Message boards :
Number crunching :
The big picture; any pieces missing?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Stubbles Send message Joined: 29 Nov 99 Posts: 358 Credit: 5,909,255 RAC: 0 |
Hello all! It's been 3 months now that I've been keeping up and participating with the threads in Q&A and Number Crunching, and lately I've been thinking about the big picture in order to find other ways to contribute something somewhere. It seems to me there is a need for:
2. the Lunatics v0.44 CPU apps to be distributed by the S@h server as stock (if possible) since SoG seems good-enough-for-now on the GPUs until Petri's apps; 3. monthly formal updates from the S@h project staff about upcoming projects and focus, and where volunteers could get involved; 4. monthly formal updates from the S@h volunteer app developers; 5. procedures and knowledge needed on how to be an active "volunteer tester" (other than just pimping a few rigs with older hardware to S@h Beta); 6. an alternative metric for baselines other than RAC & credits per day; 7. better stats about the big picture (like Shaggie's GPU output under stock, and Anonymous Platform in top 10k PCs), with an initial focus on top 10k PCs & top 10k SETIzens, such as:
b. the % of total contribution by top 10k PCs & 10k SETIzens; c. {other useful stats to be identified by all of you} 8. providing SETIzens with an easy way to compare their CPU &/or GPU to other PCs with the same devices; This is just a brain dump and I don't know if anything like this has been tried before...so any comments/suggestions are welcome...just please try to keep it constructive! |
Shaggie76 Send message Joined: 9 Oct 09 Posts: 282 Credit: 271,858,118 RAC: 196 |
I've been thinking about a Wiki too -- or at the very least a collection of guides. There's been a few things I've figured out with more google than I care to admit: - How to only crunch when electricity is cheap for you (bonus marks for auto-hibernate and resume scheduled tasks that I wrote that sync the project before shutting down). - Recommended tweaks for specific cards (eg: setting process priority higher for CUDA tasks so they can keep the GPU fed even when the CPU is busy). - Multiprocessing your GPU: I'm not entirely convinced this is a good thing for all projects/cards (my experiments showed it being questionable) so having an organized place for testimony might be good. I don't mind farting around and pulling stats -- especially if I can get it all from host.gz because then I'm not putting any strain on the S@H web server. Like you suggest, a standardized offline benchmark would be really helpful: all you need is to give BOINC a set of constant tasks with expected output and you you can run them in isolation -- right now the only approach is "wait for a while to see if your RAC improves" which is an already volatile signal. I think having a benchmark would be really good for media coverage if you could get the hardware sites to use it when reviewing GPUs (anandtech, tomshardware etc). I'm not familiar enough with how app_info.xml works but I imagine it wouldn't be too crazy to figure something out. The other irrational demand I wish I could make is to have the AMD cards annotated better -- I'm not sure if this is a limitation of the OpenCL driver or the S@H app but it's extremely frustrating to try to make sense of "AMD Fiji" especially when the NVIDIA cards are so nicely detailed. |
Sidewinder Send message Joined: 15 Nov 09 Posts: 100 Credit: 79,432,465 RAC: 0 |
If a simple hosted wiki is needed, I could probably donate a sub-domain. I would be nice to have all of this info in a dedicated place instead of searching the S@H forums/google. |
AMDave Send message Joined: 9 Mar 01 Posts: 234 Credit: 11,671,730 RAC: 0 |
I'm not familiar enough with how app_info.xml works but I imagine it wouldn't be too crazy to figure something out. View messages, in order, first. |
Stubbles Send message Joined: 29 Nov 99 Posts: 358 Credit: 5,909,255 RAC: 0 |
Here's a list of random thoughts about a S@h wiki: - I'm surprised that no one has replied about a S@H wiki having been tried in the past. - If we go ahead with this idea, it might be good to do a quick survey of other BOINC projects to see if any have a Wiki. - From looking at: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/, it seems that each country/language has done something on its own. - I personally feel that the info in the wiki should belong to the S@h project so a domain should be something like: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/setiathome or http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/wiki - If a non-berkeley.edu domain name is used, any net income (revenue - expenses) from ads should be donated to: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu for specific volunteer projects that require small investments. Please voice any reasons/concerns that are/could be a show-stopper (a no-go) before starting a new thread specific to a S@h wiki. Cheers, Rob ;-) |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 6995 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Oh, the Wiki of nonsense. Never mind. |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
Hello all! It does more than month already.
?? Maybe daily reports on volunteer devs tasks progress instead? I understand that some reading is entertaining but some writing will help better :P There is special pinned thread to subscribe BTW. Cause no sense to write every month what need to be done just to write it. Who really can help already found ways to do that, for others it's entertaining only...
Formulated already, just put in WiKi. And regarding benchmarks availability - Lunatics, download section. All that you need for offline benchmarking in SETI. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.