Message boards :
Number crunching :
Computation errors on Seti Enhanced
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 22 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Ingleside Send message Joined: 4 Feb 03 Posts: 1546 Credit: 15,832,022 RAC: 13 |
Usually when you get an error like "The system cannot find the path specified." it's because the directory or application associated with the file has been deleted. The problem with this is, the application crunched for over 1.5 hours continuously before it found-out it "couldn't find path"... 2006-05-06 10:03:01 [SETI@home] Scheduler request succeeded 2006-05-06 10:03:03 [SETI@home] Started download of file 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.57 2006-05-06 10:03:03 [SETI@home] Started download of file 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.43 2006-05-06 10:03:09 [SETI@home] Finished download of file 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.43 2006-05-06 10:03:09 [SETI@home] Throughput 67365 bytes/sec 2006-05-06 10:03:09 [SETI@home] Started download of file 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.40 2006-05-06 10:03:10 [---] Rescheduling CPU: files downloaded 2006-05-06 10:03:10 [SETI@home] Finished download of file 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.57 2006-05-06 10:03:10 [SETI@home] Throughput 59574 bytes/sec 2006-05-06 10:03:10 [SETI@home] Starting task 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.43_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 512 2006-05-06 10:03:11 [---] Rescheduling CPU: files downloaded 2006-05-06 10:03:11 [SETI@home] Pausing task 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.43_1 (left in memory) 2006-05-06 10:03:11 [SETI@home] Starting task 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.57_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 512 2006-05-06 10:03:14 [SETI@home] Finished download of file 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.40 2006-05-06 10:03:14 [SETI@home] Throughput 77253 bytes/sec 2006-05-06 10:03:15 [---] Rescheduling CPU: files downloaded 2006-05-06 12:27:02 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 2006-05-06 12:27:02 [SETI@home] Reason: To report completed tasks 2006-05-06 12:27:02 [SETI@home] Reporting 1 tasks 2006-05-06 12:27:07 [SETI@home] Scheduler request succeeded 2006-05-06 12:46:21 [SETI@home] Unrecoverable error for result 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.57_1 (The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3)) 2006-05-06 12:46:21 [SETI@home] Deferring scheduler requests for 1 minutes and 0 seconds 2006-05-06 12:46:21 [---] Rescheduling CPU: application exited 2006-05-06 12:46:21 [SETI@home] Computation for task 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.57_1 finished 2006-05-06 12:46:21 [SETI@home] Resuming task 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.43_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 512 2006-05-06 12:46:23 [SETI@home] Started upload of file 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.57_1_0 2006-05-06 12:46:28 [SETI@home] Finished upload of file 01mr99ab.4149.28994.254826.3.57_1_0 2006-05-06 12:46:28 [SETI@home] Throughput 11435 bytes/sec 2006-05-06 12:47:32 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 2006-05-06 12:47:32 [SETI@home] Reason: Requested by user 2006-05-06 12:47:32 [SETI@home] Reporting 1 tasks 2006-05-06 12:47:37 [SETI@home] Scheduler request succeeded Now, this is 2h24m from started to finish, but due to waiting on "ok" it used only 6152s, 1h42m so "lost" roughly 40 minutes before had the time to check the computers. |
Ingleside Send message Joined: 4 Feb 03 Posts: 1546 Credit: 15,832,022 RAC: 13 |
Argh, 2nd crash: "Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library Runtime Error! Program: This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information. OK." But, instead of "ok"-ing, tried stopping & re-starting BOINC, and this resulted in -9 result_overflow after roughly 1 minute... In any case, there's something that isn't working as it should... |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Just noticed this, not sure if its anything important, but on the graphics view of SETI enhanced the percentage complete is around 2-3% lower than that being displayed on BOINC, 53% complete as opposed to 56%. Not sure if this will make a difference in the end with BOINC thinking the project is done when in reality its not... The fraction_done sent for BOINC to display in percentage complete is a blend of the progress as shown by the graphics with a fraction computed from the number of chirp/fft pairs completed. It's a tapered blend about equally weighted at 83%, and the chirp/fft pair count dominates from there to the end. That is guaranteed to approach completion without overflow, so BOINC will never show 100% too soon. However, the chirp/fft pair count increases more rapidly for chirp rates under 20 Hz/sec than for higher chirps because of the relatively quick spike testing at 64K and 128K FFT lengths which is done only below 20 Hz/sec. That makes fraction_done higher than it should be as it approaches the end, but increasing at a rate such that it reaches 100% at just the right time. Joe |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
The problem with this is, the application crunched for over 1.5 hours continuously before it found-out it "couldn't find path"... Isn't that checkpoint writing? |
Rudy Send message Joined: 23 Jun 99 Posts: 189 Credit: 794,998 RAC: 0 |
Argh, 2nd crash: same crash and error, except I choose the "ok". 06/05/2006 9:52:51 AM|SETI@home|Resuming task 06ja99ab.28689.1012.277834.3.30_3 using setiathome_enhanced version 512 06/05/2006 9:52:54 AM|Einstein@Home|Started upload of file z1_1472.5__2388_S4R2a_2_0 06/05/2006 9:53:05 AM|Einstein@Home|Finished upload of file z1_1472.5__2388_S4R2a_2_0 06/05/2006 9:53:05 AM|Einstein@Home|Throughput 52978 bytes/sec 06/05/2006 10:14:58 AM|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 06/05/2006 10:14:58 AM|SETI@home|Reason: To fetch work 06/05/2006 10:14:58 AM|SETI@home|Requesting 20 seconds of new work 06/05/2006 10:15:03 AM|SETI@home|Scheduler request succeeded 06/05/2006 10:15:05 AM|SETI@home|Started download of file 06ja99ab.28689.1972.15338.3.70 06/05/2006 10:15:09 AM|SETI@home|Finished download of file 06ja99ab.28689.1972.15338.3.70 06/05/2006 10:15:09 AM|SETI@home|Throughput 126619 bytes/sec 06/05/2006 10:15:10 AM||Rescheduling CPU: files downloaded 06/05/2006 10:15:10 AM|SETI@home Beta Test|Pausing task 05ap00aa.23057.114.798576.3.205_7 (left in memory) 06/05/2006 10:15:10 AM|Einstein@Home|Resuming task z1_1472.5__2386_S4R2a_1 using albert version 437 06/05/2006 10:16:01 AM|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 06ja99ab.28689.1012.277834.3.30_3 (The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3)) 06/05/2006 10:16:01 AM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited 06/05/2006 10:16:01 AM|SETI@home|Computation for task 06ja99ab.28689.1012.277834.3.30_3 finished 06/05/2006 10:16:01 AM|SETI@home Beta Test|Resuming task 05ap00aa.23057.114.798576.3.205_7 using setiathome_enhanced version 512 06/05/2006 10:16:01 AM|Einstein@Home|Pausing task z1_1472.5__2386_S4R2a_1 (left in memory) 06/05/2006 10:16:01 AM|SETI@home|Starting task 06ja99ab.28689.1972.15338.3.70_2 using setiathome_enhanced version 512 06/05/2006 10:16:04 AM|SETI@home|Started upload of file 06ja99ab.28689.1012.277834.3.30_3_0 06/05/2006 10:16:07 AM|SETI@home|Finished upload of file 06ja99ab.28689.1012.277834.3.30_3_0 06/05/2006 10:16:07 AM|SETI@home|Throughput 30740 bytes/sec |
Rudy Send message Joined: 23 Jun 99 Posts: 189 Credit: 794,998 RAC: 0 |
hmmm same workunit, slightly different message http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=319754127 |
richard.vallance Send message Joined: 14 May 04 Posts: 27 Credit: 12,285 RAC: 0 |
I completed an Enhanced WU this morning but the result doesn't show up in my pending credits. |
kev1701e Send message Joined: 28 Dec 99 Posts: 138 Credit: 10,216,553 RAC: 0 |
I completed an Enhanced WU this morning but the result doesn't show up in my pending credits. This WU? It was granted credit on arrival. kev kev X2 4400+,4200+ @2.75GHz, XP1800+ @1.65GHz, P4 @1.6GHz |
UBT - Halifax--lad Send message Joined: 13 Dec 00 Posts: 433 Credit: 13,900 RAC: 0 |
Edit here is the WU not one of mine someone else, trying to find out what went wrong for that user, so it can be corrected Runtime Error! Join us in Chat (see the forum) Click the Sig Join UBT |
Keith Kennedy Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 149 Credit: 244,165 RAC: 0 |
I got the Windows runtime error a little while ago (This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way. Please contact the application's support team for more information.) and since then, my dual processor computer will run only one WU at a time. I've rebooted the computer, no change. Also, it just completed 10 WUs with less than 1.5 minutes -- yes, minutes -- for each WU (compared to a normal 2.5 hours under Seti enhanced). |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Also, it just completed 10 WUs with less than 1.5 minutes -- yes, minutes -- for each WU (compared to a normal 2.5 hours under Seti enhanced). Those are the "normal" -9 overflow results. |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 9659 Credit: 251,998 RAC: 0 |
This WU http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=76821425 Result: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=319957503 crapped out with the Visual C++ runtime error window, that had to be clicked Ok on, before it would continue. 5/7/2006 2:51:15 AM|SETI@home|Unrecoverable error for result 06ja99ab.28689.3698.473568.3.3_2 (Den angivne sti blev ikke fundet. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3)) 5/7/2006 2:51:15 AM|SETI@home|Deferring scheduler requests for 1 minutes and 0 seconds 5/7/2006 2:51:15 AM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited 5/7/2006 2:51:15 AM|SETI@home|Computation for task 06ja99ab.28689.3698.473568.3.3_2 finished "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me |
Mike McGuigan Send message Joined: 15 Feb 00 Posts: 3 Credit: 2,599,542 RAC: 0 |
Well this isn't really a computation error from what I can tell. But a WU that completed, the same number of credits were claimed as other crunchers and they got credited but I did not. Not sure why, any ideas? WU link This is in the result id record... <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <stderr_txt> ar=0.901162 NumCfft=50351 NumGauss= 217670278 NumPulse= 23389686271 NumTriplet= 3299847110656 </stderr_txt> |
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 9659 Credit: 251,998 RAC: 0 |
Well this isn't really a computation error from what I can tell. Yes, but if you look further on the resultpage http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=318200433, you can see it was invalid. I don't have any idea of what could have gone wrong, so it was invalid, maybe some of the others here can explain some of the possibilities. "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me |
Robert De Letter Send message Joined: 7 Aug 03 Posts: 10 Credit: 255,481 RAC: 0 |
The graphics are not working with seti@home enhanced. A friendly person answered my question by saying that you are working on this problem. |
Joel Polowin Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 6 Credit: 1,847,212 RAC: 0 |
My machine tried its first few "Enhanced" packets last night. They *each* ended after about a minute of crunching -- some with the "illegal path" error, some with the "This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way" warning box. My system is now working on some "Classic" packets, and I'll try rebooting the thing before it works its way down to any more "Enhanced" packets... but I suspect that there may be some problem with the new client. (I'm using Windows NT, FWIW.) |
Rob.B Send message Joined: 23 Jul 99 Posts: 157 Credit: 1,439,682 RAC: 0 |
Just had 42 computation errors in a row, 0 process time. Now can't download units because I have already had too many today! Never had any problems until now. If the enhanced Seti isn't stable why release it? |
UBT - Halifax--lad Send message Joined: 13 Dec 00 Posts: 433 Credit: 13,900 RAC: 0 |
Just had 42 computation errors in a row, 0 process time. Now can't download units because I have already had too many today! Never had any problems until now. If the enhanced Seti isn't stable why release it? Unless you have a different username?? I don't count 42 errored results in your computers list, unless that screen is bust/not upto date Join us in Chat (see the forum) Click the Sig Join UBT |
2of12 Send message Joined: 12 Jul 04 Posts: 54 Credit: 5,716,632 RAC: 0 |
Ok here is the thing. I havent had a problem then Downloaded update. then the following.5/6/2006 8:55:06 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 8:55:06 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 8:55:06 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 8:55:06 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 8:57:32 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 8:57:32 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 8:57:32 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 8:57:33 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 9:08:20 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 9:08:20 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 9:08:20 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 9:08:20 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 9:11:39 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 9:11:39 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 9:11:39 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 9:11:39 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 9:25:43 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 9:25:43 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 9:25:43 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 9:25:43 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 9:39:49 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 9:39:49 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 9:39:49 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 9:39:49 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 9:53:57 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 9:53:57 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 9:53:57 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 9:53:57 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 10:08:19 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 10:08:19 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 10:08:19 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 10:08:19 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 10:22:28 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 10:22:28 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 10:22:28 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 10:22:28 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 10:36:34 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 10:36:34 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 10:36:34 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 10:36:34 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 10:50:51 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 10:50:51 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 10:50:51 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 10:50:51 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 11:05:10 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 11:05:10 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 11:05:10 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 11:05:10 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 11:19:36 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 11:19:36 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 11:19:36 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 11:19:36 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 11:33:38 PM|SETI@home|Result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 5/6/2006 11:33:38 PM|SETI@home|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 5/6/2006 11:33:38 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 11:33:38 PM|SETI@home|Restarting result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 using setiathome version 418 5/6/2006 11:44:16 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 5/6/2006 11:44:16 PM|SETI@home|Computation for result 20oc02ab.9499.15937.865918.1.112_3 finished 5/6/2006 11.512.190906.1.110_1 using setiathome version 418 5/7/2006 8:37:36 AM||Resuming network activity 5/7/2006 8:37:36 AM|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi 5/7/2006 8:37:36 AM|SETI@home|Reason: To fetch work 5/7/2006 8:37:36 AM|SETI@home|Requesting 25135 seconds of new work, and reporting 16 results 5/7/2006 8:37:37 |
Rob.B Send message Joined: 23 Jul 99 Posts: 157 Credit: 1,439,682 RAC: 0 |
NO idea, my results page is pink, they all fail with; <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <message> - exit code -6 (0xfffffffa) </message> <stderr_txt> SETI@home error -6 Bad workunit header !swi.data_type || !found || !swi.nsamples File: ../seti_header.cpp Line: 210 </stderr_txt> I've downloaded two climate prediction units, that should take about 3 months to crunch. Hopefully it will be ok by then. Good luck everyone. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.