Reopened....Beethoven's II

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Reopened....Beethoven's II
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 . . . 37 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Hev
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 05
Posts: 1118
Credit: 598,303
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 321830 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 22:51:29 UTC - in response to Message 321821.  


Since you're still within your Edit hour limit, I'd appreciate it if you removed your widened version of my pic, which I've already had to remove even in it's small version.

Thank you kindly.


Point of information. Both Es's and your version are exactly the same.

ID: 321830 · Report as offensive
Profile Beethoven
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 1383
Credit: 6,852
RAC: 0
Message 321832 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 22:54:12 UTC - in response to Message 321830.  
Last modified: 31 May 2006, 22:56:12 UTC


Since you're still within your Edit hour limit, I'd appreciate it if you removed your widened version of my pic, which I've already had to remove even in it's small version.

Thank you kindly.


Point of information. Both Es's and your version are exactly the same.

I've already deleted my pic from Photobucket, so what you're seeing is not my original pic. And my pic itself was less wide than an ordinary window..it was 500 pixels in width.



ID: 321832 · Report as offensive
John Hunt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 514
Credit: 501,438
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 321834 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 22:55:22 UTC - in response to Message 321825.  

Maybe you bring it onto yourself. But ok, people, please stop disrupting this thread.

This thread is already disrupted, Ageless, because the two pics: by Es99, and just now, by John Hunt, have already flood-stretched the window way wider than it should be. Would you kindly delete these posts?

We cross-posted btw, I can see. I didn't see your post above until after I had posted my last one.


My pic is the same width as yours - see post no 321584.......
ID: 321834 · Report as offensive
Profile Beethoven
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 1383
Credit: 6,852
RAC: 0
Message 321836 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 22:58:38 UTC - in response to Message 321834.  
Last modified: 31 May 2006, 23:03:34 UTC

Maybe you bring it onto yourself. But ok, people, please stop disrupting this thread.

This thread is already disrupted, Ageless, because the two pics: by Es99, and just now, by John Hunt, have already flood-stretched the window way wider than it should be. Would you kindly delete these posts?

We cross-posted btw, I can see. I didn't see your post above until after I had posted my last one.


My pic is the same width as yours - see post no 321584.......

The pic may be the same, but the "border" is wider. Perhaps that was indadvertant. When I posted my original pic, the window was NOT widened by it.

My pic is da nada..gone...not on photobucket. You should be seeing no pic at all of it right now. Just as a point of information.



ID: 321836 · Report as offensive
John Hunt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 514
Credit: 501,438
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 321838 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:02:52 UTC - in response to Message 321836.  

Maybe you bring it onto yourself. But ok, people, please stop disrupting this thread.

This thread is already disrupted, Ageless, because the two pics: by Es99, and just now, by John Hunt, have already flood-stretched the window way wider than it should be. Would you kindly delete these posts?

We cross-posted btw, I can see. I didn't see your post above until after I had posted my last one.


My pic is the same width as yours - see post no 321584.......

The pic may be the same, but the "border" is wider. Perhaps that was indadvertant. When I posted my original pic, the window was NOT widened by it.


Apologies , sir. So I should not have replied and included your photo......
ID: 321838 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 321840 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:05:39 UTC - in response to Message 321825.  
Last modified: 31 May 2006, 23:07:19 UTC

This thread is already disrupted, Ageless, because the two pics: by Es99, and just now, by John Hunt, have already flood-stretched the window way wider than it should be. Would you kindly delete these posts?

Where is Angus when you need him? Go to your forum preferences and check "show images as links". Then add anyone you want to your ignore list. Save the changes.
ID: 321840 · Report as offensive
Profile Beethoven
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 1383
Credit: 6,852
RAC: 0
Message 321841 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:06:32 UTC - in response to Message 321838.  

Maybe you bring it onto yourself. But ok, people, please stop disrupting this thread.

This thread is already disrupted, Ageless, because the two pics: by Es99, and just now, by John Hunt, have already flood-stretched the window way wider than it should be. Would you kindly delete these posts?

We cross-posted btw, I can see. I didn't see your post above until after I had posted my last one.


My pic is the same width as yours - see post no 321584.......

The pic may be the same, but the "border" is wider. Perhaps that was indadvertant. When I posted my original pic, the window was NOT widened by it.


Apologies , sir. So I should not have replied and included your photo......

Accepted. But since your post with the pic was entered on 22:36:33, it seems that you are still within your hour to edit. Could you remove the link for the pic on your post, Sir? Thank you kindly.



ID: 321841 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 321842 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:09:55 UTC - in response to Message 321836.  


The pic may be the same, but the "border" is wider. Perhaps that was indadvertant. When I posted my original pic, the window was NOT widened by it.

My pic is da nada..gone...not on photobucket. You should be seeing no pic at all of it right now. Just as a point of information.



Your Picture at the beginning of this thread is 700 pixels wide.
The pic you posted was 541px wide.
Esme photo is the same.

ID: 321842 · Report as offensive
Profile Beethoven
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 1383
Credit: 6,852
RAC: 0
Message 321844 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:10:52 UTC - in response to Message 321840.  

This thread is already disrupted, Ageless, because the two pics: by Es99, and just now, by John Hunt, have already flood-stretched the window way wider than it should be. Would you kindly delete these posts?

Where is Angus when you need him? Go to your forum preferences and check "show images as links". Then add anyone you want to your ignore list. Save the changes.

I have no desire to add anyone to my ignore list, Ageless. And plenty of other people post pics as pics, not as links, and I'd like to have the same opportunity to do so as they do.

Therefore, I would kindly ask you again to remove either those two posts by Es and John Hunt, or edit out the photobucket links in their posts.

Thank you so much.



ID: 321844 · Report as offensive
John Hunt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 514
Credit: 501,438
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 321845 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:11:41 UTC - in response to Message 321841.  

Maybe you bring it onto yourself. But ok, people, please stop disrupting this thread.

This thread is already disrupted, Ageless, because the two pics: by Es99, and just now, by John Hunt, have already flood-stretched the window way wider than it should be. Would you kindly delete these posts?

We cross-posted btw, I can see. I didn't see your post above until after I had posted my last one.


My pic is the same width as yours - see post no 321584.......

The pic may be the same, but the "border" is wider. Perhaps that was indadvertant. When I posted my original pic, the window was NOT widened by it.


Apologies , sir. So I should not have replied and included your photo......

Accepted. But since your post with the pic was entered on 22:36:33, it seems that you are still within your hour to edit. Could you remove the link for the pic on your post, Sir? Thank you kindly.


And will you please, then, in future, ensure that windows will not become widened if someone replies to your posts....

ID: 321845 · Report as offensive
Profile Beethoven
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 1383
Credit: 6,852
RAC: 0
Message 321846 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:13:59 UTC - in response to Message 321842.  


The pic may be the same, but the "border" is wider. Perhaps that was indadvertant. When I posted my original pic, the window was NOT widened by it.

My pic is da nada..gone...not on photobucket. You should be seeing no pic at all of it right now. Just as a point of information.



Your Picture at the beginning of this thread is 700 pixels wide.
The pic you posted was 541px wide.
Esme photo is the same.

Ahhh! Thanks for your assistance on this, Cap'n! I'll now delete the picture at the beginning of this thread, and hopefully you're right and the window will shrink to a normal size.


ID: 321846 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 321847 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:16:01 UTC - in response to Message 321844.  
Last modified: 31 May 2006, 23:18:47 UTC

I have no desire to add anyone to my ignore list, Ageless.

I have no desire reading your complaints all the time, yet here I am giving you an option.
And plenty of other people post pics as pics, not as links, and I'd like to have the same opportunity to do so as they do.

The option in your preferences makes of all pictures posted as pictures a link. Want to see it? Click the link. That way threads don't stretch, no matter how big the picture is.

I don't moderate the Cafe much as it is anyway. That's CA's turf. Now, are you continuing to whine and point fingers at others or are you going to continue to post like a grown up? Having seen some of your comments in other threads... They aren't deleted either, are they? We're trying to let everyone have fun here again. So go make fun. That's an order. :)
ID: 321847 · Report as offensive
John Hunt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 514
Credit: 501,438
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 321848 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:17:17 UTC

To avoid this problem arising again,
would it be possible to have a ruling
on the size of photos allowed in posts
please. Also, the number of replies allowed
to ensure that windows do not become
stretched.........
ID: 321848 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 321849 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:20:15 UTC - in response to Message 321848.  

To avoid this problem arising again,
would it be possible to have a ruling
on the size of photos allowed in posts
please. Also, the number of replies allowed
to ensure that windows do not become
stretched.........


It dosnt matter John really. If you viewing on a 12inch monitor
then maybe but in your preferences you can display pictures as links.


ID: 321849 · Report as offensive
Profile Beethoven
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 1383
Credit: 6,852
RAC: 0
Message 321850 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:20:24 UTC - in response to Message 321845.  
Last modified: 31 May 2006, 23:21:53 UTC



And will you please, then, in future, ensure that windows will not become widened if someone replies to your posts....


I will certainly do my best to keep my pictures within reasonable size limits. But I cannot 'ensure' the size of windows. If people include quotes of eight or nine other quotes, the size of the window necessarily broadens, because of the blue lines. That's why I understand it to be poor netiquette to include more than one or two quotes.

Cordially,

Beets.



ID: 321850 · Report as offensive
John Hunt
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 514
Credit: 501,438
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 321853 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:22:29 UTC - in response to Message 321841.  

Maybe you bring it onto yourself. But ok, people, please stop disrupting this thread.

This thread is already disrupted, Ageless, because the two pics: by Es99, and just now, by John Hunt, have already flood-stretched the window way wider than it should be. Would you kindly delete these posts?

We cross-posted btw, I can see. I didn't see your post above until after I had posted my last one.


My pic is the same width as yours - see post no 321584.......

The pic may be the same, but the "border" is wider. Perhaps that was indadvertant. When I posted my original pic, the window was NOT widened by it.


Apologies , sir. So I should not have replied and included your photo......

Accepted. But since your post with the pic was entered on 22:36:33, it seems that you are still within your hour to edit. Could you remove the link for the pic on your post, Sir? Thank you kindly.


I have complied with your request to remove the link to your
oversized photo. Yet the window is still stretched.......



ID: 321853 · Report as offensive
Profile Beethoven
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 06
Posts: 1383
Credit: 6,852
RAC: 0
Message 321854 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:28:54 UTC - in response to Message 321853.  
Last modified: 31 May 2006, 23:29:40 UTC


I have complied with your request to remove the link to your
oversized photo. Yet the window is still stretched.......

So I see. Thank you kindly, John.

The window is still stretched on account of Ageless/Cap'n not having removed Es99's one copy of the pic. And you may be quite right about it being my (2nd) pic that I tried to put up a dozen posts ago having been inadvertantly oversized. While I'm sure that Cap'n is right when he says that the original version was 574 pixels wide, I put up the second version of it in a hurry and may have made a mistake about keeping it to the same size as the original.

At any rate, Es99's pic is now the one remaining stretch to the window, from what I can tell.

Moderators?



ID: 321854 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 321857 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:30:01 UTC - in response to Message 321854.  


I have complied with your request to remove the link to your
oversized photo. Yet the window is still stretched.......

So I see. Thank you kindly, John.

The window is still stretched on account of Ageless/Cap'n not having removed Es99's copy of the pic. And you may be quite right about it being my (2nd) pic that I tried to put up a dozen posts ago having been inadvertantly oversized. While I'm sure that Cap'n is right when he says that the original version was 574 pixels wide, I put up the second version of it in a hurry and may have made a mistake about keeping it to the same size as the original.

At any rate, Es99's pic is now the one remaining stretch to the window, from what I can tell.

Moderators?



for the last Time it is not streching you window.
ID: 321857 · Report as offensive
Profile Hev
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 05
Posts: 1118
Credit: 598,303
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 321858 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:32:44 UTC

It's not stretching my window
ID: 321858 · Report as offensive
Profile Captain Avatar
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 15133
Credit: 529,088
RAC: 0
United States
Message 321859 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:34:11 UTC

Why dont you check all the pictures you have posted in this thread Beets you have one alone that is over 900 pixels and two more that are over 700 pixels
and so on.


ID: 321859 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 . . . 37 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Reopened....Beethoven's II


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.