Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (116) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 . . . 47 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
There is a ton of "noise bombs" going through currently. Likely the reason for the higher return rate. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19087 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
There is a ton of "noise bombs" going through currently. Likely the reason for the higher return rate. I looked at my returned tasks just after you posted, and at that time about 25% were noisy. Just checked again and now its about 50%. Server stats are also up. Results received in last hour ** 146,414 0m |
Unixchick Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22 |
I've been checking the stats periodically in between chores, and it hit a peak around 150k/ hour and appears to be slowly falling now. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13747 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
There is a ton of "noise bombs" going through currently. Likely the reason for the higher return rate. Yep. Noticed a lot in my results, and still quite a few in my cache. And of course the random Credits being allocated- Anything from 0.3 to 5 depending on wingmate. Grant Darwin NT |
Unixchick Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22 |
The results returned per hour number is on the rise again, guessing that means more noise bombs. Still in the 140k -150k range, so no panic. |
Speedy Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1643 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 |
Thanks to "noise bombs" we have completed over 1000 channels today. No need to panic |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
The results returned per hour number is on the rise again, guessing that means more noise bombs. Still in the 140k -150k range, so no panic. Up to Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19087 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Only a few noisy bombs, average time to complete tasks is 310s (5m:10s) 25/05/2019 08:00:07 | SETI@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 25/05/2019 08:00:07 | SETI@home | Reporting 1 completed tasks 25/05/2019 08:00:07 | SETI@home | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA GPU 25/05/2019 08:00:09 | SETI@home | Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks 5m:10s later 25/05/2019 08:05:17 | SETI@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 25/05/2019 08:05:17 | SETI@home | Reporting 7 completed tasks 25/05/2019 08:05:17 | SETI@home | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA GPU 25/05/2019 08:05:19 | SETI@home | Scheduler request completed: got 6 new tasks 5m:10s later 25/05/2019 08:10:27 | SETI@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 25/05/2019 08:10:27 | SETI@home | Reporting 7 completed tasks 25/05/2019 08:10:27 | SETI@home | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA GPU 25/05/2019 08:10:29 | SETI@home | Scheduler request completed: got 7 new tasks Up a bit more Results received in last hour ** 185,875 |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13747 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
The results returned per hour number is on the rise again, guessing that means more noise bombs. Still in the 140k -150k range, so no panic. And the WU awaiting Validation & Assimilation continue to climb, Ready-to-send continues to fall, and the splitter output continues to decline. Looks like we've found the servers limits again. Grant Darwin NT |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
Ha ha. I have to scroll through 15 pages to find a page that isn't less than 50% noise bombs. Don't know whether they have had a receiver go bad at Green Bank or they just recorded when there was an extraneous noise source in the antenna's aperture. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13747 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Just watched one of my GPUs go through 10 noise bombs in a row. Grant Darwin NT |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19087 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Ha ha. I have to scroll through 15 pages to find a page that isn't less than 50% noise bombs. Don't know whether they have had a receiver go bad at Green Bank or they just recorded when there was an extraneous noise source in the antenna's aperture. My 1st page of "Valid" has 17 noise bombs. |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
I think we may have found the "fail-over" point in the servers. All my hosts are not able to download tasks but go straight to backoffs. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19087 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
I think we may have found the "fail-over" point in the servers. All my hosts are not able to download tasks but go straight to backoffs. not seen here. times BST 25/05/2019 08:42:15 | SETI@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13747 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
I think we may have found the "fail-over" point in the servers. All my hosts are not able to download tasks but go straight to backoffs. No such issues here, yet. Grant Darwin NT |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
A server request for one task is a lot more likely to go through vice the several hundred I ask for at each connection. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13747 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
A server request for one task is a lot more likely to go through vice the several hundred I ask for at each connection. I've had my work reporting limited to 60 for ages now due to that issue. Grant Darwin NT |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
A server request for one task is a lot more likely to go through vice the several hundred I ask for at each connection. But even with reporting limited to 60, I can have 5 hosts times 60 = 300 tasks being requested. And that is if I wasn't down several hundred tasks per host already because of the download backoffs, so each host is going to ask for whatever the RTS buffer has in it each time to try and rebuild my cache. I have my hosts reporting 100 tasks which works fine when the servers aren't under extreme duress like they are now. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13747 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
But even with reporting limited to 60, I can have 5 hosts times 60 = 300 tasks being requested. ? The WU reported limit is a per host limit, the number of hosts reporting from a particular connection wouldn't make any difference (unless you're talking about a significant number of the total number of active hosts for the entire project). Results received in last hour is almost 190k now. Splitter output has picked up a bit, but still behind the present load, so Ready-to-send continues to plummet (just a bit slower than is was). Edit- And a few Validators & Assimilators are disabled, which wouldn't be helping clear the surge in returned work. Grant Darwin NT |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
I think we may have found the "fail-over" point in the servers. All my hosts are not able to download tasks but go straight to backoffs. . . I have been assigned new work but the downloads are going into backoff ... Stephen :( |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.