1214713366 437514249 3149045 4741773 14388.3 247.18 39.62


I have seen some cases where I am 70 times slower than my wingman. The above line is Result ID, WU, My computer #, wingman #, my cpu sec, wingman cpu sec, and then granted credit. The WU is no longer available for viewing because seti trims them so quickly.

I just wonder how I can take so long compared to another computer. Does CUDA get the same CPU timing measurement as main CPU timing?

I have not been running seti much lately, so I am a bit out of touch with current developments.

70 times? How about 153 times faster?

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=437835045
while the unit is still there, otherwise the results are in format
Result ID, WU, (italic) My computer #, (bold) wingman #, (italic) my cpu sec, (bold) wingman cpu sec, and then granted credit

1215486281 437835045 3848568 4365728 18,917.44 123.23 39.65

I think my Athlon 2500+ is retiring, even though it's running optimized application. Of course, the wingman has CUDA.

---

What you are seeing is the time that CUDA used the CPU, it does not show that it probably took 30+ or more minutes on the video card.

---

still better than over 5 hours...

---

I'm guessing that you have seen my page as you were asking about the optimized AP app.

http://www.arkayn.us/seti/index.htm

You can also install the optimized apps on the your other 2 Intel machines. Mac Mini's?

---

Michael37 your time is close to my old p4 in seconds which i can assume, that is about 6.5 hours of crunch time? But im not running an opt app.

---

[/quote]

Old James

I am not surprised. This CPU is about 6 years old.

---

thew wil be new Windows/x86 6.08 cuda ??????
it's WTF to use!!!

cuda use 100% of core ond slowwww PC
not from start but in some time ofter !!!!!!

its on boinc 6.6.18 to 6.6.26
drivers 174.28 - 185.81
2003x64 and 2008x64
it.s BED BED BED (((((