Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (96) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 . . . 23 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
Mmmm... delicious APs.. 2015-04-03 15:34:32 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 3 new tasks 2015-04-03 15:55:00 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 4 new tasks 2015-04-03 16:05:14 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 3 new tasks 2015-04-03 16:15:30 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks 2015-04-03 16:25:45 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 3 new tasks 2015-04-03 16:41:04 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 3 new tasks 2015-04-03 16:51:18 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 3 new tasks 2015-04-03 16:56:25 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks 2015-04-03 17:44:27 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 4 new tasks 2015-04-03 18:34:27 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 3 new tasks 2015-04-03 18:54:55 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks 2015-04-03 19:05:11 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 3 new tasks 2015-04-03 19:15:27 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 4 new tasks Number of tasks today: 65 (was 55 before midnight UTC, now it only shows 10, because I've gotten 10 after midnight, and thus, a new day). 10-day cache is now full. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51469 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
And the kitties go nom nom nom for APs!!! "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13751 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
And the kitties go nom nom nom for APs!!! Just as well. MB splitters once again not up to the job. Grant Darwin NT |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51469 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
And the kitties go nom nom nom for APs!!! Kitties are still nom nom noming..... And the MB splitters now have 230K RTS buffer. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
If all these files being split haven't been done by MB before ... get them while you can, cause it's going to be 10 days for MB to catch up for new files to be added :( |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51469 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
If all these files being split haven't been done by MB before ... get them while you can, cause it's going to be 10 days for MB to catch up for new files to be added :( Yup.... But it's a nice break whilst it lasts. Meownomnomnom! "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Speedy Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1643 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 |
If all these files being split haven't been done by MB before ... get them while you can, cause it's going to be 10 days for MB to catch up for new files to be added :( Some of the tapes/datasets should move through the quickly as they are quite small 07no11af is 1.51 gig |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
... thinking they are trying to run the AP spitting a few days ahead so they have time to merge the dBases, that couldn't be could it? On a weekend? LOL |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
Is this a problem? This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress It's been ages since I seen this message when set on AP only, LOL |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51469 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Is this a problem? No, not a problem. You have about reached the limits of cache allowed. 100 per CPU, 100 per GPU....or in your case, 200 total. Meow for now...going back off to sleeps with my kitties. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
Yea mark I know, was a joke, just been so long since AP filled my cache. BUT woo hoo. |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
I can never fill my cache with APs. If anything, it seems as if my least capable machines are filled first, with my best only getting a few breadcrumbs :( I still think they are handing out APs based on your ID number of your computer. I have yet to hear anyone says it isn't happening and explain why it isn't so..... :P ;) LOL |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
As far as I know they only restrict sends more than X number if you are running a lot of errors. Which I'm sure your not because you watch the computers. Other thing is your fast computers are processing them as fast as they can get them so, it's really hard to build a cache, but your slow computers can. |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
But Zal I will trade you 150 AP's for a 980 to help with the whine *winks* |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
LOL, Still after that 980 huh? ;) With all those people returning the 970s over the 3.5 GB memory issue, might be able to pick up a used one. That 3.5 hampers crunching Seti some but still is a good GPU for it even with that limitation. No whine in a while since the backplates went on Ebay. I'm stuck at 60 APs in the cache and can't get more than that. My other machine with the 780s have 150 as well. Kind of weird. It's going to be a mute point here soon. Looking at the server we are almost done with this run of APs then it will be back to MB for a while. Zalster |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
That brings up a question I have been meaning to ask here ... I have a 2GB card, but rarely see it using more than 750Mb (probably closer to 400-500) no matter what I throw at it, is that a command line thing to use more, or it will always rely on the CPU? |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
That is probable best to start a new thread for that topic. But to answer, Work units use a combination of both physical and virtual RAM The RAM on the card will determine how many work units you are have the card crunching at the same time (parallel, instances, 2up..whatever you want to call them) The more Ram the more each card can crunch at the same time. Don't be fooled by seeing that it only uses x amount at 1 point in time. The amount can vary greatly during the course of the data being crunched. When AP 7.04 came out, there were certain work units that were using over 1 GB by themselves. That stalled a lot of GPUs until they came out with v7.05 The last part of your question. Yes it will always use some of the CPU. Think I explained that a long time ago somewhere as analogue of a factory Think of the data a material on a conveyor belt. The more powerful the GPU the more belts it has with more workers looking at the data coming into the factory on the belts. When it sees something that it thinks is interesting, it calls upon the foreman (CPU) and he comes over and examines that data and decided yes or no. After that it either gets reported or moves along and the belt continues. So a poor example but I think you get the idea. |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
Thanks for the explanation for GPU memory. It was a typo on my part about using CPU, I meant RAM, I know the GPU needs the CPU to feed it. I have lots of RAM available, was thinking it was using some of it rather than GPU mem. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11362 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
Nobody has posted in this thread for over 2 days, is that a record? |
Wild6-NJ Send message Joined: 4 Aug 99 Posts: 43 Credit: 100,336,791 RAC: 140 |
Nobody has posted in this thread for over 2 days, is that a record? It's probably due to a sugar (aka AP) rush. ;) |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.