Message boards :
Number crunching :
Workunits waiting for Validation.
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Keith T. Send message Joined: 23 Aug 99 Posts: 962 Credit: 537,293 RAC: 9 |
I've just returned the 4th result on this WU and all 4 results are marked as pending. Result # 3 was returned @ 25 Mar 2007 16:45:20 UTC Result # 4 (mine) was returned @ 25 Mar 2007 18:00:18 UTC. Any ideas ? Sir Arthur C Clarke 1917-2008 |
mikey Send message Joined: 17 Dec 99 Posts: 4215 Credit: 3,474,603 RAC: 0 |
I've just returned the 4th result on this WU and all 4 results are marked as pending. The info we see is not real time. It may have happened already but the screen may not have updated yet. Time is your friend. |
Keith T. Send message Joined: 23 Aug 99 Posts: 962 Credit: 537,293 RAC: 9 |
I've just returned the 4th result on this WU and all 4 results are marked as pending. I know it is not real time, but usually it only takes 2 or 3 minutes to update after a quorum is met. I suspect that there may be a new problem happening here. I am not greatly concerned about 12.8 credits, just pointing out that there may be a new problem develping at Berkeley. Keith |
[B^S] madmac Send message Joined: 9 Feb 04 Posts: 1175 Credit: 4,754,897 RAC: 0 |
|
gomeyer Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 488 Credit: 50,370,425 RAC: 0 |
Yup, I have bunch like that. Look at the Server Status page and Workunits waiting for validation = 30,438. (Was 16k earlier today) So something is hung. |
n7rfa Send message Joined: 13 Apr 04 Posts: 370 Credit: 9,058,599 RAC: 0 |
Yup, I have bunch like that. Look at the Server Status page and Workunits waiting for validation = 30,438. (Was 16k earlier today) So something is hung. And the Validator processes are running on.....kryten! Enough said. |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19083 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Kryten, senior moment, now up to 56k+. |
mikey Send message Joined: 17 Dec 99 Posts: 4215 Credit: 3,474,603 RAC: 0 |
Kryten, senior moment, now up to 56k+. Now it is: Workunits waiting for validation 59,161 2h |
haba Send message Joined: 19 Jan 01 Posts: 35 Credit: 126,122 RAC: 0 |
Kryten, senior moment, now up to 56k+. Workunits waiting for validation 66,834 1h |
Keith T. Send message Joined: 23 Aug 99 Posts: 962 Credit: 537,293 RAC: 9 |
|
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Kryten, senior moment, now up to 56k+. 73k last time I looked........ "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
CAPTAIN FUTURE Send message Joined: 22 Dec 06 Posts: 184 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Database/file status State # As of* Results ready to send 619,821 41m Current result creation rate 0.32/sec 1m Results in progress 1,534,578 41m Workunits waiting for validation [size=15][b]78,697[/b][/size] 41m Workunits waiting for assimilation 5 41m Workunits waiting for deletion 10 41m Results waiting for deletion 2 41m Transitioner backlog (hours) 0 41m * minutes (m) or hours (h) since last checked HELP !!!!! ;-) |
CAPTAIN FUTURE Send message Joined: 22 Dec 06 Posts: 184 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Maybe it's better not to upload and report the results? Because it's possible that some results will not validate correct? |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20334 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
Database/file status [...] Workunits waiting for validation [size=15][b]78,697[/b][/size] 41m [...] So where were those Scarecrow graphs? And how do they compare to previous panics? Is this really a panic or is this all still just a Sunday afternoon picnic? ;-) Happy crunchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
So where were those Scarecrow graphs? |
Philadelphia Send message Joined: 12 Feb 07 Posts: 1590 Credit: 399,688 RAC: 0 |
How does one stop them from uploading/reporting? |
Alinator Send message Joined: 19 Apr 05 Posts: 4178 Credit: 4,647,982 RAC: 0 |
Easiest way is to suspend network activity, but you won't be able to DL new work then either. Alinator |
Philadelphia Send message Joined: 12 Feb 07 Posts: 1590 Credit: 399,688 RAC: 0 |
Easiest way is to suspend network activity, but you won't be able to DL new work then either. How did I know that was going to be the answer, lol. Just a thought (they always get me in trouble). Can I suspend network activity and when the WU is done processing, move the file do another directory so BOINC can't find it to upload, then when things are moving along, I can move them back so BOINC can find them to upload. After I move it to a temp directory, I could resume network activity to get another WU? |
Alinator Send message Joined: 19 Apr 05 Posts: 4178 Credit: 4,647,982 RAC: 0 |
Hmmm... I never tried that, but my gut feeling is that would trash the result when the transfer is due to go and BOINC can't find the output file. A better strategy might be to temporarily increase your CI, force an update, suspend network activity, and then set your CI back to normal. That way you'd have a temporary increase in the amount of work to cover you until they get the validator logjam cleared, and when the host reports the next time once you re-enable network activity it goes back to normal. Alinator |
Keith T. Send message Joined: 23 Aug 99 Posts: 962 Credit: 537,293 RAC: 9 |
Easiest way is to suspend network activity, but you won't be able to DL new work then either. The validators (or at least some of them) are now working. The original WU in this thread passed validation a few hours ago. But they are running with a backlog. I suggest you just let BOINC Manager run normally and everything will probably catch up in the next few hours (possibly days). If you mess with files that BOINC Manager expects to find, you may cause other problems. I wouldn't reccomend it. There is currently a validator backlog of 78,697 (2h) and the upload/download server is currently disabled. [EDIT] Now working again.[/EDIT] |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.