Lunatics Windows Installer v0.44 - new release for v8 (required upgrade)

Message boards : Number crunching : Lunatics Windows Installer v0.44 - new release for v8 (required upgrade)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7

AuthorMessage
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13832
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1780325 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 7:49:21 UTC - in response to Message 1780323.  

Thanks, Grant. As it happens, I've got all 4 crunchers on 7.6.22 at this point. Should have included that info.

Wouldn't 7.6.6 be more recent than 7.6.22???
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1780325 · Report as offensive
Profile William
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 13
Posts: 2037
Credit: 17,689,662
RAC: 0
Message 1780326 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 7:49:59 UTC - in response to Message 1780323.  

Any thoughts?

From memory it relates to the BOINC Manager expecting things to be done in a certain time, and they're not, so the error results.

It was suggested I upgrade BOINC, so I upgraded to v7.6.6 (I think that was the version that got the work around for that particular issue) and I haven't seen that error message since; whereas I used to get it every few weeks or so.

Thanks, Grant. As it happens, I've got all 4 crunchers on 7.6.22 at this point. Should have included that info.

Ok, nothing to do with the installer - can you open a dedicated thread please?

finish file present too long is one of those elusive ones that nobody really ever mamnged to establish the root cause.but since you manage system probelms lets start from there.

dedicated thread please.
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. (Mark Twain)
ID: 1780326 · Report as offensive
Profile William
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 13
Posts: 2037
Credit: 17,689,662
RAC: 0
Message 1780327 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 7:50:43 UTC - in response to Message 1780325.  

Thanks, Grant. As it happens, I've got all 4 crunchers on 7.6.22 at this point. Should have included that info.

Wouldn't 7.6.6 be more recent than 7.6.22???

nope. 22>6 ;) you might want to read it as 7.6.06
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. (Mark Twain)
ID: 1780327 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13832
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1780332 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 8:11:53 UTC - in response to Message 1780327.  
Last modified: 19 Apr 2016, 8:12:48 UTC

Thanks, Grant. As it happens, I've got all 4 crunchers on 7.6.22 at this point. Should have included that info.

Wouldn't 7.6.6 be more recent than 7.6.22???

nope. 22>6 ;) you might want to read it as 7.6.06

It would make much more sense if they did number things that way.
for me 7.6.6 = 07.60.60
7.6.22 = 07.60.22
.60>.22
Well, it used to be.


EDIT, maybe the work around that was put in one of the earlier versions got dropped for the current version?
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1780332 · Report as offensive
Profile Jimbocous Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 13
Posts: 1856
Credit: 268,616,081
RAC: 1,349
United States
Message 1780334 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 8:23:04 UTC - in response to Message 1780325.  

Thanks, Grant. As it happens, I've got all 4 crunchers on 7.6.22 at this point. Should have included that info.

Wouldn't 7.6.6 be more recent than 7.6.22???

Nope.
ID: 1780334 · Report as offensive
Profile Jimbocous Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 13
Posts: 1856
Credit: 268,616,081
RAC: 1,349
United States
Message 1780336 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 8:24:08 UTC - in response to Message 1780326.  

dedicated thread please.

Will do. Thanks ...
ID: 1780336 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14672
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1780340 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 8:35:07 UTC - in response to Message 1780332.  

EDIT, maybe the work around that was put in one of the earlier versions got dropped for the current version?

The reference to a fix being included in version 7.(0)6.(0)6 was for a slightly different problem - Stderr Truncations - and I see a familiar name signing off that thread. I have no indication of a reversion on that code.

At the same time, Rom Walton put an equivalent fix into the BOINC API (the library code that all project science applications include), so the stderr problem shouldn't be reliant on a particular BOINC client version.

Jimbocous's problems seems to be happening with the x41zi cuda50 application. Unfortunately, Jason maintains his own forked version of the API library, which is still reporting version 6.2.18 (although I know it's moved on a long, long, way since then). So I don't know if that particular fix was imported into his version. Maybe he can confirm in the new thread.
ID: 1780340 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1780347 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 8:53:28 UTC - in response to Message 1780340.  

Yeah, since my variant bypasses the core issues (doesn't kill threads holding buffers being written, and doesn't write a lot) you're problably looking at some system maintenance/update rather than a Boinc client or app specific problem. Naturally with any underlying issue, one or another application could be more sensitive than others. I'd Appreciate to dig deeper as per my post in the other thread, so as to completely understand what might be going on with that system (including what else might be running)
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1780347 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13832
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1780348 - Posted: 19 Apr 2016, 8:54:41 UTC - in response to Message 1780340.  

EDIT, maybe the work around that was put in one of the earlier versions got dropped for the current version?

The reference to a fix being included in version 7.(0)6.(0)6 was for a slightly different problem - Stderr Truncations - and I see a familiar name signing off that thread. I have no indication of a reversion on that code.

Damn.
I am losing my mind.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1780348 · Report as offensive
KLiK
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 14
Posts: 1304
Credit: 22,994,597
RAC: 60
Croatia
Message 1799598 - Posted: 30 Jun 2016, 10:25:31 UTC

Download of v0.44 is not available on link! :(


non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia, EU
ID: 1799598 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14672
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1799604 - Posted: 30 Jun 2016, 11:14:10 UTC - in response to Message 1799598.  

Download of v0.44 is not available on link! :(

As I said yesterday, v0.44 can't really be recommended any more, because the application version numbers are out of date. v0.45 is in preparation, but the new applications are still going through a process of testing and revision. So we're between versions at the moment.

Having said that, I don't know which link you're talking about, but the Release announcement listed two alternative mirror sites for v0.44, and v0.45 Beta3 (soon to be Beta4) is publicly available via this board.
ID: 1799604 · Report as offensive
Profile Stubbles
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 99
Posts: 358
Credit: 5,909,255
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1804714 - Posted: 24 Jul 2016, 20:31:27 UTC - in response to Message 1799604.  

Hello Richard,
...and v0.45 Beta3 (soon to be Beta4) is publicly available via this board.

Any update available wrt ETA for Beta4, and what's to be expected in it?

Cheers,
Rob :-}
ID: 1804714 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7

Message boards : Number crunching : Lunatics Windows Installer v0.44 - new release for v8 (required upgrade)


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.