Seti Enhanced Optimization

Message boards : Number crunching : Seti Enhanced Optimization
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · Next

AuthorMessage
Ace41690

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 04
Posts: 141
Credit: 665,626
RAC: 0
United States
Message 308016 - Posted: 16 May 2006, 23:52:18 UTC

Hi, I really dont know what I'm doing. I looked at several threads about installing enhanced as well as the optimized version for enhanced. I let all my WUs drain out, and then I deleted the XML file. I allowed new work and I got the enhanced application. Then I let that one WU drain away. Then I dowloaded Crunch3r's application and extracted it into the Setiathome folder in the boinc directory. I already had an optimized app in there and i kinda deleted part of it or something. IDK i feel ive kinda made a mess of the whole setiathome Folder. Maybe someone can tell me exactly what it is that i should have in there? Anyway after i extracted the optimized app I put a new xml into the boinc folder, This is what the XML is
<app_info>
- <app>
<name>setiathome</name>
</app>
- <file_info>
<name>setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe</name>
<executable />
</file_info>
- <app_version>
<app_name>setiathome</app_name>
<version_num>411</version_num>
- <file_ref>
<file_name>setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name>
<main_program />
</file_ref>
</app_version>
- <app>
<name>setiathome</name>
</app>
- <file_info>
<name>setiathome_4.18_windows_intelx86.exe</name>
<executable />
</file_info>
- <app_version>
<app_name>setiathome</app_name>
<version_num>418</version_num>
- <file_ref>
<file_name>setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name>
<main_program />
</file_ref>
</app_version>
- <app>
<name>setiathome_enhanced</name>
</app>
- <file_info>
<name>setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86.exe</name>
<executable />
</file_info>
- <app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>512</version_num>
- <file_ref>
<file_name>setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name>
<main_program />
</file_ref>
</app_version>
- <app>
<name>setiathome_enhanced</name>
</app>
- <file_info>
<name>setiathome_5.13_windows_intelx86.exe</name>
<executable />
</file_info>
- <app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>513</version_num>
- <file_ref>
<file_name>setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name>
<main_program />
</file_ref>
</app_version>
</app_info>
The computer is crunching a WU, and has been for 8 hours, its only 70% done. I know the enhanced units take longer, but if its optimized it seems like its too long. I have a Pentium 4M 1.8Ghz. Is that the kind of time i should expect? It did the other old WUs in 2hours.

ID: 308016 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 308022 - Posted: 16 May 2006, 23:55:29 UTC

Have you looked at the front page? They aren't making any more 4.11/4.18 Wus. They're only making the enhanced wus which take 5.12, 5.13 etc.
ID: 308022 · Report as offensive
archae86

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 99
Posts: 909
Credit: 1,582,816
RAC: 0
United States
Message 308042 - Posted: 17 May 2006, 0:30:10 UTC - in response to Message 308016.  

The computer is crunching a WU, and has been for 8 hours, its only 70% done. I know the enhanced units take longer, but if its optimized it seems like its too long. I have a Pentium 4M 1.8Ghz. Is that the kind of time i should expect? It did the other old WUs in 2hours.

1. The required computation required for each result in enhanced is far more variable from unit to unit then the previous one.
2. Crunch3r's optimization on enhanced, so far as I now, is compiler optimization. By itself this may provide very, very roughly something like 20% speedup over the distributed ap. Many of the more algorithmic optimizations that formed part of the enormous performance advantage of crunch3r's 4.11 ap over the previous distributed ap are already present in the 5.nn distributed ap, so without new invention, the scope for optimization is far less.

Crunch3r'2 optimized 5.12 ap signs itself this way in stderr:

Windows optimized S@H Enhanced application by Crunch3r
Version info: Windows SSE2 V5.12 by Crunch3r

If you see that when the result is done, then you were running optimized.

ID: 308042 · Report as offensive
Ace41690

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 04
Posts: 141
Credit: 665,626
RAC: 0
United States
Message 308981 - Posted: 17 May 2006, 23:39:47 UTC - in response to Message 308022.  

Have you looked at the front page? They aren't making any more 4.11/4.18 Wus. They're only making the enhanced wus which take 5.12, 5.13 etc.


I know they arent. I found that XML thing somewhere and for some reason thought it was the right one. But i guess its not since according to the stderr it just says core client. Is all i need to get optimized a proper XML? What is it?
ID: 308981 · Report as offensive
n7rfa
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 04
Posts: 370
Credit: 9,058,599
RAC: 0
United States
Message 309013 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 0:15:53 UTC - in response to Message 308016.  

The computer is crunching a WU, and has been for 8 hours, its only 70% done. I know the enhanced units take longer, but if its optimized it seems like its too long. I have a Pentium 4M 1.8Ghz. Is that the kind of time i should expect? It did the other old WUs in 2hours.


I run Crunch3r's Optimized App and I have 3 WUs that my systems says will take 10 hours to process. I've had other WUs that process in under an hour. This is in comparison to the average of 40 minutes per WU before.

The AR value will impact how long it takes to process a WU and the WUs will certainly take longer than before to process.
ID: 309013 · Report as offensive
n7rfa
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 04
Posts: 370
Credit: 9,058,599
RAC: 0
United States
Message 309019 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 0:20:03 UTC - in response to Message 308981.  
Last modified: 18 May 2006, 0:20:35 UTC

Have you looked at the front page? They aren't making any more 4.11/4.18 Wus. They're only making the enhanced wus which take 5.12, 5.13 etc.


I know they arent. I found that XML thing somewhere and for some reason thought it was the right one. But i guess its not since according to the stderr it just says core client. Is all i need to get optimized a proper XML? What is it?


Here's the link to Crunch3r's web site.

ID: 309019 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord_Vader
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 May 05
Posts: 217
Credit: 10,386,105
RAC: 12
United States
Message 309058 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 0:31:44 UTC

If you want to start clean, delete or rename the folder (seti) and attach again.


Fear will keep the local systems in line. Fear of this battle station. - Grand Moff Tarkin
ID: 309058 · Report as offensive
Profile [B@H] Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 00
Posts: 485
Credit: 45,275
RAC: 0
United States
Message 309604 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 16:10:42 UTC - in response to Message 308022.  

Have you looked at the front page? They aren't making any more 4.11/4.18 Wus. They're only making the enhanced wus which take 5.12, 5.13 etc.


Whare did you see that? I could not find it, all I could find was:
May 4, 2006
We've started distributing work for a new version of SETI@home called SETI@home Enhanced.

But since then they have had both types as it was not a one day switch. Still getting the older BOINC type, but not as many. They seem to have run out today but that was not put on the frunt page, many still pending so some are still working on them.
ID: 309604 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 309608 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 16:15:05 UTC - in response to Message 309604.  
Last modified: 18 May 2006, 16:15:35 UTC

Whare did you see that?

Front page, third story down. do a screen refresh (F5).

tony
ID: 309608 · Report as offensive
Profile [B@H] Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 00
Posts: 485
Credit: 45,275
RAC: 0
United States
Message 309616 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 16:30:07 UTC - in response to Message 309608.  

Whare did you see that?

Front page, third story down. do a screen refresh (F5).

tony


I saw it Tony, 3 messages down, must have been blind when I read past that before.
ID: 309616 · Report as offensive
Ace41690

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 04
Posts: 141
Credit: 665,626
RAC: 0
United States
Message 309817 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 21:34:32 UTC

I completely erased BOINC and everything to do with it. Then i re downloaded and reattached to SETI. I didnt let it get any work. Then I extracted the optimized files into the Setiathome directory. Now it says download failed and wont work. what did i do wrong?
ID: 309817 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 309820 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 21:38:19 UTC - in response to Message 309817.  
Last modified: 18 May 2006, 21:39:10 UTC

Best thing ever is to set your queue size to 0.1 days or less, let Seti download the normal application and some work, then set BOINC to no new work/tasks, run the cache dry and then exit BOINC, update to an optimized client, restart BOINC, allow new work/tasks.

The app_info.xml file points to the original file as well as the optimized file that it should replace. If the original file is not around, you get errors.

ID: 309820 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 309821 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 21:38:22 UTC - in response to Message 309817.  

I completely erased BOINC and everything to do with it. Then i re downloaded and reattached to SETI. I didnt let it get any work. Then I extracted the optimized files into the Setiathome directory. Now it says download failed and wont work. what did i do wrong?

The distributions for optimized applications may not be complete -- you probably want to get at least one work unit (to get the app.) before you install the optimized version.
ID: 309821 · Report as offensive
Ace41690

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 04
Posts: 141
Credit: 665,626
RAC: 0
United States
Message 321712 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 20:49:57 UTC

Hi im back sorry i havent updated this in a while but im still having problems. I waited for it to do a few WUs as suggested and then i extracted the optimized client into the S@H directory. It would seem the program refuses to use the Setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86 file as it keeps copying the standard 5.15 one and using that instead, everytime i delete 5.15 and try to force it to use the optimized app it comes back. What am i doing wrong.
ID: 321712 · Report as offensive
Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 99
Posts: 1546
Credit: 3,438,823
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 321715 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 20:52:16 UTC - in response to Message 321712.  
Last modified: 31 May 2006, 20:53:11 UTC

Hi im back sorry i havent updated this in a while but im still having problems. I waited for it to do a few WUs as suggested and then i extracted the optimized client into the S@H directory. It would seem the program refuses to use the Setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86 file as it keeps copying the standard 5.15 one and using that instead, everytime i delete 5.15 and try to force it to use the optimized app it comes back. What am i doing wrong.


You're missing the app_info.xml file. It's needed to run the optimized app.
Take a look at my page, there's one available for download.

Just extract the app_info.xml into the same directory as the optimized app. and you're ready to go ;)


Join BOINC United now!
ID: 321715 · Report as offensive
Ace41690

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 04
Posts: 141
Credit: 665,626
RAC: 0
United States
Message 321835 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 22:55:45 UTC - in response to Message 321715.  

Hi im back sorry i havent updated this in a while but im still having problems. I waited for it to do a few WUs as suggested and then i extracted the optimized client into the S@H directory. It would seem the program refuses to use the Setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86 file as it keeps copying the standard 5.15 one and using that instead, everytime i delete 5.15 and try to force it to use the optimized app it comes back. What am i doing wrong.


You're missing the app_info.xml file. It's needed to run the optimized app.
Take a look at my page, there's one available for download.

Just extract the app_info.xml into the same directory as the optimized app. and you're ready to go ;)


Thanks! it finally definately worked as I can no longer see the graphics.
ID: 321835 · Report as offensive
n7rfa
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 04
Posts: 370
Credit: 9,058,599
RAC: 0
United States
Message 321852 - Posted: 31 May 2006, 23:21:45 UTC - in response to Message 321715.  

Hi im back sorry i havent updated this in a while but im still having problems. I waited for it to do a few WUs as suggested and then i extracted the optimized client into the S@H directory. It would seem the program refuses to use the Setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86 file as it keeps copying the standard 5.15 one and using that instead, everytime i delete 5.15 and try to force it to use the optimized app it comes back. What am i doing wrong.


You're missing the app_info.xml file. It's needed to run the optimized app.
Take a look at my page, there's one available for download.

Just extract the app_info.xml into the same directory as the optimized app. and you're ready to go ;)

Crunch3r,

Why did you include up to 5.19 in your app_info.xml file?

Thanks for all your good work.
ID: 321852 · Report as offensive
Profile akosf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Apr 02
Posts: 13
Credit: 178,509
RAC: 0
Hungary
Message 331857 - Posted: 9 Jun 2006, 5:38:40 UTC

Which windows version is the fastest?
... and how much faster than official 5.15 on different CPUs?
ID: 331857 · Report as offensive
Alex Kan
Volunteer developer

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 03
Posts: 127
Credit: 29,269
RAC: 0
United States
Message 331896 - Posted: 9 Jun 2006, 6:09:43 UTC - in response to Message 331857.  

Which windows version is the fastest?
... and how much faster than official 5.15 on different CPUs?

Ooh...now things are getting interesting. :) I don't think there are any optimized Windows Enhanced applications in wide circulation besides the ones that Crunch3r used to offer. If you do look at Crunch3r's clients, though, I wouldn't use the numbers from the quick reference WU on marisan.nl to judge performance gains--the performance profile of that WU doesn't represent SETI performance in general, at least not from my experience optimizing for PPC.
ID: 331896 · Report as offensive
Profile akosf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Apr 02
Posts: 13
Credit: 178,509
RAC: 0
Hungary
Message 331923 - Posted: 9 Jun 2006, 7:01:16 UTC - in response to Message 331896.  

Which windows version is the fastest?
... and how much faster than official 5.15 on different CPUs?

Ooh...now things are getting interesting. :) I don't think there are any optimized Windows Enhanced applications in wide circulation besides the ones that Crunch3r used to offer. If you do look at Crunch3r's clients, though, I wouldn't use the numbers from the quick reference WU on marisan.nl to judge performance gains--the performance profile of that WU doesn't represent SETI performance in general, at least not from my experience optimizing for PPC.
Thanks. So, i will do a comparison between different versions (5.15, 5.12SSE, 5.12SSE2, ...).
I see 5.15 isn't optimized, i got a 10% faster code after 10 minutes work.
Hm...
ID: 331923 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · 3 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Seti Enhanced Optimization


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.