Coulter says Canada sent troops to Vietnam

BLAME CANADA!

Alright, we can start a movement. :-D

I'm sorry...all of the little people aren't as rich as the Socialists that post here.

Please post a summary of your links. Many of us capitalists are POOOOOOR.

Thanks for your altruistic concerns.

That was a joke. Maybe you posted the response in the wrong place?

Please stop , Jeffrey. We all know you are Islam. You claim this is logically not due to you insofar as ethics are concerned. I contend that self interest and fighting terrorists IS an aspect of our morality against yours.

You only ever do postings that are degrading toward america and 'the jews'.

You can easily private message me or others if you wish further things to say in the name of Allah. I'll listen....I might even respond in Arabic. WITHOUT A TRANSLATOR PROGRAM.

:-)------there's my winky.

---

Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data!
I did NOT authorize this belly writing!

Umm, you're posting responses to the wrong person.

---

Coulter says Canada sent troops to Vietnam

BLAME CANADA!

Alright, we can start a movement. :-D

I'm sorry...all of the little people aren't as rich as the Socialists that post here.

Please post a summary of your links. Many of us capitalists are POOOOOOR.

Thanks for your altruistic concerns.

That was a joke. Maybe you posted the response in the wrong place?

No....it fits here just as well as it fits any where else.

---

Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data!
I did NOT authorize this belly writing!

Coulter says Canada sent troops to Vietnam

BLAME CANADA!

Alright, we can start a movement. :-D

I'm sorry...all of the little people aren't as rich as the Socialists that post here.

Please post a summary of your links. Many of us capitalists are POOOOOOR.

Thanks for your altruistic concerns.

That was a joke. Maybe you posted the response in the wrong place?

No....it fits here just as well as it fits any where else.

Whatever, it's not my thread. But could you at least reply to a post of the person your talking to? lol

---

Put your posts in the right place and address the person directly. You've accused another person (Jeffrey) in one of your posts of being "degrading toward america and "the jews" but replied to one of my posts. Apparently, you still haven't deleted it or requested to have it moved. Since I am of course not in any way anti-Semitic, nor have I ever said anything "degrading toward america and "the jews" as you put it, I won't tolerate any kind of potential defamation against my character. Even if you didn't mean to post those remarks where you did it's still possible to be taken by people that you were addressing me.

---

A/C....I am addressing you directly. Just you there. I'd like you to respond to it. Forget jeffrey for the moment as he crops up everywhere.

Put your posts in the right place and address the person directly. You've accused another person (Jeffrey) in one of your posts of being "degrading toward america and "the jews" but replied to one of my posts. Apparently, you still haven't deleted it or requested to have it moved. Since I am of course not in any way anti-Semitic, nor have I ever said anything "degrading toward america and "the jews" as you put it, I won't tolerate any kind of potential defamation against my character. Even if you didn't mean to post those remarks where you did it's still possible to be taken by people that you were addressing me.

---

Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data!
I did NOT authorize this belly writing!

It's obvious who I was addressing by the quotes above in other posts.....but in order to keep it simple....

A/C....I am addressing you directly. Just you there. I'd like you to respond to it. Forget jeffrey for the moment as he crops up everywhere.

Put your posts in the right place and address the person directly. You've accused another person (Jeffrey) in one of your posts of being "degrading toward america and "the jews" but replied to one of my posts. Apparently, you still haven't deleted it or requested to have it moved. Since I am of course not in any way anti-Semitic, nor have I ever said anything "degrading toward america and "the jews" as you put it, I won't tolerate any kind of potential defamation against my character. Even if you didn't mean to post those remarks where you did it's still possible to be taken by people that you were addressing me.

---

Founder of BOINC team Objectivists. Oh the humanity! Rational people crunching data!
I did NOT authorize this belly writing!

Well no not really, none of what you said in http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=43099&nowrap=true#670477 had anything to do with the quotes that were there.

---

"If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women. It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'"

Interesting..I wonder what sex she thinks she is?

---

Reality Internet Personality

"If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women. It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'"

Interesting..I wonder what sex she thinks she is?

I'm not sure that badly constructed puppets actually have a sex.

---

Hopefully the cosmos is not trying to reverse the charges.
Moderation in all things.

Interesting..I wonder what sex she thinks she is?

She's a woman. Like Maggie Thatcher. Or Oprah. Or any other woman.

---

Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...

Interesting..I wonder what sex she thinks she is?

She's a woman. Like Maggie Thatcher. Or Oprah. Or any other woman.

Then why is she asking to have her vote removed? This makes no sense.

---

Reality Internet Personality

Interesting..I wonder what sex she thinks she is?

She's a woman. Like Maggie Thatcher. Or Oprah. Or any other woman.

Then why is she asking to have her vote removed? This makes no sense.

Think of it as a form of self-mutilation. A number of mentally disturbed people tend to do this.

---

Hopefully the cosmos is not trying to reverse the charges.
Moderation in all things.

Then why is she asking to have her vote removed? This makes no sense.

I doubt she actually wishes to have the vote removed from women. She's sneering at the fact that many of them vote in a predictable block for handouts.

---

Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...

Then why is she asking to have her vote removed? This makes no sense.

I doubt she actually wishes to have the vote removed from women. She's sneering at the fact that many of them vote in a predictable block for handouts.

"If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women. It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'"

She wants to remove women's right to vote because she thinks it will stop the democrats getting in.

That is actually a form of self mutilation as Jon said.

---

Reality Internet Personality

She wants to remove women's right to vote because she thinks it will stop the democrats getting in.

That is actually a form of self mutilation as Jon said.

Or it's just empty political rhetoric designed to emphasize her point. Which would fit perfectly in line with her polemic style.

---

Cordially,
Rush

elrushbo2@theobviousgmail.com
Remove the obvious...

She wants to remove women's right to vote because she thinks it will stop the democrats getting in.

That is actually a form of self mutilation as Jon said.

Or it's just empty political rhetoric designed to emphasize her point. Which would fit perfectly in line with her polemic style.

I think you are bored and are looking for something to disagree with me about :D

---

Reality Internet Personality

Then why is she asking to have her vote removed? This makes no sense.

I doubt she actually wishes to have the vote removed from women. She's sneering at the fact that many of them vote in a predictable block for handouts.

"If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women. It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'"

She wants to remove women's right to vote because she thinks it will stop the democrats getting in.

That is actually a form of self mutilation as Jon said.

Currently it looks like the evangelic movement is pushing for a Democrat in the White House in 2009. A large number of them plan to vote for a third party if Rudy gets the Republican nod. This would split the party just about in half. Sounds like a plan to me. Guess we should all get used to saying Madame President.

---

Hopefully the cosmos is not trying to reverse the charges.
Moderation in all things.

She wants to remove women's right to vote because she thinks it will stop the democrats getting in.

That is actually a form of self mutilation as Jon said.

Or it's just empty political rhetoric designed to emphasize her point. Which would fit perfectly in line with her polemic style.

I think you are bored and are looking for something to disagree with me about :D

Well if "empty head" = "empty political rhetoric", then Rush does have a valid hypothesis. I like my theory because it's much more fun to visualize.

---

Hopefully the cosmos is not trying to reverse the charges.
Moderation in all things.

Interesting..I wonder what sex she thinks she is?

She's a woman. Like Maggie Thatcher. Or Oprah. Or any other woman.

Then why is she asking to have her vote removed? This makes no sense.

Think of it as a form of self-mutilation. A number of mentally disturbed people tend to do this.

A lot of people share her views though. Even if she's crazy I think she's still dagerous. If I recall, one time she even said something about intimidating liberals. I mean like using force kind of intimidation.

---