Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problem reporting tasks
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7
Author | Message |
---|---|
Swamirabbitina Send message Joined: 16 Sep 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 409,583 RAC: 0 |
same problem with me. Getting lots of Scheduler request failed: Http internal server error and also the Can't connect message, I have 42 WU backed up. funny thing is that WU upload just fine; just not getting credit, which hasn't changed for several days. where is this app_info.xml file supposed to be located? I can't find it. running 6.11.4 32 bit on windows 7/ |
perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0 |
Hi Swami, welcome to the forums, You wont find an app_info, you are not running optimized apps. You might want to run over to the Lunatic's site http://lunatics.kwsn.net/index.php?module=Downloads;catd=9 and see about trying it though. Optimized apps can cut your crunch time dramatically. You may need to run CPUZ also just to make sure what installer to use though I see you are running AMD so your choices may be limited. PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
heres something interesting I saw on my Mandriva box. I installed the OS upgrade and needed to tweak BOINC a bit. well long story short BOINC the OS somehow lost the apps and App_info.xml that I installed. so after much frustration about communication errors I just detached from seti and reattached. No harm since my WU's failed from the already mentioned missing files. Turns out it got work. So far so good. I can connect to seti and get work. I then stopped the BOINC process installed the AK MB and beta4 AP apps to seti@home and then restarted boinc. WU dies. then I get the HTTP error. THis is definitely something server side that is quite annoying. On a happy note, Primegrid is getting a lot of work tossed their way until this clears /EDIT I got work on the Mandriva box from seti. So, apparently its just certain boxes that cant get through In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 |
I have got two machines one running Windows7 and the other XP it is mainly the XP one I get internal server errors. The Windows 7 sometimes I get the message or I get cannot connect to server internet access ok so it must be their end the problem is. Both are uning the Lunatics App file only had this problem since the update, cannot get a latest score for my XP machine all I get is internal server errors.How do I get rid of the v5.00 version from my app file, file only update 13th July |
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 |
I have got two machines one running Windows7 and the other XP it is mainly the XP one I get internal server errors. The Windows 7 sometimes I get the message or I get cannot connect to server internet access ok so it must be their end the problem is. Both are uning the Lunatics App file only had this problem since the update, cannot get a latest score for my XP machine all I get is internal server errors.How do I get rid of the v5.00 version from my app file, file only update 13th July Further info thought I had different versions yet both are running 10.56 should I update and see if this clears it |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14654 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
I used the Lunatics site, should I change my info file for the Astropulse v5.00? I see changeset [trac]changeset:22090[/trac]: Timestamp: 08/01/10 20:43:38 (4 hours ago) If he was coding at 8 o'clock on a Sunday evening (timesramp is local time, not UTC), it's unlikely it'll be live on the server yet. But hopefully they'll be able to fix it quickly once the lab opens. |
Lionel Send message Joined: 25 Mar 00 Posts: 680 Credit: 563,640,304 RAC: 597 |
I found that in my case the HTTP Server internal error was related to my app_info.xml file. This contained references to older application versions which are no longer used. (the content of app_info.xml is reported on any update) removing the old entries in the app info file works ... thnx very much ... the lappy is happy again. L. |
Bill Walker Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 3868 Credit: 2,697,267 RAC: 0 |
There may be two seperate issues. Removing old ap references on ap.info got ride of the "http error", but I was still getting "cannot connect to server". Deatached, reattached and got one WU, estimating 25 hours to complete (forgot to reinstall optimized aps). After using the Lunatics installer, got 27 WUs, estimating 0:40 to 2:30 to complete (which is pretty close to actual). I'm almost set for the next outrage. |
Robert Ribbeck Send message Joined: 7 Jun 02 Posts: 644 Credit: 5,283,174 RAC: 0 |
There may be two seperate issues. Removing old ap references on ap.info got ride of the "http error", but I was still getting "cannot connect to server". Deatached, reattached and got one WU, estimating 25 hours to complete (forgot to reinstall optimized aps). After using the Lunatics installer, got 27 WUs, estimating 0:40 to 2:30 to complete (which is pretty close to actual). I'm almost set for the next outrage. I'd have to say it's a separate issue When I checked my ap.info it was correct but I've had trouble with connections reporting. I think it's something they did last outage. Reporting worked fine be for the last outage |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
Agreed I don't have old application data in my App_info so this seems to be a red herring In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
With the "internal server error" issue understood and being fixed, here's some thoughts on the scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server problem. Hellsheep wrote: Hey guys and girls, The question, in part, is what "too long" means. A TCP connection attempt involves sending a SYN packet and waiting for the ACK. Windows implementation waits 3 seconds for the ACK, then tries another SYN, waits 6 seconds, etc. doubling the allowed delay each time. Windows NT and Win9x default to allowing 3 retries so the final failure takes a total of 3+6+12+24 = 45 seconds. Windows 2000 and later default to 2 retries, so it's 21 seconds. From my eastern US location, I've been getting some "couldn't connect" failures, though not enough to be a serious problem. Using a web browser on my Win98SE daily driver to get http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu a dozen times over about an hour's time was always successful, but took from 3 seconds to 1 minute 36 seconds. The web browser tries again after the first failure to connect, about half those trials took longer than the Win98SE 45 second connection timeout. The Windows registry value which controls how many SYN retries are done is TcpMaxConnectRetransmissions. If I were having serious "couldn't connect" problems I'd be considering increasing it to 4 which would give a 93 second timeout. There was a "21 second timeout" thread back in 2007 related to connecting to the download server, increasing TcpMaxConnectRetransmissions in that case didn't seem to help. Possibly later versions of Windows ignore it, or possibly whatever was interfering with connections lasted longer than any reasonable timeout sequence. Joe |
Searcher Send message Joined: 26 Jun 99 Posts: 139 Credit: 9,063,168 RAC: 15 |
I have had the same issue as the OP since about the 25th. After reading thru this thread I upgraded to the latest enhanced app and all 80 reports uploaded. The time stamp on the app_info.xml did not change. |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
Hmmm thats interesting. reinstalled my opt apps using lunatics unified installer 0.36 and all my work reported and I got tasks downloading. That seems like a silly fix but it does work In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Rob.B Send message Joined: 23 Jul 99 Posts: 157 Credit: 1,439,682 RAC: 0 |
I have done most of what has been said perviously and i still get; 02/08/2010 17:10:56 SETI@home Reporting 11 completed tasks, not requesting new tasks 02/08/2010 17:11:18 Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 02/08/2010 17:11:19 Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. 02/08/2010 17:11:21 SETI@home Scheduler request failed: Failure when receiving data from the peer So the question is what has changed? I know it is not me, so it's else where. If so whrere is the prior notification, clock cycles ar enot free, some one has to pay the electricity bill. I know I'll get a kicking from the sycophants, but it has to be said. Rob.B |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
reinstalling with the newer 0.36 lunatics unified installer didnt help? did you turn off boinc before the install? In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 |
|
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 |
|
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.