Social Security is not going broke.

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Social Security is not going broke.
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 9 · 10 · 11 · 12

AuthorMessage
7822531

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 820
Credit: 692
RAC: 0
Message 76738 - Posted: 5 Feb 2005, 7:07:30 UTC - in response to Message 76728.  
Last modified: 5 Feb 2005, 7:08:28 UTC

Are you sure you're not Vulcan? There's quite a lot of logic behind your thoughts, NA.

10 Greed is eternal.
13 Anything worth doing is worth doing for money.
18 A Ferengi without profit is no Ferengi at all.
23 Nothing is more important than your health... except for your money.
40 She can touch your lobes, but never your latinum.
41 Profit is its own reward.
97 Enough... is never enough.
106 There is no honor in poverty.
123 Even a blind man can recognize the glow of latinum.
144 There's nothing wrong with charity... as long as it winds up in your pocket.
189 Let others keep their reputation. You keep their money.
190 Hear all, trust nothing.
284 Deep down, everyone's a Ferengi.

QED.
ID: 76738 · Report as offensive
.
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 410
Credit: 16,559
RAC: 0
Message 76767 - Posted: 5 Feb 2005, 9:54:17 UTC - in response to Message 76726.  

[snip!]

>
> You must be speaking of yourself again. ;-)
>
> One last thing: Get a spell checker or a dictionary. Your spelling is
> atrocious!
>

Siran, did you hear a flea bark????

.....

No, there wasn't a sound to hear after all! No, nothing!!
ID: 76767 · Report as offensive
Anonymous

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 02
Posts: 307
Credit: 24,137
RAC: 0
Afghanistan
Message 76800 - Posted: 5 Feb 2005, 13:57:09 UTC - in response to Message 76726.  
Last modified: 5 Feb 2005, 14:12:01 UTC

> The author provides information in his/her book, allowing me to learn
> something from the author. If you cannot
> see the logic in that, give up.

Never claimed to not see how you think. I said you were wrong. Pay attention please. (Either not paying attention, or not reading all of the posts -10)

Most authors write for their own entertainment, not to merely provide you with information.

> What person[al] attack? I just started busting up your assumption of
> logic. You drifted off topic with me.

Agreed, but you have not busted any assumption, only reinforced it.

> Your statements are becoming garbled. I try to respect everyone that
> returns in kind.

No garbled statement, you heard me quite clearly. We are not all equal, and therefore I do not treat all individuals equally. Respect is earned and I am quite certain you heard me say that before. (Making me repeat myself, thus wasting resources -10)

> You must be speaking of yourself. You cannot be speaking of me. I work
> for a living in the general aviation industry. What
> do you do?

(A job thatmight involve manual labor +10)

The reference is to our conversation, not your profession. I will make one post when one will accomplish my task and you will work to find the little bits you choose to respond to as opposed to responding to the entire post, or the conversation will end.....and I'm a carpenter.

> I have never been complimented so much as I have been by you. Einstein,
> genius? Cool, thanks!

You are more than welcome.

> It is NOT a fantasy
> to request that someone shows a little respect.

Agreed, it's a fantasy to believe that I will stop responding to you merely because you don't like the format of my writting. Furthermore, it's simply a needless waste of resources to post 1 reply for each comment. Somewhat like giving Social Security to a 65, but otherwise perfectly healthy person. This is the second time I have given this response....remember the respect thing? (Repeating myself, wasting resources -10)

> You do not know me. Am I republican, or am I democrat? You do not know.
> Am I on the left, or am I on the right? You do not know.
> You cannot tell from a simple request that I am liberal or whatever.

So then if you know that much, what makes you think my opinion is based on one request or even this topic alone? Do you foolishly think this is the only topic I read or that you respond to? (Foolish assumption as you have over 1000 posts -10)


> You haven't figured anything out. You cannot even show anyone a little
> respect unless they agree with you 100%. What's that
> say about you?

Agreeing with me has nothing to do with it. Living in reality does.

>> Well they say ignorance is bliss. I've yet to see it proven wrong.
>> Especially by liberals.

>You must be speaking of yourself again. ;-)


O really? Is that why YOU included the smiley face? (-10 for scarcasm without thinking.)

You lost 50 points in 1 post while gaining only 10. As I stated, respect is earned.

.
<a href="http://www.brainsmashr.com"><img src="http://www.brainsmashr.com/signature.gif"><img src="http://brainsmashr.com/boinc/counter_big.php?id=305369&amp;project=seti&amp;ctx=white&amp;cva=red&amp;cbo=white&amp;cbg=black&amp;linethickness=2"></a>
ID: 76800 · Report as offensive
Profile Siran d'Vel'nahr
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 7379
Credit: 44,181,323
RAC: 238
United States
Message 76816 - Posted: 5 Feb 2005, 15:53:13 UTC - in response to Message 76767.  
Last modified: 5 Feb 2005, 15:54:27 UTC

> [snip!]
>
> >
> > You must be speaking of yourself again. ;-)
> >
> > One last thing: Get a spell checker or a dictionary. Your spelling is
> > atrocious!
> >
>
> Siran, did you hear a flea bark????

No.... But, I could have sworn I heard a maggot farting. ;-)

> .....
>
> No, there wasn't a sound to hear after all! No, nothing!!
>

Now that you mention it Lena, I don't hear anything either. :-)

L8R....

---

My Time: Saturday, 05 February 2005 - 07:53 AM --800 (Pacific Standard Time)

CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\//
Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker
"Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath
ID: 76816 · Report as offensive
Profile Siran d'Vel'nahr
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 7379
Credit: 44,181,323
RAC: 238
United States
Message 76827 - Posted: 5 Feb 2005, 17:16:59 UTC - in response to Message 76800.  
Last modified: 5 Feb 2005, 17:25:25 UTC

> > The author provides information in his/her book, allowing me to learn
> > something from the author. If you cannot
> > see the logic in that, give up.

>
> Never claimed to not see how you think. I said you were wrong. Pay attention
> please. (Either not paying attention, or not reading all of the posts -10)
>
> Most authors write for their own entertainment, not to merely provide you with
> information.

Alright idiot, now who's not paying attention or reading all? I said "provides information" in my
statement. [Go ahead, re-read it, I'll wait an hour or so for it to sink in.] I wasn't talking about reading Sci-Fi,
Romance, Mystery, etc.


> > ....
> Agreed, but you have not busted any assumption, only reinforced it.

STOP THE PRESSES....!</B> Quick, someone pinch me! Did I read that right, he actually agreed with me? Well
wonders never cease.... There may be hope for you afterall. :-)


> > ....
> No garbled statement, you heard me quite clearly. We are not all equal, and
> therefore I do not treat all individuals equally. Respect is earned and I am
> quite certain you heard me say that before. (Making me repeat myself, thus
> wasting resources -10)

Ok, [b]garbled
may have been the wrong word. Maybe incoherent is a better one.

> > ....
> (A job thatmight involve manual labor +10)

I do not need justification from you because I work for a living. I have been around and working considerably
longer than you


> The reference is to our conversation, not your profession. I will make one
> post when one will accomplish my task and you will work to find the little
> bits you choose to respond to as opposed to responding to the entire post, or
> the conversation will end.....
and I'm a carpenter.

Your single posting theory is only working to aggravate. To the best of my knowledge, I have responded to each of
your statements. If I haven't it's because I found what you said irrelevant. And, if I believe what I read in the
bolded text above, then you, my friend, are a hypocrite. Think about it....


> > ....
> ....
> > ....
> Agreed,

WOW!!!! Again, he agrees with me.... [Launching fireworks.... oooh, aaah....]

> it's a fantasy to believe that I will stop responding to you merely
> because you don't like the format of my writting. Furthermore, it's simply a
> needless waste of resources to post 1 reply for each comment. Somewhat
> like giving Social Security to a 65, but otherwise perfectly healthy person.
> This is the second time I have given this response....remember the respect
> thing? (Repeating myself, wasting resources -10)

It's a fantasy to believe that someone narrow minded, as yourself, could even understand the term: WAKE UP TO REALITY!
I don't believe that you will ever stop being disrespectful of people. Your writing format shows that, all too well.
Explain to me the resources you're wasting by even being here, else, get off the resources kick.

I remember, a while back, explaining to you that the Social Security one collects does not come out of your
pocket. I will pay, say, $150.00 out of one paycheck to SS. That $150.00 gets credited to my SS account (my SS
number being that SS account). If and when I collect SS, it will come out of my account and not yours.


> > ....
> So then if you know that much, what makes you think my opinion is based on one
> request or even this topic alone?

You have said as much, re-read the thread.

> Do you foolishly think this is the only
> topic I read or that you respond to?

No. Unfortunately, I have read your mush all over these boards and waited until now to respond to it.

> (Foolish assumption as you have over
> 1000 posts -10)

What does the number of posts I have made have anything to do with this discussion? You must be jealous. :-)

> > ....
> Agreeing with me has nothing to do with it. Living in reality does.

I beg to differ. I have seen that the only posts you reply to with any semblance of respect are those that agree
with you or that you yourself agree with.


> >> ....
> > ....
> O really? Is that why YOU included the smiley face? (-10 for scarcasm
> without thinking.)

What? You can't take a little sarcasm? Poor you. ;-(

> You lost 50 points in 1 post while gaining only 10. As I stated, respect is
> earned.

Respect is not earned by giving and taking points. It is earned by the ethical treatment of others.

Save for my calling you an "idiot" above because you did not fully comprehend what I stated, I believe I have not really
shown any "real" disrespect to you. You, on the other hand, have resorted to name calling, innuendos, and insinuations
in the mojority of your posts.


My Time: Saturday, 05 February 2005 - 09:16 AM --800 (Pacific Standard Time)

CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\//
Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker
"Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath
ID: 76827 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 9 · 10 · 11 · 12

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Social Security is not going broke.


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.