Message boards :
Number crunching :
Seti Enhanced Optimization
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Ace41690 Send message Joined: 16 Oct 04 Posts: 141 Credit: 665,626 RAC: 0 |
Hi, I really dont know what I'm doing. I looked at several threads about installing enhanced as well as the optimized version for enhanced. I let all my WUs drain out, and then I deleted the XML file. I allowed new work and I got the enhanced application. Then I let that one WU drain away. Then I dowloaded Crunch3r's application and extracted it into the Setiathome folder in the boinc directory. I already had an optimized app in there and i kinda deleted part of it or something. IDK i feel ive kinda made a mess of the whole setiathome Folder. Maybe someone can tell me exactly what it is that i should have in there? Anyway after i extracted the optimized app I put a new xml into the boinc folder, This is what the XML is <app_info> - <app> <name>setiathome</name> </app> - <file_info> <name>setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe</name> <executable /> </file_info> - <app_version> <app_name>setiathome</app_name> <version_num>411</version_num> - <file_ref> <file_name>setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name> <main_program /> </file_ref> </app_version> - <app> <name>setiathome</name> </app> - <file_info> <name>setiathome_4.18_windows_intelx86.exe</name> <executable /> </file_info> - <app_version> <app_name>setiathome</app_name> <version_num>418</version_num> - <file_ref> <file_name>setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name> <main_program /> </file_ref> </app_version> - <app> <name>setiathome_enhanced</name> </app> - <file_info> <name>setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86.exe</name> <executable /> </file_info> - <app_version> <app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name> <version_num>512</version_num> - <file_ref> <file_name>setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name> <main_program /> </file_ref> </app_version> - <app> <name>setiathome_enhanced</name> </app> - <file_info> <name>setiathome_5.13_windows_intelx86.exe</name> <executable /> </file_info> - <app_version> <app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name> <version_num>513</version_num> - <file_ref> <file_name>setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86.exe</file_name> <main_program /> </file_ref> </app_version> </app_info> The computer is crunching a WU, and has been for 8 hours, its only 70% done. I know the enhanced units take longer, but if its optimized it seems like its too long. I have a Pentium 4M 1.8Ghz. Is that the kind of time i should expect? It did the other old WUs in 2hours. |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Have you looked at the front page? They aren't making any more 4.11/4.18 Wus. They're only making the enhanced wus which take 5.12, 5.13 etc. |
archae86 Send message Joined: 31 Aug 99 Posts: 909 Credit: 1,582,816 RAC: 0 |
The computer is crunching a WU, and has been for 8 hours, its only 70% done. I know the enhanced units take longer, but if its optimized it seems like its too long. I have a Pentium 4M 1.8Ghz. Is that the kind of time i should expect? It did the other old WUs in 2hours. 1. The required computation required for each result in enhanced is far more variable from unit to unit then the previous one. 2. Crunch3r's optimization on enhanced, so far as I now, is compiler optimization. By itself this may provide very, very roughly something like 20% speedup over the distributed ap. Many of the more algorithmic optimizations that formed part of the enormous performance advantage of crunch3r's 4.11 ap over the previous distributed ap are already present in the 5.nn distributed ap, so without new invention, the scope for optimization is far less. Crunch3r'2 optimized 5.12 ap signs itself this way in stderr: Windows optimized S@H Enhanced application by Crunch3r Version info: Windows SSE2 V5.12 by Crunch3r If you see that when the result is done, then you were running optimized. |
Ace41690 Send message Joined: 16 Oct 04 Posts: 141 Credit: 665,626 RAC: 0 |
Have you looked at the front page? They aren't making any more 4.11/4.18 Wus. They're only making the enhanced wus which take 5.12, 5.13 etc. I know they arent. I found that XML thing somewhere and for some reason thought it was the right one. But i guess its not since according to the stderr it just says core client. Is all i need to get optimized a proper XML? What is it? |
n7rfa Send message Joined: 13 Apr 04 Posts: 370 Credit: 9,058,599 RAC: 0 |
The computer is crunching a WU, and has been for 8 hours, its only 70% done. I know the enhanced units take longer, but if its optimized it seems like its too long. I have a Pentium 4M 1.8Ghz. Is that the kind of time i should expect? It did the other old WUs in 2hours. I run Crunch3r's Optimized App and I have 3 WUs that my systems says will take 10 hours to process. I've had other WUs that process in under an hour. This is in comparison to the average of 40 minutes per WU before. The AR value will impact how long it takes to process a WU and the WUs will certainly take longer than before to process. |
n7rfa Send message Joined: 13 Apr 04 Posts: 370 Credit: 9,058,599 RAC: 0 |
Have you looked at the front page? They aren't making any more 4.11/4.18 Wus. They're only making the enhanced wus which take 5.12, 5.13 etc. Here's the link to Crunch3r's web site. |
Lord_Vader Send message Joined: 7 May 05 Posts: 217 Credit: 10,386,105 RAC: 12 |
If you want to start clean, delete or rename the folder (seti) and attach again. Fear will keep the local systems in line. Fear of this battle station. - Grand Moff Tarkin |
[B@H] Ray Send message Joined: 1 Sep 00 Posts: 485 Credit: 45,275 RAC: 0 |
Have you looked at the front page? They aren't making any more 4.11/4.18 Wus. They're only making the enhanced wus which take 5.12, 5.13 etc. Whare did you see that? I could not find it, all I could find was: May 4, 2006 We've started distributing work for a new version of SETI@home called SETI@home Enhanced. But since then they have had both types as it was not a one day switch. Still getting the older BOINC type, but not as many. They seem to have run out today but that was not put on the frunt page, many still pending so some are still working on them. |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Whare did you see that? Front page, third story down. do a screen refresh (F5). tony |
[B@H] Ray Send message Joined: 1 Sep 00 Posts: 485 Credit: 45,275 RAC: 0 |
Whare did you see that? I saw it Tony, 3 messages down, must have been blind when I read past that before. |
Ace41690 Send message Joined: 16 Oct 04 Posts: 141 Credit: 665,626 RAC: 0 |
I completely erased BOINC and everything to do with it. Then i re downloaded and reattached to SETI. I didnt let it get any work. Then I extracted the optimized files into the Setiathome directory. Now it says download failed and wont work. what did i do wrong? |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Best thing ever is to set your queue size to 0.1 days or less, let Seti download the normal application and some work, then set BOINC to no new work/tasks, run the cache dry and then exit BOINC, update to an optimized client, restart BOINC, allow new work/tasks. The app_info.xml file points to the original file as well as the optimized file that it should replace. If the original file is not around, you get errors. |
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0 |
I completely erased BOINC and everything to do with it. Then i re downloaded and reattached to SETI. I didnt let it get any work. Then I extracted the optimized files into the Setiathome directory. Now it says download failed and wont work. what did i do wrong? The distributions for optimized applications may not be complete -- you probably want to get at least one work unit (to get the app.) before you install the optimized version. |
Ace41690 Send message Joined: 16 Oct 04 Posts: 141 Credit: 665,626 RAC: 0 |
Hi im back sorry i havent updated this in a while but im still having problems. I waited for it to do a few WUs as suggested and then i extracted the optimized client into the S@H directory. It would seem the program refuses to use the Setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86 file as it keeps copying the standard 5.15 one and using that instead, everytime i delete 5.15 and try to force it to use the optimized app it comes back. What am i doing wrong. |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
Hi im back sorry i havent updated this in a while but im still having problems. I waited for it to do a few WUs as suggested and then i extracted the optimized client into the S@H directory. It would seem the program refuses to use the Setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86 file as it keeps copying the standard 5.15 one and using that instead, everytime i delete 5.15 and try to force it to use the optimized app it comes back. What am i doing wrong. You're missing the app_info.xml file. It's needed to run the optimized app. Take a look at my page, there's one available for download. Just extract the app_info.xml into the same directory as the optimized app. and you're ready to go ;) Join BOINC United now! |
Ace41690 Send message Joined: 16 Oct 04 Posts: 141 Credit: 665,626 RAC: 0 |
Hi im back sorry i havent updated this in a while but im still having problems. I waited for it to do a few WUs as suggested and then i extracted the optimized client into the S@H directory. It would seem the program refuses to use the Setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86 file as it keeps copying the standard 5.15 one and using that instead, everytime i delete 5.15 and try to force it to use the optimized app it comes back. What am i doing wrong. Thanks! it finally definately worked as I can no longer see the graphics. |
n7rfa Send message Joined: 13 Apr 04 Posts: 370 Credit: 9,058,599 RAC: 0 |
Hi im back sorry i havent updated this in a while but im still having problems. I waited for it to do a few WUs as suggested and then i extracted the optimized client into the S@H directory. It would seem the program refuses to use the Setiathome_5.12_windows_intelx86 file as it keeps copying the standard 5.15 one and using that instead, everytime i delete 5.15 and try to force it to use the optimized app it comes back. What am i doing wrong. Crunch3r, Why did you include up to 5.19 in your app_info.xml file? Thanks for all your good work. |
akosf Send message Joined: 24 Apr 02 Posts: 13 Credit: 178,509 RAC: 0 |
Which windows version is the fastest? ... and how much faster than official 5.15 on different CPUs? |
Alex Kan Send message Joined: 4 Dec 03 Posts: 127 Credit: 29,269 RAC: 0 |
Which windows version is the fastest? Ooh...now things are getting interesting. :) I don't think there are any optimized Windows Enhanced applications in wide circulation besides the ones that Crunch3r used to offer. If you do look at Crunch3r's clients, though, I wouldn't use the numbers from the quick reference WU on marisan.nl to judge performance gains--the performance profile of that WU doesn't represent SETI performance in general, at least not from my experience optimizing for PPC. |
akosf Send message Joined: 24 Apr 02 Posts: 13 Credit: 178,509 RAC: 0 |
Thanks. So, i will do a comparison between different versions (5.15, 5.12SSE, 5.12SSE2, ...).Which windows version is the fastest? I see 5.15 isn't optimized, i got a 10% faster code after 10 minutes work. Hm... |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.