Message boards :
Politics :
Thermite.
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author | Message |
---|---|
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6653 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ Seems like it takes an awful lot, in a small area to just melt a car. Any Thermite paint would have had to been applied at the construction, and be almost a foot think. Steve Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6653 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
In actuality, building 7 was just physics. Each deck that collapsed added weight, and inertia to the moving system, and the support beams couldn't handle it. Steve Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30683 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
In actuality, building 7 was just physics. Each deck that collapsed added weight, and inertia to the moving system, and the support beams couldn't handle it. Weight? No. After all when it was standing still all the weight was there. So that is the mass component. Inertia, yes. As the floor above fell it picked up kinetic energy so when it met resistance of the floor below the supports could not handle it and they snap and the building pancakes. Happens in earthquakes as well. |
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6653 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
Correct. Steve Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used. I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature. [/quote] Old James |
janneseti Send message Joined: 14 Oct 09 Posts: 14106 Credit: 655,366 RAC: 0 |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide. There are already lot of those metals in a building. Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed. |
Мишель Send message Joined: 26 Nov 13 Posts: 3073 Credit: 87,868 RAC: 0 |
Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used. Can't you still tell the difference between beams that have been cut in half by thermite and beams that have simply snapped under the stress caused by the fires and falling debris? |
janneseti Send message Joined: 14 Oct 09 Posts: 14106 Credit: 655,366 RAC: 0 |
Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used. Not I:) http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used. Im asking about left over chemical traces. Not physical eveidence. [/quote] Old James |
janneseti Send message Joined: 14 Oct 09 Posts: 14106 Credit: 655,366 RAC: 0 |
Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used. Chemical traces are physical evidences. |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used. And here I was starting to doubt myself. I was worried chemical traces might be supernatural! |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used. Ok have your fun at my expense. What I should have stated and you both well know it Was. Your eyes can tell the differance in steel that has been cut, burned or sheared. But your nose might not be able to detect what explosive, acid, And or whatever was used. But a chemical test should. [/quote] Old James |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79 |
Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used. I was indeed being silly, but I figured you'd handle it ok. |
Darth Beaver Send message Joined: 20 Aug 99 Posts: 6728 Credit: 21,443,075 RAC: 3 |
Your eyes can tell the differance in steel that has been cut, burned or sheared. Yes you can If Thermite was used there would be slag residue and a lot of it , pieces would be still attached to the beams C4 different story |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.