Return of Seti Pool

Message boards : Number crunching : Return of Seti Pool
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next

AuthorMessage
KB7RZF
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 99
Posts: 9549
Credit: 3,308,926
RAC: 2
United States
Message 1050655 - Posted: 23 Nov 2010, 23:05:10 UTC

I'm gonna say December 10th, 4PM PST.
ID: 1050655 · Report as offensive
mfbabb2
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 00
Posts: 8
Credit: 132,231
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1050719 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 3:13:05 UTC - in response to Message 1049818.  


December 1st, 2010, 24:00 hours UTC/PST GMT-8


so is 24:00 the 1st second of dec 1st or the last second of dec 1st?

i select 12:00 noon on nov 29th

Actually, it is properly written as 00:00:00 (1 second after 23:59:59).
ID: 1050719 · Report as offensive
mfbabb2
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 00
Posts: 8
Credit: 132,231
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1050720 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 3:16:23 UTC

April 1, 2012 00:00:00 (Just as the asteroid hits and the world goes "bang!".)

More seriously, 12/04/2010 4:00 PM PST.
ID: 1050720 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34280
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1050768 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 8:53:44 UTC

I´m just wondering.



With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1050768 · Report as offensive
Profile Ghery S. Pettit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Nov 99
Posts: 325
Credit: 28,109,066
RAC: 82
United States
Message 1050821 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 18:03:55 UTC

Based on the latest Technical news, 12/7/2010 is the earliest.

I wonder what my RAC on PrimeGrid will look like by then? It's already much higher than I've ever seen on SETI. :-)
ID: 1050821 · Report as offensive
Niteryder
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 22,663,988
RAC: 18
United States
Message 1050822 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 18:08:44 UTC

12/8/2010 11:00am CST
ID: 1050822 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 1050832 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 19:11:06 UTC - in response to Message 1050822.  
Last modified: 24 Nov 2010, 19:11:54 UTC

7 December 2010, SETI will be back online................?!

18:00 hours UTC.
:)
ID: 1050832 · Report as offensive
Profile Mr. Kevvy Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 3777
Credit: 1,114,826,392
RAC: 3,319
Canada
Message 1050833 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 19:16:22 UTC
Last modified: 24 Nov 2010, 19:18:50 UTC

Right now. :^)

(I just got 20 WU's.)
ID: 1050833 · Report as offensive
Dave

Send message
Joined: 29 Mar 02
Posts: 778
Credit: 25,001,396
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1050834 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 19:19:49 UTC

I was just about to say...

...after Chrome chose to CLOSE ON ME...............

I've got some CUDA!
ID: 1050834 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 1050850 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 20:38:21 UTC - in response to Message 1050836.  
Last modified: 24 Nov 2010, 20:46:25 UTC

Well, got 4 (Enhanced) MB WU's on my fatest CUDA rig, (X9650@3.6GHz +GTX480, 1.4GHz)
It's a Start :)
(If it where CUDA tasks, they would have been done probably whitin the hour, they're also Resends _2)

Also haven't changed anything in BOINC, no NNT, even upped the SETI quotum a bit ;-/ .....
ID: 1050850 · Report as offensive
Kevin Olley

Send message
Joined: 3 Aug 99
Posts: 906
Credit: 261,085,289
RAC: 572
United Kingdom
Message 1050866 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 21:17:09 UTC - in response to Message 1050850.  

31 WU's so far, first couple all ready returned.


Kevin


ID: 1050866 · Report as offensive
Kevin Olley

Send message
Joined: 3 Aug 99
Posts: 906
Credit: 261,085,289
RAC: 572
United Kingdom
Message 1050874 - Posted: 24 Nov 2010, 21:39:32 UTC - in response to Message 1050866.  

31 WU's so far, first couple all ready returned.



Getting even better, the queue now stands at 68 WU's and hopefully still growing.

Seti has been given top priority.
Kevin


ID: 1050874 · Report as offensive
Zap de Ridder
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Jan 00
Posts: 227
Credit: 1,468,844
RAC: 1
Netherlands
Message 1051191 - Posted: 25 Nov 2010, 23:06:37 UTC - in response to Message 1050821.  
Last modified: 25 Nov 2010, 23:07:14 UTC

Based on the latest Technical news, 12/7/2010 is the earliest.

I agree Pettit so my new guess is 12/8/2010 10:00 Berkeley time
ID: 1051191 · Report as offensive
KWSN - Sir Frank of the Wood

Send message
Joined: 7 Dec 99
Posts: 17
Credit: 1,441,497
RAC: 12
United States
Message 1051332 - Posted: 26 Nov 2010, 15:11:20 UTC

"Totally stable and everything working perfectly.
February 30th
Not a clue what year it will be :)"

I will be more optimistic: 32 Dec 2010 at 1300 hrs

frank
ID: 1051332 · Report as offensive
Dave

Send message
Joined: 29 Mar 02
Posts: 778
Credit: 25,001,396
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1051390 - Posted: 26 Nov 2010, 21:54:39 UTC - in response to Message 1050719.  
Last modified: 26 Nov 2010, 21:56:14 UTC


December 1st, 2010, 24:00 hours UTC/PST GMT-8


so is 24:00 the 1st second of dec 1st or the last second of dec 1st?

i select 12:00 noon on nov 29th

Actually, it is properly written as 00:00:00 (1 second after 23:59:59).


Rolling back a bit, this reminds of a question that seems appropriate to ask in this environment (with people that obviously correctly understand time):

Why THE HELL do some people - in fact many - insist on the start of a day being @ 00:01?!?!?!?!?!?!

WHY DON'T PEOPLE UNDERSTAND NUMBERS????!?!?!?!
ID: 1051390 · Report as offensive
Profile Blurf
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 8962
Credit: 12,678,685
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1051391 - Posted: 26 Nov 2010, 21:58:16 UTC - in response to Message 1051390.  

Rolling back a bit, this reminds of a question that seems appropriate to ask in this environment (with people that obviously correctly understand time):

Why THE HELL do some people - in fact many - insist on the start of a day being @ 00:01?!?!?!?!?!?!

WHY DON'T PEOPLE UNDERSTAND NUMBERS????!?!?!?!


I understand this is part of military time and it makes complete sense to me-my question for you would be why are you yelling at us???


ID: 1051391 · Report as offensive
Profile GalaxyIce
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 May 06
Posts: 8927
Credit: 1,361,057
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1051394 - Posted: 26 Nov 2010, 22:05:46 UTC - in response to Message 1051390.  
Last modified: 26 Nov 2010, 22:10:14 UTC


December 1st, 2010, 24:00 hours UTC/PST GMT-8


so is 24:00 the 1st second of dec 1st or the last second of dec 1st?

i select 12:00 noon on nov 29th

Actually, it is properly written as 00:00:00 (1 second after 23:59:59).


Rolling back a bit, this reminds of a question that seems appropriate to ask in this environment (with people that obviously correctly understand time):

Why THE HELL do some people - in fact many - insist on the start of a day being @ 00:01?!?!?!?!?!?!

WHY DON'T PEOPLE UNDERSTAND NUMBERS????!?!?!?!

You're all wrong. 00.00 is the exact point of transition between one day and the next - 00.00 is in neither day. There is no such thing as 24.00 - it is 00.00 and neither AM nor PM .

(AM and PM is not shouting, just a correct way to write AM and PM)

flaming balloons
ID: 1051394 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24884
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1051397 - Posted: 26 Nov 2010, 22:15:03 UTC

When writing about the 2 halves of a day, it is noted as AM/PM, however if actual time is stated then it is as follows: - 9:15am or 9:15pm

If using the 24:00 hr clock, then AM/PM is not required.

This is supposed to be a fun thread in guessing the full return of S@H with all guns blazing, not a platform for pedantics, so please keep posts on topic please.....

Thank you.
ID: 1051397 · Report as offensive
Profile GalaxyIce
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 May 06
Posts: 8927
Credit: 1,361,057
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1051402 - Posted: 26 Nov 2010, 22:23:07 UTC - in response to Message 1051397.  

When writing about the 2 halves of a day, it is noted as AM/PM, however if actual time is stated then it is as follows: - 9:15am or 9:15pm

If using the 24:00 hr clock, then AM/PM is not required.

This is supposed to be a fun thread in guessing the full return of S@H with all guns blazing, not a platform for pedantics, so please keep posts on topic please.....

Thank you.

It's not pedantic, it's a fact. Twice every day there is a point in time, 0.00 and 12.00, when saying it is part of the following half of the day or the previous part of the day is both correct and wrong, but definitiely confusing. It's probably a mystery of our timekeeping that the aliens out there might want to hear about. It's also a very bad time to start a race or competition since it clearly creates confusion.


flaming balloons
ID: 1051402 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24884
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 1051411 - Posted: 26 Nov 2010, 22:41:01 UTC

What race? What competition? There happens to be many fun loving people on this forum who can't wait to get back crunching at full tilt....

...& that is supposed to be the main point of these projects....have fun while at the same time, aiding science.

as far as Im concerned, that's all that matters.
ID: 1051411 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Return of Seti Pool


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.