Dismissing those that believe the ability to kill millions, or 10's of millions, or 100's of millions in a short time is the same as firearm ownership.

Death toll from worldwide use of Nuclear weapons, 1945-2018 - 226,000

That ability has been with us since 1945 & nothing has happened to date, however...

Death toll from guns in the US 1996-2016 - 572,537

dismisses your asinine post.

How about comparing the theoretical deaths from nuclear weapons to the actual totals for "Deaths in Wars and Conflicts Since the End of World War II: 1945 to 2000"

Total approximately 40,968,000, rounded to 41 million

all without a nuclear weapon in sight.
P.S. That's more than the population of CA, or the total population of NY state plus Florida.

https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20060800_cdsp_occ_leitenberg.pdf

Dismissing those that believe the ability to kill millions, or 10's of millions, or 100's of millions in a short time is the same as firearm ownership.

Death toll from worldwide use of Nuclear weapons, 1945-2018 - 226,000

That ability has been with us since 1945 & nothing has happened to date, however...

Death toll from guns in the US 1996-2016 - 572,537

dismisses your asinine post.

And your fake fact comes from where?

And how many are accidental, how many are suicide?

Asinine indeed.

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

JE... Just their attempt to deflect attention from an evil Kim's attempt to terrorize and have the ability to kill millions.

America, China, Britain, France & Russia has that ability. Why are you so afraid of a little country?

JE... Just their attempt to deflect attention from an evil Kim's attempt to terrorize and have the ability to kill millions.

America, China, Britain, France & Russia has that ability. Why are you so afraid of a little country?

Long unfinished and unsatisfactory business and some can't let go of that fact. ;-)

One would have thought that they learnt their lesson with Vietnam.

One would have thought that they learnt their lesson with Vietnam.

You would've thought that after Korea they would've had the sense to leave Vietnam well alone, but no, they had to do the same crap over in the middle east just to make matters worse. None have produced any winning, but a lot of losing has been involved due to a very big lack of understanding.

Well give it a few years & we'll see a Hollywood film about Iraq released titled "Mincemeat Hill"
Would go well with:
Pork Chop Hill
Hamburger Hill

Who was it that divided Korea in the 1st place?

What has your questions got to do with a straight forward question? Didn't you learn anything while teaching history?

WHY did the US get involved in Korea in 1945?

And putting the FAKE FACTS in perspective............
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-11.xls

Crime statistics from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) show that more people were killed with hammers and clubs than with rifles of every kind in 2017.

According to the Uniform Crime Report, 467 people were killed with “blunt objects (hammers, clubs, etc.),” while 403 were killed were rifles.

The FBI report also reveals that 692 people were killed with “personal weapons” like “hands, fists, feet, etc..” and that is higher than the number of people killed with rifles and shotguns combined.

Where there's a will, there's a way...........since Ug picked up a rock in 967,000 BC and hit Og in the head....

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

WHY did the US get involved in Korea in 1945?

During the Potsdam Conference, which took place between July and August 1945 between the victory forces of World War II, it was decided that the 38th latitude would constitute the border between the Soviet Union and the United States's future occupation zones in Korea.

Huh? POTUS love MBS. Kim and MBS are peas in a pod. Since our two posters love POTUS, they must love Kim and want POTUS to join that pod.

POTUS has nothing to do with what efforts should we employ to stop Kim's evil ambitions.

Finally you agree Korea is for Koreans and POTUS should butt out!

POTUS has nothing to do with what efforts should we employ to stop Kim's evil ambitions.

Finally you agree Korea is for Koreans and POTUS should butt out!

Gary... Finally you agree Korea is for the Korean people to decide their future.

Yes, if they chose to have Kim enslave them, that is their choice. If they don't make that choice, pitchforks will come out. Just like you postulate for the USA and every other country.

Well, is also the reason you accept a Murdering and Enslaving Kim having the ability to terrorize and murder millions.

You really believe that murdering and enslaving Kim should have the ability to terrorize and murder more millions outside of North Korea?

2 different questions, but nothing new from you.

yawn