Message boards :
Number crunching :
When will Waiting for validation hit 0
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Martin A. Boegelund Send message Joined: 4 Jul 00 Posts: 292 Credit: 387,485 RAC: 1 |
In another thread, I started recording how many results were leaving the "Waiting for validation" queue. Soon I realized that a table report might be better, so here goes: -------------------------------------------------------------------- |Obs|Timestamp |In queue|Rate |Overall rate|ETA @ 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- |001|28AUG 06:20| 785K|??.?K/hr| ??.?K/hr|????? ??:?? |002|28AUG 07:00| 766K|28.5K/hr| 28.5K/hr|29AUG 10:00 |003|28AUG 07:30| 752K|28.0K/hr| 28.3K/hr|29AUG 10:00 |004|28AUG 08:00| 737K|30.0K/hr| 28.8K/hr|29AUG 09:30 |005|28AUG 08:40| 718K|28.5K/hr| 28.7K/hr|29AUG 09:40 -------------------------------------------------------------------- I will try to keep this info updated through continuously updating it, editing this message. "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?" |
Metod, S56RKO Send message Joined: 27 Sep 02 Posts: 309 Credit: 113,221,277 RAC: 9 |
In another thread, I started recording how many results were leaving the "Waiting for validation" queue. A longer record is available here. Metod ... |
MikeSW17 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 1603 Credit: 2,700,523 RAC: 0 |
From Scarecros's graph (http://bluenorthernsoftware.com/scarecrow/sahstats/) the WFV queue is clearing in a linear fashion. Around 36 hours from now looks likely (say 14:00 29/08 UTC) |
Ocean Archer Send message Joined: 11 Jun 04 Posts: 148 Credit: 504,219 RAC: 0 |
Thanks go out to Martin and Metod for their efforts in monitoring status ... |
Metod, S56RKO Send message Joined: 27 Sep 02 Posts: 309 Credit: 113,221,277 RAC: 9 |
Thanks go out to Martin and Metod for their efforts in monitoring status ... Not to me, rather to Scarecrow. I merely pointed out to his nice table. Metod ... |
Martin A. Boegelund Send message Joined: 4 Jul 00 Posts: 292 Credit: 387,485 RAC: 1 |
In another thread, I started recording how many results were leaving the "Waiting for validation" queue. Cool! Thanks! "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?" |
Lanisa Send message Joined: 5 Jun 99 Posts: 25 Credit: 688,811 RAC: 0 |
29/08/05 @ 13-15h UTC if the progress keeps running (100k results are validated in around 4h) |
Martin A. Boegelund Send message Joined: 4 Jul 00 Posts: 292 Credit: 387,485 RAC: 1 |
___________________________________________________________ |Obs|Timestamp |In queue|Rate |Overall rate|ETA @ 0 ___________________________________________________________ |001|28AUG 06:20| 785K|??.?K/hr| ??.?K/hr|????? ??:?? |002|28AUG 07:00| 766K|28.5K/hr| 28.5K/hr|29AUG 10:00 |003|28AUG 07:30| 752K|28.0K/hr| 28.3K/hr|29AUG 10:00 |004|28AUG 08:00| 737K|30.0K/hr| 28.8K/hr|29AUG 09:30 |005|28AUG 08:40| 718K|28.5K/hr| 28.7K/hr|29AUG 09:40 |006|28AUG 12:40| 626K|23.0K/hr| 25.1K/hr|29AUG 13:40 |007|28AUG 13:10| 609K|34.0K/hr| 25.8K/hr|29AUG 12:40 ___________________________________________________________ 92K have been validated in the 4hr period from 8:40 to 12:40, which is a bit slower than the 100K/4 hours mentioned earlier. Anyhow, the overall rate suggests that 100K are in fact validated in a 4 hour period. "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?" |
Mike Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34264 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 |
Hi Not correct at all. Came home from lunch at 12 UTC 648000 left to validate 13.20 UTC 609000 left. Its over 30000 an hour. greetz Mike With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
Grenadier Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 63 Credit: 5,445,784 RAC: 0 |
As the file system drains, we might see some acceleration of the validator, since it will have fewer files to deal with on the server. Maybe that accounts for that faster speed in the period you noticed. |
Haakon Rasmussen Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 18 Credit: 11,420,728 RAC: 64 |
Validation stopped at 595K. Maybe it can't get lover, because rest of WU only have one or two results to compare to, and three is needed? EDIT: If that is the case they should accept uploads to further purge the system! HÃ¥kon |
eL_nino Send message Joined: 11 Mar 04 Posts: 79 Credit: 999,964 RAC: 0 |
Validation stopped at 595K. Maybe it can't get lover, because rest of WU only have one or two results to compare to, and three is needed? You can take a look at the status screen and see that validators are off... :) You can read that Waiting for validation is counting only WU-s that have 3 results in.... :) And now you know why validation stopped at 595k. . . Just take a look at the news (rarely updated, but sometimes are news and not "news") and status screen before posting next time. :) EDIT- and when I was writing post, they turned them back on... it is 590k now. |
Joe K Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 80 Credit: 17,001 RAC: 0 |
Great tracking of database stats. For myself I would peroidicly copy and paste into notepad the database section of server page. It's dropping quick. |
Joe K Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 80 Credit: 17,001 RAC: 0 |
Great tracking of database stats. For myself I would peroidicly copy and paste into notepad the database section of server page. Here is my copy and paste of last 2 hours,it's down about 58,000 in 2 hours.And added one more from last night.This makes it down about 457,000 in about 19 hours. Database status 1600 UTC 28th August 2005 State Approximate #results Ready to send 280,772 In progress 963,160 Waiting for validation 559,508 Transitioner backlog 0 hours Database status 1800 UTC 28th August 2005 State Approximate #results Ready to send 281,219 In progress 960,748 Waiting for validation 501,425 Transitioner backlog 0 hours Database status 2310 UTC 27th august 2005 State Approximate #results Ready to send 277,979 In progress 983,274 Waiting for validation 958,500 Transitioner backlog 0 hours |
Martin A. Boegelund Send message Joined: 4 Jul 00 Posts: 292 Credit: 387,485 RAC: 1 |
___________________________________________________________ |Obs|Timestamp |In queue|Rate |Overall rate|ETA @ 0 ___________________________________________________________ |001|28AUG 06:20| 785K|??.?K/hr| ??.?K/hr|????? ??:?? |002|28AUG 07:00| 766K|28.5K/hr| 28.5K/hr|29AUG 10:00 |003|28AUG 07:30| 752K|28.0K/hr| 28.3K/hr|29AUG 10:00 |004|28AUG 08:00| 737K|30.0K/hr| 28.8K/hr|29AUG 09:30 |005|28AUG 08:40| 718K|28.5K/hr| 28.7K/hr|29AUG 09:40 |006|28AUG 12:40| 626K|23.0K/hr| 25.1K/hr|29AUG 13:40 |007|28AUG 13:10| 609K|34.0K/hr| 25.8K/hr|29AUG 12:40 |008|28AUG 19:20| 462K|23.8K/hr| 24.8K/hr|29AUG 13:50 ___________________________________________________________ As I understand one of the other posts, validators have been turn off for a period. This would explain the drop in the "short-term" validation rate, but overall validation rate still remains close to 25K/h, or 100K validated per 4 hours. "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?" |
Tern Send message Joined: 4 Dec 03 Posts: 1122 Credit: 13,376,822 RAC: 44 |
All these numbers that keep being posted here are more readily available at http://members.cox.net/thescarecrow/sstat.shtml The average hourly decrease in the WFV queue since 8/27 13:50 UTC is -24753. If anyone really needs them, I have the numbers from Scarecrow's page going back to 8/10. |
Martin A. Boegelund Send message Joined: 4 Jul 00 Posts: 292 Credit: 387,485 RAC: 1 |
All these numbers that keep being posted here are more readily available at These numbers seem to be drawn on an hourly basis, but are updated here at S@H every 10 minutes. Starting out with a small time-span, I preferred to draw immediately as a change occurred. Now I just duplicate the info in order to show what is the basis of my estimate at when we hit 0 WFV. "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?" |
Tern Send message Joined: 4 Dec 03 Posts: 1122 Credit: 13,376,822 RAC: 44 |
No problem, I'm not complaining at all about what you're doing - just pointing out for those who want to see "farther back", etc., that there's an automated routine capturing the numbers hourly for your viewing pleasure... :-) |
MJKelleher Send message Joined: 1 Jul 99 Posts: 2048 Credit: 1,575,401 RAC: 0 |
These numbers seem to be drawn on an hourly basis, but are updated here at S@H every 10 minutes. Just FYI, while the page is updated every 10 minutes, not all the numbers on the page are. They're generated separately with their own automated processes. So, even if no change is reported, the process may still be running and the page still behind. MJ |
cjsoftuk Send message Joined: 3 Sep 04 Posts: 248 Credit: 183,721 RAC: 0 |
Going back on topic. Estimated time = 17 hours I make that 13:00 UTC Monday 29th August 2005 |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.