Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 201 · 202 · 203 · 204 · 205 · 206 · 207 . . . 334 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2054918 - Posted: 8 Aug 2020, 5:56:53 UTC

Here nonpublic, for perhaps rather non-public instead, and here suggestions are welcome.

But only just turn away for perhaps only a slap in the face it could be, next also that of grief for only suffering, for still not any "relief" it could be instead.

Perhaps only a distorted face instead, for not any shape it should be either, for only that of a waiver it could be instead.

Here translate for only the insignia it perhaps could be, for not any epaulettes it could be instead, when still not any special branch of just brave people, for only the marching it still could be.

Or maybe only uncertain about the word, for still not any "instead" here, because here perhaps only a bit long line, for only just a plaque of stone earlier on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments

Here just intentional, for still not making it any sight or countenance here, for only that of ascribed instead, when still not any Census.

So for only the whatever it still could be, and next I could make it only Causality, for still not any template, for only proving for a sentence.

But only for that of an Equation instead, next that of Equivalence, for only what it could be, when still not any Laws of physics instead.

Perhaps science is still only that of absolutes for only what we could make it, but next we could still only prove, for not any Certainty it could be instead,
for next also the Faith or Belief it could be, when only that of Religion.

Only realism (large caps) for that of Fact, and next also realistic for still the meaning it perhaps also could be, for not any fantasy instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realism

Give me a laugh here, for perhaps not any better I could make it instead.

Perhaps I could be still only making it that of hiding, for also the veil it could be, for not any enveloped, because next only a mystery for that of such, for not any shroud instead.

But only God for that of its presence, and next also visibility, for still not any "up the sleeves", for also the undocumented it could be.

Next only come close to me for that of a meeting, when still not any shaking of hands, for also the sight it could be, when also countenance.

So here only trying for making it that of ascribed, for still not any testimony instead, because here still not any heart, for only just beloved.

But here making it perhaps only a sacrifice, for only the unjust it could be, when still not any "order of nature", for just the adaptation it could be.

Guess what, but I could still only make it that of Principle here, for not any closer look it could be still, when still not any skewed, for only just the
incomplete it could be still, for just lacking.

Make it only a word for that of a priest, and next take his word for granted, when still only a given sacrifice only that of Religion for such, when not any offering instead.

I will try to edit that above, for still not any incomplete it could be instead.

And just deadly wrong, for only mentioning that, and we could also be coming short for that of the knowledge it could still be, when also that of Comprehension as well.

Perhaps I could make it still only God versus the Devil, for only that of a renunciation for such, when still also that of guilt it also could be, except not any third man instead.

Here it reminds me that we could make it God just noname, for still only a Creator instead.

But next guess what, for still only the science it could be, and next we could prove for only that of Facts, for also that of results versus outcome.

And next down the drain once again, for just the other word I could say, for still not any Fallacies here.

Perhaps I could only mimic for still only the reality it could be, except also that of a moniker for also an Allegory, when just the other thing.

The only thing I know here, is that any Proof should never be just the answer here, for only meaning, when still only that of such a thing.

Only two hands for also eyebrows, and next I could also see, for not any hindsight it could be instead, because here still only God hiding behind a veil of secrecy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(classical_mythology)

Here still not any bricks for only a puzzle, except only classical Mythology instead, when still perhaps not any recognition, for only a face for such.

Just add to it for that of reckon, and next only reckoning, for that of a word, when still not any silly or stupid debate, for that of Atheists versus Agnostics only for such.

Perhaps it should be only scientific Proof only for meaning, for still not any except, for only following on a single line instead, and next proving for only a sentence, when still not any word.

Arbitrary --> Premise (arbitrariness) -- (set) Condition.

Hmm, so here proving for just the tenet or doctrine it could be, for still not any Ambiguity instead.
ID: 2054918 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2054980 - Posted: 8 Aug 2020, 21:47:49 UTC
Last modified: 8 Aug 2020, 21:51:32 UTC

And you think I am stupid, for not any wise instead, because here just cold fingers right now.

Only the Premise for the nature we could make, and next the way of looking at it from a scientific perspective.

Your attitude for just given could be for only just personal for such, when still not any science instead.

Asking whether nature could be any completed, for only completion instead, and perhaps only arbitrariness instead.

If it just came for only being meant, still perhaps randomness, for only just the eventuality it became, for still not any Coincidence instead.

And do not forget that the discussion should still be about intelligent life only for meaning, except still the vastness of space, for only making it.

But only for just where it started, perhaps still the Philosophical argument we could make it, for only that of a Reason behind.

So why could I put myself in just a role for that of asking, when still the fundamental questions it could be?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubt

Raise your hand for that of making it an Oath, and next only a bit of doubt, for not any "Beauty and beast" for only recognition instead, when also fulfillment.

Either just only a given Comprehension for that of an understanding, except only levels instead, for just the same.

Only just that of pretty versus ugly for that of a contrast, still perhaps a difference, except only a comparison you could make.

Here it still comes with both for that of meaning, when only a comparison should be a measure for only such.

So here still only apostrophes, for not any playing in bed, for only a distasteful dinner right now.

Just things for that of nature, and next the difference we still could make, for only a given Comprehension for that of a whole.

And here nature still in front of us for being visible, and it becomes magnificence and splendor for only the precious it could be.

Perhaps there should be no God just comparing with either, for still only nature instead, except also the bad for also worse as well.

Just pull it up for that of a climb, and next you could also step down for redacting a little, for still only the opposite.

But if just a bent or misspelled word for that of sentence, should not be any spoon either, only that of Proof still for meaning for that of science,
except still only that of Fact you could make it instead.

If I could be making it any Fallacies just for science, next I also could be doing the same, for only a God for just meaning.

Maybe Julius Caesar came, saw, and next went, except still only took part of the whole ceremony, for only being present, when still not any "to be or not to be".

It also reminds me here that any past, present, and future, should not be any "see, saw, seen" either, for just the look or feeling you could make it.

But rather still only the definition of just Fact you could make it, for the same Proof instead, for still only science of meaning.

Perhaps we could still prove science only for meaning as well, for not any Religion instead, except still only the two options it could also be.

We know that a whale could be beaching for not any stranded either, and for that also a project ending up incomplete for that of result.

But here still only Laws and Equations for that of meaning, for only the nature we could witness and also observe.

Here still only part time job for that of incomplete, for still not any completion instead, for only the fulfilled it could be.

For some reason I could make it only randomness for still only disorder and turmoil for such, when also the different factors, for only Chaos for such.

But it rather set, for only delivered, it could be still part of a whole for only a property for such, when still not any Object here.

Only for that of nature goes, and it still comes, for that of being present, for only its splendor, for still not any arbitrary instead.

So here perhaps not any animal I should make it either, except only completion for that of being completed, except still not any Reason behind,
except it perhaps should be just made, for that of produced or manufactured as well.

But here also a Creation myth for just telling that God created the Universe in just six days, and saw that it was working.

Is it still just two, for only both, for still only Matter Creation and Creation myth for such, when still only telling?

Does not perfectness and symmetry still come hand in hand for also turmoil and disorder, for still that of both, for just being included?

Or is the reason you only could make it God just for meaning, only that of a given symmetry, for still not any randomness instead?

But only for that of "evidently", perhaps still only Evidence for such, except not any manufactured world, for only a Universe for such.

You could be making it a split tongue, for not any harelip it should be instead, but next you also could be having a split personality.

We also know that replication could be that of a self-copying, for still only an ability to reproduce, except not any rebirth instead,
and here also better just being identical twins, for not any siamese instead.

Just business should still be only for enterprise, for also the trade it could be, when still not any prettiness instead for just only love,
and for that also the nested Algorithm, for still not any answer here.

But next also "Susan seeking", for that of the imaginary it perhaps could be, and next knowing that you could be stretching it to the limit, for still only infinity.

If nature became for just that of completed it still could be, next that of infinity only for such, for that of a meaning, when still not any Construct.

Here I better should know still, for only the Belief I could make it for that of a single God, for only a reason for that of such.

So here a cup of coffee perhaps needed, for also the cake, because here doing it almost at will, for still not any better instead.

Answer in the making, for only just becoming such, except still knowing that Proof could be just the answer we could only deliver instead.

I could be still doing a bit of Economy, for that of money for such, and next also embezzlement as well, for also that of misappropriation.

But if only the worse or worst you could make it, for that of a "Worst-case scenario", still perhaps not any better, for only the complete it should be.

I made it a notion of death here earlier on, except still perhaps only speaking for death ears, for only such a notion it could be, for still not any other option.

And here a reminder once again, that I could be making it a Fallacy both for science, for also the Religion it could be.

I better make a new one here, for just continuing, but first the cup of coffee.
ID: 2054980 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2054981 - Posted: 8 Aug 2020, 23:11:02 UTC
Last modified: 8 Aug 2020, 23:13:28 UTC

And next the little man for only just a figure, climbing the stairs for only looking into the sky, for not any wider horizons instead.

Here the self-replicating nature, for only that of copying, except still not any mass-production, for only a given produce.

So easy it is just slipping and falling, for only the Laws of nature it could be, for still not any infalllibility instead.

Nature could be still stretching it to the limits for only the infinity it could be, except not any reaching of a Conclusion, for that of grasping only for such.

Here the God it perhaps should be, for only surpassing our ability to understand, for also the notion it could be, for also that of beyond.

But next only that of free will, for not any beloved instead, for only making it "Beauty and beast", for still not any Star Queen instead.

If it became just "|----|" here for that of a given time frame, next a moment of start, for only just beginning, for also the dead end it could be,
for still not any time running in cycles, for only a spinning loop for such.

But next asking me what could be coming before, for not any after, next only preceding for that of thereafter instead.

Here time and space should be synonymous, for also the defintion of Existence we could make it, for still not any "to be or not to be".

I could perhaps still love Lucy, for only falling in love, except still not any Ambiguity or Contradiction for only just telling for that of a meaning.

Rather still only the Philosophical argument we could make it, for only that of a Reason behind, and should be a single sentence.

So here I could be still saddling the horse for only just climbing, when also needing the stirrup, for only the simple fact of not falling down.

Here the Laws of nature should be still only a reason for that of such, for not any other Reason we could make it instead.

Only ups and downs perhaps, for still only falling, for that of just plainly visible, except that just evident, should still also be that of Fact.

So, rule the world, for still not any rule of thumb, for only that of twisted instead, for still not any "dominance" you could make it instead,
when still only that of Fallacies for science, for not any Religion instead.

Just a bad spelling instead, and it next becomes "Lord", when it should be still only God, because here I am not any "asking", for only the perfect it still could be.

The moniker or Allegory I perhaps could make it for that of God for only Existence, should perhaps be for only nature instead, for that of its meaning.

Only "got it", for not any beg or "here I am" either, and it becomes only just nature for still only presence, for also the completed it could be.

Leave it to the masses for still only believing, for still not any copying or self-copying it could be instead, when just a joke could be still a card hidden in the sleeves.

And here it still could perhaps be only Julius Caesar for the farewell it should be, for not any God forgetting about the Creation he made.

Here not any disbelief we could make it for nature, when only that of magnificence and beauty, for also the Proof it could be.

Any recognition should be still only for that of God for his Existence, for not any "evidently" we only should make it for nature instead.

Therefore only just Belief here, for still not any randomness or disorder, for only the "answer" it perhaps could be.

We could perhaps only see it for just the thing it could be, except also the Proof it could be for meaning, and still only nature just for its presence.

Only "twist and shout", and next only the slip of the tongue it perhaps could be, for not any end to end carpet instead.

And for still not any wrong, for only just right instead, that of Laws of nature it could be here, for also the Proof it could be.

Any wrong should be for only that of incomplete, for still not any completeness for only that of symmetry and perfectness.

Asking that any nature could be only a thing we could be wishing for, next perhaps not the way we could be telling, for only just made.

So, dance to the beat of the night, for also the rhythm it could be, and next a pulsating show, for only an Event for such, when still not any repeating.

If I knew that nature was incomplete only for a meaning, next it became only such for the reality it could be, for still not any other thing instead.

Only a sphere for that of such a reality, and it becomes contained for that of within, for still not any past or beyond, for that of an outside for such.

All roads could still lead to the city of Rome, for not any eventuality instead, which could be telling about an infallibility only for such.

The Universe could be still vast for that of size, except still what it could room or contain, for that of its properties, for still not any droplet in the ocean instead.

Here you could make it some 13.8 or 13.9 billion years for that of age, when also 78 billion light years across, for still not any shape it could be.

But next it reminds me of the two realities we could make, when still not any Causality for only philosophy for such.

Just two parts for that of a given whole, and next not any cubit I should make it either, when only just Sets for that of proportions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportionality

So why not just properties here instead, for also the Object it could be, for only that of dimensions instead?

Only just blow my nose, for still the cough it could be, and next not any blown out of proportions for only such a cough.

Forget it instead, and next I could be waiting in front of the door, for not any entering in, for also the gate it could be.

One thing is making it just completed for that of the nature it could be, except still only praise God, for that of a meaning.

Praise the Lord perhaps, but next also the fact that I could be still having five fingers on each hand, for just the two it could be.

Only for that of being attributed, next an Object for that of such, with its properties, for only what it could represent.

So, for only just a droplet in the ocean, and next still the wonders of nature I could make it, for not any press of the button, for only infinity for such.

Any Reason behind, for only just undefined, and still not any characteristics you could make it here, for only that of defined properties.

Leave it there as I said, for only just told, when that of infinity still for not any limit you could make, for also not any Reason behind.

Just infallible should be only that of incomprehensible for such, when still not any press of the button, for only past or beyond for such.

But if just infinity could be defined as a property of nature, also the Construct it could be, for still not any other Reason.

Here the sorry for perhaps the science it only could be, next became only mentioned, for still the unsuccessful it perhaps became.

Life is life, and next also could be precious as well, for still not any opinion about a given death, for only a meaning for such.

The structured query should be still only for a programming language, and next also Set for that of Objects, for still only Mathematics for such.

Globular clusters could be still only wonders of nature, for only part of such, except still not any meaning, for only just the comparison it could be.

But next any "tantamount" for also the implict it could be, and next only infinity here, for still not any pretty instead, for just that given word.

Again the coffee for only just needed, when still not any uniform or homogeneity for just the same word.

Again, leave it there only, for still not any press of the finger it could be instead, for still only God sitting on the pedestal, for being in charge.

Only just pretty fingers, for that of an ugly word, and still only nature for its presence, for also the wonders it also could be.

We could choose to dismiss any Lucy for only a missing link for such, for still not any overall view it could be instead, for that of the Universe.
ID: 2054981 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2054986 - Posted: 9 Aug 2020, 2:04:08 UTC
Last modified: 9 Aug 2020, 2:31:28 UTC

But next having the coffee, for not any rolling tape it should be, for that of a picture of a military man, looking at the remnants of a weather balloon.

Is just just no point asking any questions about life and death, when still only science, for just the balloon it could be?

Make it any life for just a reason, and next also the wrong you could be, for that of a Judgement only for such, for still not any considerering instead.

The problem is that we could make it just debunkers for also Skeptics, except still not any hard, for only pressing a button.

Regardless, for only that of implicit, and next not any welcome either for only the answer you could make it.

Truth should be just a matter of fact, for not any testimony you could make it instead, for also a Premise as well.

I better should be off for making it only aliens here, for still not any Belief versus Existence instead.

Should I believe in aliens for only a meaning, next a handshake only for such, except still only Proof instead, for rather better off as well.

But next only an overall view for that of the Universe, for still not any broken promises instead.

The Universe could be vast for only size, except any teeming for only life, should be the other thing.

Just the enough it could be, for not any evidently instead, and next nature for only a meaning, for that of its produce.

But only reveal instead, for the spirit in the bottle it could be, and next the fantastic spectacle, for still only smoke being visible.

Lucid dreams perhaps, for also vivid, and next nature for only contrast, for still only its ability to produce.

Just "holy smoke", and perhaps not any playing guitar either, for still only the fantasy it could be, for not any monster either.

So, for still not any photographic process either, for that of emulation, still only a play for not any production instead.

Perhaps the Proof it still could be, also should be an answer for such, except not any telling for just the right or wrong it could be.

Here I was making it only complete for that of nature, for still not any incomplete, when also that of fulfillment as well.

But here only apparent magnitude for that of a star, when also luminosity, for still not any absolute instead.

Next that of "both" for just the all I could make it, for still only that of completeness, for the Universe it next also became.

If rather uncertainties instead, for only that of Ambiguity or Contradiction, next still not any nature for just telling, for only what it could be.

Just lack of precision, and it becomes that of incompleteness, for still not any fulfillment it should be here either.

But next still only a Premise for that of nature, for also the Causality it could be.

Only for that of just bending a word, still not any "mint" for only condition, when that of such for only just stating a given Fact.

Just "go to Hell", and still not any praise of the Lord I could make it, for only an opposite meaning, when still that of nature for only given worth.

You could be making it infinity for only a given purpose, except still not any negative numbers, for that of still infinity.

Yes, I know it, but if perhaps editing later on, it perhaps could be somewhat better.

A portal could be still a gate to another world, for just the entering it could be, except still only outside, for that of waiting.

So if a Philosophical argument should be still only God for that of its existence, next not any nature for only meaning either.

We could be making it a Creator for only a simple reason, for also the Creation it still could be, for that of nature.

But rather that infinity is just implicit, for that of a Creation just coming along, for only the reason it could be, and next only making it still God.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force

Any better off, and next I could be knowing it, for still not any begging or bidding instead.

But only leave it off, for just what I had to say, and next only making it Fallacies, for still not any Beauty and beast instead.

I could be having the beer right now, and for still only the power of love, it should not be any "sex machine" here, for only powers of nature instead.

Only just a waiver, for not any renunciation either, and next only a call, for still not any sin either, because here also the other word.

Just stay on course, for that of the steady it could be, and next not any alterable either, for still only direction.

Any "both" for just the why it could be, and next only direction for that of space, for still not any unilateral instead.

Only a Creator for that of Reason just behind, and still only a Creation for that of meaning, when still not any footsteps either.

Here I better could make it just an ice cube instead, when adding to a drink for just the water it could be.

I better should be watching for not any listening either, because here still not any shepherd either, for just only footsteps for such.

Here I know that for just the famous Equation it could be, next not any split personality for only double standards either.

It only becomes so, for still only a Creation of meaning, for still not any Reason behind instead.

But next only leaving undecided, for still only the left I could be, and next I could be standing in the dark, for still only waiting.

So, never mind, for still not any other technology either, for just the advanced or sophisticated it could be, when still surpassing us, for that of capabilities.

Better make it just a monster of nature instead, for that of hiding, when perhaps still not any sleeves, for only a card for such.

Perhaps craftmanship should still be an ability to produce, for still not any power of will instead.

But here I could be making it just anything for only what it could be, except still only Existence for that of nature for only meaning.

Anyway, but here I perhaps should link to that, for still only the Argument it could be, when that of science versus God here.

Sweet dreams, but next only a sex machine for a given produce, for still not any Reason behind, for only just "eventually" for such.

Only for that of worshipping, you could perhaps make it Religion instead, for still not any symbolic entity, for that of representing God.

Read my lips instead, and next also thoughts as well, for not any speculate it should be, when not any mimicking for only nature, for still not any God.

Fixing that above, if getting the time just here, for not looking any good.

Here God made it the Universe in just six days, for that of mentioned, and here it should not be any mirror on the wall either.

But for still not any contemplating it could be, next not any fathom it should be either, for still only the vivid dream, except not any beauty instead.

There is no secret that a butcher is still needed, for the slaughter it could be, except not any Causality or "Reason" instead.

Rather it makes me think that I should laugh only here, for still not any laughter or ridicule it could be instead, when only just coming along here.

If nature could be still its own produce, next also that it could be infallible just for meaning, for also the "eventuality" it could be.

Only concluding for that of science, and next I could know for only a Proof for such, except not any Certainty instead.

The nature I could be making it, should be still only two-part, for that of space and time it could be, for not any life and death instead.

Those things just being factors, should be still only properties for that of Sets, for only the respective it could be.

But next the chain for only a link, and next not any chain of Events for only that of being repeating, for also the consecutive it could be.

Just follows the other, for next the other thing, and it becomes perhaps a wrong way of reasoning, for still only thinking for such.

Religion should still not be any Proof, for also the empty air it could be, for not any Set instead, and here looking for the word.

Just moments ago, for not any "momentous" instead, and perhaps halfway to that mentioned word.

I know it could be still only climbing for science, for still not any reaching for the Heavens instead, for only that of the numbers for only such.

If just the lack of Proof, should also be the science I could make, next not any Religion I should believe, for only prove instead.

Catch the meaning here, for still not any blink of an eye instead, because here only the moment of Truth, for still not any Dawn of the morning either.

I could be making just an allegory or Moniker for the other world it perhaps it could be, except still only a Stairways to Heaven here.

The other Premise could be still that of a Creator past or beyond any meaning, for only surpassing a given Comprehension only for such.

I could be still climbing the stairs, for not any chair it could be instead, but next not any winding it should be, for only becoming infinity at the end.

But next only the teeth of the crocodile, for still not any gap, because it could be still that of |----| for only a given notion of time.

One set of Laws for that of nature, and next still only the hands of God, for only the Reason behind.

If you ever should dare to believe, only make it a Construct for that of such, for still only the infinity it could be.
ID: 2054986 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2054987 - Posted: 9 Aug 2020, 2:40:38 UTC

I tried adding a single letter for that of Judgement in this one, when still editing the other or subsequent text, but got a failure here (unable to connect).

Making a new tab, for that of fixing, and the other one still lies in the buffer, for coming up later.
ID: 2054987 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2054990 - Posted: 9 Aug 2020, 4:17:38 UTC
Last modified: 9 Aug 2020, 4:46:34 UTC

But here it still became only Jesus hanging on the cross, for that of suffering, and next also agony, for not any waiting time either.

Just a sense of feeling, and perhaps a painkiller instead, except not any scrupulous (or lack of it) for only making it torture instead.

Show your face, and next present, for that of outside, except not any inside your body, for also outside the ring or perimeter it could be.

But here only a beer of two, for not any Ideology for just telling you could be lacking any sympathies either, for also compassion.

Evilness could be a way of life for just Mind, but next you should not be any "trusted" either, for only solid.

Show me your way for perhaps only direction, and next only a scientist for such, except not any given name either.

Only that of a Faceless coward, and it should be a notion of nature for still only telling instead, when still not any Atheist for only definition either.

But if time should be still limitless, also a notion of time, for still not any infinity instead.

Do I next think that infinity should be a representation of just everything I could make it, and perhaps the answer is no.

Reveal yourself for only a bottle, and perhaps a drink too much instead, for still not any Revelation here.

Proof could be just a Fact of nature, for also the part it could be, except not any single meaning for just infinity instead.

Just tell me an answer for that of a Fact, and still the "Truth" it only could be, for not any Lie or Falsification instead.

Always that of true, for only a single thing, and next also false, for just the opposite it could be, and next only Logic for such.

If I could flip a coin for that of inverse only for such, next only a negative number for that of a positive, when still not any mirror.

Any emphasis for just only a hyphen, and perhaps still not any Premise for nature, for only its true meaning.

And here not any step for only overstep instead, because here perhaps not any threadmill, for only a rollercoaster instead.

"Roll the camera", and next roll the tape, for still only spinning around, because next time looping in circles, for still only spinning around.

Here our aspect could be still our understanding or notion for just given, except also the Comprehension it could be, for only a given whole.

Just fine, for still only circles here, because here not any cycles, for just the pulsation or heartbeat it could be, for also that of Rhythm.

If nature comes only set for a meaning, next also a definition as well, for still the true meaning for that of only "its" here.

You could be still selling cigarettes for only "man in the street", but next not any holy smoke for just grenades either.

Only come to me, and next it shows, for still a nature of its presence, for also the diversity and manifold it could be.

A precise definition of time should be still only exactness for that of such, except not any nature for only given or offered meaning.

Could you next calculate, and it could be still precise, for only a definition for such, except not any infallible instead.

Just the thing for that of any absolutes, and it should be realistic, for still only meaning.

When I know that science could be just wrong, also that of a parable, for only Religion for such.

But next only disgusting, for that of a face, and you should not be making it any moniker or Allegory for just the other representation either.

So, take care, for still not any ruthless, and I made it only just a Faceless coward, for still not any Empty set.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_set

If you could explain one thing for the other for only the Contradictory it could be, next only versus instead, for still not any opposite.

Next prove a thing only for that of meaning, and next perhaps Existence, except still not any Philosophical argument, for only making it God.

Continuing here, and next life should be only sacred for that of such, for not the other thing it could be instead, for that of an eventuality.

I could still dream, for only being a daydreamer, except God still seeing that it could be working, for not any Argument either.

But only hitherto, for not any thus either, and I am still not any Englishman, for only grave accent for such.

So here only a Daredevil, for still only overstepping, except only the limits of nature, for only just offering.

Any stubborn nature, for rather a scientist instead, and still only the Laws and Equations for that of meaning, for also a given produce or view.

But here the whatever, for also regardless, when still only looking, for that of infinity only a Concept for such, except not any Argument or Fallacy instead.

Again that Religion should not be any proven for that of subject, and next only making it a magic mystery instead.

But just face in the mirror, for also mirror and the wall, and still not any consideration just for meaning, when only an overall view instead.

And you could be making it still only blood pressure, for not any way of calculating or calibrating instead.

Only a Premise for that of nature, and also Certainty for that of such, except not any recognition of a given God, for only a smile for such.

Pain could be just a relief from agony for only a painkiller for such, except not any Symbolism for only a moniker or Allegory, for just hanging on the cross.

Just deliberate, and next also intentional, except still knowing that any scrupulous should not be any ruthless either, for also the mercy it could be.

But just purpose and act, for only the science it could be meant, next also apt or inclined as well.

Does any cheating come with only a lie for that of such, and next perhaps not any closed eyes, for only eyelids for such.

Only just the Uncertainty principle, for the reality it should be, and next not any impossible it should be here either, for only out of reach.

Just tell me about the fantasy you could have, and next also an adventure, for still only such a meaning, for not any infallibles instead.

But rather still only the "deem" or deeming you could make it, and still only mission impossible, for not any infinity for only a set limit.

What is supposed to be a wrapper here, for still only a word, except not any lineup of text instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism

Next pretty face here only, for still in the middle of the night, for not any ugly it could be instead, or perhaps a countenance.

Just part of it, for only what it could represent, and next the whole of it, for still only meaning.

So just do me a favor, for still not any present instead, and it becomes that of Gods offering, for still only science instead.

Here the juxtaposition we could make it for only science versus Religion, should be still only lacking, for also the Proof we could make.

But here perhaps not any slip of the tongue either, for still only a moniker or Allegory instead, for only what the other thing could perhaps mean.

Just in the name of, and next also face, for that of the countenance it could be, when perhaps still not any recognition either, for just the other alternative.

Proof could end up just Certainty, for still not any recognition it could be instead.

But only always, for that of the hard you could make it, and still only brutal, for not any other thing, or eventuality, it could be instead.

Perhaps unnecessary, because for still only a nose clip, perhaps not any dirty hands you could make it, for only falling down.

Ready, steady, cook, and I could be here for only acknowledging a couple of things, for still only Facts for such.

If I could be telling it wrong, for only the notion of time it could be, perhaps not any failure for only spectacular instead, except still only nature for a purpose.

So here perhaps only the bind you could make it, for that of a treaty, when still not any nose clip instead.

I could be still only a true believer for only the realistic facts I could make it still, for not any acknowledging it could be instead.

But just dirty tricks, and next also failures as well, for still not any Truth for that of meaning, for only fallibles for such.

Here Newton just on behalf for just science, for also Einstein as well, except still only a brutal world, for only just falling down hard.

So, give me a blank cheque instead, for that of a feather, and perhaps our moderator here, for still not any smile it could be instead.

Only "Susan seeking" for that of an opportunity, and next also the possibility, for still not any "mission impossible" instead.

Just all, for the everything it could be, and next also an eventuality for the cause it could be, for only that of Causality.

But next "bring me the shuttle", and next also in front of me, for that of the door, for not any eventuality it could be instead, and here making the link.

Is just the "everything" you could make for only an explanation, just a given practice for such, or should it rather be fulfillment instead?

I could be making it still a cause for only that of nature, for still not any Belief it should be instead, for still not any broken nose.

Just "darn it", for that of damnation or perdition, and perhaps still not any broken nose, for only a lost hope instead.

The end Perspective, for still only making it God for that of a pedestal, and next only roads leading to the city of Rome, for the "produce" it only could be.

But next, any Terminology, for only a definition of Religion, and perhaps no such thing either, for still not any point of making it complete versus incomplete either.

I could know what science still only "is", for not any guessing it could be instead, for only Religion for such.

Here Premise becomes just a definition of the Fact it could be still, for also the nature we could conclude.

So just hold on your breasts, for also the target it could be, and next also maintain your attitude, for only the promise it still could be.

And here any retaining you could make, for still only keeping, should not be any waiver either, for only discarding.

Either just my bad words of writing here, for still only keeping, for not any discarding, and it becomes only a waiver here instead.

Open your eyes, for only the view or outlook it could be, and next also a Perspective as well, for still not any recognition instead.

The one thing coming at me just here, could be that of an exception, for that of exception handling, except only a writeoff instead.

So just look back, for only the embezzlement it could be, for also misappropriation, and next the taxman only for such.

But if still only holding to your breasts for that of keeping, next also relentless for that of such, for also the steadfast it could be.

Only ending up in the ditch, for still not any falling, and it becomes a scientific Fact for only Perspective, for still not any recognition instead.

I would very much see a Conclusion, for only that of Proof for such, except stumbling on the Fact for only the Method it could be still.

A Proof could be stilll for that of an absolute, except not any Certainty or Truth it could be instead, and next nature for only a Premise.

When I make it any Ambiguities or Contradictions for only the thing not meant to be, next not any Certainty it should be either.

But next the given representation for that of God for only meaning, should be still only a moniker or Allegory for such.

Just the other thing, could be still only an eventuality here, for not any Proof for only that of Certainty, for also the Truth it could be.

Any "point" of it, for just making it time, and perhaps only spread instead, for that of being distributed, because here not any Planck time either.

So, take it just for only meaning, when still not any broken nose, for only a Premise instead, for still not any wide possibilities, for only being offered.

Just butter for that of an egg, and next not any "smear" either, for still only cracking, for only the birth it perhaps could be.

Any infallibilities, for just Fallacies instead, and next it became only open for that of the subject of making it only Religion here, for not any science.

The problem here is that for still only making it Fallacies, it could become wrong, for that of a story, for also the failure it could be.

Any success for also failure, and it perhaps should not be any wrong, for only the trial and error Method it could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_and_error

But if a Logical Fallacy also could be that of deducing, next we could be making it God, for only the scientific Proof it could perhaps be.

Only stay on target, for still only at home it could be.
ID: 2054990 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2054994 - Posted: 9 Aug 2020, 6:14:12 UTC
Last modified: 9 Aug 2020, 6:39:05 UTC

And once upon a time, it became only a nose clip, for that of Microsoft for such, when still not any moniker here.

Just too late here, for still not any solid and steadfast it could be instead.

Show me the way, and next you could lead me there, except not any procession either, for rather the ultimate force.

I could be making it just an offer for that of a making, when still not any clap for just a hand.

Here I made it just waiver twice in a row, for still not any writeoff of discarding instead, for also not any exclusion mechanism.

Tell me just a thing for that of nature, and still only set or implied for also the made it could be, for not any manufufactured or produced instead.

Either just your face, for not any smile, and next only a given thought for that of a meaning, for also the recognition it could be.

The thing for only versus, should be only an eventuality for such, for not the other thing it could be instead.

But only significant, for that of significance, and next also less, for only the least meaning it could be, for only that of worthless.

Here the Premise it should be only for nature, perhaps should not be any opportunity, for only possibilities being offered.

Only end to end science, and still perhaps only time, for not any end to end carpet instead, for only hanging on the wall.

Dear me, for perhaps also beloved, and next only a letter instead, for only "Letters to an idiot" for such, when still not any smile.

But if perhaps dear me, also Dear Watson as well, for still not any Premise it could be instead, for only just walking the grave.

Just parts for that of building blocks, and next objects for that of Sets, for also the attributed it could be.

Any opposition could be still only conflict, for also war, except not any reason or Premise for only telling the opposite.

So, just tell me a lie, for not any blank cheque instead, and it could become only a Premise of nature, for also the Truth it could be.

But here only a dark chapter for that of telling about a Contradiction for only the opposite, for still not any dark episode it could be.

I could be making it fried eggs, for not any dry sand either, except only that of "tolerance", for making it hard.

So here perhaps etched into memory for only just a recall, for still not any boiled eggs instead.

I know that science could be proving only for such, except feeling good, for only a bit of satisfaction.

congeal - solidify - harden, if you absolutely want or make it here.

But just "run like Hell", for only a certain condition for such, and next only IF - THEN - ELSE here, for not any loop instead.

Time could be looping in circles, for that of the cyclical it could be, except still not any forever, for only endless for such.

Any branch, and next only a filament, for still not any distributed instead.

But if making it any levels of Conscience, for also the Intelligence it could be, only a Premise for that of nature, for also the Certainty it could be.

Next your choice, for only given option, except not any wider possibilities, for only limits for such.

Here any "better off" should not be any Perspective, for only a given look for that for only science, when only the alien subject for meaning.

An agreement should still be perhaps a treaty, for not any Argument it could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branch_(computer_science)

Just excited, and I could be only leaping off, for also the power of love it could be, for still not any cylinder.

You think it could perhaps could be only assumed only for meaning, but next also fit in, for only the Perspective it could be.

Ask for mercy for only an emperor for such, and next only a reign for that of the king it could be, for only that of sovereignty.

But next white supremacy, for only the reign it still could be, and next only reigning the world, for also the conquer it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Just blow it to smithereens, for not any white powder instead, and next only ammonium nitrate, for that of a fertilizer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonium_nitrate

So here only a stich, for not any itch, and next only a wound for not any heeling, for also the etching it could be, for that of an acid.

Only for that of a couple of beers, and I could end up being incapacitated, for also lying on the floor, for still only the ground it could be.

Tolerance should be just for only attitude, for still not any keeping it could be instead, and next only breasts, for that of mentioned.

I could be making it that of a duration for only everlasting, except still not any smoking gun, for only that of tolerance instead.

Just keep it, for that of being close, and next not any tolerance for only a duration factor instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolerance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duration

But here that of everlasting instead, for still only a period, next for only that of time, when still not any pin, for only just the needle in the haystack.

Just a nozzle for that of a centrifuge, and still only rotating, for the cylinder it could be.

But only with due respect, and next only nature for that of such, except not any levels of Intelligence or Conscience it could be instead.

For that, you make it only respect for a given nature for such, for also the recognition it could be, for not any human factor instead.

If you could certify for only a meaning, next I could make it a recognition of nature, for only own meaning.

Make it just belief versus disbelief, for not any Certainty instead, and it becomes only that of credentials instead, for not any flowers.

If I could be striving for only the Fact it could be, next also recognition as well, for still not any Proof instead.

Here that of Proof next for only nature, for still not any aliens it could be instead, except still not any Contradiction or Ambiguity, for only losing hope.

Any recognition could be just for that of self- for also the face it could be, for next only that of meaning.

Weak versus strong, and next only indifference, for still not any Certainty instead.

So here repeating myself, except still not losing any hope, for only patience for such.
ID: 2054994 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055114 - Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 18:46:40 UTC
Last modified: 11 Aug 2020, 18:49:42 UTC

And the world I am part of and living in, is supposed to be a world of Chaos, if not any wrong.

So where does any Laws for this fit the overall scheme, if that of presumably so, for only an overall view?

I choose to put it in this way, only to make it not any Conclusion either.

One step forward, for just the one step back it could be, and next not any sidestepping either, for only just a random road.

Here of course it gets its own name for that, but it just fell out at the start of it.

Just an Event for only let it happen, and perhaps circumstances warranting only for such, for not any specific either, for just that of Determinism.

If one set of Laws still makes for randomness and disorder, the other could next be also that for only making it perfect symmetry.

But rather that I do not make it the current world any predetermined, for only the Events which could be still happening, for only Chaos as a result.

Here water could be just ice at times for only two different things, except the building blocks of nature, making for only different Sets.

But next still the weather, for also earthquakes, still making for that of Dynamics, for next also a changing world.

These are just old sciences, for the brands they also could be, when still not any flipping of the cards, for only making it a face in the mirror.

So here the random Event, for also an occurrence, still makes it not any able to tell in advance, for also the not any predetermined it could be.

But is not any skating on ice, for also the arms being used for only that of swimming, still dependent on the Laws of nature, for the adherence or compliance it could be,
for still only Laws of nature governing everything?

One thing is still making it only Laws of Chaos, only that of Turbulence or Viscocity for such, if not anything at all, but next perhaps for still not any usability it could be either.

Only for stil the Chaos it could be, next also Laws for only such, except not the thing being any predicted in advance, for only an Event for such.

Sorry, for next only the magic moment catching me, and I could be proving aliens instead just for meaning, for only part of this project.

But here I next was of the opinion that just the predetermined it could be, also that of given Laws for just only meaning.

And here only the written Laws of Chaos it could be still, and next only the world for that of the same, which I could be still a part of.

Here I see things still happen, for only the continually it could be, except not following any given pattern, for just unspecific instead.

So here that of order for just only written, except still only telling for that of a meaning, for just the different possibilities it still could be.

But if Newton, for also Einstein, could be proving a certain thing for that of meaning, also that it should be part of a Law, for only such a thing.

This is the thing I only am able to notice during the day, when also the press conference for just being interrupted.

Still a land of confusion here, except not any "minted", for only a set Condition it could be, for also predetermined as well, for still only nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Branch_(computer_science)

But here doing this thing for that of posting more than 17 years now, and it became only the thing being noticed.

Just the flip of a coin, and next also the face in the mirror, for still the different Premise it could be, for that of just two things.

"Options galore", and next only Sets for that of building blocks, except still only different options making such a thing possible.

But if rather a Condition instead, I could perhaps be having a different dish, for only selecting one for just the other, for also the versus it could be.

So here not any throw it in the ash, for only being discarded, for still not any embezzlement or misappropriation instead.

Rather it tells me that two options could be still open for the condition it could be, when still not any predetermined.

Needs to get back at it here for a better finish, except still not any Elvis Presley, for only "Love me do" here.

One thing is making it Laws only conclusive for the single thing it could be, except still minted on the different conditions it also could be.

If there should be just two Facts for that of telling a single story, next one should not be any true, for the other just false.

Therefore, perhaps Premise once again, for only that of condition just above, and for that, still just implicit for only Laws just telling, for still Chaos instead.

Just for that, the word "prerequisite" should perhaps be the better one just here.

So here the world of Chaos, for still only prerequisites instead, making for different conditions, only for that of minted for such, for still not any perfect world.

But here still not any "embrace", for only being a victim of circumstance, except only that of skating instead, for still not any "over the edge".

Does a Coincidence tell about any "Law" for such, for also the Ambiguity or Contradiction it could be, when still only the Laws of physics instead?

If I know that such a thing could be for only what it is meant, you still could make it the same Chaos, for only let it decide.

The fact is here that Einstein was still not any fond of Quantum mechanics, for not any "relative" it should be instead.

But for not any egg versus insect, for still the other story, just that of "Speaking of the weather", for still only the Premise it could be.

I guess Truth could be coming for just another meaning, for still only middle of the night, for also the answer behind the mirror as well.

Here at least the world should be that of both constants and variables, for still not any Variance being part of the Economy.

But ending up in hope, for still only Proof instead, just a dagger it could be for not any needlestick, when only a pinprick for such.

Here the question could be if we are any alone at all, and that just reporting should still mean Proof for the same.

So here making it just implied for only the Laws it could be still, for not any coincidental or random instead, and you get only that picture.

One thing is making it perhaps "Reason behind" for only the Laws it could be still, for not any infallibilities instead.

But next for perhaps still only a flip of the coin, the answer could be still in the dark, for not any determined.

If I know that life and death should be still only two different things for the outcome it could be, next also the options it could be for the same.

Only walking the straight line for only the one-dimensional it could be, next not any stairs for also elevator, for just the other way instead.

When I could meet the wall for just thinking, perhaps not any race it should be, for that of finishing a running heat only for such.

Just open for that of both ends, and it could be still closed for only a circle for that of such, for not any endless it should be instead.

So, could you leave it only to circumstances, for only just warranting, or could it rather be that of Philosophy, for only just thinking "off the hook"?

Here the Laws of Chaos for still only the sum of factors, for only "its" for such, except not any final decision, for only just an option.

But stiil knobbly or gnarled for the hand it could be, also different Objects for that of Sets, when still only respective parts of nature.

One beer still left in the fridge, and I could be skipping the dinner today, except the point of view I could still be making.
ID: 2055114 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055117 - Posted: 11 Aug 2020, 20:07:23 UTC
Last modified: 11 Aug 2020, 20:19:18 UTC

The problem here is that I am not supposed to "believe" in any Logical Fallacy, for rather a given condition instead, for just only minted.

We do see both turmoil and perfect symmetry, side by side for just nature, except only in an implied way, for not any predetermined.

So next perhaps two excuses, for still not any reasoning it should be instead.

Rather just "both" and nature could be showing two different faces, for only the facets it could be for such.

But if the sphere of reality, for only that of Causality for such, could be telling about a given world for only living, I could be still present, for only part of Earth.

Perhaps we could agree on just that above, for not the other or opposite Conclusion for still telling perhaps the other thing.

So here fine grain of salt, for also the sand it could be, for still not any fine music just listening at, for only the flute it could be.

The lacking Conclusion could be still only that of overstepping, for just the Religion it could also be, except not wishing to do so either.

My bad, and next I could be making it a travel to the Moon, for also a return back, when still not any honeymoon, for only infinity instead.

So, promises for not any Premises, and perhaps only endless love instead, for still not any limits of nature, for only possibilities for such.

Satisfied, and next only a condition, for still the meant or implied it could be, for that of given.

At once you make it only a gift of nature for only that of promises, next perhaps Fallacies instead, for only just the thinking of God, for only Belief for such.

"With respect for or to", and next the same limit, for still not any limits instead, for only the world meant to be, and still being part of.

So next wondering if any single thinking could be just "wrong" for that of such, when still not any single whole instead.

A notion about God should still be coming by means of Religion only for such, for still not any science it could be instead.

I still do not have to make it any ice for only water either, except that a captain of a ship could be "resolute" for only a given act of deed.

Only the Empty set, for still not any completion or fulfillment instead. and next nature for only its absolutes, when still not any infinity instead.

Let it be, let it happen, and next let it go as well, for stiil only the temperature between 0 and 100, for not any fried eggs instead.

Proving a needle is a thing I perhaps could make, and next also a needlestick, for still only a prick in the arm for such, for not any sweet dream instead.

So, for only a bit of dirty tricks, you only could throw it to ashes instead, and only vaporizing for that of a disintegration for such.

Fusion still happens at 15 million degrees for only the sun, and next temperature could also reach 4 billion degrees a couple of other places.

But still for only the single part you could make it, for not any part, and next infinity only for such, when still only meaning.

So, is just death happening, only an Event for such, or could you still be wishing it only to happen, for not any dream instead?

Here I became old, and I met the ultimate end for only reaching a limit for that of age for only the process it still could be.

So if still perhaps only a set Condition for that of deciding such a thing, it could be still ultimate for only Consequence, when just happening.

And for not any brief moment outside for just an encounter, it perhaps became only a sacrifice, for that of a given moment for such.

But next not any shaking of hands either, for only that of interchangeable Laws instead, for that of due respect with or just the other.

Any such thing for that of being predetermined instead, and still only result for that of outcome, for only letting it happen.

But next that Laws of Chaos, for only the turmoil or disorder it could be, should not be any inconclusive either just for meaning.

I could be still seeking that of valid for only the validness it should be, except that it also should be Proof for science, for only Truth for such.

Also I could still reach the top of the mountain for only just climbing, and I could also fall down the stairs, for still only the Laws of physics, for such a thing.

So, could Laws be still telling only for a certain meaning, for also the Consequence it could be, for not any Fallacies instead?

"Options on the table", for still only an options galore, except still not any falling off, for only an option for such.

So, refer back at that of Condition, for also the Conditional branch it could be, except still not any reaching for the goal, for only a falloff instead.

Either you make it a failure of just thinking, for also the faltering it could be, when still not any break-even mechanism here.

So, wish I could do it any better, for only just saying, except still only Fallacies instead, for still not any angels.

Only a push versus pull instead, and next you could make it a draw only for such, when perhaps that of an equilibrium.

Just that of Interaction should be only that of different Forces acting upon each other, for also the way of direction it could be.

But here I mentioned the dish of food earlier on, for still not any "Say you, say me", for only "yes" or "no" for that of a given choice.

Logic could be still only two different options for also circumstances, for still not any end of the road it could be instead.

You still could be losing part of the dinner for just slipping the little, except not any end of the road, for only limitless possibilities.

For that, not any improbable it should be either, when still only that of possibilities instead.

Therefore, just part of science, for still only a set example, except not any hypothetical, for just beyond a given realm of thinking.

We know that an excution could be still that of facing the wall, and therefore not any God for just showing us his face either.

Add to it rather the notion of time, for still only the limitless possibilities it could be, and next aliens coming out of the dark, for only that of time instead.

But next no secret that even such a thing could be with respect for only nature, for still only possibilities being given or offered.

If the definition of nature should be still only a scientific one, next the "options on the table" it still could be, for that of only such a thing.

So, hold your breath, for still not any heart, and it becomes meaningless for only that of only contradictory instead.

Here I still could make for a mechanism only just deciding, when it could be still falling off the table, for not any travel to the end of the Universe instead.

Both could be still offered, for only that of constraints or limits, except still only possibilities instead.

But if infinity could be telling about just the "everything" it also could be, next not any moniker for just God for its presence either.

If the Laws of physics rather should be telling about possible limits, it became for only that of a nature being created, for also the way it should be working.

But rather that you make it a fulfilled world, for that of completion, only because that of infinity should be the reason here.

Is the excuse for that of possible Religion, still for only that of a fufilled or completed world, only because of infinity, or should there be another Reason?

The coffee got cold here, so better make a new one.
ID: 2055117 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055289 - Posted: 15 Aug 2020, 1:24:30 UTC
Last modified: 15 Aug 2020, 1:40:38 UTC

Anyway, I can not do it right now, for only a sense that God could still be only the Religion we could make it, for not any science doing the same.

Only that of Hippocrisy for just a leaderboard, and next a ship could be having both a stern, for also that of just in front, and lost the word.

But always that of Proof, for still not any Sets, and it becomes only saturated for such, when only filled to the edge.

I do not know if this ever went in, but for only a sense of infinity I still could make it, perhaps also a notion as well, except not any left to decide.

We made it a question of fallibilities versus infallibilities here, except perhaps not with respect to any given Laws of nature.

But next that of Certainty once again came up on me, for that of a quite important factor, or just thing.

For only a nature still existing, it could be that of ordered Sets, except also confusion at times, for only just Ambiguity and Contradiction for such.

Add to it still that of infinity, for only making it Confusion still possible, next perhaps asking the reason only for such a thing, when still only dubious.

But next not any waking up from bed, only because I could be telling you the story (or Equation) either.

Just good versus bad, for also the other thing as well, and it still relates to that of infinity, for just the "all" or everything for just given.

So, if a Construct could be still telling that "all cards are still on the table", just infinity for that of such.

But next be the judge for still only decision-making for such, and next not any factor either.

So, is just a leftover that of Cardinality, except still only a subtraction, for also the "join" or union you could make it?

3-2=1, but next I was not asking about any infinity here just either, for still the part or element it could be.

And next perhaps not any working, because only just infinite should be that of Creation instead.

Why make it any philosophy for still only asking a couple of questions, when only nature around us, for that of being present?

Only that of Truth is supposed to be a virtue, for next also translating the same, except still not any Creation for just the same as well.

So just two Laws, or that of different, for just thinking that God could be still the Reason behind, for that of possible Laws, while nature could be its own thing.

Next almost tempting making it a circus in town for also a clown, except still only showing up, for that of presence.

But if nature is still perhaps implied, also that it could be created, just for a meaning for only so, and it could become still that of Reason, for only behind.

Next, only a mirror on the wall, for also sleeves for just your arm, and nature could be still hiding a secret, for not revealing anything.

Should I next believe in a Creator for only that of revealing itself, or should it still be hidden, for only just a mirror?

So here just forget the bent shape, for just the apt or inclined it could be, for not any other word instead.

Making it a Reason for only that of Laws of nature still present, and next still that of apt or inclined only for such.

Just come one for the pretty lady or woman she is or could be, and next only "be there", for that of stealing the show.

Could I make it just explicit, or perhaps implicit instead, when still stealing the show, for not any notion of infinity it should be instead?

Which thresholds or limits could be set, for still only "do me a favor" instead, for just being so kind, except not any "absolutely" either?

Again, that infinity makes it only limitless for that of nature, for still only a thing we could believe in, and also witness.

But next with respect to God, and next only fulfillment for the same, which should be only completion for the part we could make.

If nature could be precious, also that it could be generous, except still a hostile world at times.

The thing of looking at nature for just perfect, could be still an option we could make, except just that of otherwise most of the time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus

So peace upon mind, for still not any fractional calculus, because here that of apt for only inclined, is still with me.
ID: 2055289 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055292 - Posted: 15 Aug 2020, 2:03:37 UTC
Last modified: 15 Aug 2020, 2:08:43 UTC

If we make it so that nature could be coming with two different purposes (or functions), next perhaps true, for only the dubious it still could be.

But when you make it perhaps Truth for only an answer still given, only that of set (or implied) just for the same.

Hah, but the answer is that we never could make it any Arithmetic just Logic either, except perhaps only giving an excuse for such a thing,

Next stumble upon the Fact that just Religion could still be the excuse you could make for the same thing, and next "hah" for the same.

Nature could be still both fallible and infallible, but next only making it God as an excuse, for only Reason behind.

Just hard lesson, for still only given reality, and it could be still only a feather, for not any "harsh" it should be instead.

So, "Letters to an idiot", and we could still only see for not any believing, except only making it a Prophecy instead, when perhaps not any wonders or miracles either.

Sorry, but leaving to you for only taking the bus, except not any philosophy, for making it Reason behind instead.

But next sucks, for only making it Timotei shampoo instead, for not any love versus hate instead.

So, what if I perhaps left you (or subject), for only Cardinality instead?

Is not the nature just implied, still only the ordered Sets we could make it, for still not any Reason behind, for that of possible "completion"?

Hmm, so two Sets of Laws, next one for that of nature, and the other for that of Divinity, and you could make it an Abstract here.

Is nature supposed to be any perfect, for only completion for such, or could the other alternative be still only perdition or damnation instead?

Perhaps a good reason is still not any believing in a God for just the making you could make it, except not any "never say never".

Only just "Creation" instead, and it becomes that of prescribed medicine only for such.

Need a hook instead, and next perhaps a climber for such, for only holding to your rope.
ID: 2055292 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055341 - Posted: 16 Aug 2020, 8:30:22 UTC
Last modified: 16 Aug 2020, 8:33:29 UTC

So just make it a head on top of a throat, if not any shoulders either, and always the guy in the lab, doing the hard thing for us.

But here a note received earlier on, that I was supposed to "believe" in science, for not making it any so either.

Answer in the crowd, for always making it, except not any undisclosed or misplaced, for just being forgotten.

We know that just fortune could be that of misfortune for just the opposite, when still not any mishap instead.

So here Dr. Eric Korpela, for perhaps making it an "expectancy" for only what we could deliver, except still science only stealing the show.

Just purpose for that of gain, still the goal of seeking Extraterrestrial intelligence, for also the result it could be, for not any wisdom instead.

Next an achievement could still make it that of a goal, for only being a winner for such, when still that of result only.

But next, a wish only instead, and perhaps "which-which", except not any Star Queen nebula it should be either.

Sorry, but I made it nature in front of me, for perhaps not any fingers either, and I could be still wishing for an answer, by only doing so.

I also made it in "due respect", for still the science that could be, or is, except not any Reason behind, for only that of Religion instead.

Here getting a more steady sense, for that of uttermost, that it could be still a Reason behind, for only just created, except still only Religion for only such.

But next wishing to make it any "context", for also depth, when that of Philosophy instead, here guessing it could be only just thinking still.

If just Proof could be the science we could make, also that we could be still speculating, for the answer still unknown, or perhaps unexplained.

But only when you know it, next still Proof, for only the "absolutes" you could make it, except also just a couple of answers.

Here Fundamental Laws of science, should also mean a fundamental way of understanding, for still the Philosophy it could be.

Just blow the horn, for still not any basun instead, and that of uttermost could also be that of extremes for only doing it, when still not any infinity.

Here infinity could be still only a Concept, except not any deciding factor, for just making it a reason, for still only the Universe for its Existence.

So, just only speaking for that of God, and I perhaps could make it Existence instead, when still only fallibles of nature, for that of a threadmill it could be.

Just an underscore for also an hyphen, and it could be still the added subject, for not any substance or phrase instead.

You could make it still a needle for that of being inserted, except not any indifference for just coming with your mind or personality.

But only set, for perhaps not any ordained either, and next nature coming for only a meaning for such, when still that of implied.

Our notion, for still not any readily, should make it still only implied, for also the result we could get, and also answer we could make.

Any prior, for just in advance, and perhaps only knowing it, for still the set condition it could be, for that of nature for such.

When knowing that nature could be completed, also that of fulfilled, except still not any skidding on ice, for just slipping the other way.

Any expectancy, and it could still perhaps deliver, for only hope for just so, except not any despair it should be instead.

Just mount the horse, and you could be riding the saddle instead, for still not any sailing at sea, for only doing such a thing.

Any provability should be still going with the science we could make, for only that of "respectively" for such, when also that of due.

Here just the science it still could be, and next also meant.
ID: 2055341 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055343 - Posted: 16 Aug 2020, 9:12:51 UTC
Last modified: 16 Aug 2020, 9:40:44 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqiTJK_uzUY

And here not any medicine either for only drugs, but could be checking out that.

Just hilarious should be for still only the funny you could be, except not any smack in the face either.

Or maybe just that of marvels instead, for still only the notion you could make it.

The set condition you could make it, should still be only nature, for not any other certainty instead.

Only make up your mind for that of the decision it could be, and only a set condition for such.

But if a set condition also could be that of a Conditional branch, also that of "way off", for just the deviation it could be.

So back with the good stuff for just translating, and next only that of unalterable again, for also mandatory or invariable as well, for perhaps also inescapable as well.

But again, only the small window for that of editing, and not any text below, so leaving it there.
ID: 2055343 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055345 - Posted: 16 Aug 2020, 10:06:43 UTC
Last modified: 16 Aug 2020, 11:06:05 UTC

So yes, the excuse you perhaps could make for God, should perhaps be science instead, when still only unalterable.

If God made it just Laws for that of Certainty, perhaps not any hinge you could make it here either.

Just the other thing, and still perhaps that of presence, for still only rolled up by means of sleeves, for only just invisible.

If the countenance I could make, should only be with respect for nature for such, also the deed it could be.

Always the pattern we could make and also trace, except not mandatory standards instead, for that of following suit.

So, what is just nature for that of given hand, when also present as well?

Here the "due respect" I could make it, should be still science only for such, when not any Religion instead.

Just climb to the rope, and you could perhaps endure, except still not any final answer just for only meaning either.

Fulfillment should still be that of completion when next only meaning it, for that of nature also being the same.

So here still that of apparently, for also evidently, when also the ostensibly you could make it, for only just a purpose or intention for only such.

The Ambiguity it perhaps could be, for just ambiguous for such, could still be just another thing here.

Any recognition it perhaps could be instead, and next only wake up in the morning only for such, except not any given call.

Save me, for that of day, and next also spare parts, for still not any given call it could be instead.

Any monster, for just call of the wind instead, and perhaps still only respect for that of nature, for not any disrespect instead.

So, any just "whatever" you could make it, for still only a set condition, and it becomes only nature only, for not any disrespect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

If I made it just nature meant to be, also implied, for only still that of its presence or being.
ID: 2055345 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055382 - Posted: 17 Aug 2020, 1:56:44 UTC

And here the first signs of autumn, for a couple of red leaves on the trees, for also putting away my glasses for being only inside.

Next a beautiful sky for just clear, and what I thought was Jupiter at first, is showing up to be a waning Moon instead.

Therefore not any treetops either, for only that of Causality for only making it a possible reason, for still perhaps not any Reason behind.

But only a Premise for still not any Laws, and still only the wild guess it could be, for also an assumption.

I made the wrong posting with another project, for thinking that nature could be still infallible, for also the lack of completion it could be.

But rather making it "both" for still the separate it could be, next only added for each separate meaning it could be.

Therefore making it only a Logical consequence, when that of Negation for only numbers for such, when still not any Logic instead.

So better continue here, in that it could be that of an Implication here, for still only logical for such, when not any Fallacy either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

Next getting into it again for only just warm fingers, because just adding for also including, it could be also pouring, for only subtracting a bit of water.

I made the point here that nature should be that of "both" for just the thing it could be, except still not any discussion of infinity, for only that of completeness.

So here still not any Empty set for only just part of it, when also that of Logical complement, for just the opposite it could be, and here NOT.

And also making it that I am not having any programming language just at hand, for only the 1 versus -1 it could be, when only that of switching.

NOT(0) should perhaps not be any -1 either for just numbers, except still only uncertain, for that of 1 versus -1 instead.

Perhaps we could be making it still a discussion of life versus death for only just means, except not any aliens we could make it for just believing.

But next the Creator I perhaps could make it for only a Reason for such, should be in the context of science, for not any Religion either.

If nature could be still perfect, also that of symmetry as well, except still only that of randomness, for just the incomplete it could be,
except still going hand in hand, for only the "both" I could make it.

But again add for only just include, for still not any subtracting for only just pouring, when rather that of exclusion or inclusion instead.

Just part of a Set, for still the conjoined it could be, and you rather should give a look at Set theory, for still only the cut and paste, for not any union instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram

And here not digging any further into that, except also the other article or two for perhaps explaining it only the same way.

Everyone knows that nature could be only for a Consequence, for the result it also could be, when still not any splendor or magnificence instead.

So if still only relying on science for just the Methods it should be, perhaps not any "enough" for just the other thing instead.

The third-degree option for just that of only speculating, became the other place as well, for only that of Faceless coward or noname for such.

Just consider for making it that of Religion only science instead, and you next could still prove only for meaning.

And only for a result still only in the making, it could also be the thing we could be striving for, for still not any "eventuality" instead.

Yes, fingers but next trying to fix that in due order as it only comes up or arrives.

If Set A could perhaps be science as a whole, next Set B for only Religion instead, for still not any Set C for just the unknown it could be, for also part.

Next making it the third option for only deducing, and perhaps speculating for just the Idea it could be, for still not any Proof for such.

Aggression and primitive instincts are still part of your personality for also Mind, except not any spiders, for just the tender it could be.

Just hand in hand instead, for only following suit, and perhaps still only the balancing line for that of keeping it tight, for only just an equilibrium.

So here it becomes that of a circle for also circumference, when still only meeting itself at the tail, for not any upright it should be instead.

But next only an Idea for that of Comprehension for such, for still not any Conception instead, for just making it that of the Bible.

Just fingers crossed for only holding tight on science for only such, and next not any sliding for just the unknown it could be, when only speculating.

So just eat fish for only that of dinner, when still not any recognition for only just Fact, when only that of recognizing a face instead.

For some reason making it flawed or faltering for just the imperfect it could be for only just nature, except that of Ambiguity or Contradiction instead.

Only randomness should be that of turmoil, for also the Chaos it could be, when still not any perfect symmetry instead, except for perhaps "both" still included.

But next that of Truth for still only science for such, when not any hard press of a button, for making it any past or beyond, for only a given reality for such.

Here infinity for just the Concept it could be, except still not any "all or everything" included, for just the part or Set it could be.

You still could make it only Fallacies, for just infallibilities for such, when still not any recognition of a face, for only that of recognizing for such.

But here only the word "ostensible" for showing up the fact that I could be still following suit for only track for such, except not any up to it right now.

Just excellent, and next also well done, for still not any smile instead, for only catching a given moment.

Duties and obligations could still be the job for just carried out, except also following standards, for only the practice it could be.

So here not any overtone either, for just the sound of music, when only that of a pitch for such.

And next perhaps not any big gun either, for only a salute, for only that of caliber for such, when still only expressing yourself, for that of meaning.

So, deduce only Laws for that of Certainty only for such, and still not any Logic either, for just an Implication instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

Whatever link you could make, for still not any Deduction, and next only that of Fallacy instead, for only an ability to conclude.

So either just a famous Equation for that of Equivalence, for still not any part versus whole instead, for that of infinity.

And here it reminds me of the fumbling it could be for only just playing the guitar, except not any Einstein, for just "God is not playing with any dices".

Only recognition for just Fact, and next that of nature only for such, for that of both presence and meaning, when still not any definitive Proof.

Here the Proof we still could be making for only science, when not any Causality, for also the Reason behind it also could be.

Only just included, for the all and everything it still could be, and next that of completion as well, for just fulfilled.

And here perhaps the perfect symmetry for not any randomness instead, when still only disorder and turmoil for that of the latter.

But only a taste of reality, for not any bittersweet either, and still only such a thing for nature, for that of Ambiguity or Contradiction here.

So, "swing" for that of a rhytm, and perhaps make it a dance instead, for just the turnaround it could be, for not any flipover either.
ID: 2055382 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055383 - Posted: 17 Aug 2020, 2:13:44 UTC
Last modified: 17 Aug 2020, 2:25:59 UTC

http://www.primegrid.com/forum_user_posts.php?userid=12041

Here the other thing for just being said with the other or parent project, except still only hidden here, for also a double post.

It reminds me that baryton could be still for that of singing a song, when not any flute for just Differential calculus instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_calculus

You could be asking a moderator there for possible access, when still not any acquaintance, for that of running this project instead.

Just too hot in here, for also an headache, and next not any up to it, for only that of mentioned.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_relation

And yes, for only the science we still could make it, next also part as well, because here the second link for that of an added reference.

The thing of making it Reason behind for only just such a thing it could be, and next still only Proof for that of also Equations.

But if next stumbling on the fact that even Proof could not be any perfect, next perhaps not any faltering mechanism it should be either.

One thing for just the other, for still the diverse it could be, when also separate as well, for still not any included, for only comprehensible for such.

Next I could perhaps be asking who could be the winner of the game, except not any Ambiguity or Contradiction for just the "explaining" it still could be.

Is Proof still the answer you only could make, and next only nature for a given purpose, for only the way it could be working.

Make it only an absolute Fact, and next the absolute Proof it could be still, for only that of science for just meaning.

Just side by side, and two figures could be standing next to each other, for still not any forwards or backwards instead.

One thing is still that of a famous Equation, for not any "Equivalence" it should be instead, for just different Principles be that of same for only just worth.

So here making it that of apparent visual magnitude for only the luminosity of a star, for not any absolute magnitude instead.

The remaining part of the sentence was lost here, but perhaps was posted the other place (or just here).

Perhaps that of completeness could be still fulfillment for only such, when still only part of infinity for what it could represent.

Either just you, for not any me either, except still not any Reason for only the thing it became, when only the Universe for such.

Making it that of set, for also implied, and still not any forget, for just the shy or forgotten it could be.

Only just "here I am", and still only sitting here, for not any equal or equality instead, for just the different things it still could only be.

But if infinity should be that of completeness for just nature, also the "enough" it should be, for that of sufficient.

The sad thing is that I could make it just hands for that of breaking, for still not any fathom it could be instead.

Just the other way, and perhaps only flipping a book, for still only the science it could be, for also Religion as well.

But if not wrong, making it that of self- here for that of the possible Conscience it could be, when also that of recognizing, for only the surroundings it could be.

Spell it wrong instead, and it becomes recognition for just the other word.

So, count to zero, for still not any 3, and next only "trip-trap" for such, when only a Method.

If nature could be a balance between just the randomness it could be, for also that of perfect, you could be still having a nature for only its Symmetry.

But next ups and downs, for still only waking up in the morning, for not any drain it should be instead.

Just spinning around, for that of a cycle, and it becomes a loop only for such, when still the FOR TO DO for that of such, for also DOWNTO.

But only nevertheless, and perhaps REPEAT - UNTIL instead, for the moment which could never happen, for only an endless cycle.

So just the funny thing instead, for still only "rather", when only that of naming scheme for only just that, for still not any Condition.

Next that of a single dot (".") for only the point it could be, except not any dash or hyphen for only a single line for such, making it one-dimensional.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_length

Here it should be that of two separate ones only for such, and trying with this one here.

Just fill it up for only a couple of plastic bags, and you could make it electrons for just all it could be, for still not any Force of gravity instead.

Only count for that of enumeration, and still the number of electrons it could be, for only a Universe just for meaning.

Here just "zillions" for that of such, for not any "spoke at length", for only the misunderstanding it could be.

So here it does not matter, for only just bother, for still the discussion it could be, when only that of science, for not any Religion instead.

Water could be still ice for that of being frozen, but still not any swinging around your head for just a bucket, when that of escaping gravity.

So here still each separate thing for only the context it could be, when also "niche" for that of the same, when that of water being held inside the bucket, for only just upside down.

Does a Theory next hold when only being proven, or should it be just Proof for only such?

When making it perhaps Laws of physics for only a reason, still the functionality it could be, for only that of working.

But next perhaps still only Fallacies, for that of a given Reason only for such, because of not being any infallible either.

Not any good here, for only just that of order for only given fashion, for still the determined it also could be.

Only scratch my head, for also the nose, because here wrong at first, for still only the two different possibilities it could be, for that of "both" for such.

Leaving you with no choice, for only sitting here, and I could be falling off the chair instead, for only just an option, for not any eventuality either.

But rather making it a fuse instead, for that of a switch, and next turn it both on and off, for only the different possibilities it could be.

So here not any escape either for only just route, when still only EXIT instead, for the exception it also could be.

And here perhaps infinity for both the on and off it could be, for not any other things instead, or just either, for only still being added.

Making it any NOT(infinity) and it should be just invalid, for the phrase or sentence you could make it, for still not any included.

I could make it just OR for that of separating, except also the different Sets it could be, for just what it could contain.

But next 1 for also -1, and it could be still added, for just the different things it could be, except only included for only part of infinity.

The big failure for also flaw here, is that you could make it still negative numbers, for not any inverse instead.

And next I could be climbing a stairs, for only a chair for such, and next could be falling, for not any excluding it could be instead, except still only part of infinity.

Just back and forth, and still only a loopback for such, when also that of repeating, for not any flawed or failure it could be.

Only subtract instead, for not any add, and still the method for only being used, for not any added instead, because here the Empty set still only part of infinity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_set

Not finding the article right now, but still that of 0 for only -1, for only the negative Logic it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism

Making it a direct link to that of Atomism, when not having the other link first, it becomes the wrong reference for only Logic here, and next sorry about that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negation

Here not the Calculator in front of me, for also the Yafu it could be, for only a Python script instead, for that of making it only negative numbers.

So here choosing only to go to the Moon, for not any flawed it should be for that of a purpose, when only that of "own" for just meaning.

But here perhaps still not any absurd it could be, for only just flawed or failing, when still not any Ambiguity or Contradiction for just telling the answer it could be.

Truth could be just the answer you could give or make, and therefore not any false versus true either.

Like that of both OR and NOT, you could make it AND for just the added it could be, when still only just the same.

Therefore, not any negative infinity, for only -("~") for such, for only just the opposite it could be.

When only knowing that nature could be failing or faltering for only the flaw it could be still, next still only that of an Ambiguity for such, for not any "self-thinking" or reference either.

But rather that nature is coming with such a reference for only the property it still could be, for just that of being made of.

Perhaps I could be still pressing the button just hard, but next not any infinity I could reach for only just getting at, for only traveling through space.

Just flawed design, for still not any perfect, and next only nature for coming with such a thing, for still only the property for making it up.

So. is a recognition perhaps a better thing, for not any reaching the limits, for only capabilities for such?

Anyway, just stretched out hands, and you could also be making it a cross, for only a moniker or Allegory for such, for not any crucifixion it should be either.

You could make it a given measure for a couple of things, for not any immeasurable instead, but still it could fail at times, for only a flawed design for such.

So here perhaps still not any infinity for only the Construct it could be, for that of a Creator for just meaning, for also the representation it could be.

Knowing that it could be just infallible, for only that of Ambiguities and Contradiction for such, and next it could go both ways for that of Events and results.

So therefore not any endless either, when still only spinning in a loop, for that of time for only such, because for only just spinning, it should not be any escape or exit either.

But next you know it, for that of an eventuality for such, and next only told, for being that of Reason for such, when just flawed design made for a Universe for living.

"Veni, vidi, vici", and next I came, saw, and just won, for also the left it could be.

Stealing the show, and perhaps the one with the name only doing it, for only a Reason for such.

- - -

The sad thing is that we could make it total destruction for that of nature, when also annihilation for such, except still not any total for just completed instead.

So, only spinning around, for still not any flipover either, and it becomes only opposites, for still not any "both" it could be instead.

If nature could be coming with just two aspects, for not any more, for still only the "both" it could be, perhaps not any more either, for just infinity instead.

Just thinking that nature could be intelligent for only coming with a design, and it could be still flawed for only that of functionality.

I better should be doing this at Seti@home instead, except only nature for only a Consequence, when still that of result instead.

But if nature should be only science for the Philosophy we could make it, still perhaps only science here.

Here just not any Equivalence for only the ordained it could be, for still not being the same.

Only "dances with wolves", and perhaps only the ring it could be, for also that of an embrace.

But here the parable for that of apparent versus absolute magnitude for only luminosity, for still not any fathom it could be instead.

At first it becomes that of "encompass" here, for just the included it could be, when perhaps not any Sets for only just infinity either.

The circle makes for stil a circumference, for also the embrace it could be, except only shaking of hands instead, for biting itself in the tail.

So here perhaps our level of Comprehension only within the circle, for also perimeter it could be, when that of the other for still outside.

Next "O" for not any oh it should be either, and I could be only biting myself in the neck.

Could there be another way of thinking here, for also the reasoning it also could be?

The fact is that you could end up making it science just an excuse for only Religion instead, for perhaps just the opposite.

But if the self-reference could be still only the infinity you could make, next perhaps not any absolute it should be for only Fact either.

Making it the Laws of physics for still only deciding, and next also the Proof you could make.

The book of science should be still nature only coming along for only meant to be, for not any chapter instead.

Therefore, Laws for just included, when still coming along, for just part, for not the other thing either.

"Call the waiter", for here eating a bad meal just complaining at, and next still being served, for not any waitress instead.

Here meaning just the cook for that of making the dinner, when still the waiter for only serving the dish.

Could you next pretend only nature coming with that of randomness, for not any other assumption it could be instead?

When you know that it could be just randomness, also the incomplete it could be, for still only design, for also not any perfect either.

I made it that of a winner here, for just the game it could be, except not any perfect symmetry, for only randomness instead.

Any absolutes could be still only telling about infinity for just existing, for also the complete it could be, when also incredible.

But next having a sense of Belief, only because it could be "more" at times, and perhaps wrong, for only just a notion.

Having a terrible day, and you could be knowing the Swedish name here, for only just fruitful, when still not any flowers here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_calculus

Like also Differential calculus, the first one could be just terse for only subject, when still not adding any infinity, for only Concept.

Reason to believe perhaps, and next I could be stretching it to the limits, for still only infinity for such, when only within the context of science.

But rather the balanced option it could be still, when only that of design, for still the flawed it also could be.

Only just hand in hand instead, and it becomes that of "both" for still included, for also the splendor or magnificence it could be.

So if I could be walking the narrow line for just gymnastics, perhaps still climbing for only a chair, for not any line instead.

But next only falling, and it becomes that of failure or mishap, for still only the circumstance it could be, for also an Event.

Only a sharp pen for that of a pencil, and next only turned upright, for still not any falling it should be instead.

The face against the wall, should still not be any mirror, except that you could be having your hands on your back.

So, up versus down, and still not any "alright" either, for just face showing up, for that of across for such, and not turned away.

The circle could still be not any line, for only a circumference, except only turning upright, when still not any face down.

But if making it any fallibles for just opposites instead, and perhaps not the same, for just only meaning, for only a Contradiction here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

Any excuse for just only making it science for not any Religion instead, and perhaps not any clown you should make it either.

So "tell" me of just the science I could make it here still, and perhaps not any Religion either.

Remember for that of the open or close it should be for that of a hatch, still perhaps not any spinning for a loop, when only a cycle for such.

Proving a third-degree option, for only a chapter for such, could end up being impossible, for only the Laws of physics for still only set.

For some reason, any NOT should perhaps mean nothing, for only the Empty set it could be, except only a negative meaning, for just the opposite.

So here only a defined world for just the love or establishment it could be, when only science instead, for still not any self- for only Conscience for that of meaning.

Except that you perhaps could make it foundation or fundament instead, for just the bad word above.

Only just 0, for that of 1 or -1 for the inverse, still the complement it could be for just opposite, for not any switching of a fuse instead.

Thinking that any infinity should be making it for only the better, and perhaps still only the framework of science, for also the reality it could be.

But as I said or mentioned, for not any told, you could be still pressing the button just hard, for only the past or beyond you could make it.

So here for only the extremes it could be for still only science, when not any "Conception" it should be instead.

Here just reality could be telling about the world I am living in, for not any imaginary instead, and here not any unrealistic, for only just beyond for that of such.

Just impression could also be the Perception you could make it, for still not any infinity for just the ultimate it could be, for only Fact for such.

So, just the other thing, for still not any science for only just limits, and next only that of Faith or Belief instead.

I do not see any Creator for just in person, and next perhaps not any terminators or endpoints for only a finishing line either ("|---|").

So, only just a failure, for still only a mishap, and we could think that nature could be faltering for only the mechanism it could be, for still only the Laws of physics.

Coming to the Fact for only just a Conclusion, and still nature for only made for also the reason it could be, except still only that of "both".

One thing being noticed here, is that "Laws of physics" perhaps is not the best word here either, for only just Interaction instead, for also the Fundamental it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

So next who said or made it, for still only the fundamental it could be, for also determined, for still not any weakness or faltering instead.

Only just a mishap for that of walking the narrow line, and I could be still falling down, for not any perfect symmetry instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism

But like also the mentioned Atomism, which I chose to skip, for only Philosophy for such, because here still only nature determined, for only a Consequence for such.

And still for not any time for only spinning around either, you could make it a notion of Heaven and Hell instead, for not any part of nature either.

But for still not any Creator in person, only the master of the ship instead, for just Commander for such, when being at the helmet.

Making it still only Religion, for not any third-man or option instead, and it becomes just wrong, for still only the implied it perhaps could be.

Just final, and still for perhaps a chapter, when only a book for such, for not any decisive moment it could be instead, for just ultimate.

Only "to be or not to be", and next here I am, for still only the meaning it could be, for not any other explanation instead.
ID: 2055383 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055385 - Posted: 17 Aug 2020, 3:30:16 UTC
Last modified: 17 Aug 2020, 3:43:15 UTC

And killing off the quotes, for just being in the way, for only separating two posts by using a couple of dashes instead.

So just Hippocricy for not any general either, and it becomes that of "third man" for only an option, when also a surmise for that of such.

Such a thing could be still that of Fundamental Interaction only for just nature, except not any wild speculation or Idea it could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

But next only repeating myself, for perhaps a thing being mentioned before. except still not any wild thought for only a speculation, for not any failing it could be instead.

Rather that of flawed for also failure, when still that of design, for only the thing being meant, for just coming along.

But again that nature could be still that of "both" for just the part it could be, and next also both flawed and perfect, just at the same time.

So here not any deviating from just the track, when also the uncertainty it could be for not any predictable, when only the Uncertainty principle for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

"To be or not to be", and here perhaps not any Miracles either, for just losing track of it, and you could be ending off the road, for only just outside, when also a ditch.

Making it any different thing, for still only the thing it could be, and next still that of infinity, for not anything else, or perhaps better.

But rather "time is up" for only an option, and here guessing you still could be proving Miracles, for only science for such.

Here the only thing I could say, is "enough", for that of filling a bottle to capacity, for also the cup of coffee as well, for not rooming any more.

Here it also comes to me that for just the Miracles it could be, also superstition as well, except still only past or beyond for not any proven science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstition

But next I am only an "eggman" for such, when still only tantalizing, for not any hard press of a button instead, for that of pushing it to the extremes.

Infinity could be still a single Concept only for such, except also the varying degrees of science, for only branches for such, when also Sets.

Just pick up the subject, for that of the right one, and perhaps a better way of understanding you also could make it.

Here that both a circle and square could be inside or within an Object only for such, except still only that of a Set, for not any falling leaves instead.

Asking for a single solution when only that of an Equation for such, and perhaps E=mc2 here, for still not any infinity or singularity instead.

For only just a sweet dream, still not any rot or putrefaction here either, for also the decay it could be, when still not any "corruption".

Show me your face, and still perhaps only a smile, for only the facing outward it should be, for not any inwards instead, and here perhaps a better wording.

But here still the Fact that we could be proving for science, when still not any single thing for only explaining it all, for only that of limits for such.

I guess you still could make it an angel for only a moniker for such, when still not any falling for only just "peeing" for that of such, for not any suckle either.

But if Fact could be still that of recognition for only a face for such, next perhaps a smile, for also the science it also could be.

There should be no secret for only the disrespect we could be making it for that of both gods and angels, for still only ways of science instead.

But rather that Einstein makes it just "relative" for only the thing it could be, for not any Uncertain instead, for that of a principle for only such.

So here still only that of falling into the ditch, for only a trap for such, when not any reaching for the stars, for that of infinity only for such.

Therefore, still not any believable, for only unbelievable instead, when still that of infinity for comprising just the everything it still could be.

Just the everything it could be still for science, and next also the Comprehension we could make, when still just Facts versus Proof instead.

So here do not any touch for only a button for such, when still only that of everything for only the notion of infiinity it could be, for not any divine subject instead.

Next Fallacies for only just Religion, and perhaps still only science I could make it, just for meaning, and next also dare as well, for only just touching.

If I could make it still only a spiral staircase, for also winding or circular, I could be still only a fireman during an emergency, for only sliding down the vertical bar.

But next only a single piece for that of continuing, except not any consistency, for just adhering to a couple of principles.

So here perhaps rather a corkscrew instead, and it could be winding up itself for just forever, for that of sharp edges, when still only infinity for that of such.

Next it comes to me that it perhaps should not matter either, for just the circle it could be for also circumference, when still only biting itself in the tail.

Use a razor instead, for that of your skin, and you could be doing such a thing forever, for still not any smooth instead.

Therefore not any "We will meet again", for only a gentle touch for such, when also a smile, for still only the closed circle instead, for that of an endless loop.

Really it becomes only that of a thing for only consider, when still only different things for such, for also the view or outlook it could be.

Just give me a smile, and you could be doing that, except not any believing for only making it gods and angels, for only that of a Proof for science for such.

Only choose for that of select, and you make it the preferred Method for still the thing you could be proving, when also that of Conviction for such.

So, judge for only a given sense, and still only a consideration for such, when just only thinking, and it becomes that of preferred option, for also alternative.

Therefore, adhere to just the Scientific Method it could be still, except perhaps rather direct Proof instead, for also the Evidence it could be.

I made it that of Exception handling earlier on, for still not any weakness or complacency, because here perhaps only two different things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling

Therefore not any "transform indifference" it should be here either.

Again too hot in here, so cutting myself short instead, for only that of a sentence for such.
ID: 2055385 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055540 - Posted: 20 Aug 2020, 0:30:31 UTC
Last modified: 20 Aug 2020, 0:55:06 UTC

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=85566#2054453

And the sun could be shining, for not any rain coming down in the meantime either.

Why not make it just attributed or ascribed for only myself just to tell, for not any science it should be instead?

This discussion ended up just quite good, for not the other thing it should be either, for just falling off, for that of Doubt for only such.

Choose to believe, and next for only that of Certainty, and next the thing we rather could prove, for also the better thing just for meaning.

So here either optimistic, for not any standing on the ground for just a halt, when at least science for that of a positive attitude for such.

The better science is always the one we could do, and next also believe in, for only a given purpose, when also meaning.

Only assuming that there could be intelligent life out there, for not any 500 billion galaxies for such, and always the Premise we still only could do.

All those things just meant, perhaps also became meant, for still the Beauty and beast it could be, for also magnificence and glory as well, for still not any Proof.

But only wish, for that of a simple expectancy, and next only that of thing for just real, namely that of a heaven filled with stars, for only stars and galaxies for such.

Only words for that of science, and still only such an expectancy, when still not any Premise for only Proof, when also that of Certainty as well.

So here not any "Pizza grandiosa" for only the big making for that of such, but also that of "grandeur", for that of the magnificent it still could be for nature.

Either express just my feelings for the notion it could be, when also moment, for not any wish it could be for only just forthcoming, when rather
making a point for that of a word, for only having it explained.

And too many windows or tabs opened here, and next the emphatically it should be, when also explictly or expressly as well.

pending - awaiting - expectation - anticipation

But here you make it an emphasis for that of a word or sentence, only for have it said, and next it becomes only such an emphatic moment, only because of being possible.

So why not just fruitful instead, for only the moment of hope it could be, for not any joy it could be instead, for that of compassion?

Heaven could be still just awe for that of making, but next that you be struck by lightning only for such, for also the fear it also could be.

And next the thrill it also could be, only that of love for still only marriage, for not any excitement instead.

So, lost in space, for still only lack of words, and perhaps I could be swearing for not any better it should be either, for only stating a couple of words instead.

I could be translating for that of a man brandishing his gun for not any knife it could be instead, and next only swinging above his head.

But next the immediate response of the police, was that of shooting the man down, for still only the moment of excitement it could be.

And here for only that of incompleteness for just nature, for not any other thing it should be instead, for just the better of it for that of meaning.

So, why just fiddle away, except only mess with such a thing instead, for still not anything you could believe instead, and next also prove?

In which way could you make it nature that of "weighted", for still not any easy or hard it should be, for only a kickboxer for such?

Is it that of precious perhaps, or could you still weigh it in your hand, for only what it could be worth?

So it goes, and next for that of a total scheme which could be the "everything" we just could make for that of meaning, for only Comprehension for such.

You know it could be the better science at times, and next also an emphasis for only the words we could make it as well.

I made a posting earlier today, where I questioned the whole aspect of nature for only its completeness, when it rather should be Fallacies instead.

There just thinking that for not the cultivated harvest it still could be, only that of a nickname for just God, when still that of noname or Faceless coward instead.

Perhaps the science we could get, is only a promise for such, for still not any Laws or Equations instead, for rather that of Reason behind, for only just meaning.

But next "enough", for not any still, and next only the Laws of physics it could be still, for also the Equations just coming along, for that of part.

So here not the other set of rules, for also Laws, for still the mandatory it could be, except only from Gods hands instead, for the Creation he still was only responsible for.

But next "adapting" for only that of science, and next you think I could do so for only just meaning, for still not any middle or intermediary approach instead.

Here you could assume that of Creation for only just Gods meaning, for still the Religion it could be, for not any adapted or ascribed instead.

So, just blood on teeth for only that of being eager, and next not any sweat, for just letting it go down the drain either.

The point is that we could still make it nature complete for that of its beauty, when also splendor, for also the fulfilled it could be, except only result for that of Proof.

When you know it could be a Revelation, still perhaps not any sacrifice either, but just a point for that of Religion, for still only the Faith it could be.

Sights and sounds, and next only for that of music, for still not any playing of a flute, for only singing a song.

But always with that of respect for only science for such, for only the adoring it perhaps could be.

So here only "Tingaling Bell" for still only a flute for that of such, for not any ringing of a bell, for that of a lesson it could be, and next only school work here.

In my country, we are having a quite lovely melody for just the latter, for still the "springing" it could be, when only running for that of a lesson.

Perhaps you could make it "All the birds" instead, and next also a Palindrome, for that of phrase spelt backwards, for also the number it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palindrome

Any sweet music here, and next go to bed, for still only the lovely moment it could be, for also that of a Hymn.

So here maybe just delicious for that of taste, and you could still make it only a sweet moment, for a bit of tasting only for such.

But at PrimeGrid, you are supposed to make it only numbers for that of validness, for still not any Proof it should be either.

What if science is only just infallible, for just that of no meaning for such, when still not any Proof we could make, only with respect to itself?

Is nature just indefinite, only because of a constant, or could we make it a Construct instead, for still only what it could represent?

Here questioning that of validness for only Proof instead, except rather that of Proof itself for only subject, for also that of Uncertainties it also could be.

I made it that Fallacies should perhaps be for the Religion we could make, except only a bit of falling, for just the "fall guy" it could be, when that of failure.

So, come to that for only the Conclusion you still could make, when only that of failure, for not any Fallacies it should be instead.

Here just fall guy or failure for only the nature we still only could make it, and becoming distracted here, for that of a message about Norton safe search.

To be clear, just the physical aspect of nature we only could make it still, for also that of gravity, when that of Fallacies could be that of Religion instead.

Nature could be still only inconsequent for that of the failures it only could be, when not any nondeterministic for just the other part either.

So, valid for only just Consequence, and I guess it should not be any Religion here, for just only the Fallacies we could make.

Just attributed, for also ascribed, should be still only part of Religion only for such, and next guessing that it should be still only science here.

Having just the wrong belief, for only looking at a couple of paper stamps, for not any pencils either, and next only gray sheet, for that of lying on the floor.

Here the military man only making us supposed to believe for still only sheets for such, when that of the Roswell incident here.

But given nature as a whole for only a measure, and still the Belief you could make, except more tangible instead, for just the word I only knew.

Should I prove for only a given whole, for that of the wholeheartedly it perhaps is, or could it still be only a piece of the cake, for just that of a given whole?

Throw me just one word for that of meaning, and next also such as well, for still not any fine words for only that of a lesson, when rather a tenet or doctrine instead.

Perhaps we could be looking for an Equation expressed by means of a short word, for not any endless sentence instead, for only expressing a bit of Algebra for such.

It could be still on behalf of just science, for only the couple of nice words it could be, for not any expression, for just attributed instead, when only that of Religion.

"I love you", so next also "Dear friend", for still not any Lucy or Dr. Watson it should be instead, for only that of an adapted story, when also that of a Census.

My words at PrimeGrid just better here, for that of its original meaning, but here not any copy or paste just now.

Here it became still only Darwin for only the monkeys or apes it could be, for also that of Einstein, for only making it time just relative.

But next that of tangible once again, because it could be the word you could catch, for still only a nice meaning here, for not any such above.

Again, could have the transcription from just the other project later on, but here getting late at night, for just a break needed.
ID: 2055540 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055543 - Posted: 20 Aug 2020, 2:04:12 UTC
Last modified: 20 Aug 2020, 2:07:30 UTC

So, got a bit tired here, as you perhaps noticed or saw, so here trying with a cup of coffee instead.

Really, but except for the mentioned transcription, for only that of cut and paste, still only a reference to that of science, for only the Proof we could make.

But here "stemming from a Fact", for still not any stem cells, and you rather could make it that of attributed or ascribed, just for meaning.

"Cuckoo", but are we back at the starting point for only that of a lesson, when still not any learning, for just being taught?

Again, could be having my last one from PrimeGrid later on, for that of being pretty good, in my opinion.

But only when it goes tough, it also goes wrong, for still only the science we could make it, for not any Religion instead.

Just words being expressed by means of science, and next also pure and clean, for only the meaning it could be, for still not any ugliness instead.

The other thing could be just "nondeterministic" for also that of relative, when stlil not any tangible, for only that of steadfast for such, when also that of a grip.

Here at just past 3 AM in the morning, the coffee only makes me sweat, for still also the end of day it could be, for not any better.

But questioning the whole aspect of that of science, is perhaps not such a thing I should do, for still only leaving it in Doubt instead.

Here it comes to me that nature should be still comprehensible for just Fact, and next you also could understand, for still only that of grasp for just meaning.

But if Relativity only makes for that of Uncertainty, when still only relative, also that of both Ambiguity and Contradiction, for still the Proof we could make.

I made a Palindrome for that of "All the birds", and next only sing a song, for that of a flute for such, when only a repeating melody.

So, words should still go for only the Proof I could make it, and next also a steady hand for just holding, when still only a grip for that of a handle for such.

Just thinking that nature could be for that of absolutes, when still only nondeterministic, and it becomes just another thought.

The upper hand should still be only for science, and not any God, when also that of Contradictions or Ambiguity, for only the uncertainty it could be.

But is nature still only diverse for that of meaning, next you also could be doing just that, for still the explanation it could be.

Validness still goes for only that of Proof you could make it, for not any invalid it should be for nature instead, when only that of Contradictions.

So making it any Creator by just only asking, and still only Uncertainty for that of such, when not any Fallacies either.

Here making it that just failure or flaw, for also a mishap, could also be that of "falling guy", for still not any Fallacies, for only that of Religion for such.

The first one here for that of the physical Laws of nature it could be still, and next also prove for the meaning it should be or belong.

This because nature could be still perfect, for not any imperfect instead, and next also complete, for that of the fulfillment it also could be.

Any consummation instead, and next still only for that of Religion for a subject, for yet the other discussion it could be.

So, not any ready, for just brave, and still only such a circle for that of reference, when also a circumference as well, and therefore not any past or beyond either.

It really bogs to that of nature here, for still only the thing it could be, when also that of a reference for such, and next also "bogey".

Just two short lines for that of an excerpt, and next you could think I am quite good, for still not any waiting to the morning instead, for that of the rest.

One thing is making it "leap-frog" only for such, when not any undeterministic either, for only the failing of the Laws, for not any lacking either.

Here God saw that it was working, for still a couple of errors, except not any basic principle for only reason instead, and next adding that of fundament,
for also the foundation it could be.

And yes, noticing that it is perhaps not not any good here, for only grim hands for such, when still 3:35 AM in the morning, and I should be in bed.

Trying to fix here, by just removing a single word, for perhaps the better, except the latter part of the quote just added here.

Up in the morning perhaps, but next also late in bed, for still the meantime during the day, and next at least things being done, for not any thereafter it should be either.

Please have me excused, for still not the other discussion it could be, but could I be still lying just flat, for not any wake-up in the morning instead?

The intended purpose is still that of making it a moniker for only the compassion it could be, when also that of mercy, for still not any ruthless instead.

But only for that of Faceless coward or noname, perhaps only a slap in the face instead, and next you could turn the other cheek just around.

So, given call for just a telephone, and next only making it such a thing, for not any attributed or ascribed it should be instead, for only just Religion.

But if nature could just only deliver, for that of a sentence, just such a thing we could make it, when still only that of a moniker here.

Like a turntable, next also the Phase shift for just the face you could make it, when still not any option just for meaning, when only science versus Religion.

Here you make it that of "adapted" for still only the Religion it could be, when that of ruthless, for still only the slap in the face it could be.

Always science for that of meaning, and next you could question that of mercy for only just love, when still that of ruthless instead.

So, Lord for not any Overlord, and still waiting until tomorrow for the other story it could be, when only just better.

The interface for just layer where it could be a possible middleman for that of an intermediary, is perhaps no such thing I could get at, for only just a pedestal instead.

Here at first, making it a gateway only for such, for still not any Wormhole it could be instead, and here perhaps clemency, rather than just love.

Just having to translate here, for still only the film or membrane it could be, also that of a pellicle for such, for still not any wake up in the morning, for just give me a call.

Too late right now, and I will have the complete transcript just tomorrow, for still only that of a cut and paste.
ID: 2055543 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7034
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2055590 - Posted: 21 Aug 2020, 3:47:19 UTC
Last modified: 21 Aug 2020, 3:51:37 UTC

And here flipping the disks once again, for still having two physical ones attached.

Here I chose to install Windows 10 on a partition that initially did not look any good, but got a fix at first.

Also inserting the second graphics card, but noticing that the two partitions on the other disks just blew, for not taking a password.

I did not do any more with the processor fan, where there is still only a single fan blade, but the airflow is mounted on top of the running card.

Either it becomes yet another install of Windows 10 on each subsequent partition, if not finding another solution just before.

Next it needs attaching to at least one project here, and downloading the three applications for that use, went quite smooth.

Regardless of any credit, a start could alway be slow, for just catching up with a couple of things.

Here selecting the ESP LLR tasks for no credit at all, using a secondary account, together with Genefer18 on the GPU.

I made two separate recoveries of the big partition that was lost, and next made it one for that of an install.

But at first it must have crashed out here completely, so here or this is a thing that could still be showing up.

Either just that of complete, for making it all or everything, for still not the other discussion here, but the oldest files are back from 2006.

Still the Intel Core i9-10920X here, with its 24 processor core, and once again it could be the subdivision for just making 12 instead.

Discoveries could be coming readily at hand, for only a steady progress, except for still the hibernation just here.

So, for not any WYSIWYG for just giving it a casual look, it could still be the other thing for just looking at nature instead.

Here my Genefer18 tasks finishes up in just an half hour or so, and it becomes the second one just finished right now.

And getting back here from just the other pages it could be, also noticing the edit it also should be, when not doing it any better.

We could be having some 37 known primes for that of the Genefer18 I chose to pick up, except only a droplet in the ocean for only such.

But here also making it the big question we could still seek to answer, for only that of a Reason behind, when still only that of Creation.

If I could still be having ten fingers and ten toes, each on separate hands or feet here, next also the alternatives you could make for science.

Making it just with respect with only a single thing it could be, next a physical context only for such, for only the thing it could be meant.

Nature does not any sell, but it only comes implied for just the meaning it could be, when still that of "Beauty and beast" for just the both of it.

But here also that of randomness and turmoil, for still the Chaos it could be, when also Coincidences as well, for only an Event which could be spawned.

I tried making it that of obvious, for still the implied it could be for only just meant, when still not any reasoning just for nature, by only deducing for such.

You could still make it the bridge above river Kwai, for still not any Wormholes instead, when it should be only that of elementary science.

So here you throw just a rope, and next it becomes a bridge, for still being connected, by only a structure, for not any philosophy it should be instead.

One thing is doing it such a thing for only the science you could make, for still not any connection, for only a bridge for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

And for having just the first beer, it became that of Einstein–Rosen bridges here, for just the other name it could be.

When does science go wrong, for still only leaving us to speculate, and next the notion of time for that of Special Relativity, for still not any Darwin instead.

Make it any incomplete just for the understanding it could be, and next also failure, for still not any complete understanding instead.

Our way of only doing such a thing, could be still that of fulfillment, for also the consummation it also could be, when only just Religion.

Does science set any limits for only the Comprehension we could make, and still that of infinity only for such, for not any Fallacies instead.

But is Religion next only part of science for only the subject it could be, or should rather science be part of Religion, for only the thing we could make?

So, make it a touch for only your fingers, and still you could not dare, for only being just brave.

The thing here is that we could be making it shining for only that of a Hotel for such, for not any Credible evidence instead, for also a witness for such.

But next asserting a Claim for only making it, for still only the answer it could be, for only assuming a couple of Facts.

Just sunshine, and next sunshine for that of up in the morning, and next sunset for only just the end of the day, for still not any landscape you could thread instead.

If it could be still only just in the door, for also out again, I could be still inside for just entering, except both a lock and key needed, for not any handle instead.

Next, show me the door for just follow you out, and you lost the magnificent moment for just being in there and present, for only the joy it could be.

Making it still a binge for that of a drink, it should not be any excessive force for only a bit of celebrating either, except still the moment of joy.

Either we could dismiss it for only the Fact it still could be, and next not any Wormholes part of nature for only a given meaning either.

Science is still only science, and next I could be only drunk, for that of the glorification I could make it, when still only joy for that of sunshine.

Make it an adventure instead, and next a landscape you still could thread, for only that of a mill for such.

But Einstein makes it a notion of time for just a famous Equation for such, and next not any happiness for just a fortune, when still only luck instead.

I always could open a door for not any asked either, and next the river of water could be just flowing, for that of free access.

Any splendid instead, and next a moment of free fantasy for such, when still not any splendor either, because a moment could be still that of happiness.

And here it comes to me that you could make it gratitude instead, for still not any "gracious me" it could be instead.

But next of course I could give you a smile, for still not any scientific Proof, for also that of a grimace as well.

Where is the scientific Proof for still only your standpoint, for the place you could be, and also notion you could have, for still not any feelings either?

Could nature be any leveled, and should it next be that of Philosophy, for only the way of thinking you could make, for also the given context it could be?

Press the button for still only the science it should be, and next not any glorification instead, for only the splendor it perhaps could be, just around the corner.

If nature could be still offering you one possibility for that of death only for such, it still should not be any Wormholes just for meaning either.

Knock-knock, so in the door for just the door you could enter, and next a Wormhole for that of such, for still only the splendor and glory it could be.

Dismissed perhaps, and next it goes down the rank, for not any drain instead, for still not any seal instead, making for just a marker.

So, if still only that of Wormholes, does it go past any infinity for only the glorification it perhaps could be, or should it still be within the context of science?

What if just incomplete could be only that of Sets only for such, when also part, when that of complete should mean glorification for just the infinity we could make it?

Answer still open perhaps, but next only that of a hatch for still only such.
ID: 2055590 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 201 · 202 · 203 · 204 · 205 · 206 · 207 . . . 334 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.