Message boards :
Number crunching :
Recommendations for HD 6870.
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Iona ![]() Send message Joined: 12 Jul 07 Posts: 790 Credit: 22,438,118 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Possibly a slightly misleading title, as I'm awaiting delivery of the stated card...an XFX (Pine) graphics card. My trusty HD 4890 (RV790 factory OC model) is being replaced and soon to find a new 'home' running in X-Fire in my partner's PC...I'm aiming to install Cat 11.12 on that 'rig' and run the older SDK, which will allow GPU crunching again on that 'rig' whilst still having far better fps in games, as was wanted. However, what I'd really appreciate, is advice on the best Catalyst package for a 6870, bearing in mind that this is a General Purpose PC; so I'm looking for the best overall package and not necessarily the one that gives the best fps or the fastest 'crunch', but a 'happy median'. I also have a number of the Lunatics installer packages....36 - 40. To be honest, I've gone round in circles trying to find anything that even resembles a definitive answer, for nearly a week! The possible combinations are staggering, to put it mildly! Don't take life too seriously, as you'll never come out of it alive! |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 33884 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 ![]() ![]() |
In my honest opinion Cat 12.3 is a good choice. But for HD 6 cards Cat 12.1 might be a better choice. Especially for crunching. My son has a 6850 and Cat 12.3 is running fine on it. Additional note. If you like to crunch on it use a more recent app. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 ![]() |
I'm running 12.4 on my HD6850 - 2GB. It's been running Einstein BRP4s ever since. No problems. |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 ![]() ![]() |
Possibly a slightly misleading title, as I'm awaiting delivery of the stated card...an XFX (Pine) graphics card. My trusty HD 4890 (RV790 factory OC model) is being replaced and soon to find a new 'home' running in X-Fire in my partner's PC...I'm aiming to install Cat 11.12 on that 'rig' and run the older SDK, which will allow GPU crunching again on that 'rig' whilst still having far better fps in games, as was wanted. You appear to be running Win XP on your computers. If you want to run Raistmers' latest OpenCL Apps, you will need to run at least Catalyst 11-12 or 12-1. You can't run any Catalyst newer than 12-1 with XP, so, the choice isn't too difficult. I've had better success with 11-12 as I seem to receive fewer AstroPulse Access Violation (0xc0000005) Errors with that version. If you're lucky enough to not receive that error, either of the 2 versions of Catalyst would be fine. |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 33884 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 ![]() ![]() |
TBar beat me to it. Yes, no big choice then. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6533 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 ![]() ![]() |
I am using CAT 11.12 with my HD6870. I did try some of the CAT 12.x drivers, but ended up going back. As I was having some weird playback issues when using VLC. Some kind of dropped frames or stuttering. I haven't bothered with any newer ones since. The current apps are built on SDK 2.6. So until that requirement changes I probably don't bother looking at the newer drivers. I figure if it isn't broke, don't fix it. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours |
Iona ![]() Send message Joined: 12 Jul 07 Posts: 790 Credit: 22,438,118 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yes, I realised at work, this morning that XP was going to limit my choices and I'd be looking at something like the same Cat Suite I'm currently running (11.12) on my 4890, and I also had problems with the later Cat 12's drivers. I'm running quite an old version of SDK on the 4890...so I'd better look at running something a little less ancient! It is also looking increasingly likely that before too long, I'll have to commit to something like Win7 64 bit....maybe dual-boot using a second drive, to keep the capability of still running all my XP32 progs. A pity in a way, as XP Pro has proved to be extremely stable for me. Don't take life too seriously, as you'll never come out of it alive! |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 31337 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 ![]() ![]() |
I havn't found a program yet that I ran on XP that won't run on Win7 (both 32 & 64 bit) so you should be fine. ;-) Cheers. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6533 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 ![]() ![]() |
Sometimes Windows7, or Vista, may prompt with a message saying something like "This application has known compatibility issues, are you sure you want to use it". I just check the box for don't tell me thing again and hit yes. Otherwise I also haven't had any issues running apps. However the 64-bit OS's will no longer run any 16-bit applications. So if there are some old 16-bit apps you are fond of you would need to dual boot for that purpose. Anther option would be to use a VM or something of that nature. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours |
©2023 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.