with six fast Linux machines and they got zilch and the seventh was my wife's slower SoG Win7 box and presto... 130 tasks. Just the luck of the draw (I hope.) ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 37754 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 ![]() ![]() |
I noticed that gbt_splitter#4 got briefly pulled from duty. Now back. I wonder if it was hanging up the output. Really frustrating that my Linux box is still unable to get any appreciable work while my slow Windows7 boxes have mostly full caches. The guys are probably trying to break up the congregation of splitters working on the 1st GBT file in the list (still looks to be a half dozen splitters still working on the 1 file when you zoom in on it) and get them working on other files instead and you just caught them in the act. ;-) Cheers. |
Stephen "Heretic" ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 ![]() ![]() |
I noticed that gbt_splitter#4 got briefly pulled from duty. Now back. I wonder if it was hanging up the output. Really frustrating that my Linux box is still unable to get any appreciable work while my slow Windows7 boxes have mostly full caches. . . Ironic as it may be for once I have the opposite experience. Both Linux boxes received nearly full caches (over many requests) while the Windows box got work right away for the GPU but struggled over many many attempts before getting any work for the CPU. I had to reschedule WUs from the GPU Q. Stephen ? ? |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
I finally had to shut off gpu work entirely for the project and wait through 4 request cycles before the servers finally decided to send me 40 cpu tasks on the Linux machine. I haven't had any cpu tasks from Seti for 2 days now on that machine until just now. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
I noticed that gbt_splitter#4 got briefly pulled from duty. Now back. I wonder if it was hanging up the output. Really frustrating that my Linux box is still unable to get any appreciable work while my slow Windows7 boxes have mostly full caches. I'm absolutely convinced that the project ignores Ryzen machines for work requests. Couldn't get work on the Windows Ryzen either. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Jan 01 Posts: 112 Credit: 29,923,129 RAC: 6 ![]() |
Creation time is at 72 a second at the moment. That's the highest I've ever seen it. Most of my machines have a full cache - a couple of them I did have to kick start though. 0 results ready to send and number of units received in the last hour is at 55k but I would imagine those numbers will return to normal in the next few hours. ~Chris ![]() |
rob smith ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22739 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 ![]() ![]() |
Hard to say exactly what the state of play is with the replica being over an hour behind the master.... Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
rob smith ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22739 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 ![]() ![]() |
....from the number of tasks on my crunchers it looks as if the splitters are spluttering again :-( Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14690 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 ![]() ![]() |
I'd allowed one of my single GPU machines to help Einstein for a while. I've just given it a prod to restore normal service, and got the full 100 at the first request. As somebody said, it's the luck of the draw. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Mar 12 Posts: 5375 Credit: 30,870,693 RAC: 1 ![]() |
Caches are full and RAC is steadily dropping ............everything back to normal and the Credit Screw is turning as usual. ![]() "Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)> |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3848 Credit: 1,114,826,392 RAC: 3,319 ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11451 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 ![]() ![]() |
Those who use Einstein as a backup project should take note and have a sufficient cache next Tuesday or they may very well run out of work. Einstein has decided to join the fun by stating We are going to shut down the project next Tuesday, Jan 23rd at around 10 AM CET for an upgrade of our database backend systems to make them ready for the years to come. We're going to upgrade hardware parts, operating systems as well the databases themselves, which is why we need to shut down the entire project, including the BOINC backend and this very website. We should have the pleasure of a double outrage. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Apr 13 Posts: 1859 Credit: 268,616,081 RAC: 1,349 ![]() ![]() |
Those who use Einstein as a backup project should take note and have a sufficient cache next Tuesday or they may very well run out of work. Yeah, it is a shame about the scheduling. Any other day would have sufficed ... ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
Can always choose another backup project. I'll have MilkyWay and GPUGrid.net as backups also. Though if I build a big enough cache of Einstein work, that shouldn't be an issue either. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11451 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, it is a shame about the scheduling. Any other day would have sufficed ... But a double outrage is something to behold. |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14690 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 ![]() ![]() |
Can always choose another backup project. I'll have MilkyWay and GPUGrid.net as backups also. Though if I build a big enough cache of Einstein work, that shouldn't be an issue either.Last time I crossed swords with MilkyWay, it was appallingly badly managed. And GPUGrid is giving me RSI in the mouse-click finger, because I run it but have extreme difficulty snagging new work. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
Can always choose another backup project. I'll have MilkyWay and GPUGrid.net as backups also. Though if I build a big enough cache of Einstein work, that shouldn't be an issue either.Last time I crossed swords with MilkyWay, it was appallingly badly managed. And GPUGrid is giving me RSI in the mouse-click finger, because I run it but have extreme difficulty snagging new work. MilkyWay?? Badly managed?? Wow, very different experience here.. MW is the most set and forget project I have run. I never have to micromanage it at all. I love the hard limit of 80 tasks per gpu at any one time. Never a chance of getting too much work and never any chance of running out. I only crunch gpu tasks so that means I have run the Binary Pulsar Search while it lasted and now run the Gamma Ray Pulsar Search. The only issues I have seen with the project is the occasional bad work unit that promptly gets tossed out very quickly. The servers seem to stay up for very long times, months at a time in fact. Yes, I have just recently joined GPUGrid.net and the gpu work availability is very spotty and random. The tasks when they are made available are quickly gobbled up by many fingers bashing the update button. The cpu work for Linux hosts has had work available pretty much all the time. No problem getting cpu work for the Linux host. We are asking the project scientists to make the cpu work available for Windows too. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14690 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 ![]() ![]() |
Well, I found it necessary to make Post 58550. Read through to Post 58572, and note his titles. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.