1732 days to compleate one work units!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Message boards : Number crunching : 1732 days to compleate one work units!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
manney

Send message
Joined: 29 May 07
Posts: 22
Credit: 190,595
RAC: 0
Sri Lanka
Message 597844 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 14:08:53 UTC

i was running this workunit scince last night
it has completed 0.866% and its already done 14 hours and it says 24 hours and 54 minutes to completion and counting up. but when i do sums

100/0.866*14=1732days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1732/365=4 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
is this possiable how can this be?????????

this is the work unit http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=138533636

the work unit ID is "02oc99ab.6919.22866.928404.3.78"
can someone please hlep me??????
ID: 597844 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 597847 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 14:12:41 UTC

Of the two others who have a copy of that wu. One ended in computation error, and the other exited -9 (noisey). I don't know of any wu which would take that long. consider aborting it.

tony
ID: 597847 · Report as offensive
manney

Send message
Joined: 29 May 07
Posts: 22
Credit: 190,595
RAC: 0
Sri Lanka
Message 597849 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 14:19:37 UTC

should i abourt the work unit, i need answer quick cos iam abort to go to sleep
ID: 597849 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 597851 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 14:21:35 UTC

dump it. that fast enough?
ID: 597851 · Report as offensive
manney

Send message
Joined: 29 May 07
Posts: 22
Credit: 190,595
RAC: 0
Sri Lanka
Message 597858 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 14:27:55 UTC

i aborted it. dam that was waste 15 hours for nothing.
ID: 597858 · Report as offensive
Filipe

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 00
Posts: 218
Credit: 21,281,677
RAC: 20
Portugal
Message 597887 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 15:01:33 UTC - in response to Message 597858.  

i aborted it. dam that was waste 15 hours for nothing.

100/0.866= 115.47. Then, 115.47*14= 1616 hours, which is 67 days!!!!
ID: 597887 · Report as offensive
Profile WimTea
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 02
Posts: 34
Credit: 909,865
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 597947 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 20:21:29 UTC

100/0.866= 115.47. Then, 115.47*14= 1616 hours, which is 67 days!!!!

I'm not the greatest mathematician in the world, but where did the % factor go in that calculation?
ID: 597947 · Report as offensive
Filipe

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 00
Posts: 218
Credit: 21,281,677
RAC: 20
Portugal
Message 597978 - Posted: 3 Jul 2007, 21:12:38 UTC - in response to Message 597947.  

If it takes 14h to complete 0.866%, then it will take 16.16h to do 1%.
So, in order to complete 100%, the wu will be done in 1616h, which is aproximately 67 days!!!!
ID: 597978 · Report as offensive
Filipe

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 00
Posts: 218
Credit: 21,281,677
RAC: 20
Portugal
Message 598297 - Posted: 4 Jul 2007, 8:55:46 UTC - in response to Message 597844.  

What computer are you using?
ID: 598297 · Report as offensive
Profile Conan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 05
Posts: 15
Credit: 1,585,618
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 598982 - Posted: 5 Jul 2007, 9:52:55 UTC

> The odd thing about the Wu that 'manney' worked on is that it was later issued to two slower machines and they did it in 44 seconds and 123 seconds, so it appears to have been a stuck WU. It was also aborted by another user.

this WU

ID: 598982 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith T.
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 99
Posts: 962
Credit: 537,293
RAC: 9
United Kingdom
Message 599000 - Posted: 5 Jul 2007, 12:06:58 UTC - in response to Message 598982.  

> The odd thing about the Wu that 'manney' worked on is that it was later issued to two slower machines and they did it in 44 seconds and 123 seconds, so it appears to have been a stuck WU. It was also aborted by another user.

this WU


The 2 hosts which sucessfully reported were both using Chicken 2.2B apps.

Another good reason to use Chicken :-)
Sir Arthur C Clarke 1917-2008
ID: 599000 · Report as offensive
Profile AlphaLaser
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Jul 03
Posts: 262
Credit: 4,430,487
RAC: 0
United States
Message 599273 - Posted: 5 Jul 2007, 21:44:55 UTC
Last modified: 5 Jul 2007, 21:46:15 UTC

Yeah,

The standard SETI app seems to hang occasionally on those types of WUs, but Simon's optimized apps don't. The real reason you'd want to get the optimized apps though is for the huge increase in crunching speed and RAC.

Optimized app with graphics
Optimized app without graphics (slightly faster)

There are several variations of the applications targeted to certain CPU architectures. The above links will automatically choose and install the correct one.
ID: 599273 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : 1732 days to compleate one work units!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.