Seti computational farm |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Seti computational farm
1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
If this dosn't get posted here moderators please let me know where it goes... | |
| ID: 1302322 · | |
|
On my return to Seti, I was running 2 desktops & 1 server. The power bill was £320 per quarter. | |
| ID: 1302331 · | |
|
What do you pay for electricity? | |
| ID: 1302368 · | |
|
If you run 24/7 figure $150.00 per machine + or - $50.00. | |
| ID: 1302385 · | |
|
(from someone who has done this) ... Your better bet, on a WU per watt ratio is to invest in a modern multi core machine , stuff it with economically priced gpus and let it rock. | |
| ID: 1302388 · | |
|
Yes perhaps from an electric standpoint I'd be better off with quad core machines and just forget the pile of old pcs I have sitting around collecting dust. Most of those machines are 1ghz-2ghz single core machines. | |
| ID: 1302398 · | |
How many video cards can I jam into each machine? As many as the motherboard supports , most of the older machines do not support cuda enabled graphics cards as they typically do not have the correct interface. | |
| ID: 1302399 · | |
|
Older rigs can do a decent job if supplied with GPUs to do most of the work. | |
| ID: 1302402 · | |
|
Thanks for your thoughts guys. I think I will just add one more modern machine to my current setup. Something like a quad core with 4 or 5 gpus I think would be best way to increase my output alot, without my power bill skyrocketing. | |
| ID: 1302416 · | |
|
"It has a 30K RAC" | |
| ID: 1302417 · | |
|
Oh I get it, recent average credit... mine shows a whopping 81... | |
| ID: 1302419 · | |
|
If you have just restarted SETI then your RAC will need time to build that back up again (anything up to 8wks or so) but now compare your Quad against mine (I take it that yours is a Q6600 too), Computer 5712423, (though with the recent server problems its RAC is about 2K down), and you'll likely realise that a better GPU or 2 will help you along by a large margin. ;) | |
| ID: 1302423 · | |
|
GenuineIntel | |
| ID: 1302431 · | |
I have very little experience with gpu computing. If I got a quad core machine with say a good nvidia gpu card that is pci-express for main video... Regret having to be skeptical, but that sounds very ambitious for a start in gpu computing. There are some cards that run on pci slots, but they aren't very powerful, and you run into issues when the cards in the system are not fairly comparable. The less powerful cards may constrain what you can do with the powerful one, etc. Think 5 is too ambitious to start with. You'll also run into power supply constraints and heat problems. I'll let others get more specific if you're interested in pursuing something like this. ____________ Another Fred Support SETI@home when you search the Web or shop online with GoodSearch and GoodShop | |
| ID: 1302444 · | |
|
Maybe you should figure out why you are | |
| ID: 1302477 · | |
GenuineIntel Upgrading your current GPU to something more efficient would be a good first step. Loading up a few machines with 3 or 4 high end GPU's is probably the most efficient. However you will have to invest in high capacity power supplies & cooling. With single, or maybe dual, GPU's per machine you can use more run of the mill components. With a large multiGPU system the CPU is less important. As you may be using it only to run the OS and feed the GPU's. So you could go with a lower cost CPU. When adding these systems you just have to decide on how much power you are willing to pay for to run them. The UPS's I have in a rack show a usage of about 400 kW/h per week for only about a third of my machines. So it is probably safe to say I'm using around 5,000 kW/h per month running all of the systems. I don't know what the rate we pay for electric at work is, but my home rate is about $0.18 per kW/h. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today! | |
| ID: 1302488 · | |
|
If you want serious crunching power, GPU is the only way to go. The CPU is not that important. Things to have in mind are power consumption, heat management and GPU spacing. | |
| ID: 1302508 · | |
|
Allright I think I understand more but I'm still asking, do I just get pci gpu cards and can load them up in one machine, say 4? | |
| ID: 1302551 · | |
|
I kinda meant add gpus as my extra hobby funds allow... I don't think I can afford to buy another machine and 4 gpu cards all at once, but I can get a machine, wait a bit, buy a gpu card, wait a bit, and so on... | |
| ID: 1302552 · | |
I kinda meant add gpus as my extra hobby funds allow... I don't think I can afford to buy another machine and 4 gpu cards all at once, but I can get a machine, wait a bit, buy a gpu card, wait a bit, and so on... Not too many motherboards have enough slots for 4 GPUs, and many cases would not have enough room on the back panel for them. You'll have to research this carefully before proceeding. I only have one rig running 3 GPUs, and that one is laying flat, no case. All the others only have 2 due to case limitations, although they do have enough slots for 3. ____________ ****** "Ask not, what your kitty can do for you. Ask what you can do for your kitty." As it is kitten, so shall it be done. | |
| ID: 1302553 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Seti computational farm
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |